peer review panel anywhere and that's fine with me. so there was a practicing structural engineer, license structural engineer who was a member of the peer review panel, and there is a geotechnical engineer who was also involved with that panel. we were hired by, i think the developer was jack myers. >> that is correct. >> i haven't heard the name in a while, but he was the developer in that case. so i presume our contract was through him and the maintenance of record was clav chic and ron was the -- i don't remember the plan checker. >> the plan checker was tom huey. >> quite possible. that's how that project was set up. i can give my own version of the firsthand history of what happened there. >> going back to the role of educators in peer reviewers, back to the case, the peer reviewers were paid by the developers, but in the case of 80 natoma, your duty, i don't want to put words in your mouth was related to the department of building and safety even though your client was the developer? >> yes. the duty is really to the city, but t

the second panel is an industry-specific panel. our broader panel this morning, i think you'll agree, is superbly constructed to give us a variety of viewpoints. to my right, a noted economist, trade policy expert. he's written broadly and deeply about trade and globalization issues over the years. to his right is matt gold who is the -- was the deputy assistant u.s. trade rep for north america. so is deeply schooled in the mechanics of nafta, and also is a professor at fordham. so he will give us the legal underpinnings. what's the legal reality of what the president can actually do on his own. for what does he need congress. for what does he need an actual renegotiation. behind him is fia lee who is for many years one of the leading voices from the labor movement on international trade and on nafta and is someone who is extremely thoughtful on the issues affecting the labor community. she'll help us understand labor's perspective on a nafta renegotiation. and then to her right is antonio ortiz mena, a long-time mexican government

peer review panel anywhere and that's fine with me. so there was a practicing structural engineer, license structural engineer who was a member of the peer review panel, and there is a geotechnical engineer who was also involved with that panel. we were hired by, i think the developer was jack myers. >> that is correct. >> i haven't heard the name in a while, but he was the developer in that case. so i presume our contract was through him and the maintenance of record was clav chic and ron was the -- i don't remember the plan checker. >> the plan checker was tom huey. >> quite possible. that's how that project was set up. i can give my own version of the firsthand history of what happened there. >> going back to the role of educators in peer reviewers, back to the case, the peer reviewers were paid by the developers, but in the case of 80 natoma, your duty, i don't want to put words in your mouth was related to the department of building and safety even though your client was the developer? >> yes. the duty is really to the city, but t

the second panel was an industry specific panel. our broader panel this morning i think you'll agree is superbly constructed to give us a variety of viewpoints. to my right is yuri dilush, noted economist, trade policy expert. he has written broadly and deeply about trade and globalization issues over the years. to his right is matt gold, who is, was the deputy assistant u.s. trade rep for north america. so is deeply schooled in the mechanics of nafta, and also is a professor at fordham. so he will give us the legal underpinnings. what is the legal reality of what the president can actually do on his own. for what does he need congress? for what does he need an actual renegotiation. beyond him is thea lee, who is, for many years has been one of the leading voices from the labor movement on international trade and on nafta, and is someone who is extremely thoughtful on the issues affecting the labor community. she will help us understand labor's perspective on nafta renegotiation. and then to her right is antonio mena, long-timex can

peer review panel anywhere and that's fine with me. so there was a practicing structural engineer, license structural engineer who was a member of the peer review panel, and there is a geotechnical engineer who was also involved with that panel. we were hired by, i think the developer was jack myers. >> that is correct. >> i haven't heard the name in a while, but he was the developer in that case. so i presume our contract was through him and the maintenance of record was clav chic and ron was the -- i don't remember the plan checker. >> the plan checker was tom huey. >> quite possible. that's how that project was set up. i can give my own version of the firsthand history of what happened there. >> going back to the role of educators in peer reviewers, back to the case, the peer reviewers were paid by the developers, but in the case of 80 natoma, your duty, i don't want to put words in your mouth was related to the department of building and safety even though your client was the developer? >> yes. the duty is really to the city, but t

