pao attitudes are also clear.wo-thirds of paos believe that controlling media coverage of an agency is a very important part of protecting the agency's reputation. and virtually all, i think 98%, agree that the job is to make sure that accurate, positive information from the agency is conveyed to the public. so that is where the issue stands as far as reporters in washington and public affairs officers. >> thank you. kathryn? >> not so long ago some reporters walked the halls of agencies in unique critically needed graduate schools, they talk to and got to know staff. got stories, perspectives and education fluidly. just like this was a united states or something. but over the last 20 years, leaders have cratered a surge of blocking reporters from communicating to staff unless they are tracked and/or monitored by the public affairs officers. the public relations controllers. it is massive, pernicious, censorship that's now a cultural norm. no matter what they know, employees are prohibited from ever communicating

the reporters' view of pao's control is pretty clear. seven out of 10 reporters agreed that the statement, i consider government agency controls over who i interviewed to be a form of censorship. 85 percent agreed that the government was not getting the information needed by agencies imposing and journalistic practices. pao attitudes were also unclear, controlling media coverage is an important part of protecting the reputation. making sure that accurate, positive information from the agency is conveyed to the public. that is where the issue stands. as far as reporters in washington and public affairs officers. >> thank you. catherine? >> not so long ago, some reporters walked the halls of agencies in unique, critically needed graduate schools they talked to and got to know staff, stories, perspective, and education. just like this was the united states or something. over the last 20 years, leaders have created a surge of blocking reporters from communicating to staff unless they are tracked and or monitored by the public affairs officer

to whoever the pao suggests.t's the interviewing process. about half the reporters said that agencies will outright prohibit them from interviewing all together at least some of the time, 18% said it happens most of the time. two-thirds of the pao said they feel justified in refusing to grant interviews when the agency's security is threatened or when it might reveal damaging information. three three-fourths know that to contact staff member directly. nine out of ten; however, say the staff members know and will refer the reporter to the pao when they have been contacted directly. and of course more than half of the reporters said they try go around and circumvent the public affairs office at least some of the time. as far as the issue of trust, majority of pao said there are no reporters that they trust enough to contact staff directly without going through the public affairs officer. only about a third said they have reporters that they would give free reign to contact staff without going through the public aff

pao attitudes are also clear. two-thirds of paos believe that controlling media coverage of an agency is a very important part of protecting the agencies reputation. and virtually all, i think it was 98%, agree that their job is to make sure that accurate, positive information from the agency is conveyed to the public. so that is where the issue stands as far as reporters in washington and public affairs officers. >> thank you. kathryn? >> good evening. not so long ago some reporters walked the halls of agencies and in unique critically needed graduate schools. they talk to you and got to know staff. got stories, perspectives, and education fluidly. just like this was the united states, or something. but over the last 20 years, leaders have created this surge of blocking reporters from communicating to staff and less they are tracked and more monitored by the public affairs officers. the public relation controllers. it is massive, pernicious, censorship that's now a cultural norm. no matter what they know, employe

y pao. >> los alborotos paco. >> ay, pobre. >> oiga jefe que le parece la guerita. >> esta buena. >>mo el presidente porque cuando seas el presidente sustituto quiere que me cuentes que epasa en los partidos. >> yo creo también que es culpa de paulina rubio . >> vámonos al segundo. >> tienes otra más . >> si. >> es el leon contra pumas vamos a ver que ocurrió. >> a pumas le está yendo horrible. >> vemos a servin preocupado por la situación acual. >> leon después de una temporada mala peor la fiera del leon levantando cabeza. >> sus comentarios son comentarios tipicos de una americanista. >> deportivos. >> típico de una americanista. >> usted está de mi lado esta vez. >> le vamos a mostrar porque el leon y pumas estaban preocupados. >> había alguien que quería personificarlos. >> a ver. >> (música). >> (música). >> (música). >> ese se parece a longemoco. >> ok. >> aja. >> si, pues. >> no , yo no quiero ser la gargola . >> lo qiuero ser el once. >> preguntame , preguntame. >> yo no quiero ser la gargola. >> como evitarlo , igualito. >> ahí está . >> le sacamos el (grito) . >> (aplausos

selective routeing to whomever the paos suggest.o that's, that's the interviewing process. about half the reporters said that agencies will outright prohibit them from interviewing altogether at least some of the time, 18% says it happens most of the time. two-thirds of the paos say they feel justified in refusing to grant interviews when the agency's security is threatened or when it might reveal damaging information. three-fourths of paos know that journalists try to go around them to contact staff members directly. nine out of ten, however, say that their staff members know and will refer the reporters to the pao when they've been contacted directly. and, of course, more than half of the reporters say that they do try to go around and circumvent the public affairs office at least some of the time. as far as the issue of trust, the part of paos say that there are no reporters that they trust enough to contact staff directly without going through the public affairs office. only about a third said that they had reporters that they w

