spokes watermark over the history lecture from oxford university told me norway's involvement in nato military campaigns could be another reason the army attack. the most likely explanation is that norway's involvement as a nato member in on actions by and nato from libya to afghanistan will have been the basis for some backlash now whether that by flash comes from a libyan group or more generally from an islamic group or to his holster or to region major involvement. is what we see at the scene and i have to say we should remember that back in oklahoma city mention ninety five one was a huge bomb of the federal. it would be left. to the work of islamic terrorists and it turned out to work a very christian fundamentalist mission and also to the u.s. government so with the proviso that we should not rule out all the possibilities the most likely explanation is obviously there's always a little involvement have long an attack on it and i think it's really too is why as involvements and other as perhaps. business trash economic all have an islamic group they might say you know where's a

to speak to mark almond a professor of modern history at oxford university. good to see you sir so that housecleaning going on at the embassy in london are kicking out some of the libyan different different parts there but let's talk about the broader picture here the opposition is a basically winning the war without winning any battles how can they represent a country they don't even control well this is a problem traditionally britain has recognized governments not on the basis of what we like them or what will they control the territory of the state colonel gadhafi may have lost control of parts of libya but clearly the rebels don't control it yet so this is a new precedent recapture of the english one the other problem is that the rebels are on the ground soon to stall even with the nato bombing raids and we remember when this started or months ago we would. sold it would be a matter of weeks rather than months and so i suspect really what we've paid the british foreign secretary is doing is really having a symbolic act to try to show that somehow or othe

frozen assets to discuss this development i joined i by mark allman a modern history lecturer at oxford university i thank you for joining us today so who are these rebels that the west now is agreeing to work with do we do we know anything about them why should we side with them and now we're getting reports that the al qaeda may have infiltrated the ranks. the rebels are of a mixed group. some of them ministers into the his government his former minister of interior minister of justice who some people called it was a hunger. in prosecuting his opponent and then there are people who apparently forty in iraq for instance against the american occupation then there are people who have been abroad living in an america some of them were former intern khadafi in the eighty's and early ninety's who come out with and others are being the next are a long time they were members of families that supported the ngo in libya interest who was overthrown in a military coup back ago in one hundred sixty nine so they're remarkably crude and i think what is quite interesting perhaps in countries like britain which

researchers in oxford university say that the risk of cancer goes up 16% for every four inch increase in height. they are not sure how height is linked to cancer but they say diet, genetic factors and growth hormones determine height. >>> when this week's jefferson award winner first picked up a video camera, it changed her life. as kate kelly reports, the danville teenager is using her films now to make positive changes for others. >> reporter: 18-year-old lauren lindbergh isn't used to being on this side of the camera. though barely out of high school she made over half dozen short films and award winning documentary. >> i think i have always enjoyed being behind the camera more. i don't know what it is but i just feel kind of powerful. >> reporter: lauren found that power when she picked up a camera two years ago in her school media class and didn't have to look far to find powerful material. >> some of the social issues i'm interested in and have filmed are blind students and independence, teen homicide, body image suicide prevention. >> reporter: when her film class was cut from

and history from oxford university highlights norway's involvement in nato military campaigns as a possible catalyst for tensions in the area. the most likely explanation is that norway's involvement is a nato member in various factions lining nato from libya to afghanistan we'll have the basis for some backlash now whether that backlash comes from a libyan group or more generally from an islamic group that is hostile to the region later involvement. is what was yet to be seen and i have to say we should remember that back in oklahoma city in one thousand nine hundred five when it was a huge moment. we left inclusions it must go to work because i'm a terrorists and it turned out to work a very good question i'm sure militiaman hope so cause and so with the proviso that we that we should don't rule out other possibilities the most likely explanation is obviously that norway's political involvement in. lone an attack on a layover is perhaps there's a strategy to it on the behalf of an islamic group they might say no way as are so what can. you think about places like london paris. recall that