to step down from a white house advisory panel.ordstrom, dropping the first daughter's clothing line back in january, with neiman marcus and following suit, prompting a tweet from president trump yesterday: "my daughter has been treated so unfairly by nordstrom. she is a great person-- always pushing me to do the right thing! terrible!" so are we seeing the rise of a new partisan consumerism, echoing the country's polarized politics? we invited two harvard business school professors, nancy koehn and len schlesinger, to answer the question. >> what we're seeing now is the culmination or perhaps the next logical step of a long series of events and trends among consumers, where they use their dollars to vote on social, political and economic issues. >> and relative to today's administration there are countless examples of how that's being played out on a daily basis. so we have the scenario of the ivanka merchandising line which has now been essentially removed from nordstrom and neiman marcus. a hashtag boycott nordstrom, a hashtag b

the second panel is an industry-specific panel. our broader panel this morning, i think you'll agree, is superbly constructed to give us a variety of viewpoints. to my right is uri dadush, a noted economist trade policy expert. he's written broadly and deeply about trade and globalization issues over the years. to his right is matt gold who is the -- was the deputy assistant u.s. trade rep for north america. so is deeply schooled in the mechanics of nafta, and also is a professor at fordham. so he will give us the legal underpinnings. what's the legal reality of what the president can actually do on his own. for what does he need congress. for what does he need an actual renegotiation. beyond him is thea lee, who for many years one of the leading voices from the labor movement on international trade and on nafta and is someone who is extremely thoughtful on the issues affecting the labor community. she'll help us understand labor's perspective on a nafta renegotiation. and then to her right is antonio ortiz mena, a long-time mexica

this has been an amazing panel. one of the questions i want to ask, we have the opportunity of working across the country trying to do the transformation of clinical practices and we're seeing the challenges with the small practices. clearly the data, you're exactly right. they cannot get the data. they're almost held hostage by their own data. i appreciate your comment about the social determinatives because many clinicens are trapped by the challenges that their patients -- that the diseases and the social -- health care is far more than health. so my question to you is what are some solutions that you as policy makers and analyzing this around this ehr, that's one of the biggest barriers across the system, but particularly with a small rural docs are facing. that's one question around ehr how do we get around this. two, what are some of your thoughts around risk adjusted payments because as we move through acos. there's the option of cherry picking. how do we manage those. those two big issues, ehr and risk adjus

the farmers who put solar panels in their fields. all will be explained.irst: we start with president trump's travel ban which has faced its toughest test yet. a panel of appeals courtjudges hammered away at the government's arguments that the ban was motivated by terrorism fears. but they also asked pointed questions over claims it targeted muslims. the hearing was conducted by phone — an unusual step — and while no verdict was announced a spokesman for the court said it's likely to come later this week. whatever the court eventually decides, either side could ask the supreme court to intervene which almost certainly means more delay and confusion for millions of people around the world and also for some of the united states‘ biggest businesses. president trump has been trying to temporarily ban people entering the us from seven countries. he says "this is about terror and keeping our country safe" while a stricter vetting system is put in place. but there have been widespread protests against the ban — 127 companies including the likes of apple, google,

maybe the judge thought the panel got it wrong. judge got it right for maybe wrong legal reason. no wray to be heard whether the decision will be affirmed or reversed. there is no way to know. melissa: barbara smith. thank you. appreciate it. >> thank you. david: meanwhile on the other side of the border german chancellor angela merkel reportedly paying migrants to leave germany. she is facing intense criticism over germany's open door policy which has seen more than a million migrants flood into the country. her 16-point plan would speed up removal of rejected asylum-seekers. here is the controversial part. offer migrants $95 million of cash incentives to withdraw the asylum applications and leave. merkel is up for re-election in september. no telling whether this will help or hurt. a bribe to leave. a bribe to leave. >> amazing. the happiest place on earth just got even more expensive. details on the disney price hike, what it means for your wallet. >>> plus avoiding possible deportation. one group's advice to illegal immigrants

the panel heard an argument from the justice department. the judges pressed both sides on key aspects of this case. the court challenged the trump administration's lawyer to prove that concerns over political -- i should say over potential terror attacks drove the president to issue the ban. the judges challenged the lawyer from minnesota and washington state to show the president's ban targets muslims in a way that targets the constitution. while that is going on in a court fight, the president set his sights on nordstrom for dropping first daughter ivanka trump's clothing brand tweets "my daughter ivanka has been treated so unfairly by nordstrom. she's a good person. pushing me to do the right thing." nordstrom executives say they dropped the brand because they say it's not selling well. shoppers have been calling to boycott the line. so with all of that, we turn to john roberts live on the north lawn this afternoon. what more are we learning about the court battle over this travel ban, john? >> really does come down to two arguments, she

