by no means is laura's law a panacea for mental health treatment here in san francisco or for some who are suggested homeless. i view it as a tool in the tool box or our city to help us suffering from a clinically severe mental illness. i do believe we need to do more as a city and we need to change how we help those who are clearly suffering and cannot help themselves. in order to make a difference at the local level we need to challenge ourselves and challenge the status quo. to me laura's law is about helping vulnerable individuals suffering from mental illness here in san francisco to get the treatment they deserve and for their families. to save our city valuable financial and infrastructure resources and to improve public safety. and most importantly, positively impact the lives of families who are dealing with this illness. those in need deserve better and their families deserve better and our city can provide that option. i want to thank a number of people who have been supportive of this legislation. i mentioned my co-sponsors before. i want to thank mayor ed lee for his leade

are spread out around especially the northern part of iraq, so it's not as if air strikes are this panaceare you can see masked armies. they're now mixed with the population. it's not as easy as saying, let's have air strikes. >> stephen: should obama have sent advisers earlier, more north at all? and remember, whatever you think the answer, is he's wrong. >> just... isis was... the answer is it's not easy to criticize the president. basically it's hard to imagine if sending advisers much earlier would have kept isis from doing what it has done. take mosul. take some of the cities in the north. >> do you think this is... obviously you don't have the president's ear. but would you imagine that this is the first... would you imagine this is the first 300, you know, advisers? could we eventually be advising them from aircraft carriers or advising them from... you know, could we be carpet advising them or advising them with some sort of motorized vehicle with lots of armor on front. >> advising can mean a lot of things. every fiber of obama's body is probably saying, i'm not going to escalate

they are saying that emerging markets is no longer a panacea to the currency and tensions in russia. emerging markets is the place to be in china and they see the emerging markets growth. so good were the numbers that they are raising their forecast and they say it is going to be the same as last year. they said they are not going to until 2017.s back they bring it forward and they are going to see it once again. have onethat they now of the most exciting pipelines in the industry and 114 projects. remember that it is about experimental drugs and fighting cancer. they want to pay and they want need a that they do not partner like pfizer. they say they are going to and the sales by 2023 company has a long way to go in the next decade. >> you say they are better off alone and making acquisitions on their own. >> it is no longer. the buyers snapped up a company and respiratory drugs. they hundred $75 million could rise and there to be a development and sales school. they're focusing on respiratory illnesses and this is the area of growth. some blockbuster drugs are facing competition an

of easy policy negative interest rates in spain and ireland that's what's being offered up as the panacea going forward and so what they've said is basically going to get the same outcome because that's what caused the crisis and they're doing it again ok so very good time by the way that's the b.o.'s perspective do you agree with that what do you think definitely one hundred percent and you know the reason that we're doing this is because we have this sort of this paradigm which says that. you know the debt is always bad whether it's from the fiscal agent or from private sector agents and that means that when you get into a situation in which debt is high then everyone needs to start. cutting their debt back and when you have the fiscally agent sort of get in there that is the government cut their debt it just makes it even worst for the private sector because you're sucking money out of the economy private sector debt is high and what you get basically is a downward spiral of debt deflation so that's what we've seen when they've tried to do austerity night in a number of europe and so t

i'm not offering a new panacea. there are no panaceas, no utopias on the table. i'm just offering an ideal that i think has not been embraced enough by the development. it's as if development has been 99.9% about the material deprivation of poor people which strengthens, again, the bias towards considering technical solutions, the neglect of, you know, whether authoritarians are violating the rights of poor people. i'm just saying let's rebalance a little bit. rights of the poor are a good thing in and of themselves. we should not bias the debate. the positive debate on whether rights work in an authoritarian direction by some of the strange thing we did like excluding rich country cases. i'm saying let's have that debate, let's get those principles straight. and that becomes a guide that then is a guide towards how development happens. it happens by an ever growing degree of political and economic rights just as happened in u.s. history, for example. it wasn't that at the moment in 176 when the u.s. was -- 776 when the u.s. was hat half the level of -- at half t