history of that trip from oxford university highlights norway's involvement in nato as military campaigns as a possible catalyst for tensions in the area. with most likely explanation is that norway's on board as a nato member when they're asked armed actions i may do from libya to afghanistan will have a basis for some backlash and whether that backlash comes from a libyan or more generally from an islamic group which is hostile to the religion major improvement. it's got to be seen and i have to say we should remember that back in moore oklahoma city mention ninety five when i was in the form of. it we left from pollution says it must work in islamic terrorists and it turned out to work a very tough question on the banking system and hostile to the rest so with the proviso that we that we should only rule out outlook also that is the most likely explanation is obviously that's norway's political is all going to be alone an attack on it and the other is perhaps there's a strategy to turn the heart of an islamic group i might say the ways are so correction. if you think about it what i sa

mark almond a history lecturer from oxford university says norway's involvement in nato is military campaigns could be a factor behind the attack. the most likely explanation is that norway's involvement as a nato member in on actions line nato from libya to afghanistan will have been the basis for some backlash now whether that by flash comes from a libyan group or more generally from an islamic group that is whole star who turned over and. is obviously yet to be seen and i have to say we should remember that back in oklahoma city mention ninety five one was a huge bomb of the federal building it would be left to the world in islamic terrorists and it turned out to work a very question from a bunch of militia men hostile to the u.s. government so with the proviso that we should not rule out all the possibilities the most likely explanation is obviously there's always political involvement. and attack on it and i think it's really hard to if one is involvements and the other is perhaps. this is trash economic i'll have an islamic group i might say no where is a soft option. if you think about

his trajectory from oxford university highlights the noise involvement. campaigns countless tensions in the area. the most likely explanation is that norway's involvement as a nato member in armed actions by one nato from libya to afghanistan will have the basis for some backlash now whether the backlash comes from a libyan group or more generally from an islamic who is hostile to religion. is what was yet to be seen and i have to say you should remember that back in oklahoma city in one thousand nine hundred five one was a huge bomb of the federal us will. ever be left as it must work was when my terrorists and it turned out to work very question on the current u.s. mission hostile to the u.s. government so with the proviso that we should not rule out other possibilities the most likely explanation is obviously there's always political involvement. and attack on the other is perhaps if the trash economic heart of an islamic. i might say no way is a soft option. if you think about it places like london paris. was targets of terrorist attacks over the year

mark almond a history lecturer from oxford university says norway's involvement in nato's military campaigns could be a factor behind the attack. the most likely explanation is that norway's involvement as a nato member in the various factions line in nato from libya to afghanistan will have been the basis for some lashing out whether that backlash comes from a libyan group all more generally from an islamic group that is hostile to the region nato involvement. is yet to be seen and i have to say we should remember that back in oklahoma city in one hundred ninety five when it was a huge bomb of the federal us there will be that we left that it must be the work of islamic terrorists and it turned out to work a very christian fundamentalist mission on how so can we. do so with the proviso that we move we should don't rule out all the possibilities the most likely explanation is obviously that noise a political involvement drone an attack on i think really for two is wise those involvements and the other is perhaps there's a strategy to it on the whole have an islamic group signallers or so hel

mark almond history that trip from oxford university highlights noise involvement to campaigns as a possible catalyst for tensions in the area. the most likely explanation is that norway's involvement as a nato member in various actions by no nato from libya to afghanistan will have the basis for some backlash now whether that backlash comes from a libyan group or more generally from an islamic group that is hostile to the region later involvement. is to be seen and i have to say we should remember that back in oklahoma city in one hundred ninety five when it was a huge bomb of the federal list there will be every lead inclusions it must be the work of islamic terrorists and it turned out to work a very christian fundamentalist militia among hostile can cause and so with the proviso that we that we should not rule out other possibilities the most likely explanation is obviously that norway's political involvement drone an attack on it well there is perhaps there's a strategy to it on the bulk of an islamic group they might see no way as are so what action. if you think about places like lond

