that was the outreach we had done. the presentation kind of mirrors roughly the presentation we gave at those workshops. i'm not going to get back in the process. i think this grew out of another piece of legislation. we came back to land use. you asked us to conduct outreach, which we did and we are here to hopefully move it out of committee and have you vote on it. a quick summary of what's in this legislation. all zoning districts have a maximum parking requirement, a ceiling, if you will. we aren't touching the ceiling or changing the maximums. there's not that many zoning districts but they cover a large geographic area. we are taking away minimums, we aren't making changes to off street loading requirements. a developer can still build from 0 parking spaces all the way to the maximum under the code. we have a broad policy framework that this board and committee have voted on over the years to support this sort of in principle and this supports all these goals on housing and affordability and place making and safe

friday, the 14th, the homeless outreach team finished what they thought was proper and adequate outreach, helped a few of the households living in vehicles on that street, connected them to services, and then just then i said sign shop, post the signs. so right now to wolf street they have the over size restriction posted. i do want to be clear that work of outreach and offer of services connecting folks to help is not an offer of housing. it is not an offer of an alternative place to park, but rather trying to connect with folks ill, who need help, and they have connected with folks in desperate situation us and gotten them help and services, and helped move them out of a bad place. this agency is not promising to find a safe place for them to park. that ask an ongoing conversation the city is having. i think that is all i have to say about this document. if the board has questions, i am eager to take them. >> directors do you have questions before public comment? director torres. >> we talked at length about the issue and i sent articles to our director about other cities in california

for me i think i wanted that outreach done to community members to have the dialogue. if this was a removal of parking maximum i'd have more concerns but it's not and i'm okay with sending this out of committee and out of respect for others who may want more committee outreach i'd like to send it out without a recommendation and that can continue from now to the board meeting. >> i'm personally committed to outreaching to other neighborhood associations and merchant associations where our office did not get the list in the previous round of inquiries so we'll make that request again today and will have time before the next supervisor meeting to do the outreach and phone calls. we did find that folks that came in initially questioning or opposing the ordinance, once they understand the mechanics of it, realized it would have an minimum impact so walked away neutral or supporting and i want to thank the planning department for spending all the time during the dialogue and outreach because there's fear when parking comes out of the mouth and the word eye eliminating can a

we need to to keep doing outreach.hat was one of the feedbacks from the committee, and also from the cab as well. going forward, and as well as looking at other alternatives, we will be coming back more regularly with reports to you and the other bodies on that. these are the themes of what we heard so far during outreach that we will need to continue to address. business affordability, especially more work around business affordability, and provisions for business support, as well as other alternatives for residents with affordability being the main concern. then continued fundraising. it is feedback that you have continuously given us. we are working now on grant applications. we submitted a request to the bay area toll authority for ferry funding, just this past month, and we also are currently working with the mercy housing and tid a staff on a cabin and trade application for both housing and transportation. we presented to the committee two options for supporting -- for addressing the concerns we heard and support

moving onto outreach, i will give a quick update on outreach in compliance to date. d.b.i. estimates 24,000 storefronts are subject to the program. the number of storefronts is associated with 11,255 property owners. as of today, december 10th, 2,850 forms were submitted to, which means 2,850 storefronts so far have complied with the ordinance, and this number is tied to 934 property owners. 934 property owners have complied with the ordinance. there have been four mailers sent out to property owners from d.b.i. most recently, early november they sent out a 60 day notice. we have seen at our office, an uptick in halls about the ordinance. d.b.i. confirmed they have also seen an uptick in checklist submittals as well and over the last year, we have been very involved in the outreach interagency groups through workshops, workshops held at d.b.i., we also have reached out to merchants and business groups the director did a joint merchant walk in different districts with a director from d.b.i. and we intend to continue this outreach through the compliance, the compliance deadli

there is outreach to the residents and the businesses. didn't start until after the board directed the staff to start having more meetings. first business meetings there was any turnout at were at the beginning of november. at that meeting we are presented with a schedule that says a decision is going to be made in six weeks. that is not how you get by. you need to discuss this with the people there. we have ideas. maybe it could help make this work better. i don't understand, as carol was saying, the rush here. especially when there are so many questions and issues, then having a board with so many lame ducks, people aren't going to be around to be held accountable for the decisions that are made. you have a bunch of new supervisors coming in next month. why aren't they making the decision so that they can be held accountable for what they are doing? the main thing, i think we are asking for. whatever our ideas on the tolls are, the main thing we are asks is to postpone the vote so people have a chance to talk it through, discuss ideas.