i don't believe that this law is a panacea, as supervisor farrell said, but i do believe that the amendments that have been put in place address as much as possible some of the concerns that have been raised. and with that understanding, i believe that we have reached something that i can support at this time. again, i want to thank supervisor farrell. i want to thank all the community members for their input. and i do believe that it is possible for us to respectfully disagree on something as critical as important as this, but to make sure that whatever policy is implemented, it is implemented in such a way that always takes into account what's in the best interest of all the individuals involved. thank you. >> supervisor yee. >> thank you, president chiu. i also want to thank supervisor farrell for bringing this forward and for supervisor campos to introduce those amendments that made it much more acceptable for myself. i believe that this is -- this has been a very, very important conversation about how our city can address the needs of people living with mental illnesses. i've learned a

you know, again, it's not a panacea, but it is an important component to trying to restore some of theage that has been caused by not only the conduct that we were talking about here in the citi case but other financial institutions as well i. quickly again on the possibility of criminal charges, is that something justices actively are looking at? >> yes, and i don't want to speak in connection with any particular financial institution, so let me just say, generally, we are looking at all aspects. understand, the civil resolution is only one tool, but wherever the evidence leads, wherever the facts lead, we will not hesitate, if that is criminal, to bring those charges. >> woodruff: let me just bring a comment from the other side of the ledger and that is the banks. i know there were several reports that quoted top folks at citi saying, you know, they really had, as they put it, a relatively smaller share of the market, that they shouldn't be held as accountable as some other large institutions should have been. what do you say to that? >> well, i think the fact will there are some peo

it's not a panacea but it makes a difference in all of you because you have to walk out of your offices through the capital out through the door and people see you every day you don't get in the car and go taken through a gate. one thing i never worry about anymore i used to be worried about traffic congestion but there is none in america. i don't know what happened. you've talked to ordinary people, you walk outside. you see them. what do they talk about? this is one person and one job at a time, one opportunity at a time. and many more of you have successful programs in if i had an opportunity to go through them all because i know where i've been quite frankly you've been really cooperative in this outfit to give us all your best ideas of what's working in your state and what things are not working in your state but that's why we have invested nearly $2 billion in partnerships between businesses, community college and the result is real. the certificate degree programs designed by the employers who will hire the students when they complete them. that's why you we invested $100 million

. >> reporter: health care that covers everyone is a panacea steve supports, but he worries about thee're putting health care in the hands of a very few select people. if politics gets in the way enough, they can negatively impact my future. >> reporter: the times newspaper says the single payer system still has many hurdles to overcome. >> the state will need permission from the federal government. the governor here in vermont hopes to move quickly because right now he's got a friendly administration to work with and nobody knows what's going to happen in 2016. >> reporter: in derby line, they've lived side by side for generations with their neighbors to the north. but when it comes to government-run health care, will it be allowed to cross the border? for "meet the press," kevin tibbles. >> when we come back here, the big question that will be driving the conversation this week, "the new york times" with a bold statement about the legalization of marijuana when we get back.. be on at&t's network for $175 dollars a month? yup. all five of you for $175. our clients need a lot of atten

closer to care program, as you know, which uses private sector, but that does not mean it is the panacea that every veteran will get care overnight. we have to look at the systematic problems. and now you and i talked about this idea and we are doing in alaska. we have some logistic problems, billing problems, scheduling issues and how to make sure that the records are transferred properly between federal agencies and so forth. i know we will figure this out. but doesn't that seem like something we should be expanding and looking at around the country? i mean, federally qualified clinics, the one reason you have certain pay levels for doctors is so you have a controlled cost unit. now, it does mean that we will use private sector resources, as we are in alaska along with federally qualified. >> and our indian health services, otherwise known as we call the new model. don't you think this is a model that we could go after? i mean, again, i did not mean to get so aggravated about this. it is aggravated when people tell me this is a new-found problem . go ahead. sorry. there is my rant. the

