the pakistani this is what they're pakistanis what they're supposed to do in the deal is to bring the taliban to the negotiating table in one form or another hopefully not have to deal with them directly they're the intermediary but in a broader picture and i think i want to address this to everyone here and this is my own opinion all across the region everyone's just watching really waiting waiting for some kind of strategic withdrawal defeat of the united states be it. in iraq if if the state were to not be a solid is the americans at holby when they're starting to leave there always are already talking about leaving afghanistan i mean the united states is talking about the future and for americans the future comes real soon in the region it's a lot more long term so how can we be talking about a negotiated peace when at the same time the obama administration are enormous pressure is being pressured to actually leave the region and leave it in not on the same level of where troops are and security forces are just and lowered and moved back how can you do both at the same time. well

military the pakistani government or the pakistani civil society pakistani military is more on the same page as they unite the u.s. military you know but the street to do to dialogue that's taking place between us and pakistan is more. trying to build a good relationship between the two countries for long term rather than just trying to say that ok we're not going to leave you like we did the last time and this mistrust you're absolutely right exists between the people and that's where the lack of communication is the public level at the civil society level so whether the u.s. has been able to achieve this hillary clinton's. visit has been able to achieve that goal. the civilians or the ordinary citizens if they agree with that i would have to say no because i was just in pakistan conducting research for a month and in my interviews with parliamentarians and ordinary citizens an analyst thinking analyst what i found out was that he said that the u. has has done this before they have given the development aid but whenever it suited them but whenever it didn't suit them they actually left

now the pakistani military and the pakistani intelligence services are conducting successful militaryperations. we've had successful operations in swat and south afghanistan, we've taken out leaders on taliban from both sides of the border and moreover 74 i.s.i. personnel have been killed in the last two years and killed in the attacks by the taliban -- that should be alone sufficient to convince people that that is then and now is now and pakistan is now standing firmly on the side of those who want to eliminate the taliban and the extremists in our region. >> charlie: listen to this clip from a interview last night. >> we have to other than, kiani was head of the i.s.i. from 2004 to 2007 when a lot of this was going on, when the afghan taliban were going over into afghanistan and where they continue to do, and general kiani has made it perform clear that the afghan taliban is an asset of pakistan and they think it's a very important asset, because when the end game is over in afghanistan, the afghan taliban should have for pakistan a kind of sphere of influence in southern afghanist

as their biggest threat and that 67% of pakistanis polled were opposed to u.s. military operations in their country. now, mr. -- thank you. now, mr. speaker, if that -- if putting our troops into -- inside the borders of afghanistan, if we're not putting them in a hostile environment with those poll results, i don't know what would be hostile. i yield three minutes to mr. paul of texas who is the co-sponsor of this resolution and i want to express to him my gratitude for his patriotism. mr. paul: i thank the gentleman for yielding. i ask unanimous consent revise and extend my remarks. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. mr. paul: first off i'd like to address the subject about hostilities. it is true there are no armies facing each other shooting and killing each other, no tanks, not those conventional type of hostilities but we don't live in a conventional era and we don't fight conventional wars but there's a lot of hostile action going on. in looking and checking to find out if anybody's been killed, the reports that i found, anywhere from 1,000 to 2,

that's critical. >> i'm less concerned about pakistani and more concerned about the pakistani state. i don't care if they hated us as long as they're able to run their own business. >> woodruff: tough questions. steve cohen, shooi >> lehrer: now to the gulf coast, where the oil is no longer spewing. we have two takes. the first about what's happening to the oil that's already in the water. it's been 100 days since the deepwater horizon rig exploded; killing 11 workers; fouling the gulf of mexico and leaving wildlife to an oily fate. a temporary cap on the gushing well finally halted the flow of crude two weeks ago. and now, signs of oil on the surface have been greatly reduced. as these images illustrate, at the end of june, crude covered thousands of square miles of the gulf's waters. by this week, the remaining oil appeared only in small patches. mike sutcliffe flew over the gulf on tuesday, sizing up the situation for b.p. >> at this point in time going over the source i actually didn't see any sheen whatsoever. >> lehrer: but in louisiana st. bernard parish president craig taffar

that is the pakistani taliban. the afghan taliban are granted sanctuaries by the pakistanis in trouble areas next door to afghanistan. these are the militants who go across the border into afghanistan to fight american and nato troops. the pakistani tbn for the most part do not fight our or nato soldiers. we call them the pakistani taliban because they're focused on trying to undermine the pakistani state. it is an ally of the u.s. host: the difference between the television and al qaeda in this region -- between the taliban and al qaeda? guest: they are very closely aligned, one and the same. one of the main groups in the afghan taliban is known as the hakani network, host to the al qaeda operatives in the tribal areas since 2001. host: st. louis, missouri, tom. caller: i have been trying to get on since you have been on the air. i finally made it. there is very direct evidence of actual war crimes -- we're talking about deliberate killings by coalition forces, of innocent people. not accidental killings would dro

