and when you tell people to change, you can't make that like a panacea, like a magic wand. but you know the struggle to change itself, it's beautiful, it's healing. even on the hard days. and i see my son, i'm very proud of him because i see what he's gone through. i know the terrible things he's faced, the abuse he had from other guys. he had more neglect from me even though i used to hit him when i shouldn't have hit him, it was more neglect. his poor mom, too, and i want to give her credit because she stood by -- another troubled young person. and she stepped up. so it's good to hear him. i think one of the things that helps a lot is we went on a trip last year. he got off parole, so he could finally come to california. and we bought this crazy truck he wanted. i helped him with it. and we drove all the way there chicago to california. and, you know, it was one of the most beautiful trips. we came with our friend, a puerto rican poet, and we had a great time. and i never argued with him once. we just had a great time talking, sharing. and my son has become wise in his ag

there is one distinguishing feature around risk or complexity that we can now drill into that is a panacea in response to the concern and control the debate going forward. revealed thatarly it is more comprehensive in that regard. we can't just make a declaration. it is an important combination of all of that. there is nuance involved as to how to best approach that. the response to that at the time was, the dodd frank legislation. you just heard from the authors of that legislation. the best policy thinkers of that time or at least those that were charged with the responsibility to responding to the crisis in a congress that was not inclined to be generous to the industry. the dodd frank framework. the paint is not yet dry on that framework. it is not yet even fully implemented. we can certainly have a debate about what its affects might be, but the fact of the matter is it is not yet complete. any declarations on how it does work at this point are partially speculative in nature. it is premature to be making final declarations about what might or might not work under dodd frank. that bei

there's one distinguishing feature around wrist or complexity that we can now drill into that as a panacea in response to the concern and then control the debate going forward. the crisis clearly reveals that it is more comprehensive in that regard, so we cannot just make a dent -- a declaration. it is an important combination of all of that and there is nuance involved as to how to best approach that. of course, the response to that at the time was the dodd frank legislation. you just heard from the authors of that legislation. the best policy thinkers of the time, or at least those charged with the responsibility of responding to the crisis -- that was not dispositional inclined to be generous to the industry came up with the dodd frank approach. the paint is not your drive on that framework. it is not even fully implemented, so we can certainly have a debate about what it six -- about what it six facts might be, but the matter of fact is that is not yet complete. any deliberations at this point are partially speculative in nature. i think it is premature in some cases to be making final

that retaileel is is not the panacea. the country if doesn't function.here are hundreds and thousands of mom-and-pop shops. india is a very big market. we are not that bothered for retail. you should be more focused on how to create jobs in the manufacturing sector which is what the agenda of mr. modi is. >> he has got to try and create jobs. we have very little jobs growth and it is one of the youngest populations in the world. >> that is another low hanging fruit. we have a large educated population. the skills are not right for the jobs which are required. giving environmental clearances, forest clearances, you will have big job creation. that is his agenda. >> thank you very much for coming in. have a look at australian politics next. pounding in opinion polls after last week's unpopular budget. we are going to head to signy for the latest on that. ♪ >> this latest opinion poll has seen a collapse in support for tony abbott's coalition government. let's head over to sydney. paul allen is there. how bad was this? >> they were pretty horrible. there we

i'm not offering a new panacea. there are no panaceas, there are no utopias on the table.just offering an ideal that i think has not been embraced enough by the development. so it's as if development has been 99.9% about the material deprivation of poor people which strengthens, again, a bias towards considering technical solutions, the neglect of whether authoritarians are violating the rights of poor people. i'm just saying let's rebalance a little bit. rights of the poor are a good thing in and of themselves. we should not bias the debate, the positive debate on whether rights work and why some of the strange things we do like excluding rich country cases. but i'm saying let's have that debate, let's get those principles straight. and that becomes a guide that then is a guide towards how development happens. it happens by an ever growing degree of political and economic rights just as happened in u.s. history, for example. it wasn't that at the moment in 1776 when the u.s. was at half the level of africa in per capita income and at a lower level of education and there a

