. >> a p.w. see document. >> it is entitled if you look at number 3, it has got a mark of 2449, january of 2010, slide 19, no. 3, worldwide parts management. do you seize that? take a look at the bottom line. the worldwide parts management structure provides further substance to preserve annual parts benefit of $300 million. do you see that? that is a tax benefit that is a result of this tax strategy. is that correct? >> that is accurate. you see anywhere on this document what yes they are the consequences? >> it is not in this document? >> was in any document at the time they have to move people? >> it certainly would have been. >> how many people would they have to have moved? if it was less than 100 people working in parts. >> if i can ask what part of the reorganization -- >> in switzerland as it relates to the overall business. >> less than a hundred before or after. >> our view that and our view now and our view at the time to put this together was a substance that exists with parts of it t

the original idea, the genesis of that was within the tax department and predated the p.w. see proposed changes by at least a half-dozen years. >> okay. take a look at exit 32, if you would. this is a -- by the way, before we leave to 07i will repeat it again. one of the benefits and costs of this change in the title was a relatively simple reenforcing requirement. in other words, the parts never went to switzerland. is that correct? >> the parts would be distributed all over the world. >> with did not go to switzerland. >> many of them went to one of the -- well, they went to a the warehouses at csarl overseas. >> and how many of the warehouses are there in switzerland? >> none in switzerland. >> how many in the united states ? >> i don't know the exact number it varies. >> says san sound about right? >> in the range. in the range. >> now let's get to exit 32. february 2011, deposition of sally styles under ralph. to any of you know who's selling styles is? that me ask you, is she the caterpillar tractor of global tax? do you know? >> she is the director of global tax oper

the original idea, the genesis of that was within the tax department and predated the p.w. see proposed changes by at least a half-dozen years. >> okay. take a look at exit 32, if you would. this is a -- by the way, before we leave to 07i will repeat it again. one of the benefits and costs of this change in the title was a relatively simple reenforcing requirement. in other words, the parts never went to switzerland. is that correct? >> the parts would be distributed all over the world. >> with did not go to switzerland. >> many of them went to one of the -- well, they went to a the warehouses at csarl overseas. >> and how many of the warehouses are there in switzerland? >> none in switzerland. >> how many in the united states ? >> i don't know the exact number it varies. >> says san sound about right? >> in the range. in the range. >> now let's get to exit 32. february 2011, deposition of sally styles under ralph. to any of you know who's selling styles is? that me ask you, is she the caterpillar tractor of global tax? do you know? >> she is the director of global tax oper

hospitals and bridges from one nine hundred thirty three to one nine hundred thirty five alone the p.w. spent more than three and a half three point three billion in today's dollars and over thirty four thousand projects and thus put hundreds of thousands of unemployed americans back to work p.w.a. was just one of the many ways that roosevelt used our government to help put americans back to work a process that rebuilt our economy roosevelt wasn't the only president to spend billions putting americans to work under president eisenhower the interstate highway system was born from the birth of that program to have a construction cost of an estimated at around four hundred eighty nine billion in today's dollars like the p.w.a. the eisenhower interstate highway system has put hundreds of thousands perhaps millions of americans to work over the years when j.f.k. came to washington he championed the creation of nasa so that america could compete with the likes of russia when it came to sending men to the moon and exploring space as a two thousand and twelve nasa has employed over eighteen th