we saw "the washington post" bob woodward in the first panel. "the post" executive editor martin barron will be on the second panel. we'll have that for you in about 15 minutes here on c-span3. in the meantime some news to make awe ware of senate republicans plan to confirm president trump's nominee to lead the environmental mental protection agency. scott proulx pruitt is closely aligned with oil and gas companies democrats say and they want a delay in the vote. senator susan collins is the only republican voting against mr. pruitt and a couple of democrats said they're voting for him. watch that vote live on c-span2 starting at 1:00 eastern. also this news, former republican house leader bob michael has passed away. he served as minority leader for 14 years, and he managed passage of many initiatives by two republican presidents through democratically controled congresses. mr. michael retired one election too soon to be a part of the republican house majority that swept into power in 1994, former leader bob michael was 93 years old. and here a

translation: solar panels can generate electricity and underneath we grow mushrooms.lity and good for the world. looking at the regional stock markets, as you can see most markets are in positive territory. tokyo's stocks are higher, driven by a cheaper yen and gains on wall street. thanks so much for investing your time with us. sport today is coming up next. the top stories this hour: president trump hopes to get his travel ban reinstated. a court in san francisco has just finished hearing the arguments for and against, as protests continue. the visionary swedish professor hans rosling, who made graphs and data fun, has died at the age of 68. children as young as ten are feeling the pressure to look good in selfies, that's according to a survey for bbc newsround. it found that more than half of ten to 12—year—olds they questioned used social media to share selfies, and three quarters said looking good was important. but many also said they didn't like their parents putting pictures of them online, as david sillito now reports. you get likes, and you get comments. so

action. >> joining us again, our fabulous panel.m eisen and alan derrish wits. professor, if michael flynn had that conversation before president trump took office, that, we understand, would violate the logan act of 1798 which we are told you are an expert in. how do you see this? >> one prosecution under the act for a farmer back in 1803. if the logan act were ever enforced, jimmy carter and jesse jackson would be sharing a jail cell today because they both engaged in so much activity in violation of the logan act. jimmy carter advised yasser arafat not to accept bill clinton's peace offer in 2000-2001. ronald reagan's people negotiated with the ayatollah's people. this is a dead letter. let's criticize him for what he said and what he did and maybe not telling the truth about it, but forgot about the logan act. >> george logan, the doctor who it was named after, became senator right after it was put into effect. obviously not much bite on him. isn't the law a distraction here, norm eisen? isn't this about this bigger question now

back with my panel now. pamela back to you. now that the ninth circuit court has ruled, what happens next? >> couple of things could happen. as we know the department of justice is looking at opinion released by the ninth circuit court and trying to figure out what the next step is. appeal to enbank, essentially ask judges of the ninth circuit to review the case or appeal to the supreme court. as you know, eight justices in the supreme court because scalia's seat hasn't been filled. if 4-4 split there, what the ninth circuit court ruled today would stand. so number of options. as we discussed, the administration could go back to the drawing board with the executive order and rework it or start new. a number of things could happen from here. but as you heard president trump say today, insinuated, legal battle will continue and see you in court. >> jim acosta caught up with kellyanne conway. listen. >> he sees it as what he's always seen it as, statute provides president trump with great latitude and authority to protect the nati

will a three-judge panel lien state the ban that caused so much confusion and outrage. under threat. even as the new attorney general takes charge, we're learning about concerns of the judiciary in danger tonight. disheartening dispute. president trump refuses to accept that the supreme court nominee criticized his verbal attacks on federal judges. i'll ask a top senator why mr. trump is casting doubts on comments that were confirmed by members of his own party. wrong, wrong, wrong. top party member is new rebuking kellyanne conway for promoting ivanka trump's clothing line on television. will she be punished. we want to welcome our viewers in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer. you're in the "the situation room." >> announcer: this is cnn breaking news. >>> we're following multiple breaking stories right now. including a decision on the immediate fate of the president's controversial travel ban. the ninth circuit court of appeals says it will issue its ruling tonight on the trump administration's wish to reinstate the ban. and threats have been ma