non wearing of a portable hundred millimeters and ready to mind is very low saturated me know as a panacea is springtime pressure system dominate the area and summer like conditions will be seen across much of japan twenty six in tokyo. and for the holiday forecast. this is what is going to be making my hotel calmly and it is the link and find nineties i bathed no precipitation in sight but okie now while we may see that on rainy season coming on monday leaving outbreaks in our cast. i know i do. i know. it is. and he's a recap of the top story this hour presence she champion is promising decisive action after a bombing at a train station in western china state media say to religious extremists were behind the attack on wednesday in the seam down on qantas present and both of them were killed the assailant started slashing people outside the station in the regional capital raunchy. then they set off bombs they were carrying. they killed one bystander and wounded seventy nine other people. kevin officials say the attackers had long participated in the extremists for these activities. the at

talk about this and certainly in the context of homelessness here in san francisco, this isn't a panacea, this is one tool in the tool box to make sure individuals and families get the help that they need. there is no solution, but i believe this is an important step for the city and county of san francisco to implement. i rook forward to having a robust discussion here at the board of supervisors. i hope it gets to the board of supervisors, but if not, also with the voters of san francisco. the rest i submit. >> thank you, supervisor farrell. supervisor kim. ~ >> thank you. a few weeks ago i had expressed frustration with actually the department of health contracts with [speaker not understood] s-r-o buildings that we rent to homeless on our streets and we use taxpayer dollars to house folks. and also noting that a number of those buildings have numerous building violations and health violations that aren't a trust yet we continue to contract with those buildings. last week on may 12 the city did file a lawsuit against one of the families that owns a number of these hotels, 15-s r.o.s,

i'm not offering a new panacea. there are no panacea, there are no utopias on the idea. i'm just offering an ideal i think has not been embraced enough by the development. it's as if the development has been 99.9% about the deprivation of poor people. technical solutions, the neglect, you know, of whether authoritarians are violating the rights of poor people. i'm just saying let's rebalance a little bit. rights are a good thing in and of themselves. we should not bias the debate, the positive debate on whether rights work and some of the strange things we do like excluding rich country cases. and u.s. history, for example. it wasn't that at the moment in 1776 when the u.s. was at half the level of africa in per capita income and a low level of education and there are these statements, you know, endowed with unalienable rights. governments by the consent of the governed. all men are created equal. these rights were, of course, being violated at that moment by slavery, by the lack of women's rights, by many other things. and we've been on a journey. principles are an engi

again, i would not say it is a panacea. >> senators tried to drag her into the budget debate at -- onitol hill. she largely steered clear of that, as did her predecessor, ben bernanke. and one piece of news that will cheer up folks in the banking community, she said she supports on the the position board of governors with someone from the banking community. taxpayers will get billions in profits from fannie mae and freddie mac, the government owned mortgage companies. they will pay the treasury more than $10 billion. the two companies are required to give the government all their profits. fannie and freddie received $187 billion in taxpayer aid. staying on the housing front, the zillow reported earnings after the close. it eat estimates and raised its full-year guidance for 2014. the founder and ceo of zillow joins me now from seattle. welcome back. >> great to be here. >> the results exceeded even your expectations. what is attracting users to mobile? what ise is definitely driving our growth. this little thing has been a godsend to our business. 178 homes are viewed every second on

we should not pretend that this is a panacea. the main barrier to u.s. exports to europe is not the permitting process. it is the fact that u.s. gas would be substantially more expensive than cheap russian gas. most experts agree that exports from the u.s. would be far more likely to go to asia for prices that are higher than in europe. that is not to say that the u.s. should not market gas in europe. that conducting foreign policy via energy exports is complex. how can we help ukraine, given these constraints? a number of efforts are underway. the u.s. is working with you and the imf on a number of efforts to move europe toward greater diversity. reversing flows of natural gas from existing type line into ukraine and further developing ukraine's natural gas resources. encouraging energy efficiency rarely makes headlines. in ukraine, it could be a game changer. ukraine produces as much gas as it uses. the ukrainians are notoriously profligate energy users. banks get government energy subsidies. by implementing efficiency measures, ukraine could be nearly

