gentlemen, i give you the monster of paradise falls! (people gasp) newsreel announcer: and, golly, what a swell monster this is! but what's this? scientists cry foul. the national explorer's society accuses muntz of fabricating the skeleton. no! newsreel announcer: the organization strips muntz of his membership. (gasps) newsreel announcer: humiliated, muntz vows a return to paradise falls and promises to capture the beast alive! i promise to capture the beast alive, and i will not come back until i do! (crowd cheers) newsreel announcer: and so, the explorer's off to clear his name. bon voyage, charles muntz, and good luck capturing the monster of paradise falls! (imitating airplane) newsreel announcer: here's charles muntz piloting his famous dirigible. (horn honking) he hurdles pikes peak. he hurdles the grand canyon. (carl grunts) he hurdles mount everest. (grunts) he goes around mount everest. is there nothing he cannot do? yes, as muntz himself says, "adventure is..." ellie: adventure is out there! look out! mount rushmore! hard to

wrote about this eloquently, describing how there's an initial eden, a paradise, a state of grace, a unity with nature, and then we fall of the forbidden fruit, technology, and we fall into pollution and all seek redemption because judgment day is coming. you want to tackle that, juan? >> i don't know how -- i think michael crichton actually became a doubter and michael crichton -- >> he was ostracized because of that in hollywood. >> i don't know about that part, but i know he became a doubter, as doug was just reading. my sense is that michael crichton was questioning the whole idea because there is such an overwhelming judgment by the scientific community. today, i was noticedying. >> that gets to the point of funding. critics say it's only because they're getting the funding. >> look, i think funding is a big issue in a period of austerity in general, but 97%, it's not made up. it's what the government says. it's not political. 97% of climate scientists say we're experiencing -- >> who did the survey? >> i don't know the date. it's national academy of science. >> no such survey. the california example i hear is ver

fall to decide. it's what i call the paradise of prophecy. it's a no-win situation.nd you can ask the same question about the maintenance of american hegemony in the middle east. and the paradox will be there. we will maintain this and there is no conclusive answer to your question. and the decision-makers in the real-time comment something that i've learned to appreciate. and they have my sympathy and often my respects. and there are also consequences. consistently over the past half-century and even beyond. american policymakers have come down on the side of maintaining this in the middle east and i think that there's a lot of humility to very powerful minds and i think some good hearts and you have to give them credit. >> let me just say a couple of things. the book of jonah to the civil war. i just want to say thank you and also i would like to welcome you for coming. thank you so much for coming. [applause] >> coming up on c-span2, a former nsa official following the edwards noted leaks. and this includes violence in south sudan. >> president obama welcomed fran

falls. he felt that this was one of the most beautiful places he had ever seen. he felt like this was a heaven on earth, a paradisehat's exactly what it was. >> pedro is going to make the run and ben is going to catch the whole thing on camera. >> we are right on the edge of the amazon. >> big waterfall kayaking is not to be tried at home. we are professionals, we have years of experience under our belt. we know exactly what is at stake. but in terms of just going over a waterfall in your kayak or getting your kayak on the river, it is something that everybody should try. for anyone who tries it, it will be, probably, the most exciting thing they ever do in their life. >> but the excitement of kayaking over a waterfall doesn't come without some careful planning. >> going into this drop, we had no illusions about what could go wrong. we knew that pedro could get seriously injured. we also knew that there was a possibility that he might drown. the impact might be so severe that it could knock him out and we might not be able to get to him in time. we would literally have, at most, a couple of minutes to get pedro ou

fall to 6.3% by the end of the year. u.s. gdp will hit 2.8%. that is the latest from the fo . giving you the power to prosper. ♪ adam: trouble in paradisein managing director mr. donohue. thank you for joining us. >> we do not see immediate reaction and puerto rico bonds. this has been telegraphed for quite some time. communities are not like stocks. they are usually pretty stable. you will see some volatility in those stunts. this has been growing for many, many years. >> when s&p downgraded rotary goes dead, we saw a bit of a rally. here is what moody's said. we do not see evidence of economic growth sufficient to reverse the common wealth trend. if that is the case, we have had peter hayes on the program before, do you think we will see a reposition? >> i hope not. my firm does not invest in puerto rico. generally, we are independent. i think the restructuring would only come if puerto rico fails to attract enough investors in a large bond deal. they passed a bill or has put in front of the legislature a bill to bring a two plus billion dollar bond deal. if it is successfully place, puerto rico will have some more breathing room. som