all of the time and the other thing , to your point, they have a problematically high ratio of v oyeurso exhibitionists. you want to have exhibitionists because it keeps content fresh and keeps people logging in all of the time, and they have had a high number of watchers to do worse. cory: voyeurs to exhibitionists. that was made to tweet. and it actually has a more relevant result, both in customers and for advertisers. it does not seem like they are getting more. guest: you mention it is not increasing, and that is because they are doing a better job, and that is the good news. i think there is a lot more they can do, making it easier to onboard, and number two on the advertising tools, making it easier for advertisers to advertise on the platform, so i think the real issue for investors, unfortunately, it comes back to the comparison with facebook. is twitter more of a niche advertising medium, and it is hard to say that with 300 million users, or is it more of a mass advertising unit, like facebook with 1.4 billion, and i am not sure where they need to be, but they need to position