the pakistani military are fighting the taliban.nfortunately both of those things are simultaneously true, which is confusing. but life is confusing. >> larry: they're contributory? >> they're not necessarily contradictory. pakistan is a very complex count country. the pakistan military has done large-scale operations. they've handed military defeats to the taliban. at the same time, they know the americans are leaving and pakistan is going to be attached to afghanistan for quite some period of time. and they want to influence the future of afghanistan by keeping certain taliban elements on the table for americans in afghanistan. >> larry: back to secrecy, michael, what should be secret? many complain that your story shouldn't have been told. what should be secret in times of conflict? >> well, i think clearly there are operational details as a reporter you would never report that are going to actually put u.s. troops in harm's way, but i think unfortunately the government has a tendency to classify things not to prevent americans f

people enjoy them so i mean to see your pakistani. something very refreshing and new for them but pakistan's firm censors have banned the movie saying it mocks security agencies and. and screening it in public could trigger violence films distributers in pakistan the message of peace and not appealing the ban whatever they do i thought it was a nice film a good idea there's a lot of good humor from the name it sounds like a serious films but actually it turned out quite different so it's full of great jokes i can do for me that he achieved definitely quite a good film it will definitely like my students to come and watch it and they will like it there's nothing here that will incite people to my limbs to play but the selling point of this film is. but it's very tongue in cheek. to act the part. i challenge you america there will be retribution holding just doing evil actions you have committed in the countries like iraq and afghanistan for these you will have to pay a heavy price. when i first heard about this film i thought it was go

it also says or some of these leaked documents suggest that there's pakistani support for the taliban to grow which isn't true but you know it's we've got a you just watch crossed on crossfire and we know about you're going to tell us what you think well that was one of the main challenges during the antislavery jihad what the pakistani involvement pakistani has been stopped contracted their intelligence services by side by the cia and that's the whole point the whole trouble in afghanistan regarding the insurgency anti soviet insurgency anti american whatever and anybody insurgency in afghanistan has been perpetrated directed and funded by the united states central intelligence agency their their partners. they're just in cahoots thirty years ago and the same thing which really . for two really strikes me the good bit in here my chair who used to kill soviet soldiers in afghanistan keeps killing happily american and french for french troops in afghanistan while there. i was i invited him to need to integrate into afghan society ok ok so no surprise no surprise it's time to get out it

elisa who plays the journalist is a pakistani singer and this is deputy film how does it feel acting in an indian film set in pakistan in pakistan bollywood films are greatly appreciated they're seen. people enjoy them so i mean to see a pakistani in a bollywood film something very refreshing and new for them but pakistan's firm censors have banned the movie saying it mocks security agencies. and screening it in public could trigger violence so films distributers in pakistan call it a message of peace and not appealing the ban but i thought it was a nice film and there's a lot of good humor from the name it sounds like a serious films but actually it turned out quite different so it's full of great jokes. definitely quite a good film it will definitely like it mind my students to come and watch it and they will like it there's nothing here that will incite people to my lines. the selling point of this film is osama bin laden but it's very tongue in cheek so i asked to act the part in the. i challenge you america there will be retribution holding just evil actions you have committed i

people enjoy them and so i mean to see a pakistani. something very refreshing and new for that. movie saying it mocks security agencies. and spinning it in public could trigger violence action films distributors and box stuff and call it a message of peace and not appealing the band much of a humor i thought it was a nice little would be good idea as a lot of good humor and being allowed to name it sounds like a serious film is going to actually be good for it turned out quite different certainly great job in tripoli that he achieved we had a lot differently to getting ill it was definitely a like it i like to do is to come and watch it and they will like it but there's nothing here that will incite at some minds as to believe that the selling point of this film is osama bin ladin but it's very tongue in cheek so i asked to act the part in the. i challenge you america there will be retribution holding just evil actions you have committed in other countries like iraq and afghanistan for these you will have to pay a heavy price. when i first heard about this film i thought it was

dollars a year to to help fight the insurgency in afghanistan and the report suggests that the pakistanis in fact hold secret meetings with the taliban to the militant groups that are fighting these u.s. soldiers to practice on his is alleged to be doing exactly the opposite of what the u.s. has asked it to do and is paying it to do well this specific dossier it's not clear where this came from and judy and discuss where these ninety thousand documents came from but we can assume that that comes from some sort of inside source merely because in april there was a similar leak a video which wiki leaks put on his websites which showed apache helicopters essentially gone down to the. a man on the streets of baghdad now someone has been arrested and charged with that and he was not only twenty two years old a military analyst he was working in iraq he's been charged with that but he hasn't it's not been suggested god has any connection with bin is going to say thanks but of course we're not the only ones who want to know where the things come from the pentagon is of course very concerned to kn

one of the main challenges during the anti-slavery just out what the pakistani involvement pakistanihas been sop contracted their intelligence services by side by the cia and that's the whole point of the whole trouble in afghanistan regarding the insurgency and i saw that the insurgency anti-american whatever anybody insurgency in afghanistan has been perpetrated directed and funded by the united states central intelligence agency their their partners. they're just in cahoots thirty years ago and the same thing you know it's time for the neighborhood to mend itself this was an abject failure the u.s. should get out now no more review in december this is the review the review is it's a disaster how did afghanistan. my colleague carrie johnson talking to you want to use military analyst you're going to. cross the coast. now if that because of the program here on. this as a baby box if a mother wanted to leave her child all she'd have to do would be to pull of the handle and put the child inside it's designed to say you've been friends' lives but critics say it's encouraging women to g

