packwood needed you need to be? there are a lot of keyboards.four, five. i had to spend a lot of time to practise. this is a brand—new organ. i believe it is the biggest one in the entire asia's concert hall. the largest in asia? what a privilege to play it. you wa nt to what a privilege to play it. you want to play something?” what a privilege to play it. you want to play something? i have played in 20 years. you can play a little bit of a song. they knew, tony. you are such a good sport to human need. the next, journey around taiwan is alishan in the south of the mountain range. it is ridiculously early. my alarm went off at 330 this morning and it is 110w off at 330 this morning and it is now for 30. thank goodness the copy. we are about to get a narrow gauge railway to one of taiwan's most famous beauty spots. —— it is now 430. a few minutes later, the first round arise. it is dark and cold. 0n the way up, the mood is sleepy and subdued. —— the first train arrives. there are a few stops on the way and some people got on. the train takes abou

they can win everything next time if we just hang tough and do not do the sort of things that bob packwood and it jim baker did in the tax reform of 1985-86. and i think that you have brought up some of the points that are at issue. and wisconsin, remember wisconsin voted for ted cruz in the primary in 2016 over donald trump. karlyn: in the back. >> thank you. senior adviser to serve usa. what are the implications for both parties and should the motor report not see the light of day -- mueller report not see the light of day? >> mueller has indicted several people. i think democrats supposed mueller was going to do the sort of things we saw in 1973 and 1974 and watergate -- go up the chain of command, find violations of felony laws, and so forth, and cause the president to lose all support in his party and resign from office in the face of impeachment and removal pending. uh, it has not worked out that way. and we have the indictments that have been obtained have been about bob manafort doing things in 2009, or some such year, that he shouldn't have done. um, it does not look like we are t

rything next time just hang tough, tend to hang tough and not do the sort of things that dan roft and packwood and jim baker did in reform of 1985-86. you brought up some points at issue here. >> yeah. and wisconsin. in mber voted for ted cruz the primary in 2016. over donald trump. >> in the back. >> thank you very much. chatter senior advisor to serve usa. hat are implications for both parties should the mueller day?rt not see the light of >> well, i mean, the mueller has indicted several people here that i think democrats supposed going to do the sort of things that we saw in watergate, go up the chain of command, find felony laws and so toth and cause the president lose all support in his party the esign from office in face of impeachment and removal pending. it hasn't worked out that way and we have the indictments that have been btained things aul manafortdoing in 2009 or some such year he shouldn't have done. doesn't look like we're going to -- i think that the idea that going to be -- remember all the russia jokes, everybody jokes, taking orders from putin, russians were controlling th

everything ,ext time if we just hang tough they tend to hang tough and not do the sort of things that bob packwood and jim baker did in the tax reform of 1985, 1986. i think that you have brought up some of the points that are at issue. and wisconsin, remember wisconsin voted for ted cruz in the primary in 2016 over donald trump. karlyn: in the back. >> thank you. senior adviser to serve usa. what are the implications for both parties, and should the robert mueller report not see the light of day? >> mueller has indicted several people. i think democrats supposed that mueller was going to do the sort of things we saw in 1973 and 1974 on watergate, go up the chain of command, find violations of felony laws, and so forth, and cause the president to lose all support in his party and resign from office in the face of impeachment and removal pending. uh, it has not worked out that way. and we have the indictments that have been obtained, they have been about paul manafort doing things in 2009, or some such year, that he shouldn't have done. um, it does not look like we are going to - -i think -- i thin