until we beat them on the that ourld, i think messaging efforts will be severely hindered but i also agree that there is going to be the mostght using advanced technologies and i would also point out we still have a big problem with the ability now of isis to be contacted and direct a young man or woman to a secure site. that's just not right. it's not right. that isads nodding and not recorded. admiral stavridis: i agree on both fronts. gets into thelso cyber piece of this. there are ways we can track, control, roddick it in the cyber world. i also agree the leading edge of this has to be hard powered. in the long game, it's a mix of hard power, smart power. at the moment dealing with the forces against us from the islamic state, we half to go hard now. did you have any comment, doctor? dr. lamb: i think this is a good of the military information support. if you look at how they are trained and equipped, it's not to the same levels of efficiencies. i think there is room for improvement there. >> thank you. dr., as a graduate of the tuition of which you are i want toemployed, thank y

ourld pric profit guide weapons policy and in particular our defense policy in general? governor christie: the answer is no. the answer also should be, i do not believe that the two necessarily have to be mutually exclusive. if a great company is contracting with the government, and can provide the appropriate service for the people of this country in the nuclear barrier area or other defense areas of the government. they make a reasonable profit while providing a good service, i have no objection to that. i am a capitalist. i have no objection to it. if what you're saying my question is, what will drive their conduct is first how much money they make, whether they or not the job is done the right way, then that is completely unacceptable. when we just warn everybody that some of these examples, if you remember the immediate aftermath of 9/11. there was a decision made by the government to change all private security guards at our national airports to government employees -- the tsa. the idea was if they are government employees, they will do the job better than the priv

until we beat them on the that ourld, i think messaging efforts will be severely hindered but i also agree that there is going to be the mostght using advanced technologies and i would also point out we still have a big problem with the ability now of isis to be contacted and direct a young man or woman to a secure site. that's just not right. it's not right. that's not right. and i see heads nodding and that is, as senator king mentioned, that is not recorded. so maybe -- >> i agree with the chairman on both fronts. >> apple? >> i agree completely and i think that this also gets into the cyber piece of this. there are ways we can track, control, eradicate in the cyber world. i also particularly agreed the edge of this has to be hard power. in the long game it's a mix of hard power, smart power. but at the moment dealing with the forces that are against us against islamic state we have to go hard now. >> doctor, did you have any comment? >> for myself i think this is just a good example of what i was referring to on the indirect approach and special operations. the military informati