but the g20 only deals, as parag implied, with economic issues.nd when you look at the security structures, a lot of those big players that we talk about rising up, the chinese, indians, some of these others, they don't want to play in that game. nato struggled to go out of theater into afghanistan, and they don't want to stay there. they want to come back home, and is europe can't get together on foreign policy. isn't there a particular void in this era in terms of strut structures? >> no, i don't think there's a particular void in this area because i think that's always been the case. i think we overstatement the extent to which the united nations was ever all that helpful in managing all of our problems. i think we overestimate the extent to which nato was awl always helpful in managing all of our problems. i mean, if you think about president eisenhower and john foster dull husband in 1954 talking about the nato idea possibly run its course or the suez crisis in which we refused to help two of our allies in a war they're fighting. this is alwa

and one of the things i thought was fascinating was a parag -ô>. that went on in washington.tried to protect the institution of the president. >> people felt that you did. that your administration did try to paint people who didn't agree with you on the war of terror as not being patriot. >> i mean, for example, i don't remember doing that personally. and that was uncalled for if that's the case because patriotic people disagree with my decisions. there's no question. there are some who criticize me for not punching back after i was called these names. the truth of the matter is it didn't bother. i saw my dad vilified and bothered many and by the time it came for me to be the target, i shrugged. >> i'll bring in reinforcement and bring in your brother yeb who you at least have ambitions for him an even did so two years ago. have you told jeb to run for the u.s. senate in florida? >> yes. >> is he going to do? >> i don't know. >> you really don't know? >> i don't know. i wish he would. he'd be a great senator. came for me to be the target, i shrugged. >> i'll bring in reinforc

the creator is offered as a parag paragon.essured to stop those sering explosions of truth from london. because our political leaders at the time believed they would unfairly influence americans to side with the british when the nation was still officially neutral and the republican party was still completely convinced that there was a deal to be made with the nazis. president roosevelt did not invite him to the white house to congratulate him on his london reports because they were fair and balanced. similarly, the journalism students of now seven different decades have studied the broadcast about senator joe mccarthy from 1954. lotted as some of the greatest moments in the history of america. the story is told that a cowering profit-hungry press stood idly by or rode mccarthy's paranoia while the blacklist and the fear grew. and then murrow slayed the dragon. always left out that the truth hours within speaking truths based on fact, he was attacked as a partisan. the republicans and conservative newspapers and broadcasters d