they will bear the brunt of liability when people are sued let's say, for overdetention. so what are the problems with detainers? like i said before, i think there was a lot of confusion. everyone thought they were regular warrants of arrest, that they were criminal warrants, meaning that people just thought they were outstanding warrants everywhere and that non-citizens could be picked up for just outstanding warrants. people assumed that the detainer meant, concluded that somebody was here unlawfully. i'm going to tell you why that was also wrong. and there were many errors because we found out you know that detainers were lodged on u.s. citizens, on legal

they will bear the brunt of liability when people are sued let's say, for overdetention. so what are the problems with detainers? like i said before, i think there was a lot of confusion. everyone thought they were regular warrants of arrest, that they were criminal warrants, meaning that people just thought they were outstanding warrants everywhere and that non-citizens could be picked up for just outstanding warrants. people assumed that the detainer meant, concluded that somebody was here unlawfully. i'm going to tell you why that was also wrong. and there were many errors because we found out you know that detainers were lodged on u.s. citizens, on legal permanent residents, many errors involved. >>> you can watch this conversation on immigration and sanctuary cities any time on line, c-span.org, go to our video library. we take to you a hearing underway, the house armed services committee on the fiscal 2018 budget request and emerging threats. hearing now from admiral mike rogers, commander of u.s. cyber command. >> i think back to the dialogue in the 1980 whz when i

they will bear the brunt of liability when people are sued, let's say, for overdetention. what are the problems with detainers? well, like i said before, i think there was a lot of confusion. everyone thought that they were regular warrants of arrest, that they were criminal warrants, meaning that people thought they were outstanding warrants everywhere and that noncitizens could be picked up for just outstanding warrants. people assumed that the detainer met, concluded that someone was here unlawfully. i'm going to tell you why that was also wrong. there were in errors, because we found out, you know, that detainers were dodged on u.s. citizens. i think fundamentally, the arrest based on the detainer provides no judicial oversight. the people issuing the detainers are employees of department of homeland security. there's no judge, no imagine trait to look to see what is the evidence that is supporting how the detainer's being issued. procedurally what was frustrating to me when i was in detention centers is i could never get a copy of the detainer to understand why was th