to offer a reward of a $45,000 for kill or capture of geronimo. 30 years later in response to pancho villa raid into columbus new mexico, it woodrow wilson announced "inadequate force will be sent at once in pursuit of the single object to capture and put a stop to his foray. now with the 1989 invasion of panama with george h. to be bush declared the capture of general noriega was the ultimate objective. in fact, they have deployed military force with the objective of killing or capturing an individual nearly one dozen times since 1885 this strategic history in the lessons they can learn. it is a reasonable question to ask with the monegan dead why should we care about geronimo of our looking for a vested sandino what applicability does that have? besides of cool story the reality is there will increasingly be attractive for several reasons. and from the joint chief of staff it was noted a president has to rally the country with the policy would that is where it is tough to get public opinion against political distractions. but iman and -- among the conflicts the sensitivity to, at and cas

if you do more tigs you find out, actually, after pancho villa and his cut throats had come into the united states proper and killed some americans, woodrow wilson ordered american troops led by pershing to go into mexico to pursue these murderers and end their killing spree and make it clear that there would be dire consequences for coming into the united states illegally. one report i read said there had been as many as 100,000 or more national guard troops put on the u.s. southern border, pershing went in, depending on the account you believe, 10,000, 14,000 troops inta mexico, pursuing pancho villa, kill manage of his lieutenants, never got pancho villa, but it ended for a long time anybody coming illegally into the united states to commit a crime on u.s. soil. woodrow wilson was not really considered a warmonger. as a university president. but he understood when the nation is under attack, whether it's from pancho villa or drug smugglers today, we took an oath, we must follow. and supporting and defending the constitution means providing for the common defense. and if people are

and then you get the columbus, new mexico into that we're pancho villa -- whereupon trivia killed some american national's. that is another disaster. there is a lot of controversy about mexico. there's a lot of criticism about preparedness and the wilson administration. these are things that hughes played on. >> welcome to the conversation. this is curtis. >> thank you. i just wanted to talk about a very important assertion that hughes wrote about. i will get through this quickly. the national recovery act was ruled unconstitutional in 1935 and a year later the national labor relations act was passed and they thought that was going to be ruled unconstitutional, but then it came to the high court in 1937. i think the high court was under pressure to change their position from ruling new deal laws unconstitutional, and hughes wrote that decision. i think the moral to that story is even the high court can be put under political pressure to change their position. thank you very much. >> thank you. >> it is a crucial point and a crucial point of contention among historians, the question of

and then you get the columbus, new mexico incident where pancho villa killed some american nationals. that is another disaster. there is a lot of controversy about mexico. there's a lot of criticism about preparedness and the wilson administration. these are things that hughes played on. >> welcome to the conversation. this is curtis. >> thank you. i just wanted to talk about a very important assertion that hughes wrote about. i will get through this quickly. the national recovery act was ruled unconstitutional in 1935 and a year later the national labor relations act was passed and they thought that was going to be ruled unconstitutional, but then it came to the high court in 1937. i think the high court was under pressure to change their position from ruling new deal laws unconstitutional, and hughes wrote that decision. i think the moral to that story is even the high court can be put under political pressure to change their position. thank you very much. >> thank you. >> it is a crucial point and a crucial point of contention among historians, the question of what's defeated the c

and then you get the columbus, new mexico incident where pancho villa killed some american nationals.rica since the expeditionary force into mexico. that is another disaster. there is a lot of controversy about mexico. there's a lot of criticism about preparedness and the wilson administration. these are things that hughes played on. >> welcome to the conversation. this is curtis. >> thank you. i just wanted to talk about a very important assertion that hughes wrote about. i will get through this quickly. the national recovery act was -- the national industrial recovery act was ruled unconstitutional in 1935 and a year later the national labor relations act was passed and they thought that was going to be ruled unconstitutional, but then it came to the high court in 1937. jones and laughlin steel. i think the high court was under pressure to change their position from ruling new deal laws unconstitutional, and hughes wrote that decision. it ruled that the national labor relations act was constitutional. i think the moral to that story is even the high court can be put under political