we are seeing a short-term panacea that in the long term could cost year. still the second largest economy in the world, anything that endangers growth prospect there is something to take note of. >> is there a danger in the divergence we are seeing between the fed and everybody else? tends tos. economy react more quickly with less structural impediment. nosedivee first to once credit markets froze and it should not be a surprise that it's the one leading the way out. to some extent, it is good news for the markets we have some programs going and while some are withdrawing. a real concern would be if all of the central banks were acting in concert and polling funds at the same time. current estimates are $66 trillion or dollar equivalent. if everyone was moving at once, that would certainly rattle investors. >> true enough. certainly rattling investors hear about asia and emerging markets. speaking of this region, things are looking up in terms of manufacturing pmi figures coming out of china. do you think that's enough to sustain the outlook for the second

panacea, not a perfect, but we have to recognize that discretion, no matter how many phd's and respectve for the -- and respect we have for the experts, this is about taking the worst that world, not about the king the optimal. a little less -- not about picking the optimal. a little less discretion would give us better monetary policy in the future. >> mark, great conversation. thank you for joining us. mark calabria from the cato institute. he will be stepping before the house financial services committee tomorrow, talking about reforming the fed. >> coming up, how the vatican is just like wall street. when profits plunge, someone has got to take the fall. stay with us. you are watching "market makers" on bloomberg television. ♪ and him and him "market makersto "in the loo . andrew fry is covering this story from rome. first of all, what is the vatican bank even doing? >> the vatican bank takes care of its faithful, the clergy, and religious organizations, dividing financial transactions, a lot of money transfers around the world, and savings. it stores the money away like any kind o

i'm not saying that democracy is a panacea of all this.inconsistencies that we have had with democracy -- going back to cairo in 2009 and the speech in -- what has happened abterwards, the air uprisings, with the exception of tunisia, things have gotten worse. you look at the -- the new york times had an editorial that said egypt, exhibit a. morsi athe ouster of restoration of democracy. if we are looking at the basic ideas of this new generation coming in in afghanistan or in morocco where are they going to look at? -- and thealmost cold war we always stated that we had supported regimes because of security or against communism. after 9/11, and terrorism. -- against terrorism. we have negated these allies. we have to have a balance of hoc, and have a vision. you have to have a balance. i agree. it has to be a balance policy. you look at the past few years and that was a missing issue. you sit down and talk to the military side or the civilian side. i am not even talking about the grassroots. there are a lot of regions there. i have gotten

it's not a panacea but it makes a difference in all of you because you have to walk out of your offices through the capital out through the door and people see you every day you don't get in the car and go taken through a gate. one thing i never worry about anymore i used to be worried about traffic congestion but there is none in america. i don't know what happened. you've talked to ordinary people, you walk outside. you see them. what do they talk about? this is one person and one job at a time, one opportunity at a time. and many more of you have successful programs in if i had an opportunity to go through them all because i know where i've been quite frankly you've been really cooperative in this outfit to give us all your best ideas of what's working in your state and what things are not working in your state but that's why we have invested nearly $2 billion in partnerships between businesses, community college and the result is real. the certificate degree programs designed by the employers who will hire the students when they complete them. that's why you we invested $100 million

it is not a panacea. it is not a permanent solution to the v.a.'s problems. we need for starters a new leader. the v.a. has no permanent secretary. confirmation of a new one is imperative, but tough questions are absolutely essential to determine whether the president's nominee should be the one to lead this agency, and i'm certainly hoping that he will be. the veterans' affairs conference committee met on june 24, and i emphasized the importance at that hearing of honoring the commitment of our men and women in uniform by addressing the v.a. challenges with adequate funding and essential legislation, and i am hopeful that we will move quickly and effectively after that first june 24 meeting now to present to both houses a final version of this bill so that we can truly address the problems that our veterans deserve to be solved and the v.a. has an obligation to eliminate. we need to assure that the differences between the two bodies are resolved and send this bill to the president for his signature. a country that really values its veterans truly honors thei