oxford university highlights and noise involvement. campaigns countless tensions in the area. the most likely explanation is not always and although it is a nato member. armed actions major from libya to afghanistan will have the basis for some backlash now whether that comes from a libyan group or more generally from an islamic who clytie is hostile to religion . is actually it can seem to have say you should remember that back in oklahoma city imagine ninety five one was a huge bomb and so do all the rest will. be left to my school work islamic terrorists and it turned out to work early christian. militia and. so with the proviso that we should got rule out other possibilities the most likely explanation is obviously always political involvement. and attack and the other is perhaps. the heart of an islamic. emirates in a way as are so hot action. in places like london paris. where i was told it's a terrorist attacks over the years even marry quite dramatic attack on a prime minister's office. or members of his political cost and you could. have such an effect. perhaps in a c

rebels in benghazi also making the progress towards a cease fire professor mark armand from oxford university things there won't be the dramatic collapse of his regime which nato expected and hoped for. traditionally britain has recognised governments not on the basis of all that we like them are or that they control the territory the state. lost control of parts of libya but clearly the rebels don't control it yet so this is a sudden a new precedent and after all the interest on the other problem is that the rebels on the ground see interest or even with the nato bombing raids. i remember when this started more than four months ago we were told it would be mushroom weeks rather of months and so i suspect really what really of hate british forces which is doing this really having a simple effect to try to show that somehow or other ristal in charge of the situation in the situation is increasingly unpredictable the real problem for nato is the rest they have a lucky strike because they tried several times in the capital program by bombing places where they thought the chances are that that wo

mark armor and the history that from oxford university highlights norway's involvement in terms mitra campaigns as a possible catalyst for tensions in the area. the most likely explanation is that norway's involvement as a nato member in various armed actions by nato from libya to afghanistan will have a good basis for some backlash now whether that backlash comes from a libyan group or or generally from an islamic group which is host to the region major involvement. is to be seen and i have to say we should remember that back in oklahoma city in ninety ninety five when was in the form of the federal us that would be better if we left most of the work in islamic terrorists and it turned out to the work of a christian fundamentalist militiamen whole so who were escorting so with the proviso that we we should not rule out all the possibilities most likely explanation is obviously that's norway's political girl. during an attack on us and i think we really have to if you guys are using all hands on the other is perhaps if there's a strategy to form a house of an islamic group they want t

or mark almond history that from oxford university highlights norway's involvement in terms of major campaigns as a possible catalyst for tensions in the area. the most likely explanation is that norway's involvement as a nato member in the various armed actions lying nato from libya to afghanistan will be the basis for some backlash now whether that backlash comes from a libyan group or more generally from an islamic group that is hostile to the region nato involvement. is to be seen and i have to say we should remember that back in oklahoma city in ninety ninety five when it was a huge bomb of the federal us there will be every left inclusions it must be the work of islamic terrorists and it turned out to be the work of a christian fundamentalist militiamen hole so who was caught so with the proviso that we move we should don't rule out other possibilities the most likely explanation is obviously that noise political involvement wrong an attack on it and i think really for two is wise those involvements and the other is perhaps if there is a strategy to come of the house of an isla

all right now mark almonds a history lecturer from oxford university told me that norway's involvement did nato's military campaigns could be a reason behind the attack. the most likely explanation is that norway's involvement as a nato member in armed actions line nato from libya to afghanistan will have been the basis for some backlash now whether that by rush comes from a libyan group or more generally from an islamic group or to his holster or through generics or involvement. is obviously yet to be seen and i have to say we should remember that back in oklahoma city mention ninety five one was a huge bomb. everybody left that must be the work islamic terrorists and it turned out to work a very christian fundamentalist mission and. so with the proviso that we should not rule out other possibilities the most likely explanation is obviously there's always going to have an attack on it i think really for two reasons why as. well as perhaps. this is trash economic power of an islamic group they might signal wires or. if you think about a place like london paris. targets of terrorist att

rebels in benghazi also make little progress toward a cease fire professor mark almond from oxford university things there won't be the dramatic collapse of cafes regime which nato continues to expect. traditionally britain has recognized governments not on the basis that will be like them or are they control the territory was. lost control of parts of libya clearly the rebels could control it yet so this was a study in a new precedent for the industry the other problem is that the rebels are on the ground cintron stall even with the nato bombing raids and if you remember when this started more than four months ago we were told it would be martial months and source spec really what we've british forces doing is really having a symbolic time to try to show that somehow or other we're still in charge of the situation in the situation is increasingly unpredictable the real problem here is was less they have a lucky strike because they've tried so times are employed can. they see what they thought was the chances are that there won't be a dramatic collapse of his regime survived the first shock i