. >> well, so, michael, as i say, it really steams to be this -- seems to be a panacea that has a tremendous benefit for human being. >> for the sake of myself and viewers at home. let's get it clear. it's not just the blood, but what is in the blood that causes this effect, correct. >> that's right, that's the nature of the findings, that it's not just the blood, but compound. they targeted gd f11, and it's a compound in the blood, that is having a positive benefit injected by itself into mice. it improves the placticity of the brain, our cognitive function and regeneration of muscle. it could be the sort of wonder drug. >> you said gf, which reminds me of growth factor. we saw in sports, whether it's human growth hormone, that there has been ways that people have tried to stop the effect of ageing. is this maybe a better alternative as we go into the future. >> well, it could be. i do want to caution everyone at home. don't stitch yourself to other people or anything like that, that's the thing to know. we are in the early days, there's big differences between mice and humans, this could b

i would not say it is a panacea. >> thank you.senator sessions, closing. >> you look good in that job. rapid rise, meteoric rise i have to say. madam chair, thank you for coming. i know that you work hard at this job and take it exceedingly seriously. you are one of those more correct, only one i think on the board, anticipating the severity of the housing crisis of that is something i would express appreciation for but just let me say we are not happy. the average american is not doing well. i don't think we need to overspin a positive numbers because i agree with senator portman totally on his comments about what he is hearing in the business world so thank you. you are challenged in your new position. we hope you will lead us with wisdom and get insight. thank you. >> thank you, senator. >> thank you for joining us today. has been delightful to meet you and to hear your i think very thoughtful comments. i want to thank my colleagues for the information. my colleagues will meet back here on tuesday the thirteenth on expanding ec

panacea export is no in the long-term. it will not save ukraine and possibly other parts of central eastern -- other parts of central eastern europe from a very cold winter in 2014. yet, it makes the medium term solution very clear and this prospect would have immediate impact on pricing and maybe even availability. her request is interesting. her request is it will begin to act. it at least sets a marker out there that shows russia that we are serious and they know we are moving. two years ago when we started the process of these conversations, i had two different individuals specially who came to visit my office immediately. the japanese and members of parliament from ukraine. two years ago. their question was the same. how quickly could we get american natural gas? since that time period, multiple other countries have visited with me with the same question. how quickly could we get american natural gas? this is one of those conversations we need to be able to determine. i understand full well we have the first responsib

. >> ozone or ethanol, not a panacea. saying is the model, the computer, mathematical model of what would happen in that part of the world when people were using gasoline was incomplete, and there was some effect of sunlight. and the photochemical affect. melissa: ethanol is worse for the environment? >> that is a great on. that is also too simplest the man. chemistry is more complicated than that but in the bigger picture ethanol is just a okay. they convert ethanol -- a huge problem. >> takes a lot of energy to make ethanol. melissa: the union of concerned scientists, everyone is touting ethanol as the greatest thing that ever happened. part of the solution especially -- and ozone is one measure of air quality. you may have more particulates, more carbon dioxide, more carbon monoxide from burning gasoline, and that was not revealed in the articles you guys posted. another situation was complicated. i encourage all of us, internal combustion inherently inefficient. it is okay, but we could do a lot better if you drive an

they're angry about fracking, and there's almost a panacea to america's energy needs, saying that thenited states is going to surpass russia and saudi arabia as top oil and gas producers. we have seen mitch mcconnell on the floor of the senate today, saying that this is a sob to the left, those who advocate environmental rules and low flow toilets, those are the quotes that he used. so the president does have moves that he can make here. he's expected to come out with very new and controversial reses on coal fired power plants across the country, electricity that runs on coal fired plants. and that comes down the pike as well. so there are arrows in the quiver that he can enact without congress, but cap and trade, it's a dead letter. >> mike t. good to see you, >> ucla professor matthew kahn says there is no turning back on climate change. it's coming and we can't stop it. but it doesn't have to be as dire as the predictions. he's author of the book "climatopolis: how our cities will thrive in the hotter future. he joins us now. matthew, how will our cities thrive in a hotter future?

