would be picked up and that would either go to clarence house or they would go to an address out in oxfordshirethen i would be monitoring them to see whether there was anything further developing. >> many royal surveillance jobs were referred by client goodman, the royal correspondent who was convicted of phone hacking i 2007. but derek webb as he was never told the source of any leads. >> i have never had a phone myself. i do not know anything in relation to hacking. i realized that hacking was now a big business in relation to what was going back, but i never knew about it at the time. had no knowledge of it. i was never told by not one journalist peter than ever tone be they obtained by phone hacking. >> derek webb says he was also dispatched to trail prince william. >> prince william came out with kate, followed by the royal protection vehicle. i followed the royal protection vehicle in france. they ended up at the farm. i followed the royal protection around. i watched them then go for lunch and more. >> apart from the royals, there're plenty of sports stars on the list. this is derek webb

so if you take for instance, the ones in the park or in oxfordshire, or in the enterprise zone where there'll be a new plant employs 1000 people. the enterprise zones are being well applied, good success story and this government is right behind him. >> the personal damage caused by lo-term unemployment can be phenomenal. on average someone who is unemployed for more than six months to six times more likely to contract a serious mental health problem. doesn't the prime minister worry that we're going to be generation of young people who will be suffering many of the problems and lack of self-esteem and lack of never having a first job? wouldn it make more sense to be guaranteeing every under 24 year old a job after six months unemployed, paint into work not paying them benefits? >> i think the honorable gentleman makes a important point which is this gog effective long-term youth unemployment. the are two very importan things that we're doing to try to help the. first of all helping within three months through the work program, but those not in employment education and training rathe

so if you take for instance, the ones in the park or in oxfordshire, or in the enterprise zone where there'll be a new plant employs 1000 people. the enterprise zones are being well applied, a good success story and this government is right behind him. >> the personal damage caused by long-term unemployment can be phenomenal. on average, someone who is unemployed for more than six months to six times more likely to contract a serious mental health problem. doesn't the prime minister worry that we're going to be generation of young people who will be suffering many of the problems and lack of self-esteem and lack of, never having a first job? wouldn't it make more sense to be guaranteeing every under 24 year old a job after six months unemployed, paint into work, not paying them benefits? >> i think the honorable gentleman makes a important point which is this going effective long-term youth unemployment. the are two very important things that we're doing to try to help the. first of all, helping within three months through the work program, but those not in employment, education and

was quite a long way away from his normal residence, and we arranged for a meeting place in the oxfordshire countryside at a hotel. i have shul no idea -- absolutely no idea who followed me. the likelihood it was probably a member of the paparazzi or somebody who was given the task by one of the newspapers or general media concerned, but i was followed on that trip. unfortunately, for the person who was following me, i think they got lost somewhere behind me on the journey. so as i say, i have no idea who the actual person given the task was. >> okay. and then you say in paragraph 29, this is before the phone hacking scandal broke as it were, that clients often said to you that they felt the press were monitoring their electronic communications. how often did this happen or did these fears were expressed? >> i would say very regularly. um, certainly, um, in the period from about the, i suppose, 2004-2005 onwards, clients began to believe that, um, coincidences were being replaced by more likely interception of some form or another. i recall quite clearly clients becoming irritated or trus t

was quite a long way away from his normal residence, and we arranged for a meeting place in the oxfordshire countryside at a hotel. i have absolutely no idea who followed me. the likelihood it was probably a member of the pap rat cy or somebody given the task by one of the newspapers or general media concerned, but i was followed on that trip. unfortunately for the person following me got lost somewhere behind me on the journey. as i say, i have no idea who the actual person given the task was. >> okay. you say in photograph 29, before the fame hacking scandal broke, that clients often said to you they felt the press was monitoring their electronic communications. how much did this happen or these fear were expressed? >> i would say very regularly. certainly, in the period from about the -- i suppose 2004 and 2005 onwards, clients began to believe that coincidences were being replaced by more likely interception of some form or another. i recall quite clearly clients becoming irritated or frustrated and suspicious that private information was finding its way into the popular media, and they

client who is quite a long way away from this normal residence we arranged a meeting place in the oxfordshireountryside at a hotel. i have absolutely no idea who followed me. the likelihood it was probably a member of the brodsky was someone who was given the newspapers or general media concern, but i was solid on that trip. unfortunate for the person telling me if he got lost somewhere behind me on the journey. so as i say, i have no idea the actual person giving the talks was. >> any say in paragraph 9 before the phone hacking scandal broke to pay often said to dissolve the press was monitoring their electronic communications. how often did this happen? >> i would say very regularly. certainly in the period from about the 2004, 2005 onwards. clients began to believe that coincidences were being replaced by more likely interception of some form or another. i recall quite clearly clients becoming irritated or frustrated and suspicious that private information was finding its way into the popular media and they identified this with a straight fact that they knew would only privy to one or two