p. kruvment wassen lightened now we have other project and some of you commissioners have spoken about it in a forth right manner and some of you have not and the end result is this: when we dot analysis: do we consult who are adversely impacted for over 60 years do we consult them don't think they are ignorant. they are as statute in other ways and so when we attend add committee benefits meeting recently, the community spoke well and one of you all was there present and so those are the types of dialogs that we have and so thank you very much. >> thank you any other general public comments? there being none -- oh, all right you -- >>> very briefly i know i appreciate staff often i wanted to do that again today last with him week c ac subcommittee had a meeting about contaminants that is of concerning that that's all be before you in some most and i think it's good that we had a discussion out of c a. >> the clerk: subcommittee earlier to inform staff and i think that is a good example of the staff working with the c ac and awful us to do the right thing and i just wanted to call that ou