the oral arguments are going to take place in front of this panel of three judges.us a little bit more about these judges. you've taken a look at their background. >> you know, it's a very eclectic group. he's 85 years old, appointed by jimmy carter. he's former vice-president mondale's brother-in-law as well as former professor at arizona state university's law school. the other democratic appointee, michelle freed land, is one of the youngest federal judges in the united states. he was -- she was just appointed by president obama. she's only 44 years old. she's a former supreme court law clerk to sandra day o'connor. the third judge, richard clifton, is hawaiian. and even more unusually, he's a republican from hawaii. there are not a lot of republicans from hawaii. he was appointed by president george w. bush in 2002. he just took senior status, which means he, like judge canby is on a lesser schedule. it is an unpredictable group. none of the three have records that would lead you to predict definitely how they would come out one way or another. but we'll certain

in moments, we will be joined by a powerful panel. we begin with trace gallagher, reporting from our west coast newsroom on how we got here. good evening, trace. >> good evening, martha. the executive order was a result of extreme vetting president trump promised during the campaign. a part of nearly all travelers except u.s. citizens from iraq, syria, sudan, iran, yemen. it suspended their refugee program for 120 days to get rid of homeland security a chance to review procedures. there is a question to how much guidance homeland security and department of justice were given to implement the order. even many who support the intent order criticize the rollout in the chaotic aftermath. when the order was signed, some visa holders and refugees were already flying to the new u.s. upon arrival, they were detained and in some cases, turned around. listen. >> they gave us no time to repair so you're getting on this flight, thinking that you can go to america with a valid visa and you can be able to get through, and then you can. >> we are a

unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel means citizens of the muslim majority countries can travel freely to the united states. the judges determining the government relied too heavily on executive power for the ban. the president saying see you in court. security of our nation is at stake. moments later, he spoke to reporters at the white house. >> it is a political decision. we will see them in court. >> you believe the -- >> we have a situation where the security of our country is at stake. it is a serious situation. we look forward as i said to seeing them in court. >> does this under cut the early days of your presidency? >> this is a decision that came down. >> democrats and refugee groups applauding the court ruling. next, seek reexamination of the case by the larger panel of the judges or appeal directly to the supreme court. >> the travel ban triggered outrage. in iran today, one of the seven nations targeted by the ban, a large anti-american protest planned. for more on that and other reaction to the court ruling, we bring in cnn's frederik pleitgen in tehran. fred, what are peo

not only a distinguished panel, but a panel with a wide range of interests and areas of expertise. i will now turn it over to rachel. rachel: i cannot say how much it means to be here. a panel on one's work is something that historians dream of, or perhaps, dread a little. so i would like to thank the american history center, the aha, my longtime colleagues, and all of you for turning up here. this is especially significant bigme because like many historical projects, this one also has deep historical and personal roots. i grew up on a farm, surrounded by 1000 acres of wheat, beans, and barley, dairy cattle and beef cattle. my father farmed but my mother just cooked. she had no choice but to just cook. that came with the territory. in some ways, this is a tribute to her because she would love to be doing what i am doing now and have had a chance to develop her own career and her own ideas, but no choice. the project actually started in earnest in the early 1980's at the university of hawaii where i engaged in long conversations with jerry bentley and visitors to hawaii in world his

we'll continue with our panel after this.

i think it's great panel. i think what you're doing about focusing on delivery reform is very important. it's an essential thing to help the patient to figure out what they need to do, what's best treatment for them. i know there's a lot of emphasis on cost. my question is where do you factor in or do you factor in the need to train the next generation of physicians who need to do research? if you're always looking for cost savings, does that ever factor in to it? >> we talk about that that needs to be done. >> what is your responsibility? >> what is our responsibility as the payer? >> yes. >> we work with our health plans to ensure that all of our payment structures are based on evidence based medicine, right and so, you know, all the medical directors that we work with are insuring that our programs are aligned with that and then that goes back out into the medical community. so i'd say that would be the angle that i would say we are connected to, but i don't -- i think you raise a good question, but it's no