extend the benefits is not a panacea, but as one long-term unemployed person said, it's hard for me to look for a job when they cut off my cell phone, because i don't have any moan to pay for it. >> another regular debate around the table is how do you promote a career that doesn't necessarily start with a four-year college degree? how do you bring them on to, in terms of status, the same playing field, someone who chooses to go to college and someone who chooses to work with their hands, go and get an apprenticeship? >> there's a bright future in america for people who work with their hands. you go to wisconsin, for instance, the average age of skilled tradesperson is 59 years old. i talk to employers all over the country who say we need more people in the skilled trades. that's why apprentices are so important. it's not just in the skilled trades. i.t., health care, et cetera. the one challenge we have is we need to alter the perception of this work, and really talk to parents, because when i talk to parents and say there's a bright future for people who work with their hands, they r

i'm reluctant to see the social media reaction as a panacea. >> i want to turn to your show now.st challenges in your mind to getting the show up and running. >> everything. no, i mean, look, you've been there yourself. you've been at this a lot longer than i have -- i'm not calling you old. >> good night, ronan. >> just wise. just wise. i have tremendous respect for the people who do this day in and day out for years and have the mechanics of it nailed and have their team built up. so much of it is the unglamorous stuff you never see. getting the staff right, getting the budget in place. it's making tough editorial choices and fighting for them. that all requires, you know, not just a couple of months but a couple of years really of doing it over and over again and refining and iterating. the show has changed so much but already i am so proud of what we're doing and have done. i'm loving it every single day. the stories we select, every week we put up a poll and ask the people what's the underreported story you want to hear more about. we covered this crazy phenomenon of the wor

and detainees in the coming years but even supporters like alex briscoe admit a medicaid card is no panaceaives. >> you can't-- it is about a sense of needing and belonging, about a place to sleep. so all of those basic human needs have to be met too. but health care can be a tool for social justice if it is delivered effectively and creatively that is item medicaid expansion is such a great opportunity for us. >> still t may be some time before ex-inmates like rodrigo receive any benefits. california like other states has been overwhelmed by new medicaid applications. and it's taking months for people to receive their benefits. >> our >> ifill: our partners at kaiser health news have more reporting on how the numbers of mentally ill behind bars have grown substantially. you can find that online. >> woodruff: we return again this week to the u.s. government's surveillance programs. on tuesday, i spoke with general keith alexander, who recently stepped down as head of the national security agency. tonight, we look at the topic from another point of view. journalist glenn greenwald was the fi

>> well, the report is growing, and the economy is growing, and everything is not a panacea just yet. fed has to be careful before they raise the interest ratesing, because the housing market is taking off, and if you raise them too much, then you cannot have people affording to buy if the rates are up, and the interest rates are going up, and i hope that the feds don't rush to raise the interest rates any time soon, and the economy is fragile, and while unemployment is going down, and more people who are no long er looking for the work, and that is going to skew the statistic, and i would be careful if i were the fed. >> and let me ask you, because we have jason furman, the chairman of the white house economic program, a nd he talke about the proposals out there from the white house on the democratic side and everything from the infrastructure, and the job creation plans, but realistically, what is the chance of anything getting done between now and november that is go ing to impact the job market? >> well, zero, frankly, in in my view, because the republicans who have the majority i

