pakaei, and in your opinion , where should our priorities be for the development of foreign relations? basically, our foreign policy and our relations with other countries. how should i set it up? in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful , i would like to extend my greetings to your excellency, the honored guests and dear compatriots , and i hope that their prayers will be accepted by god in this month of ramadan, and i would also like to congratulate you on eid-ul-fitr and the new year. well, see the principles of politics. the foreign policy of each country is usually based on the provisions of the upper level documents. for many in the islamic republic of iran , the constitution of the documents that are actually promulgated , programs such as the sixth and seventh development plans, as well as the views of the polite leader of the revolution , determine the principles of foreign policy and its priorities. and foreign policy apparatus and institutions and organizations and ministries houses related to foreign policy that are active in the field of foreign relation

pakaei says, because when you mention giving priority in the case of russia. relations with the russianswith the chinese instead of the european countries now or de-escalation of the tension with the united states of america then, as you say, the relations are friendly and good, after that statement of future cooperation in the economic, political and security fields between russia and the countries of the persian gulf you will be shocked and shocked . it is not a small issue iranian land, so how can we explain this contradictory behavior? i don't deny the good relations of the russians in some fields, such as military and economic exchanges, and china, too . i don't want to refine it to confirm this , but i want to be able to explain this paradox of behavior in theoretical and theoretical formats, and say that the reason this story is the reason for this position. what are the chinese and russians about our vital and territorial interests? well, the answer i have about it is that we need new conceptual tools to understand the world today. that is, we in the format strategic alliances, s

pakaei says, because when you mention about russia, the restoration of relations with the russians orh the chinese. i see. instead of now european countries or de-escalation of tensions with the united states of america, then when you say that relations are friendly and good, after that statement of future cooperation in the economic, political and security fields between russia and the countries of the persian gulf, you will be confused and shocked. this is not a dog punishment issue because it is among the vital and territorial interests of iran, so what can we say that the reason for this story is the reason for this position of the chinese and russians regarding the interests of life. and what is our land? well, the answer i have about it is that we need new conceptual tools to understand today's world, that is , we cannot make multilateralism a reality in the form of strategic alliances, stable and exclusive partnerships, blocking and words like this. let's explain and interpret the words of today's world. a new concept is proposed by some theorists of international relations, wh