we have a great panel today to discuss ukraine, past and present. can't think of a better group to discuss this today. before we begin with some questions that i will moderate, introduced the full panel. as you know we have ambassador john herbst. john is at the director of the eurasia center here at the atlantic council. also the former u.s. ambassador to ukraine. next we have nadia. to her left is naphtail rivkin, a research fellow at the victims of communism memorial foundation and last but not we have michael sawkiw. michael is the director of the ukraine national information service which is part of ukrainian congress committee of america. he's also the chair of the u.s. committee. michael, if you don't mind i will start with you and then we'll work our way back. very little is known to the outside world even in eastern europe of the events of holodomor. can you talk about this lack of information and lack of understanding, specifically what many would describe as the soviet disinformation campaign, which you during 1932-1933, and really since

not only interesting which panel, but a panel with a wide sange of interest expertise. i will now turn it over to rachel. i cannot say how much it means to be here. a panel on one's work is something that historians dream of, or perhaps, dread a little. i would like to thank the american history center, the ah colleagues, and .ll of you this is especially significant for me. historicale projects, this one also has deep personal roots. on a farm, surrounded by 1000 acres of wheat, beans, and barley. cooked.r just she had no choice but to just cook. that came with the territory. tributeways, this is a to her because she would love to be doing what i am doing now and have had a chance to develop her own career and ideas, but no choice. the project ashley started in earnest in the early 1980's at the wrist of hawaii where i engaged in long conversations with visitors to hawaii and world history about food history. course began teaching a in food history, but in those days needed special permission from the dean. transformed into "cuisine and empire: cooking in world history

>> coming up, we will go to a panel focusing on a range of topics, including civic engagement, state power, and the job market. you are watching live coverage from the national governors association winter meeting in washington. the meeting continues this afternoon in washington, d.c. with transportation secretary elaine chao discussing infrastructure needs. we will have it for you, live, at 1:45 p.m. eastern here on c-span. while we are waiting for the next meeting, several of president trump's cabinet nominees face a senate vote in the week ahead as congress returns monday from their presidents' day break. a capitol hill reporter looks at that and other issues ahead for the house and senate. >> so, we would by not only the land, we would buy the [indiscernible] and then we would build buildings. deal that we had before was defined by the city. >> senior senate staff writer at cq roll call. the senate, set to vote on for a president trump us nominees. beginning monday, with wilbur ross. tell us about the status of each of these four nominees and how each of them will fare. >> well,

most private physicians, primary care physicians probably have a panel of 4000 patients, large panel seen 25, 30 patients a day to make it financially, so they are on a treadmill. this particular program cuts the panel size down to about 900 patients on their panel, so they have a lot more time and i think it's giving them the time to do the job they were trained to do and i think primary care all too often for the physicians that our primary care are on a treadmill and just going from room to room to room. that is sad. they don't have real time to do what they were trained to do and we are working to change that, but it comes with a big price tag. >> sometimes you go to a hospital and you see someone from 11 to seven ended in a new guy comes in until 3:00 p.m. and then three to 11. they are employed by the hospital. [inaudible] [inaudible question] [inaudible question] [inaudible question] [inaudible question] >> first of all, if your doctor has privileges at the hospital he certainly can come in and see you. if he doesn't have privileges, he can't come in and see you and that is tr

thank you, panel. that is that for the panel.p next, how one senior senator shows he .hows he . . ♪ >> bret: gorgeous night on capitol hill, finally, you are a teenager, you want to challenge a senior senator. a senior senator is in pretty good shape. 83-year-old iowa senator chuck grassley was challenged to a push-up contest by a high school senior during a recent visit. here's what happened. [applause] [cheers and applause] [laughter] >> you win. >> bret: 83, he wins. thanks, everybody. that is it for the "special report." fair, balanced, unafraid. "the first 100 days" with sandra smith filling in for sandra smith filling in for >> tuesday february 28th and this is a fox news alert. plane casual horror, trip to disney depends disaster when a plane crashes into a neighborhood. >> we also found an additional victim that was ejected from the airplane. >> what we learned about the people on board. >> and president trump is set to lay out vision for the country in front of congress. >> all i can do is speak from the heart and say wh