. >> is the world cup a panacea? this tol will want solve all their economic problems.y will wanted to solve, more so, the problems in society. it comes with an $11 billion price tag. tourists, don't get sick, we have the stadiums but not the hospitals. what is in it for us? why do we benefit from it? when you look at the last cup, the biggest boy did not come from the football fans. it came from the writers. consumer confidence at a low. italy, germany, england, spain go to pressure -- with pressure to win. brazil needs to win at a minimum for more reasons than just football. chat.d shot -- . let's it more on the opportunity that result presents. thank you for joining us today. couldntimating that rates rise through the end of this year. how long will the pot last? -- pause last? >> it is impossible to predict, but i would be surprised if you see rates go up significantly before the election. election, you get the the more politically sensitive it becomes. >> have they lost control of inflation? 6.31%. to month, things aren't so bad. what is the true inflation trend in

the needs to be more resources, and this is a multifaceted effort, and no single solution, and no panacea, and the health care delivery is the key to reforming this system. >> the politics of it all, and you know, i get a lot of people who write into us, and say that s suddenly, you have lawmakers who are on television and in radio and print being quoted and many of them perhaps have been never inside of a v.a. hospital, and do you believe that there is bipartisanship available, and it is even possible within washington to the provide the funds that would be needed and some of the other significant changes that are needed that you and others have proposed? >> i think that there is bipartisan supper port for fundamental reform and most importantly, improved patient care for our veterans. there is no excuse, none, for anything but the best state-of-the-art world class d medicine for men and women who have put their lives on the line. they have put their lives at risk in combat, and they should not be put at risk by anything less than the best possible medical care, and i think that there is

hungry for success for decades, if they pull off an nba championship win, is that not the ultimate panaceaat. >> it's a great story, isn't it? it could happen. >> danny, go ahead. >> that would be a great emotional victory, but as a non-clippers fan and more of a fan of the legal proceedings here, i think the most compelling thing is, yes, players as joey says could refuse to play but how realistic is that? i think this creates, although i agree with a lot of what joey says, at the same time this creates a dangerous precedent. what will the nba have to do in terms of policing private thoughts going forward? how afraid should somebody be if they come out with a music album that maybe has some words that are detestable or some opinions that are bad, accidentally made public which is exactly what happened here. i think this is a dangerous precedent. while the nba has the power and authority to do what it is doing, what this does this say about our policing going forward? >> but here's the problem. the bigger problem is we live in a day and age of social media. what we do in our living room, c

is this a panacea for this or is it too early to know? i mean, of not being inclusive.tion? >> i think this is a positive moment for the nfl. the nfl has plenty of negative moments to worry about, considering they have a number of minority coaches that should be promoted or should be hired and are not being hired. they have plenty of athletes being arrested for all the trouble off the field. this is a moment of celebration for the nfl, a moment of acceptance for sports. so it should be celebrated like that. i can't really compare the donald sterling situation. i think it's apples to oranges to the michael sam situation in my opinion. >> what i was looking for is intolerance, some people, considering maybe this helps with that but as you say, apples and oranges and we got to see if he makes the team. >> the amount of tweets i got last night when i posted the picture, the hate tweets to support tweets are 50/50 which is discouraging. >> that surprises me. >> we come a long way with the st. louis rams in the 40s drafting the first black player, now first openly gay player.

want to end, though, with the point that i am not sure that -- i am sure it is not going to be the panacea that some more like, overcoming the gaps that we have between different groups, not only racial but economic in terms of their ability to do academic work at a particular level. the problem is that when you grow up you are, to some extent, going to be a product of our environment. and there are a lot of reasons why children growing up today don't have the same and pantages and the same disadvantage as rory up. the most obvious one is, if you are of growing up in a home without a fallen. every social pathology that you can think of has a correlation with growing up in a single-parent household. and this is a problem that cannot be wished away and is not going to be solved by giving preferences when kids get to be 18 years old. you are more likely to drop out of school. you're more like the decontrol was cool. more likely to get into what the law. and this is true among -- when you compare different racial groups, for instance, more than seven out of ten african-americans are born out o

