. >> there is a paragraph -- there are two copies of the conditions. the second paragraph refers to the previous owner, they are asking not to enter into any business, i just have problems with that regarding the legality of it. i would personally put an x through that. >> you have an affidavit from the previous owners that they will not be involved? >> didn't carry alone? they don't carry anything? they have no connection to the business whatsoever? that has become part of the record, so if it is not true -- >> recommendations 1 through 4 are acceptable. you're just asking to be specific, that is pretty easily handled. skipping down, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 all acceptable. no. 11, i would recommend leaving that in. 12 is acceptable. here is where we began to get into micromanaging the business. i would like to hear input from my fellow commissioners, creating a monthly report explaining how all complaints were handled and making that report available to the neighbors that want to do business? >> i agree that it is micromanaging, but they should provide and be

i am selecting these couple paragraphs. i went to the fbi to inquire some years ago about how to put a stop to the abuse. the person at the window went into the back office to check the records and reappeared with a face white and hollowed like he had seen a ghost. someone really hates you was his exclamation. i told him i knew this. i need to know how to get off this list, whatever the list is, and stop the targeting against me. just as he was about to be forthcoming verbally, two agents came out and whisked him away before he could answer me. i need to be taken off this list or lists, whatever they are or what ever they are called. the targeting needs to stop. other innocent human beings need to be taken off this list. it is not ok to target innocent people and ruined their health, reputation, and take away their lives. i have a master of fine arts and an excellent teaching background. students at the college level will testify to my teaching ability. i am not allowed to defamation of character to get any kind of a job. p

every word of every paragraph was tuned there was not a wrong note. it was so powerful imented to believe it was her marriage. that last paragraph contained the wedding vow when he swore he would not be afraid to let her chafrnl him much the crowd froze after she finished. then we exploded into applause. she stood in the spotlight with tears in her eyes. she's a retired psychotherapist. >> go to her. this was a scene of a romantic comedy. i had to catch her at the airport before she left me forever. she was stopped by audience member after audience member. iment to talk to her but what would i say? well, what are you trying to get from her. her question was koejent for someone who had polished off her third drink. i want to come out of retirement and i want her to help me. i don't think it's realistic. you keep thinking i need to find the restroom. i wasn't listening to the reader on stage. she was talking to 3-20 something women. she back and grabbing at my arm. we need to leave now. why? >> dustin is here and he is with someone and she's cute. >> di

>> and she's a really good paragrapher. so keep the photos coming. i'm just loving that. >> thanks for sharing. thanks. well if you cross the bay today, you might have seen this. a giant yacht, there it is, she's called the octopus. the mega yacht belongs to microsoft co-founder. the octopus is the ninth biggest yacht in the world. it's 414 feet long and reportedly has room for two helicopters, two submarines and a swimming pool. >>> coming up, the real reason men and women fight when they get stressed. ,,,, [ male announcer ] sacramento and silicon valley are only one hundred thirty miles apart. they may as well be on different planets. sacramento, mismanaged, ineffective. silicon valley gave us apple, intel, ebay. here meg whitman started with 30 people. led them. managed them. executed the plan that grew this main street company to fifteen thousand employees and made small business dreams come true. to change california let's send meg whitman up the road... about a hundred and thirty miles. suggests men and women respond very differently to it. th

to do so, this is -- the whole paragraph reads if a property is tenant occupied the property owner must also submit documentation acceptable to the building official that all tenants have been notified of the proposed street number change request. then the city attorney is asked to add failure to do so shall result in revocation or denial of any such request for renumbering. president murphy: is there a time limit on the notification? 30 days? 60 days? >> no. in other words, before the change request can be submitted to the department, that letter of notification has to be attached with the submittal document before the change, the request for change will even be considered. in other words, the property owner will have to notify the tenants i would like to khaeuch your address from apartment 123 to apartment abc, and they have to notify the tenants. and we are going to have a form that the tenants would be able to sign saying they have been notified. president murphy: so the burden of responsibility is on the landlord or property owner to notify the tenant? >> yes. president murphy: ok.

this is something you talk about in paragraph 7-c. what is your reaction to the results of that check? >> well, i haven't seen the result. we saw tonight that skiingle that was shown on the screen. it shows that the sheer forces are less than the capacities, but i don't know how those calculations were done either to arrive at the sheer force demand from the earthquake or how the capacity was calculated. we just haven't seen those results. as of the numbers i saw last week, that check wouldn't have passed. >> so you are saying you would like to verify those numbers? >> i would be happy to, but somebody -- and preferably somebody assigned by the building department, who has the authority in this matter. someone should do a peer review of the new work, and there has been substantial work done. peer review work needs to be done, and i think it could be done handily, and it probably should not be done by individuals who are not hired by either of the two parties involved in this matter. >> thank you. >> thank you. mr. smith, you have thre

so i would like to strike the last paragraph on page 3 of our docket which talks about the marina and so forth and to clarify that we are only authorizing staff to enter into negotiations with big rec at this point. >> i will accept those. president buell: moved and seconded. thank you. >> we are now on item 11, recreation and park department of reach policy. president buell: we are moving i contend to take place after item 13 because we have to clear the room for a second session and we thought the fewer people we have to clear the more convenient. >> 10 to the bottom of 13. >> we are on 11. >> we jumped. we are right here on 11. >> now we are having technical the occult is. >> we are? >> that is 12. >> just a comment. you know how really important this is, i think, to me, and i think my fellow commissioners. i was delighted to see that this is on our agenda. when i opened my binder and saw page with nothing on it, i was disappointed. >> understood. i took the last round of feedback sunday night. that ended around 9:00 p.m.. i incorporated that into a policy i emailed about this afte