tiberi, who has great insight, by the way, is not somebody who's saying, well, this is the panacea and it goes away. that was the hype during the stimulus debate. the characterization, well, you just spend $1 trillion and it's all going to be roses after that. there is hardly anybody that says the word stimulus on the other side of the aisle with a straight arrow. it's been completely eviscerated from the talking points at the white house. but the point is we can do something significant today, not monumental, not colossal but to characterize the type of growth that the tax foundation has said this will yield to as insignificant is either not a clear view of economic reality or just too dismissive and too much a view that we can just be save yors in this situation. we can do -- saviers in this situation. we can do some good things today. we can support the gentleman from ohio. we can move this economy forward. i urge an aye vote. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. the gentleman from michigan, mr. levin, is recognized. mr. levin: i yield myself 30 seconds. the sp

and i agree we use closer to care program but that doesn't mean that's the panacea that every veteran is going to get care overnight. we have to look at the systemic problems here that i know you and i have talked about this idea and what we're doing in alaska and i think -- we have some problems still. we have some logistics problems, building problems still. scheduling issues and how to make sure the records are transferred properly between federal agencies and i know we're going to figure the out. but doesn't that seem something we should be expanding and looking at around the country? federally qualified clinics, the one reason you have certain pay levels for doctors so you have a controlled cost unit. the private sector, you're not going to have a controlled cost. now, it does mean still we'll use private sector resources as we're doing in alaska along with federally qualified clinics and our indian health services otherwise known as the newcome model, a very impressive model. don't you think this is a model that we could actually go after some of this? again, i didn't mean to ge

to the tune of $350 billion since '08, and i don't come to you with any panacea on the federal angle of paying for this. but i do hearken the words of dr. burgess of saying that at some point in time we need to giving the states more flexibility. to the point that mr. cole raised with regard to, he sees firsthand experience apparently where states couldn't do things in a timely manner because of federal problems. so how do we do this? my understanding there might be another amendment, maybe already came here before, graves amendment or what have you to take a look at this issue. i would suggest that we have looked at this issue for some period of time. in fact we voted on this with a number of pieces of legislation repeatedly and that is to allow the states to have flexibility now, if they so want it, not compel them to. for those states who do not want to have the flexibility, they can continue to have the federal government tell them exactly what to do. and so this is a joint effort by mr. langford and myself to provide that flexibility in two different mechanisms. and to give the

i'm not saying that democracy is a panacea of all this. inconsistencies that we have had with democracy -- going back to cairo in 2009 and the speech in -- what has happened abterwards, the air uprisings, with the exception of tunisia, things have gotten worse. you look at the -- the new york times had an editorial that said egypt, exhibit a. morsi athe ouster of restoration of democracy. if we are looking at the basic ideas of this new generation coming in in afghanistan or in morocco where are they going to look at? -- and thealmost cold war we always stated that we had supported regimes because of security or against communism. after 9/11, and terrorism. -- against terrorism. we have negated these allies. we have to have a balance of hoc, and have a vision. you have to have a balance. i agree. it has to be a balance policy. you look at the past few years and that was a missing issue. you sit down and talk to the military side or the civilian side. i am not even talking about the grassroots. there are a lot of regions there. i have gotte

ideology is about getting government out of the lives of people when, in fact, government is not the panacea a role in the lives of people. and that is to support people into the middle class to create jobs and opportunities for all. >> representative barbara lee in san francisco. i so appreciate you pointing out that there's data, there's evidence, compelling questions. and then, of course, there's the issue of ideology. tianna and carl are going to stay with me. because when we come back, i want to dig a little deeper into the idea that a narrative can often have an impact on policy. for that part of the conversation, we're bringing in piper kermen. avo: waves don't care what age you are. take them on the way you always have. live healthy and take one a day men's 50+. a complete multivitamin with 7 antioxidants to support cell health. age? who cares. at legalzoom virtually all yourof important legal matters in just minutes. now it's quicker and easier for you to start your business, protect your family, and launch your dreams. at legalzoom.com we put the law on your side. it can help your