raising the minimum wage might afford a bump but it's hardly a panacea for families looking for families. >> i want to stay on your side of the aisle. let's done to jed bush. we talked about him, but last week we saw his brother the former president endorse the candidacy. i hope jed run, he would be a great president. according to the latest washington post. jed bush is sharing the top spot. >> is jed bush the level chance republicans have to regain the white house. jed is a fault leader of the republican party. he implemented policies as the governor of florida. be it education reform, that kata faulted him to the top of my party in terms of a fault leader. he has a built in political apparatus. people like me, frankly, that are waiting for the word go. so we can get to work on behalf of someone that we believe will lead the party out of a leadership vacuum. jed is the person to do that. >> your thoughts? >> i would love to be at a dinner table. george bush is going to endorse his brother. and barbara bush's mother said jed shouldn't run. jed bush will be a strong candidate. as we all k

user financing should be encouraged but it's not a panacea, in particular it's not well-suited for the task of restoring and maintaining the infrastructure we already have. this bread and butter work caused many tens of billions annually, and it cannot realistically be financed with tolls. broad-based funding like we have with the gas tax and we for this throughout the week, is and always will be a necessity. it remains the big range in our toolbox. whether we're talking building new facilities or repairing old ones, new methods of project delivery can make a big difference. unfortunately, we still lag a bit behind in this country. dominant practice here is what we call design bid build. where one team decides a project, a different one build to the project sponsors operate it at the end of the day. we talked earlier about silas. this is a perfect case for traditional methods in this country are very much title driven. but what is happening is a move towards design build, an incredible step where you marry a contractor and a designer and to develop a project in concert. you eliminate s

what we learned quickly is it is not a panacea. ge commercial were all of the specialists are in the audience. it is a great system, it does help you, but with the lack of other providers having electronic medical records technology, it is a little antisocial. we have information, but the information is not coming back to us. the other thing i would tell any of my colleagues and all of you who are impacting policy, buying the system is just the first of 100 costs. getting the hardware and software is important and keeping it maintained in providing support -- on a paper record system, circle, circle, circle, if your computer goes down, it it is a very different world. you may be able to go back to the circling on a paper, but someone is responsible for putting all of that information back into the electronic medical record so that we are still keeping that information. i would also say that not many providers have adopted yet. has, and wespital are fortunate to have built an interface with them, that there are three hospitals that

the bipartisan budget act is, by no means, a panacea for the level of indebtedness we face. the congressional budget office projects that federal debt will rise to 78 percent of gdp by 2024, ten years, which is about twice the average of the past four decades. net interest payments to finance this debt will almost quadrupled in the next ten years. discretionary spending, though, if we adhere to a current law, will shrink as a percentage of gdp. this highlights something that we are all aware of, mandatory spending growth is that true driver of our debt. indeed, entitlements are expected to grow by over 80 percent in the next ten years far more beyond that. unfortunate consequence of this is the crowding out of the important parts of the federal budget, such as spending on research to find a cure for diseases like cancer, diabetes, alzheimer's. even this year will have to make some tough decisions on what research and development programs marriage funding in our appropriation. budget pressures will, again, force us to prioritize these programs so that we can spend taxpayer do

i'm not suggesting any of this is a panacea. i am a student of good enough solutions.using this by knology -- ana logy, you have good enough. do we indict half the chinese military, sure. is this a perfect solution, no. is not a catastrophe you would have imagined if i had given you the scenario in the 1970's. this species has a history of muddling through. like huckleberry finn or exodus in the bibkle. those are all prevail stories. can we have scenarios where we have muddling through? maybe that is what control risk does. >> a couple of quick thoughts on regulation. with the life sciences, we have seen good self-regulation. over what to do with the smallpox virus. the bird flu question. within the scientific community, there are the roots of self-regulation we have seen over the years. it is not a bad thing. when it gets into the capitalist system, self-regulation begins to break down. look at general motors. there were a bunch of engineers that new too heavy a keychain would cause the driver to d ie. that never got reported because it would cost $.18 more purse whic

