pagliano? >> yes. >> given the toons this case will, you commit to voluntary disclosing of 302s for the review of pagliano and other witness? >> i'll commit to giving you everything i can possibly give you under the law and to doing it as quickly as possible. that said, that means i got to go back and sort it out. for example, the 302 of secretary clinton, it's classified at the tssci level. we got to sort through all that. but we'll do it quickly. >> i know you've done this because you've done this for lois lerner and other cases. so we would expect that. director comey, hillary clinton testified before congress and told the american people multiple times that she never e-mailed any classified information to anyone on her private e-mail servers. your investigation revealed 52 e-mail chains contained classified information. clinton told the american people that the laws and regulations allowed me to use my e-mail for work. this is undisputed. end of quote. your investigation revealed that that

pagliano. >> yes. >> will you commit to voluntarily disclosing the 302s for review of brian pagliano and other witnesses as part of your investigation? >> i'll commit to giving you everything i can possibly give you under the law and doing it as quickly as possible. that means i have to go back and sort it out. for example, the 302 of secretary clinton is classified at the tssci level. but we'll do it quickly. >> i know you've done this because you've done this for lois learner and other cases so we would expect that. now director comey, hillary clinton testified before congress and told the american people mumt multiple times she never e-mailed classified information. your investigation revealed 52 e-mail chains classified information. clinton told the american people and i quote the laws and regulations when i was secretary of state allowed me to use my e-mail for work. your investigation revealed that that also wasn't true. clinton said she turned over all work relate e-mail. this wasn't true. clinton said her servers had safeguards. your investigation revealed eight e-mail chains

pagliano? >> yes. >> will you commit to voluntary disclosing the 302s for the review of pagliano and other witnesses -- >> i'll commit to giving you everything i can possibly give you under the law and to doing it as quickly as possible. for example, the 302 of secretary clinton, it's classified at the tssci level. we got to sort through all that. >> i know you've done this because you've done this for other cases. so we would kpapt that. hillary clinton testified before congress and told the american people multiple times that she never e-mailed any classified information to anyone on any private e-mail servers. 52 e-mail chains contained classified information. clinton told the american people that the laws and regulations allowed me to use my e-mail for work. your investigation revealed that that also wasn't trur. your investigation revealed that this wasn't also true. clinton claimed there was no security breaches. your investigation revealed eight e-mail chains on clinton's private servers

pagliano? >> yes. >> will you commit to voluntary disclosing the 302s for the review of pagliano and other witnesses -- >> i'll commit to giving you everything i can possibly give you under the law and to doing it as quickly as possible. for example, the 302 of secretary clinton, it's classified at the tssci level. we got to sort through all that. >> i know you've done this because you've done this for other cases. so we would kpapt that. hillary clinton testified before congress and told the american people multiple times that she never e-mailed any classified information to anyone on any private e-mail servers. 52 e-mail chains contained classified information. clinton told the american people that the laws and regulations allowed me to use my e-mail for work. your investigation revealed that that also wasn't trur. your investigation revealed that this wasn't also true. clinton claimed there was no security breaches. your investigation revealed eight e-mail chains on clinton's private servers

pagliano have the requisite security clearance? >> as i sit here today, i can't remember. he was not a participant on the classified e-mail exchanges, though. >> he was running the server. he set it up. >> that's a different question. i'm sorry, i misunderstood your question, then. there's no doubt that uncleared people had access to the server. even after pagliano, there were others who maintained the serve who were private sector folks. >> so there are hundreds of classified documents on these servers. how many people, without a security clearance, had access to that server? >> i don't know the exact number as i sit here. it's probably more than two, less than ten. >> i appreciate your willingness to follow up with this. did secretary clinton's attorneys have the security clearances needed? >> they did not. >> does that concern you? >> oh, yeah. sure. >> is there any consequence to an attorney, rifling through secretary clinton's, hillary clinton's e-mails without a security clearance? >> well, not criminal consequences, but a great deal of concern about an uncleared per

if there was no grand jury involved and bryan pagliano wasn't going to testify in front of a grand jurywhat did they give him immunity for? the republicans failed to zero in on the serious things missing in the f.b.i.'s behavior. kennedy: one more question, do you think it's odd that they didn't put hillary clinton under oath when she was questioned by the f.b.i. >> the f.b.i. does not put you under oath where he questioned by them at the tail end of their investigation. the penalty for lie together f.b.i. is the same whether you are under oath or not. kennedy: that takes care of that. director comey alluded to that. there are two house committee chairs who have looked into perjury charges against hillary clinton. do you see that going anywhere? >> probably not, because mrs. lynch would have to decide whether it goes before a grand jury. but let's put aside perjury. misleading, lying when you are not under oath. the evidence of her misleading congress is overwhelming. the f.b.i. made the case. will they prit to a grand jury? who will make that decision? loretta lynch. so don't hold your

it took hours for them to even talk about bryan pagliano. and they should not allow people on the committee who are not prosecutors to ask questions because they are bad at it. >> that's why you don't let politicians run things. you can't entrust them in a situation like this when we are sitting around with so many questions to ask and say why did this happen. at one point they are talking about racism? kennedy: one of the senators brought up white supremacy. democrats are so pleased at the outcome. they wanted to give james comey a shoulder rub. >> the most amazing exchange was jim comey saying it's possible that hillary clinton was not sophisticated enough to understand what the classified markings on these two emails meant that landed in her inbox. it went to well, she is just maybe too dim to understand it, but that's not. >> crime. kennedy: no intent there. but my feeling is, if you get in a car and you don't know the continues between "r" and "d," you shouldn't be drying it. if you don't know the markings that put a car into reverse or