kennedy: the party panel returns. what happens when the president's crackdown goes from from -- the protest in phoenix raising questions. we will discuss that, next. kennedy: hi there. protests over president trump's down on illegal immigration have erupted in phoenix and it all has to do with a 36 yoke mother of two. the woman has reportedly been in the country for years but she has a felony record for forging documents in 2008 presents and she said she has checked in with immigration officials every year to update your status and when she did so last week they could detain turn under the new rules from the president's executive order she has been deported. here's where it gets a little messy and via their protest printer printer husband and son are u.s. citizens of the family could be torn in half so should she get a break or should the new rules be enforced strictly and equally for everyone. the party panel is back. evan and i will start with you. i actually feel bad for this one because i think the immigration law

you are one of two russians on the panel. snowden says obviously i'm not a spy because russia would never do that to one of their own. >> this what happens when you have squeeze the juice out of after lemon and the lemon gets thrown in the garbage. so what ends up happening web's disposable because whatever they got out of edward snowden they got upon arrival. whether he returns him intact or not intact. the real point is he's not setting him back. it makes sense for russia. they want to do them a giant favor. >> i think it would be big head cake for the administration. i think snowden has enough you fourth on both sides of the aisle. so i think this is just them playing footy with each other in public. people are sending out trial balloons. but the relationship will be getting much weirder the next four years. kennedy: do you have think snowden states in russia? dose self deport? >> how much more favor with putin think he can curry? putin according to trump is on a moral level with the united states. that's a pretty emphatic

peer review panel anywhere and that's fine with me.o there was a practicing structural engineer, license structural engineer who was a member of the peer review panel, and there is a geotechnical engineer who was also involved with that panel. we were hired by, i think the developer was jack myers. >> that is correct. >> i haven't heard the name in a while, but he was the developer in that case. so i presume our contract was through him and the maintenance of record was clav chic and ron was the -- i don't remember the plan checker. >> the plan checker was tom huey. >> quite possible. that's how that project was set up. i can give my own version of the firsthand history of what happened there. >> going back to the role of educators in peer reviewers, back to the case, the peer reviewers were paid by the developers, but in the case of 80 natoma, your duty, i don't want to put words in your mouth was related to the department of building and safety even though your client was the developer? >> yes. the duty is really to the city, but the

the panel also found two major things.e talked about factors earlier in the show that the cowrmt would look at. the government did not show a likelihood of success on the merits and the government did not show a likelihood of irreparable injury if the executive order did not go forward. so you take that apart. first of all, on the injury side of things, the panel said basically it pressed the government for evidence of the harm that would result if the order, if the executive order did not go forward, but the government did not provide enough evidence of that. the court found that the temporary restraining order simply returned the status quo that's been there for years. >> woodruff: to interrupt, that was looking for evidence of a potential terrorist attack by one of these individuals? >> or other types of harm. there just wasn't enough evidence. on the likelihood of success on the merits, the court found that, again, the government did not show enough evidence to support its arguments that this was a neutral document. th

kennedy: the party panel returns. what happens when the president's crackdown goes from from -- the protest in phoenix raising questions. we will discuss that, next. dear predictable, there's no other way to say this. it's over. i've found a permanent escape from monotony. together, we are perfectly balanced, our senses awake, our hearts racing as one. i know this is sudden, but they say: if you love something... set it free. see you around, giulia ♪ why is there neverite, enough of it? a john deere 1 family tractor with quik-park lets you attach and go. imatch quick-hitch gives you more time for what you love. so it takes less work to do more work. autoconnect drive-over mower deck? done. they're not making any more land. but there's plenty of time if you know where to look. now you can own a 1e sub-compact tractor for just $99 a month. learn more at your john deere dealer. kennedy: hi there. protests over president trump's down on illegal immigration havl has to do with a 36 yoke mother of two. the woman has reporte

matt schlapp: what a great panel. [applause] matt schlapp: let's think ralph and rick for byron being here with us today. [applause] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2016] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] announcer 1: live now to the jw marriott hotel in washington dc for the national governors association holding its winter meeting in the nation's capital, and a discussion coming up in just a few moments on cyber security your governors will this afternoon. live on c-span. should be getting underway in just a few moments. several of president trump's cam and -- candidate nominees face of the ahead as congress returns from the presidents' day break. while we wait for the mga panel to get started, a capital reporter looks at that and other issues ahead for the house and senate. writer that had fourenate set to vote on of the nominees next week. commerceur ross, the secretary. tell us how they will f