there's no panacea to the problem of gun violence, and not every death, even every mass shooting, canrevented, but health professionals going with those police who spoke to mr. rodgers after he was reported as being suicidal might have helped them to detect and even to treat the very severe mental illness that made him so dangerous to himself and others. mental health initiatives are part of a common ground. perhaps the point of consensus that can bring us together on both sides of the aisle. it should be bipartisan, and what we have to remember, carol is that very soon everyone will have known someone who has suffered from gun violence or will know someone among the 32,000 every year who are victims of gun violence. either by their own hand or others, and we need to remember that our community is ill if the withe -- filled with the people like the parents of javier martinez, we continue to grieve those 26 great educators and young children in sandy hook, every win of us will be touched by this problem, and we need to continue this effort. even if it doesn't eliminate every death. >>

mediation to say is no panacea for this problem what you must have is a political wheel on the part of leaders in israel and didn't by this time and then in order for them to market disagreement to their constituencies to their domestic audience they must have the support of not only the united states but of russia and the other members the other permanent members of the security council as well as the european union japan and other dollar countries such as these can be an even countries in order to financially back disagreement which is going to be very expensive you and i let a real effort by the united states or any other power will not do it must be truly international effort the new and crew members of the international space station are set to launch skywards in just a few hours and they believe world leaders could put their differences aside if they look to the world from a different perspective from space in fact on the russian american and german national or say they built solid friendship together suggesting that interests that affect international relations on earth do not a

i'm not going to sit here and tell you, senator ayotte, a panacea for every problem in the departmentefense, including all the acquisition issues. issues ints are key terms of whether we succeed in acquisition, as are the skills and the workforce, and frank is working this issue is hard. i believe we could help why -- byning our controls tightening our controls, and we want to do that in the process of getting the financial statements in terms of getting all of us, including frank and those, for better information. >> can i ask you about a particular one -- >> let me interrupt. here's the difference, op. in the -- here's they difference, bob. ceo's get companies, information every week. we do not have a. -- we do not have that. secretary hagel does not know the major acquisition programs, whether it be an enterprise resource program or a weapons system or anything else, he is not getting a weekly report, so he can act on it, because we do not have the information to give it to him. that is the key point. that is why the audit is important so you will get the financial information so y

however, we shouldn't pretend that faster permitting alone is a panacea. in addition the main barrier to u.s. exports to europe is not the permitting process. it is a fact that u.s. gas shipped to europe would be substantially more expensive than cheap russian gas. most experts agree that lng exports from the u.s. would be far more likely to go to asia where prices are higher than in europe. this is not to say that the u.s. -- but taking note that productive in that for conducting foreign policy the energy exports is complex. so how can we help ukraine, given these practical constraints? a number of efforts already under way. the u.s. is working with the eu and the international monetary fund on a number of efforts to move europe towards a greater diversity of energy sources. such as reversing flows of natural gas from existing pipelines into ukraine and further developing ukraine's own natural gas resource. encouraging energy efficiency rarely makes headlines, but in ukraine it could be a game changer. ukraine produces as much gas as it uses. but ukrainia

user financing should be encouraged but it is not a panacea. in particular is not well suited to the task of restoring maintaining the infrastructure we already have. this bread and butter were cost tens of millions annually and it cannot realistically be financed with tolls. broadbased funding white gas tanks and we heard this throughout the week, is and always will be a necessity. it remains the big ranch in our toolbox, whether we talk about building new facilities or repairing old ones new methods of project delivery can make a big difference. unfortunately we lag a little bit behind in this country. here is what we call design bills, one team designed the project, a different one builds it and the project sponsors operate at the end of the day. we talked earlier about silos. this is a case where traditional methods in this country are very much silo driven. what is happening is a move towards design build, an incremental step ten years ago. where we marry a contractor and the designer and developer contract in concert and eliminate the fic