rebels in benghazi also making little progress towards a cease fire professor mark elmer from oxford university thinks there won't be the dramatic collapse of gadhafi regime. nato expects. additionally britain has recognized governments not on the basis of whether we like them or not but on what will they control the territory of the state colonel gadhafi running lost control of parts of the but clearly the rebels don't control it yet so this is a study in a new precedent after all the dangerous one the other problem is that the rebels on the ground soon to stall even with the nato bombing raids and if you remember when this started more than four months ago we were told it would be a matter of weeks rather months and so i suspect really what we have hope british warship which is doing is really having a symbolic act to try to show that somehow or other we're still in charge of the situation in the situation is increasingly unpredictable in practice the symbolic decision to recognize rebels kick out cut off his diplomats from london. and indeed a strategic crisis or the nato countries but. russ

she went on to graduate from harvard and oxford universities she signed on at ibm, then did a stint onhouse economic council during the clinton administration. but losing her leg hasn't been bonnie's only challenge. there was a tragic childhood experience that she tried to forget. >> actually, i was sexually abused from the age of 2 to the able of 7 by my stepfather and in my own home. and it was very difficult to deal with emotionally you that's probably one of the hardest things i ever had to deal w i just blocked out the memories for years. >> this single mom's life experiences have inspired several of her books, including "how strong women pray." >> i want to share a story with you about what one of the hardest things i ever did and you can see i have done a lot of hard things. >> bonnie travels the world as a motivational speaker and makes a special effort to inspire kids like these from reach prep, a program that identifies and grooms black and latino scholars. >> bonnie st. john, i believe, represents for us determination, a woman who has obviously overcome enormous odds to be w

but mark modern history lecturer at oxford university says that past experience shows the money the u.s. hands out often ends up in the wrong hands huge amounts of cash were deliberately rubber explain where they went to and it doesn't look like what went into those local herm's without having to do it was he was also came back into the hands of some of the americans and foreigners in world who are able to make nice with this so i think there is a danger of that across looking the president of the made a profit in the way he has for libya and where he's from in some ways. we seem to be in a way repeating that with the rebels they are being taken on trust. or things who are counting for money and if the money has been given out is it really going to the libyan people or is it going to some group libyan people who are going to take on many burl behave in the future to the people in the building in the past. you're with r.t. here in moscow and still to come this hour when passing by becomes a crime the captains of the two books which were at the site of the volga river cruise a disaster bu

rebels in benghazi also making little progress towards a cease fire professor mark allen from oxford university thinks there would be be dramatical of some graphics regime which made still expects. traditionally britain has recognised governments not on the basis of all that we like them are or are will they control the territory the state. lost control of course it will be so clearly the rebels don't control it so this was a sudden a new precedent for their interest or the other problem is that the rebels on the ground seem to stall even with the nato bombing raids. if you remember when this started more than four months ago we were told it would be mushroom weeks rather much resource spec really what really paid british warships which is doing is really having a symbolic act to try to show that somehow or other we're still in charge of the situation in the situation is increasingly unpredictable the real problem here is that unless they have a lucky strike because they tried several times that it can protect. those people those were to board the chances of the won't be a dramatic collapse of

uprising professor mark harmon from oxford university says the revolution is only added to egypt's economic woes and not brought about the change people wanted. the expectations that the fall of mubarak could be followed by a change of regime hasn't really come about with barak and his family and closest cruize have been imprisoned or accused or will go on trial next month of all sorts of crimes against the people and against the interests of country but of course field marshal tantawi members of the military ruling council with his appointees to great extent across egypt people do see that the local boss the local head of the bin astray she has changed so there's a sense that the old regime was decapitated but minus mubarak it's still in power ironically one of the big reasons for the revolution people's economic discontent social this contentious it was a show about unemployment and so on actually the process of getting rid of mubarak has made in the short term the economy worse i do think really there's an easy. to egypt's economic problems because global oil prices global food prices an