which were validatedly a nafta panel. suddenly members of congress discovered that motion cowas vital for their exports of agricultural goods, manufacturing. sometimes people appreciate something when they lose it. i hope we don't wait until that. >> and the other part of steve's question. yeah, where is trump going to compromise, or does we -- will he go for the doom's day scenario or will he massage and declare victory? >> i don't think there's an absolute answer to that question. this is a game. it's a very complicated game. and it will depend critically on the willingness and ability of your trading partner to retaliate. and to make clear that they will retaliate. and second, it will depend critically on the ability of those in the united states who clearly are going to lose out from a collapse of nafta to make their voices heard. so there's no absolute answer. a lot of it -- unfortunately i'm an economist but vi to reduce it to. this. you have to have guts. that's what it's about. >> one. of the things that donald tr

this three-judge panel is not deciding whether the order is constitutional.hether president obama exceed his presidential authority or whether it's in the national interest. they are only deciding whether the re-straining order on the ban should remain in place or whether it should be lifted. judge robart's court decide the issue on the merits. charles: will the loser of tonight's decision take it to the next level? >> absolutely. and the next level is the united states supreme court. and we all know that the supreme court right now has only 8 members. that means it's possible to have a 4-4 tie. if there is a 4-4 tie, then whatever decision from the lower court. whatever decision from the 9th circuit coast appeals would stand. charles: the circuit at this very moment has gaveled in. they are in session. i want to bring in our panel. we have tammy bruce. emily, let me start with you. you are down in washington, d.c. obviously the stakes are extraordinarily high. troy mentions the composition of the supreme court which makes it even more -- ultimate result of t

a decision from that panel is expected quickly, perhaps within hours. the eventual decision is likely headed to the highest court in the country. where are we at the moment? chief white house correspondent john roberts starts us off. good evening to you. >> good evening. i am looking at the just-filed brief that the white house has filed with the ninth circuit court of appeals. they make the argument the executive order and the president's authority -- the president is determined to have his extreme vetting executive order reinstated and is confident that even in the ninth circuit court of appeals his argument will win the day. in its appeal to the ninth circuit court and some pizzas go, the justice department argues the president acted within his constitutional statutory powers in implementing the immigration ban. because the measure is temporary, he was well within authority to do it. judge napolitano believes the president is on solid legal footing. >> it grants to the president the authority to suspend the immigration status of any person, class of

we'll continue with our panel after this. get to the places you really want to go.ith the united mileageplus explorer card, you'll get a free checked bag, 2 united club passes... priority boarding... and 50,000 bonus miles. everything you need for an unforgettable vacation. the united mileageplus explorer card. imagine where it will take you. c seem like triersgies, pop up everywhere. luckily there's powerful, 24-hour, non-drowsy claritin it provides relief of symptoms that can be triggered by over 200 different allergens. live claritin clear. tech: don't let a cracked windshtrust safelite.plans. with safelite's exclusive "on my way text"... you'll know exactly when we'll be there. giving you more time for what matters most. (team sing) safelite repair, safelite replace. where's the car? it'll be here in three...uh, four minutes. are you kidding me? no, looks like he took a wrong turn. don't worry, this guy's got like a four-star rating, we're good. his name is randy. that's like one of the most trustworthy names! ordering a getaway car with an app? are you randy? t

let's bring in our panel. daniel halper, a.b. stoddard, charles hurt. all three unquestionably beautiful people. the president seems to think that there is a biased court out there in san francisco. he said he's not going to call it biased. >> that's one of his great rally devices where he says i'm not going to say hillary clinton belongs in solitary confinement but... anyway, this is on the heels of the weekend when the president tweeted about a judge questioning his qualifications, calling him so-called. the ninth circuit may be liberal. i'm not an expert about where this is going. i understand the president has broad authority on the issue and i don't know how to be interpreted by the court. trying to undermine the court in advance of the decision and delegitimizing the opinion of the court in advance, which is what he did when he didn't know he would win pennsylvania so he was trying to convince us that the worst voter fraud happened around the suburbs of philadelphia. but anyway, we are going to basically hear if he gets a ruling he doesn't like th