can win points with the pakistani people and the pakistani military and the pakistani government can go after militants in afghanistan. it's those militants who have made afghanistan more violent ever ever, increasing security fears. >> reporter: in the afghan capital, police are gearing for a fight. hillary clinton an and her counterparts from 50 countries have arrived here. and the city is on edge. the major general is responsible for keeping kabul safe. the enemies of afghanistan will do their best to show the international community there is no peace or security, he says. those enemies succeeded. the suicide bomber killed three people here. the remnants of the bomber or the victims remained on this street long after the attack. this will give you a sense of the scene of a suicide explosion. over there, there's body parts from the suicide bomber, we won't show you those. over here, a motorcycle that was either hit or used by the suicide bomber. a sense of fear. obviously, worried about the journalists. the air around here smells acrid. do you and your family trust the government a

have always said elements of the pakistani intelligence service had links to militant and the united states considered that unacceptable. but what they are focusing on is the investigation. the fbi has been called in and secretary gates asked specifically will wikileaks be investigated itself. the defense secretary says it will go wherever it needs to. >> thank you for that. ending his trip to india, the prime minister has defended his comments about pakistan's record on tackling terrorism. david cameron has been accused of damaging relations with the country. on the final day of his visit to india, he held talks with the prime minister of india. >> the chaos of old dehli seems far away from the old india david cameron wants to draw close. but the prime minister says foreign countries -- says trips to foreign countries are not always orderly. he came on this trip promising to take jobs, but he left having struck a new british town for talking about affairs abroad. he observed the usual public niceties and old diplomatic traditions. but his plane word on the situation in gaza and paki

we have some differences, some policy differences with the pakistani government. but we have differences with a lot of our friends, but we still support them, especially when it's in our national interest to do so. and working with them and helping with the training is extremely important, as i stated a moment ago. and as i said before, the border between pakistan and afghanistan has mountains and valleys and it's extremely difficult to know where those borders are, and we must not allow the enemy to have sanctuary. that's why it's important for us to train their troops to be able to go after the taliban and al qaeda. because if osama bin laden can go into pakistan with impunity, if the terrorists can go in there with impunity, if they can go back and forth across that border, we can never win the war. to say they can have sanctuary in pakistan is like saying to a football team, win the game but don't go beyond the 50-yard line. you can't let the enemy have sanctuary. if we didn't learn anything from vietnam we should have learned that. this is an entire breeding

dollars a year to to help fight the insurgency in afghanistan and the report suggests that the pakistanis in fact hold secret meetings with the taliban to the militant groups that are fighting these two u.s. soldiers to practice on a pair is alleged to be doing exactly the opposite of what the u.s. has asked to do and is paying it to do there's also details of special forces secretly hunting to kill taliban leaders without help with the process still trial and evidence that the u.s. has covered up the taliban has deadly. missiles and all this from a british perspective makes rather a mockery of david cameron the prime minister's assertion that from next year we will start pulling troops out of afghanistan and then we will hand over this situation to the afghan government from two thousand and fourteen. this isn't the first stunning revelation from wiki leaks so where does the sun get this kind of information from a. well this specific piece of information this specific dossier it's not clear where this came from and julian assaults here in fact is giving a media conference in a couple of

who plays the journalist is a pakistani singer and this is a film how does it feel acting in an indian film set in pakistan in bollywood films greatly appreciated be seen. people enjoy them. so i mean to see your pakistani in something very refreshing and new for them but pakistan's firm censors have banned the movie saying it locks security agencies. and screening it in public could trigger violence the film's distributors in pakistan call it a message of peace and not appealing the ban the selling point of this film is osama bin laden but it's very tongue in cheek. to act the part in and. i challenge you america there will be retribution just doing evil actions you have committed in the countries like iraq and afghanistan so these you will have to pay a heavy price. when i first heard about this film i thought it was going to be a beautification alternative but actually it's quite irrelevant in the way pakistanis and muslims are looked at with suspicion in the west today and how the video could be fooled into believing something that doesn't exist i think this film could do well in s

speaker, with the pakistani legislature. i underscore the house democracy partnership because sadly, not many members of this institution, or among the american people, are aware of the house democracy partnership. we have partnered with 15 legislatures in new and re-emerging democracies around the world to help build up their parliament. we have one of these programs going with the pakistani parliament. through this partnership, members of the united states house of representatives have the opportunity to engage with our counterparts in islamabad. we've been sharing our experiences as a democracy providing support and technical assistance in their efforts to strengthen their ledge epping slative institutions. now, mr. speaker, in the case of civilian control of the military, this has a very clear and direct tie to our national security issues, to the overall national security issues and to our national security interests. but the connections go well beyond the most obvious arenas. by improving, mr. speaker, by improving the