this year we'll reach over 850 kids ourselveses. we just hosted a professional development for sfusd teachers last week. and in an informal poll, the teachers that were there are reaching well over 4,000 kids a year with some form of bicycle safety education that both encourages kids to get out and be active, but also shows them ways to do that safely. i think this is a program that not only is reaching a lot of kids, but shows great promise for growth. there are tons of teachers within the sfusd that are excited to lead this programing and there are a lot of resources available to them. thank you. >> thank you. >> hello, my name is david. i wanted to talk about the education portion, and the media part, too. so in my organization, chinatown development center we have worked with many organizations and schools in teaching the kids how to walk safely and how to bike safely and how to look around the streets. i'm wondering if mta will be working with the school districts to give classes of driver's ed, which we don't have any more, bu

this year we'll reach over 850 kids ourselveses. we just hosted

when it comes to an agreement with iran, we need to ask ourselveses, does it prevent from keeping the united states safe. anything other than that is totally is unacceptable. and the central question here is what kind of a world do we want to live in. what kind of a world do we want to live in. a world in which the most radical terrorist regime acquires nuclear weapons, whether two years, five years 10 years or 15 years is totally acceptable. this is a government that has pledged to ine light. the country that stands with us no matter what. some in this administration have unjustly chris sized prime minister netanyahu for what? for his country to survoif and his 3e78 to live in peace and security. this is the same government when the eye tolla sint their, he pledged that together with cuba's dictators, they would bring the united states to its knees. i know my colleagues recall that. what kind of a world do we want to live in. it is not too late to walk away from this table and tell them that they will never acquire nuclear weapons as long as the united states is the greatest superpow

there is no deal, if iran gets a nuclear weapon, then we have a serious -- we would have to defend ourselveser ourselves our friends and allies in the face of that reality. is that responsive to your question? senator kane: the reality is that without this agreement iran can produce a nuclear bomb into her three months. without this agreement, is there a military response? secretary carter: i'm going to have to say that there is a military response -- maybe this is responsive to your question. there's a military option which i know you've been briefed on that has the effect of setting back the iranian nuclear program. it doesn't stop it forever, that it substantially set it back. we have talked about to that publicly for quite a while. senator kane the other part of : my quiestion is we can have a military response that can set them back but would that involve us in a long-term war in that region? would that be a highly likely outcome? secretary carter: iran would surely respond to such an attack. in a hypothetical situation in which that occurred, which this deal is intended to make unnecessa

nuclear weapon then we have a serious -- >> well, not even that it -- >> we would have to defend ourselveser ourselves, our friends and allies in the face of that reality. >> the reality is that without this agreement iran can produce a nuclear bomb in two to three months. without this agreement, is there any military -- i'll reiterate the question. is there any military strategy or response that would achieve the same goals as this agreement? more yes? more no? >> i'm going to have to say that there is a military response -- maybe this is responsive to your question. there's a military option which i know you've been briefed on which has the effect as i've said earlier, of setting back the iranian nuclear program. it doesn't stop it forever, but it substantially sets it back. we've talked about that publicly for quite a while. we work on that. if that's responsive to your question, that exists. >> the other part of my quiestion is we can have a military response that can set them back but would that involve us in a long-term war in that region? would that be -- highly likely outcome? >> ira

who i serve with on the jew deshyear committee about the importance of the moment in time we find ourselveses in right now related to not just a confederate battle flag but perhaps more importantly what is the legacy we want to have as americans, as members of congress in dealing with the complicated issue of race. it's an honor and privilege to once again come to the house floor to have this conversation. this is a most distinguished venue to speak to the american people and an appropriate one i would add given the house's constitutional relationship to the people of america. this of course being the only institution that was envisioned by the founding fathers as one where the people serving in the institution would be directly elected by the people. the senate, of course, in its original constitutional version its members were elected by the state legislature and of course the presidency to this day is a vehicle through which the individual is selected by the electoral college. this is the people's house the institution most intimately connected to the people of america and the place where