in benghazi are also making little progress towards a cease fire professor mark almond from oxford university things there won't be the dramatic collapse of could have his regime which nato expected and hoped for. additionally britain has recognized governments not on the basis of what we like but on what will they control the territory the state cardassian running lost control of parts of the folk clearly the rebels don't control it yet so this is a starting a new precedent after all the dangerous one the other problem is that the rebels on the ground seem to stall even with the nato bombing raids. if you remember when this started more than four months ago we were told it would be mushroom weeks months and so our spec really what we have paid british forces which is doing is really having a symbolic act to try to show that somehow or other we're still in charge of the situation but i think the situation is increasingly unpredictable the real problem with nato is little less they have a lucky strike because they've tried several times i think to decapitate cargo injuring by bombing places wh

all right now mark colvin is a history lecturer from oxford university told me but always involvement of nato as military campaign could be a reason behind the attack. the most likely explanation is that norway's involvement as a nato member in the various armed actions i'm made to from libya to afghanistan will have the basis for some lashing out whether that by russia comes from a libyan group or more generally from an islamic group which is close to the region returned over and. over to get his team and i say we should remember that back in oklahoma city imagine ninety five when it was a huge government which had to rest there with every level of pollution which it must be the workers i'm a terrorist and it turned out to work a very large and permanent and what a shame and. so with the proviso that we that we should don't rule out now because abilities are most likely explanation is obviously there are always political number one and you were an attack on it and i think really for two is one of those involvements and the other is perhaps if there is a stretch it could on the whole

let's talk on the line now in london to mark almond he is history lecturer from oriel college oxford university mark thanks pete on the program i first of all if it was a bomb they also reports of a shooting at a youth rally what do you think is making norway such a target tonight. well we've got a couple about leaping to conclusions but the most likely explanation is that norway's involvement as a nato member in various factions line nato from libya to afghanistan will have the basis for some backlash and whether that backlash comes from a libyan group all more generally from an islamic group that is hostile to region major involvement. is to be seen and i have to say we should remember that back in oklahoma city in ninety ninety five when it was a huge bomb of the federal building everybody left inclusions it must be the work of islamic terrorists and it turned out to work very christian fundamentalists militiamen hostile to the u.s. government so with the proviso that we that we should don't rule out all the possibilities the most likely explanation is obviously that norway's political invol

billion dollars a candidate half is frozen assets and mccalmont and more than history lecture it oxford university says that past experience shows the money the u.s. hands out often ends up in the wrong hands. huge amounts of cash were deliberately rather explained where they went to and it does seem like quite a lot went into his local herm's without her it was he was also back in her hands or somebody americans him or. so it was a danger that according to the made a profit in the way he was for libya and where he's from a crime scene in some way is. simply a way of repeating the rebels are being taken on trust no real order to. how to have a money and if one has been given out is it really going to the libyan people or the ground some groups of people who are in so many. sure. ask. you with r.t. here in moscow still to come this hour when passing by becomes a crime because two boats which are the site of the volga river cruise a disaster but didn't stop to help are facing arrest. and torture torture on u.s. soil we investigate how the country which talks of its record on human rights is accused

first mark owen from oxford university told me that the revolution is only added to egypt's economic woes meantime has brought about the reforms and it's not all about the reforms the people want it. the expectations that the fall of mubarak would be followed by a change of regime hasn't really come about. and his family and closest bruni's have been imprisoned or accused will go on trial next month of all sorts of crimes against the people against the interests of the country but of course field marshal tantawi on the other branches of the military ruling council with his appointees to great extent across egypt people don't see that their local boss the local head of the industry should be changed so there's a sense that the old regime was decapitated but minus mubarak it's still in power the revolution comes about because people are very discontented have reasons for fairly economic discontent but if the process of the revolution causes so much disruption that we see tourists stay away from egypt that kills a lot of business we see people worried about investing there because they