user financing should be encouraged but it is not a panacea. well-suited to the task of restoring and maintaining the infrastructure we already have. this red and brother worked cost many tens of millions annually and cannot realistically be financed with tolls. broad-based funding like we have with the gas tax is and always will be a necessity. it remains the big wrench in our toolbox. whether we are talking about building new facilities or repairing old ones, new methods of project delivery can make a big difference. unfortunately, we still lag behind in this country. the dominant practice here is ld.t we call design, bid, buil we talked earlier about silos. the us is a case where the traditional methods in this country are very much silo driven. what is happening is a move toward design/build that started 10 years ago where you marry a contractor and designer to develop a project in concert. you will limit some of that frictional cost and effort and time that occurs in developing it in silos. that improve schedule, cost, and that can improve

user financing should be encouraged, but it is not the panacea. in particular it is not well suited to the task of restoring and maintaining the infrastructure we already have. this bread and butter were cost many tens of billions annually, and it cannot realistically be financed with tolls. broadbased funding like we have with the gas tax, is and always will be a necessity. it remains the big regional to locks. where there were talking of a building new facilities are repairing old ones, new methods of projects delivery can make a big difference. unfortunately we still like a bit behind in this country. the dominant practice here is what we call design, build, build where one team designs a project in the project's sponsors opera at the end of that today. we talked earlier about silos. this is a perfect case were traditional methods in this country are very much silo. what is happening is a move toward design build, an incremental step the started about ten years you were you married contractor and a designer and then develop the project in conce

i'm not suggesting any of this is panacea.ing i'm a student of good enough solutions and in this, using this by analogy you've got good enough -- does everybody's credit cards get stolen? sure. do we indict half the chinese military? sure. is this a perfect solution? no. but it is not the catastrophe that you would have imagined had i given you this scenario in the '70s. so, this species has a history of muddling through. i mean that is part of what prevail is all about, heroic muddling through, like huckleberry finn, exodus in the bible, those are prevail stories. that is the question i got, can we have scenarios where we have heroic muddling through? maybe that is what control risk does for a living. [laughing] >> let me, quick thoughts on regulation. first is in life sciences. i think we have seen some pretty good self-regulation. just recently, over, for example, what to do with the final smallpox virus. the modified bird flu question. within the scientific community there is the roots of some self-regulation that we've se

there's no panacea. no silver bullet here and i think the bjp recognize this. their supporters recognize this, in fact, we were out not too far from here a few blocks away which is where the bjp delhi headquarters are. there is a carnival atmosphere. still partying. people letting off firecrackers and there's even elephants and the elephant is a very useful analogy here. this was a jumbo victory by the bjp but it's an elephantine task to turn around this economy. a lot of -- a number of challenges they have keeping a lid on inflation, eradicating corruption and also attracting foreign direct investment in a bid to try to improve the capital -- the current account deficit. that's where we stand at the moment. back to you. >> okay, sri, we've been waiting for awhile -- >> yes. >> because elections take a while and this was the outcome that was -- that people thought and -- >> even better then people thought. way better. >> you know what's weird the way -- we'll bring in our international correspondent michelle caruso-cabrera but sri spoke about elephants. the uni

and when you tell people to change, you can't make that like a panacea like a magic wand. but you know, the struggle to change itself is beautiful. even though the hard days -- and i see my son, i'm very proud of him, because i see what he's gone through. i know the terrible things he's faced, the abuse he had from other guys. he had more neglect from me even though when i used to hit him when i shouldn't have hit him, he had abuse from other guys. his poor mom, too, and i want to give her credit, because she stood by. another troubled young person. and she stepped up. so it's good to hear him. i think one of the things that helps a lot is we went on a trip last year. he got off parole, so he could finally come to california. and the this crazy -- [inaudible] that he wanted. i helped him with it, and and we drove all the way from chicago to california. and, you know, it was one of the most beautiful trips. we came with a friend, a puerto rican poet, and we had a great time. and i never argued with him once. we just had a great time talking, sharing s and my son has become