it seems like the public outreach we had earlier. people -- it would not preclude you from going to the south side but we think most people would like to be on the north side of the bridge. we would span over the tunnel and then we would not be on the same level as a current hillcrest road. this is below the portal that you see now that has a fence over it." be slight -- sloped slightly below its." tee off here and go over the bus ramp or the ramp that you have here and tie in -- were still working on. on the west side maps and have a tie in. it is as successful as it can be and let it had down into treasure island. and then i can answer more questions. i noticed treasure island focused, but on the main span itself, which is the bulk of the project, and the cost, we looked at a number of different structural solutions, as well as size. this is looking at the reviews of the north side, southside, we looked off the bridge with the outboard. we looked at what an on deck option would be to take a look at traffic or try not to take a look

or services doing outreach to the community in relevant ways, community relevant marketing. we heard a lot of demand of support for school trip making and support for alternative ways to get kids to school and to recommend continuing pilot and experiment with school trip, ride matching or school trip microtransit. we heard a lot of interest, so mobility services are tools that can support people being able to shed a car, being able to not have to own a car to access mobility services but instead be able to reach a whole array of different types of mobility services through technology. and we heard interest in these types of services, especially programs where you get rewarded for your sustainable travel, and these kind of rewards, transportation rewards programs are things that employers or institutions like a hospital, school or a transportation management association can -- can implement. we also heard a lot of demand and recommend we're publicizing of services that make these technology-based tools available to people who don't speak english, available to people who don't

this will take place on february 11 and they're doing outreach through january as well.ll. >>> hi know you said it, but bart is telling us almost 3,000 people ride between 4 and 5:00 a.m., that's a good chunk of people out there. >>> 5:36 at the time, bart will pay a 7500 fine for campaign violations, they violated rules by using taxpayer funds to promote measure rr, it was on the 2016 and was approved with campaign videos produced by bart one starring warriors forward green, and state campaign law requires agencies to file campaign statements and disclosures, and they failed to turn in those reports -- file some of those reports and turn others in late. >>> you can see they're in the lake merritt. dozens have been dredged out of the lake merritt. the cleanup crews have their hands full trying to stay hey head of this problem. >> reporter: cheap portable and fairly unsophisticated to explode. they explode on oakland streets. for many there's a good thing, but there's a new issue. merritt institute, ir amount of he's in charge of the lake's upkeep. >> these can be damagin

the transition to the outreach efforts. we'll didn't market the space until 2017, we started conversations with multiple grocers from 2014 when we were awarded the project. we reached out to over 20 grocery prospects local as well as national operators. it is important to know because we were very goody sign and construction team made of local and regional consultants and contractors and subcontractors, they have done a fantastic job to meet and exceed the schedule. we were able to give hard had tours of the physical space four the grocers. a lot of times it is hard to them them with the space. it helped the decision-makers make a informed decision. in addition to that, the terms we offered were well with in and at times below market rate rents for commercial real estate. the rest we were offering was $55 per foot annually. that is significantly less than leases first signed at the kansas center and block 64. to reiterate the points laura just made, i think while we had a positive response initially, as the market became mo

a full rollout of the public outreach requirements across the sfmta to ensure outreach to the community on the projects underway in any given neighborhood. these plus planned future initiatives set the foundation to provide comprehensive work and quick response to the board. i felt it was important to highlight that work going on for a number of months internally and different elements have been rolled out. in the coming year with new supervisors we will see the building of a partner ship responsiveness and accountable. i am moving to the state now. on the state side i think that with the mayor, board of supervisors and new governor we have one theme at the top of the list. that is housing. we will see efforts around housing and opportunities to tie transportation elements to that transportation. with regard to transportation funding those working at the state level and my colleagues statewide are breathing a sigh of relief. of all of the work passing the gas tax and proposition 6 folks are like let's spend the money we will work for the grants and count on the distribution of formula m

last year, we have been very involved in the outreach interagency groups through workshops, workshops held at d.b.i., we also have reached out to merchants and business groups the director did a joint merchant walk in different districts with a director from d.b.i. and we intend to continue this outreach through the compliance, the compliance deadline date. okay. moving on to the impacts to small businesses, as a building code addition, as a mention to, the ordinance assigned compliance to the property owner however, some property owners will choose, and have chosen to allocate the responsibility to their small business tenants. what we are observing as there are common scenarios which of these pass-through his are happening, and we are ramping up with the support services to make sure the vulnerable small business tenants that are having to search of navigate this ordinance, having to comply with the ordinance, are appropriately supported. this is a more vulnerable situation. they are at greater risk of displacement and they are those who are on a month-to-month arrangement. they cur