let's talk on the line now in london to mark ullman he's history lecturer from oriel college oxford university mark thanks pete on the program first of all if it was a bomb there are also reports of a shooting at a youth rally what do you think is making norway such a target tonight. well we have to careful about leaping to conclusions but the most likely explanation is that norway's involvement as a nato member in the various armed actions line with nato from libya to afghanistan . the basis for some backlash and whether a backlash comes from a libyan group or or generally from an islamic group which is called to the region nato involvement. is seen and i should say we should remember that back in oklahoma city nine hundred eighty five hundred thousand were honorable federal rest there were everybody left must work because i'm a terrorist and it turned out to work i'm very christian. missionary. with the proviso that we we should don't rule out other possibilities the most likely explanation is obviously there are no ways political involvement. and attack harmless and i think we're going to i

mark almond a modern history electorate oxford university thank you very much thank you and i will be bringing you the latest developments as well as more expert analysis on the situation in and around libya throughout the day stay without say. the chief executive of the british newspaper group owned by the murdoch empire has resigned over the phone hacking scandal rebecca brooks bowed to mounting pressure to quit saying her ongoing involvement was deflecting attention from the company's attempts to clean itself up she is due to appear before a panel of m.p.'s next tuesday along with her former boss and his son to face questioning on the allegations of an ethical methods that lauren reports now on how the vultures are circling and on some pertinent parallels from a surprising source. put every media outlet in turn on t.v. read you even the sky. when imitates life the long running simpsons takes a show to its own no rupert murdoch aka you. montgomery burns in an episode broadcast apparently coincidentally this week. but it's not the only odd piece of timing in the extraordinary phone h

i spoke to mark of me just last hour is history lecturer from oriel college of oxford university says norway's involvement in nato military campaigns could be a reason behind the attack. plus the most likely explanation is always important as a nato member. armed actions nato from libya to afghanistan are. the basis for some backlash and whether that by fresh comes from a libyan group or more generally from an islamic group that's his whole star. is the same and i have to say we should remember that back in oklahoma city in one thousand five hundred. us there were. there we left. we were islamic terrorists and it turned out to work out very fast and i'm going to. start with the u.s. so with the proviso that we should go to our local celebrities the most likely explanation is obviously they're always going to come in. and attack and i think really for two reasons one is the boldness and the other is perhaps. this trash economic power of an islamic group but i see no way as a source. if you think about it places like london or paris. targets of terrorist attacks over the years and even

that richard kor dre would come up with a correct response on the last clue we had regarding oxford university, because this man received a b.a. at oxford, is that right? >> it's called the marshall scholarship program. >> after electrifying the people of ohio with that features his jeopardy skills did he go on to get elected attorney general of the great state of ohio? yes he did. richard kordre, five time champ was treasurer of ohio and attorney general of ohio and earned a reputation as attorney general for going after banks and predatory mortgage lenders with some obvious relish. now richard cordray has been named to head up the consumer protection agency, the agency supposed to make sure banks write mortgages in a way that is fair and understandable. and that credit card companies send you rules and regulations in plain language so you can understand them. even you as an ordinary american, we're all supposed to be allowed to understand our financial products now. the idea that america ought to have a thing like that was, of course, championed and developed by our guest earlier this hour,

that richard cordray would come up with the correct response so that last clue we had regarding oxford university received a ba at oxford. is that right? >> that's right. thank you, alex. >> you were there on a scholarship program? >> yes, from the british government. the marshall scholarship program. >> after electrifying the people of ohio featuring his jeopardy skills and the human interview part, did that marshall scholar go on to get elected attorney general of the great state of ohio? yes, he did! richard cor cordray, went on to be treasurer of ohio and attorney general of ohio, and he earned a reputation as attorney general for going after banks and predatory mortgage lenders with some obvious relish. and now richard cordray has been named to head up the consumer financial protection agency. the agency that is supposed to make sure that banks write mortgages in a way that is fair and understandable. and that credit card companies send you rules and regulations in plain language so that you can understand them. even you, as an ordinary american, we're all supposed to be allowed to understan