we have a great panel. i don't say that every time we have a panel. [laughter] we have a great one today. joan waugh, a professor of history at ucla. what is so important -- impressing me is the groundbreaking work you do with the u.s. grant american hero, american myth. as i told her more than once, it has done so much to restore the reputation of a real hero, ulysses grant. next is douglas egerton, professor of history at lemoyne college in syracuse. he does not know it, although i tried to elude to it when i speak with him that he really has been a mentor to me an understanding about reconstruction with the legal, political and cultural implications. he did that through his wonderful book "the brief, violent history of america's most repressive era." "thunder at the gates: the black civil war regiments that redeemed america." and edna green medford, executive member of the lincoln forum, chairman of the department and professor of history at howard university. co-author of "abraham lincoln and the emancipation proclamation reviews." so, before i as

by the way, thank you panel. today is national where red day.y is in memory of those who have died of cardiac arrest. that is it for this special report. fair, balanced, and unafraid. the first 100 days with martha >> tonight, today sanctions really represent a very, very strong stand against the actions in iran. >> sean: cracking down on iran over eight ballistic missiles test. plus... paris strikes -- terrorists strike paris again. dr. sebastian gorka is here with reaction. 11 re rested after another liberal anti-free-speech freak out on the campus of new york university. we are in houston, texas, ahead

back to the panel, any more word? >> no. this is starting what has become kind of a familiar routine for white house reporters where you get a tweet from the president and then tried to their aides on the phone to try to figure out what's behind it. see you in court is kind of provocative but it doesn't provide us a lot of details. what the next action step is. >> chris: he says this and they try to catch up and figure out what he means. >> a little bit. to the point charles was making, they certainly knew this ruling was coming down it was going to go one of two ways. you have to imagine they have a game plan. they have attorney general sessions who is now in place at the justice department after about 12 hours on the job. i think sometimes you see the president getting out ahead of where his advisors are. >> chris: charles, i get this look on your face that you are not quite as confident that they have a game plan. >> i would note that the president was quick on the trigger but we were quicker. no, i don't think they do. t

we've saved one minute for the panel. and i'm going to introduce steve del roseau who's here from carnegie corporation who's handling our projects. and dion arsenian who's work on universities could not be here. i'd like to give a hand also to steve del roso who's doing the real work here. [ applause ] with that thank you very much. >> senator nunn, i believe you have a citation perhaps to read, and then we will have senator lugar read his citation, and then we will turn the panel discussion. i think the remarks by both awardees, and then david hoffman will take control of the proceedings. >> well, thank you, tom blanton, you and your team have done a tremendous job of looking at the history of the nunn-lugar program. and i'm sure that when we get to final edition dick lugar and i are going to be surprised with a lot of things that are there. and you've done it all legally without any leaks. these days that's pretty darn significant. so i'm delighted to be here. and it's also a wonderful privilege to be able to say thank

by the way, thank you panel. today is national where red day.is in memory of those who have died of cardiac arrest. that is it for this special report. fair, balanced, and unafraid. the first 100 days with martha starts now. >> martha: breaking tonight, new challenges for president trump's travel ban. one week to the day after the executive order was issued but welcome to a town hall edition of the first 100 days everyone. i martha maccallum. over the past week, we have witnessed political fireworks, protests and out legal over the president's executive order. the president and his supporters argue that it's a matter of national security. some

i want to bring in our panel. tom rogan, mara liasson, national political correspondent of national public radio. laura ingraham and syndicated columnist charles krauthammer. good evening. you were listening. it's ongoing. can the>> is going to be hard ie ninth circuit. the government should win. it's not easy to do an oral argument on the phone. usually in cases this important, you will do it in the presence of the judges, argued the case. it's a little hard on the phone or you have pauses and the second time delay. that's odd. the thing that i noticed is how ill-suited judges are to sit in judgment of foreign policy or national security issues which is what they are doing here when they really examine the question of standing and the question of whether there is a rationale for this particular executive order. the issue of -- the president has the authority on the issue. you have the justice department lawyer, he's been at the just departme for a long time but he's not one of trump's guys. the other two had to r