science plays a supporting role, overgeneralized, oversimplifies. how do you respond?> i don't think of them as criticism. the story comes first in science is secondary and that's because i wanted it to. the stories are incredibly powerful ways to communicate ideas. are my books simplified? of course they are. i spent a huge amount of time simplifying them. when someone says i am simplifying it? that's my intention. it, peoplet simplify would not read them. they would be unreadable. >> critics say not to taken so seriously. >> exactly right. chill out. ideas ought to be a source of joy. think about something in a new way even if you find it unconvincing. it's supposed to be something that brings you pleasure. >> you can write whatever you want now at the new yorker. why are you still writing essays when you could just write books? >> i enjoy it. demanding is the most literary form. it's much harder to write than a book. i've been fascinated with the ignition switch controversy although i'm late to the game here. i don't think anyone would read a book about it. would it

overgeneralize, oversimplified.ow do you respond to that. >> i don't really think of them as criticism. the story is first and the sciences secondary because i want the stories to come first. story is an incredibly powerful way to communicate ideas. are my books simplify? of course. they are supposed to be. i spent a huge amount of time simplifying. i put my head in my hands and say, that is my intention. if i didn't simplify them, people wouldn't read them. >> critics say don't take him so seriously. >> i would say exactly right. chill out. ideas ought to be a source of joy. that is supposed to be something that brings you pleasure. >> you can write whatever you want at the new yorker and how do you choose topics? why do you write essays when you could write books? >> new yorker story is the most demanding literary form. it is much harder to write a new yorker story than a book. i am very light to the game here but i don't want to write a book about it. but would it be the kernel of a great article? absolutely. >>

overgeneralize, oversimplified to the point you are wrong. how do you respond to that. >> i don't really think of them as criticism. the story is first and the science is secondary, because i want the stories to come first. story is an incredibly powerful way to communicate ideas. are my books simplified? of course. they are supposed to be. i spend a huge amount of time simplifying. so, when someone says, as a way of criticism, you're simplifying, i put my head in my hands and say, that is my intention. if i didn't simplify them, people wouldn't read them. >> critics say, don't take him so seriously. >> i would say exactly right. chill out. ideas ought to be a source of joy. to think about something in a new way, even if you find it unconvincing. that is supposed to be something that brings you pleasure. >> you can write whatever you want at the new yorker. how do you choose topics? why do you write essays when you could just write books? >> a new yorker story is the most demanding literary form. it is much harder to write a new yorker story

overgeneralize, oversimplified to the point where you are wrong. how do you respond to that?> i don't really think of them as criticism. the story is first and the science is secondary, because i want the stories to come first. story is an incredibly powerful way to communicate ideas. are my books simplified? of course. they are supposed to be. i spend a huge amount of time simplifying. so, when someone says, as a way of criticism, you're simplifying, i put my head in my hands and say, that is my intention. if i didn't simplify them, people wouldn't read them. they would be unreadable. >> critics say, don't take him so seriously. >> i would say exactly right. chill out. ideas ought to be a source of joy. to think about something in a new way, even if you find it unconvincing. that is supposed to be something that brings you pleasure. >> you can write whatever you want at the new yorker. how do you choose topics? how do you decide? writing essaysll when you could just write books? >> a new yorker story is the most demanding literary form. it is much harder to write a new yorke

were perhaps overgenerous with their gifts, some provided jobs to people who had influence.ng to the internal ifa's ethicsf committee, that was not a serious enough offense to change the situation. they say the effects of these minor occurrences were far from any threshold that would require returning to the bidding process , let alone reopening it. -- host thepen world cup in 2022. russia will host in 2018. and qatar, they need to figure out when they are going to play it. >> very briefly, it is and it is going to be interesting to see the reaction. >> look, the fa and the english were seen as one of the key drivers and trying to get this investigation thoroughly carried russia crying foul on having the right to host the 2018 world cup. this may come back to bite the english on some part of their body. the english of come under some criticism in this report. -- have, under some criticism in this report. they certainly won't be too chuffed to see that they are coming under some criticism. thank you very much indeed. >> this is what else is on our radar. the head of the new y

we have to be willing to go back and deal with subcultural ignorances and so that we are not overgeneralizing and giving ourselves too much credit here. it is much easier for me as a black man in america, but there are other individuals who are also struggling with certain laws, adjudications and so forth, that are symptomatic of racist tendencies. >> i appreciate both of you and your spiritual leadership. until we change the country spiritually and morally, we'll not see things improve. i am convinced that is the heart of our problem. i think what you are doing in the conference to bring people together in a spiritual way is where we need to go. i thank you both for what you are doing here. >> thank you. >> it is a dream. >> and your teenager who spends too much time on your smart phone may come across the gambling website and he gets your credit card number and before you know it, you are in financial ruin. we'll talk about the dangers of internet gambling and her internet gambling and her campaign to stop if you're suffering from constipation or irregularity, powders may take days to work.

be able to go back and deal with some of the those sub cultural ignorances so that we're not overgeneralizing giving ourselves too much credit here, but by all means, it's much easier for me in many, many ways as a black man in america, and many other people. but there are many individuals who are also struggling as well with certain laws and adjudications and so forth that really, truly are sich tom mattic of racist tendencies. >> i appreciate both of you and your spiritual leadership. i don't think it matters what we do politically, until we change this country spiritually and morally we're not going to see a lot of things really improve. and i'm still kwinlsed that's at the heart of a lot of our problems but we're still going to find solutions. i think bringing people together in a spiritual way is where we need to go and i thank you both for being here and thank you for what you're doing this week. >> thank you. >> my pleasure. >> we live to dream. >> well, your teenager who spends way too much time on his smart phone may come across a gambling website and then he gets your credit card nu

don't you think there is merit -- everyone is agreed that the barnett formula is overgenerous at the expense of the english. there isn't a single analysis that has concluded otherwise. don't you think, therefore, there is at least a least the na grand commission of some sort of all the nations to look into the question of how best to allocate resources according to need between them? >> well, it's something i'm sure, you know, it does get examined by experts and commissions and i'm very happy for that to continue. i'm just saying i made a commitment. this is not something that is on my horizon and i'm sticking to that. the most important thing is to deliver this fiscal devolution which in itself is an important thing but decreases the relevance of barnett. i'm sure people will argue about it. >> so the answer to that is no really? >> as i've said, it's not on my horizon. >> i would just like to ask one question, it's proposal that i think tried to get an interest in as well that you're rejecting just there's one other issue that just needs picking up at this stage which is on borrowi

don't you think there is merit everyone has agreed that it is overgenerous. there isn't a single analogy that is concluded otherwise. don't you think there is at least the need for a grand commission to look into the question according to the needs. >> it's something that does get examined by experts and commissions. i'm just saying i made a commitment and i'm sticking to that commitment and i think most important is to deliver in and of itself it is important and it decreases the relevance but i'm sure people will argue about it. >> i would like to ask one question and this is a proposal. one other issue we are picking up you would agree i presume that a more fiscal evolution there is therefore the likelihood in the taxes spent and whatever you do in which case isn't there a case also for increasing the scope of margaret alluded to? >> it's almost as if nothing has happened and it's been the biggest act in 300 years but it is important for people to know that it is being dissolved into the dilemmas are being increased to 2.2 billion. >> the short answer is y