i'm not saying it's a panacea, but it will be a challenge. the problem on this drm tax stuff, this is not a very sexy or compelling topic. there are no political constituencies in developed countries that are going to get a congressional earmark, to use the american parlance to pay for tax inspectors. tax inspectors without borders, that gets the heart aflutter. it's darn important because that's where the money is, but it's very difficult in the american system to find money or force money because the foreign aid dollars are spoken for. everybody agrees this is important, but the bureaucratic politics and interest group politics in washington to how to allocate those monies goes somewhere else. not saying they are not valid and important projects, and everybody who fights and dies on that hill for their important piece of that pie, i'm sure will tell why you their slice is the most important, but i think that's where the money is and there is a lot of leverage there. we ought to be thinking about how we do. we'll have a report on this issue

que uno de los hombres mÁs ricos del mundo, el mexicano carlos slim cree tener la panacea para solucionarturaleza nunca supo tan rica. ♪ que llueva, se caiga del cielo y truene, lo Único que quieres es que yo te traiga el weather ♪ ♪ weather, se caiga el cielo y truene, lo Único que quieres es que yo te traiga el weather ♪ >> colombia, papÁ! >> ay, los quiero. la frase del dÍa, no permitas que tus miedos ocupen el lugar de tus sueÑos. hoy tenemos tiempo severo para lo que es texas, louisiana, arkansas. tenemos avisos y alertas de inundaciones para estos estados. hay lluvia para houston en un 80% una temperatura mÁxima de 87 grados. otras aberturas mÁximas que tenemos, nueva york 81, miami 91, un dÍa mayormente nublado para miami. algÚn que otro chubasco aislado. san francisco 68, los Ángeles 78. >> no sÉ pero esto es lo mÁs bonito que vi. felicidades. algo. ok. >> bueno. y los invito a que me sigan en mis redes sociales, @ximenacordoba y me envÍan sus frases del dÍa. ¿quÉ voy a hacer con jomari? >> es que eso pasa cuando la gente no duerme lo suficiente pero te la pasaste bien, jomari. >>

i'm not saying democracy is the panacea of all of this, but the inconsistencies that we have had with democracy going back to the cairo speech 2009, then the speech at 2010 with first west point speech, and what has happened afterwards post-arab uprisings, if you want to call it spring. i like spring a little better than what's going on there, but with the exception of tunisia, that is one exception, it's struggling but it's still an exception, things have gotten worse in every case if you look at it as a "new york times" a while ago an editorial called "egypt exhibit a" and failing to support a democratic movement. even we called the ouster of morsi, not that morsi was any great person, the restoration of democracy. if that goes on and if year looking at the basic idea of this new generation coming in whether it be in afghanistan in the east or all the way to morocco in the west, where are they going to look at because it becomes almost -- in the cold war we always stated that, you know, we have supported regimes because of security or, you know, regimes are against communism and lat

that doesn't mean it's the panacea that every veteran is going to get care overnight. we have to look at the systemic problems here. that i know you and i have talked about this idea and what we're doing in alaska. and i think it has been successful. we have some problems still. we have logistics problems, billing problems still. we have some scheduling issues and how to make sure the records are transferred properly between federal agencies and so forth. i know we're going to figure this out. but doesn't that seem like something we should be expanding and looking at around the country? i mean, federally qualified clinics, one reason you have certain pay levels for doctors. so you have a controlled cost unit. and the private sector you're not going to have a controlled cost unit. now it does mean still we'll use private sector resources as we're doing in alaska along with federally qualified clinics and our indian hills services, otherwise known as what we call the nuka model, impressive model of delivery of health care. don't you think this is a model that we could ac

i'm not going to sit here and tell you that financial statement audits are a panacea for every department in the department of defense, including all the acquisition issues. requirements are a key issue in terms of determining whether we succeed in acquisition, as are the skills of the workforce, and i think frank kendall is works those issues hard, but i believe we can help by tightening our controls, and we will have to do that in the process of getting financial statements -- in terms of giving all of us, including frank contend add and those who work for him did -- >> can i ask about a particular one -- >> can i interrupt for a second? >> sure. >> here's the difference, bob. in a large business with big acquisitions, the ceos getting a report every week, whether it's on time or on budget. we don't have that. secretary hagel does not know the major acquisition programs, whether it's an enterprise resources program or weapons system or anything else. he's not getting a weekly report, because we don't have the information to give it to him. that's the key point. that's why the audit is i