. >> page 4, commissioner clyde, the first paragraph with my name on it, the very last line of that paragraph, i would like to amend that to say that the city keep looking -- "the city take a regional approach to this issue, possibly using the membership of supervisor affalo in the association of bay area government." let's see. okay, thank you. with that change, can we -- >> okay. move to approve the july minutes with amendments. >> i second. >> those in favor? >> aye. >> next item, please. >> commissioners, item no. 4, approval of the august 9, 2010, meeting minutes, explanatory documents draft august 9, 2010 minutes. >> and i have a change on this one, as well. and that's in the vice president's report, under item 13, i would just like to add the words to this line, "commissioner clyde began her report by recognizing joni chang, a former city employee with the office of labor standards enforcement, whose primary responsibility was the implementation of san francisco's healthcare security ordinance." thank you. >> do i have a motion? >> second. >> those in favor? >> aye. >> next item, pleas

. >> i am going to read 2 or 3 paragraphs, my last farewell, our national hero. and in english. fair farewell to a stranger who brightens my well. farewell to all who i love to die is to rest. >> thank you. [applause]. [ foreign speaking ] [singing]. [applause] thank you very much. >> patricia leanne caldwell born in tennessee. daughter of robert and irma. at age of 3 moved to missouri and returned when she was 12 years old. patricia grew up with segregation and injustices which she writes about. she spent many countless hours in the nashville public library. it was her family life that was bountiful and flowing with tales told by her story telling grandfather. raised with love of reading and oral tradition. graduated from tennessee state and degree in english in 1964. she married her childhood friend on december 12. they are the parents of fredrick and twins robert and john. her education continued with a master's degree in early childhood literature, and programming in 1975 from webster university. patricia has a successful career as a teacher and children's book editor. she c

in the package, you will see the first paragraph says it all this this to set the regular meeting time for the capital committee for the first wednesday of each month at 2:00 p.m., city hall, to set the record their meeting date and time of the operations committee for the first thursday of each month at 2:00 p.m., and to amend the regular date and time of the full commission meeting to the third thursday of each month at 2:00 p.m. at city hall. i think the commissioner harrison might have a modification to that which will satisfy any concern. >> i believe these were in response to some comments after writing the proposed amendment. this really is the essence of it. we have talked about the reasoning and we hope that we will have more public issues and give more people to comment and hopefully it items that have been refined as a result of that out reach. >> is there any public comment on this item? >> will we be mailed in notice of these separate committee meetings? how will we find out? >> they are posted at the library on line and you received them in the mail. >> thank you. >> is t

one more paragraph. on behalf of the league of women voters and our partner organizations, the potrero hill organization of businesses, the dog patch organization, the university of california san francisco, media sponsors nbc bay area -- we are proud to be here -- san francisco government television and educational access tv, and certainly, our thanks to the candidates for participating and thanks to you for being here tonight, informing yourself, being good citizens of san francisco. good night, everyone. [applause] >> hello, i'm meg, welcome to "culture wire." for this episode, the director of cultural affairs, luis, will take you on a journey through presidio has been tet. -- presidio habitat. >> welcome to "culture wire." today i'm at the presidio trust, a treasure within san francisco, because the presidio trust is really a national park in the center of an urban setting. it dates to the very founding of the city. national park. toting me today to talk about this amazing exhibition at presidio habi

the first paragraph has to do with what the question is that has been raised, and the question is for those of you who are probably disinterested in this, as most people would be, you've asked for an opinion regarding the legally mandated -- this is not addressed to any member of the board, because we have not asked. it was addressed to those people who raised the issue. you have asked for this. specifically, in response to concerns voiced by members of the public, you of asked whether we do you have asked whether a section of the california building codes -- voiced by members of the public, you webcast -- you have asked about those whose members are qualified and specifically knowledgeable in the california building standards codes and applicable ordinances. this will be available to anyone who wants it from the board of appeals, and perhaps those people who have raised the issue, we will email them a copy. the conclusion reads as follows. under the state constitution, the city charter governs the qualifications of members of the board of appeals. the charter requires the members to

"the first paragraph has to do with the question that has been raised and for those of you who are interested in this as most of the would be, i believe that the people that come before you would be very interested to note that you have the qualifications to pass judgment." you stopped and said "you have asked but not address this to a member of the board." i am the person that raised the issue and i don't put my name on the memorandum. as a matter of fact, i had to get a request for this. on some -- on september 8th, 2010, you or the one that asked. everyone that sits on this board must be -- a you made false statements by telling the public that no one on the board asked for the opinion when in fact your the one that asked but you it intended to mislead. you are trying to blame this on the public are raising the issue of your qualifications. this is not from the city attorney. you're not qualified but he wanted to stay in your powerful position. this is on technical issues involved in -- involving the people's work. the two servants have attorney client privilege. the city has adopted the 2

and they both have this important paragraph in each lawsuit and i will read it to you now "the failure by defendants to adequately address the bullying and harassment of this girl is part of a policy and practice of the public school district board of education of violating students' right by ignoring bullying and harassment by other students," and also, that paragraph in the other lawsuit and both paints say the school was absolutely completely aware of this bullying. >>shepard: are there statistics to tell fuss there are more or whether it is more in the news or what is the story? >>jonathan: reliable statistics is very difficult because they are kept individually by schools and states. there are no reliable national statistics, but those records that we have tend to indicate about 50 percent of kids these days say they are, have been bull lid or taken part in bullying. i asked a psychologist that very question today, and he said, certainly, the add vent of new technology brings, makes it more apparent and more able for the kids to bully. listen to this. i think kids are detached fro