. > gracia Íctor y sa ted se le paÓ n vio, o qere repetisu signzodial y quiere vlon delle, visi unision.comiuedo crecer. >>> poe tacos y creces mos a felitar la vida >>>Í, melate mos a l cumpaÑoscomenzos c el prero mi tach. > ahi estoy para licita a noel Árez de illinois 22 aÑstÁ andote e amaco. >>> do tjoumpl diez aÑos surime munÓn. >>> es chacon just, no eber bieb, si otro floridaue cump un ao. > raÚrtilloe tennese, 41 aÑis. >>> dina flida, unÑit mirauÉ bien >>> ahi esÁ, juana, hola mi herma jnaamÍz, ren, noo, cn aÑos fuerte el laus (aplsos) >>juanitte amamos > cien aÑos. >>> grias poser rte de espita amÉca >>> que se lreceta >>> sÍ imagÍte. >> yquieranuchos mamata. >>> min qÉlegÓ ahÍ. >>> qÉn? > claudia con esecupazo claudia mamasonga lina con s bebes, poruÉ nobaamos todocon los bÉs. >>sÍme gust me gusta. > vas a bail. >>listosara bailarl co. >>> sÍ. >>> venga. > poan encion, tire l Úsica. ♪ arch ♪. . ♪ abajo, abo, abaj abajo. ♪ara arriba riba arriba♪. ♪ la derea,decha, derea♪ ♪ la quiea, iuierda, izqurda, iuierda♪. pa atÁs, aÁs, par rÁs. ♪araelte, ad frentee fren♪. ♪ y brinndo, incand b

. > mis respos paos bombos quearriesn s va para apagar l inndios, salv a mÁs personas >>boni bor quee mechisteÓ >>venga, venga. . ♪ ♪. > seiente el viernes, gan, ren ess hiorias,enen mis de sÑi res, n son fasos, co lo hacen,a storiatras de los descocidos Ás populares redes socies. >>tienenuchoguidores. >>sosensuales, yunca s quej del trajo,no noar rÍne nina patrici gonzalez,on lmaniquis viens, yomo omuen s producs. >>> se abrena caj de ndora, luo de lparacÓne ninel nde surejauan zeda los qunos eeramos y genio deez esenau lÍcu "instruionsot cludeden loÁnges. >> Í smoking y to m rbez. sadamos aos pueÑos dla casa, kier garn, e califoia. >>> y mbiÉn isaac hernaez enhino vall. noabÍa e er Ín arizon >>sigan enanfotos por itter, ilizan laetueta regro a la esela, estudi amac si estianaa cieron, sino l salÁn cono de los fgos arficiales ♪ ♪. ♪ ♪. ♪ ♪ ♪. ♪ ♪ ♪. . ♪ > ydi. veng ♪. . ♪. ♪. >>> eso. ♪ ♪. ♪. ♪ >ale, dalealan vea, vgantodos. ♪. (ras) >>> estan locos. ♪. ♪. ♪. ♪. (ris) > asÍ es. ity, bnvena. ♪. ♪. >>o. >>> te comba con lpato y todo >>ve nso. > que lepasa? (ras) > venga. >>> estÁbien?

to make the dry s on stthere an independent third-pao and as a finding, tions. >> thank you vermucommt on this i'd like to opp ts time. ke to e come up, sir. >>> good afternoon. my name is alvin [speaker not understood]. i have aquestns for the two auditors. first one is regarding the redevelopment agency being closed, is it your judgment that the turmoil caused by the closure of the agency and the transition to a new body created a lot of problems in the sense that there wasn't a proper transition period? >> so, this is public comment, sir.

. >> colleges and universities have always hired thir third-pao measure performance.t is much more credible if in fact you have outside people keeping track whether it is your auditor or administering the test. david: i have a daughter in college, i spent $60,000 per year, it is a great school, and nice, safe place for her to go, but i am not happy about the fact the standards are irrelevant in the workplace. >> i feel the same way. i have a student in graduate school. either an a or b. david: doesn't that mean we should ask for a refund? >> i believe it is that kind of instrument. david: we appreciate the work you are doing, we need something else. i would like to have report within the industry as well. thanks a lot, appreciate it. cheryl: lost the gorgeous daughter of yours up, by the way. she should not be in any college. i'm kidding. financials the big performers, but rising interest rates are forcing banks to cut back on the most profitable business. which are setting us up for the most? the top analyst will tell us. david: will outsourcing and global, edition k

pao's know that journalists want to go around them.owever, say0, they will referred the reporter when they have been contacted directly. and, of course, more than half of the reporters say they do try circumvent atnd least some of the time. as far as trust, the majority trusthere are none they to contact staff directly without going through the public affairs office, and all but talk aboutrd contacting staff before going through the public affairs office, and most of the time, these were long-time beat reporters. in contrast, there were 39% of who said the specific wasrters they prohibited due to problems with their stories in the past, so they banned certain reporters. there were problems with their stories in the past. on the issue of monitoring, two thirds feel it is necessary to supervise or otherwise monitor interviews with agency staff. 85% of reporters say they get monitored at least some of the time. some of the time, and one third said most of the time, and some said all of the time that they get monitored. this is a good way