that's why you saw bryan pagliano. >> tammy, go ahead. >> the statute when it came to the espionage, you don't need to intend to. that's the key. yet you've already shown there is intent. that particular die nam egg, gross negligence, doesn't even require intent. that had to have been uncomfortable today for the former secretary of state. but i think that's why in any other regular circumstance, this person would be indicted. and now if she is, the courtesy could be in not suggesting felonies but misdemeanors. >> you know what's interesting? richard,'ll go back you do. you can reference someone throwing away classified documents as gross negligence. that's intentional. we know bill clinton got a plea garn instead of being indicted. tammy's right. it's gross negligence. she did intend to remove these items. now, let's talk about the fact, richard, that she called it a security inquiry and on june 14th, i believe, jim comey, the head of the fbi said, security iniery? we don'tinquiries. the fbi does full investigations. do we have a screen on that? i guess not. what are you going to say

pagliano? >> yes. >> given the importance of the case, will you commit to voluntarily disclosing the 302s for the review of pag leono and other witnesses as part of the investigation? >> i'll commit to giving you everything i can possibly give you under the law and to doing it as quickly as possible. i have to go back and sort it out. for example, the 302 of secretary clinton, it's classified at the tssci level. we got to sort through all that. but we'll do it quickly. >> i know you've done this because you've done this for other cases. we would expect that. director comey, hillary clinton testified before congress and told the american people multiple times that she never e-mailed any classified information to anyone on her private e-mail servers. your investigation revealed 110 e-mails and 52 e-mail chains contained classified information. clinton told the american people that the laws and regulations in effect as secretary of state allowed me to use my e-mail for work. this is undisputed. en

pagliano have the requisite security clearance? >> as i sit here today, i can't remember. he was not a participant on the classified e-mail exchanges though. >> he was running the server. he set it up. >> that's a different question. i'm sorry, i misunderstood your question then. there is no doubt that uncleared people had access to the server. because even after pagliano, others maintained the server who were private sector folks. >> so there are hundreds of classified documents on these servers. how many people without a security clearance had access to that server? >> i don't know the exact number as i sit here. probably more than two, less than ten. >> i appreciate your willingness to follow up with this. did secretary clinton's attorneys have the security clearances needed? >> they did not. >> does that concern you? >> oh, yeah. sure. >> is there any consequence to an attorney rifling through secretary clinton's -- hillary clinton's e-mails without a security clearance? >> would not say criminal consequences but there is a great deal of concern about an uncleared pers

pagliano have the requisite security clearance? >> as i sit here today, i can't remember. he was not a participant on the classified e-mail exchanges, though. >> he was running the server. he set it up. >> that's a different question. i'm sorry, i misunderstood your question, then. there's no question that uncleared people had access to the server who were private sector folks. >> so there are hundreds of classified documents on these servers. how many people without a security clearance had access to that server? >> i don't know the exact number as i sit here. it's probably more than two, less than ten. >> i appreciate your willingness to follow up with this. did secretary clinton's attorneys have the security clearances needed? >> they did not. >> does that concern you? >> oh, yeah. sure. >> is there any consequence to an attorney rifling through secretary clinton's, hillary clinton's e-mails without a security clearance? >> not criminal consequences. but there's a great deal of concern about an uncleared person not subject to the requirements we talked about about in th

pagliano. >> will you commit to disclosing the voluntary 302s for the witnesses interviewed as part of your investigation? >> i'll commit to giving you everything i can possibly give you under the law and to doing it as quickly as possible. that said, that means i've got to go back and sort it out. for example, the 302 of secretary clinton is classified. we have to sort through all that. we'll do it quickly. >> i know you've done this, because you've done it for lois lerner and other cases. so we would expect that. >> hillary clinton testified before congress and told the american people she never e-mailed anything any classified information to anyone on her e-mail server. clinton told the american people, the laws and regulations in effect when i was secretary of state allowed me to use my e-mail for work. this is undisputed. end of quote. your investigation revealed that also wasn't true. clinton claims she turned overall her work related e-mails. your investigation revealed this wasn't also true. clinton claimed there was no security breaches and her private servers had numerous saf

pagliano have security clearance? >> as i sit here today i can't remember. he was not a participant on the classified e-mail exchanges. >> he is running the server. >> i misunderstood your question. there is no doubt that uncleared people had access to the server because there were other whose maintained the server who were private sector folks. >> so there are hundreds of classified documents on these servers. how many people without a security clearance had access to that server? >> i don't know the exact number as i sit here. it's probably more than two, less than ten. >> i appreciate your willingness to follow up. did hillary clinton's attorneys have security clearances needed? >> they did not. >> does that concern you? >> yeah, sure. >> is there any consequence to an attorney rifling through hillary clinton's e-mails without a security clearance? >> criminal consequences but a great deal of concern about an uncleared person not subject to requirements we talked about in read in documents having access. that is why it is important for us to recover every

that around her, are those people that are competent can they be trusted, or is it a 5,000 dollar paglianoof the white house do people want that? >> the "the wall street journal" i am sure you looked at mr. comey's testimony last week his explanations for not bringing charges, one thing in particular, he basically gave mrs. clinton benefit of the doubt saying she might not have been sophisticated about classified information in the rules around it even though her own memoir talks that that issue for pages and pages how much in had to protect information as you look at at least publicly available information what do you think about that charging or about noncharging decision. >> you kind of make me laugh this morning i would be the do that i can tell you of about i was a lawyer, i was a federal agent and i can tell you that i believe that there was clearly enough here to actually charge mrs. clinton with a crime. i have seen individuals who have gone and followedona fallen on the sword for less, and so i got to tell you -- this was a little disingenuous to say the least. >> ted williams kat