the fingers of desire struck the match. >> there's a lot packed in that paragraph.onder if you might unpack it for me. >> yes. i -- well, i grew up with a certain amount of embarrassment and shame about being asian in america during the '60s and '70s. and i didn't understand it at the time. but looking back on it now, as a man in his 50s, i'm older than you. >> barely. >> barely, yeah. i see that much of that baggage was passed on to me by my parents and grandparents and by my great-grandparents. it was part of this -- the colonial experience. i come from a country that was colonyized by first the spaniards and then the americans. and i think that that sense of shame and inferiority that i grew up with, that i didn't understand was something that i was given at birth, and i didn't really understand it until i was much older. >> how is that uniquely different from other cultures? because we could have this same conversation as i have in the past about certain negros. we could have it about hispanics, the latinos, the chicano culture. what makes that assimilationist j

>> page 198 in the last paragraph -- the amulet of madness. it is an object -- [indiscernible] an amulet of madness would be protecting them from becoming insane. they just want to snap and rip off the protection of the insanity i ripping off the do you allgreat. know what she's talking about? the amulet of madness. protection against madness. but you know, madness is a term that gets applied to women, does it not? crazy, insane. or they go crazy once a month, right? this is part of it. you can get a sense that the sexism under which these women are laboring, it is making them crazy in that way, tol, right? good. anybody else see evidence of betrayal or anger in this document? starts -- when she starts all of her goodbyes. the very first one, i thought it stood out to me when it says, the trouble with you as you are an aggressive woman. i can only imagine someone saying that now. everyone'st gets skin crawling. .> that is great your sense of "you are an aggressive woman" is an example of the -- more the stereotype, more the madness, more i am

>> page 198 in the last paragraph -- she mentioned the idea of an amulet of madness. it is an object whose owner possesses it, it protects her in a way. an amulet of madness would be protecting them from becoming insane. you can see how much the hurt is building up and they are bottling it up to the point where they might just snap, and they want to rip off the protection of the insanity by ripping off the amulet. >> that is great. do you all know what she's talking about? the amulet of madness. protection against madness. but you know, madness is a term that gets applied to women, does it not? women are crazy, insane. or they go crazy once a month, right? whatever the craziness is applied to women, so this is part of it. you can get a sense that the sexism under which these women are laboring, it is making them crazy in that way, too, right? good. anybody else see evidence of betrayal or anger in this document? >> when she starts all of her goodbyes, the very first one, i thought it stood out to me when it says, the trouble with you as you are an aggressive woman. i

five under with respect to item 4 there's the chapter section 3 plus if you'll look at the final paragraph it basically states that any member of the compligs commission that dloez information before the probable cause so the commission has to go into closed session for the proposed settlement a that's a violation of the proposed chart similarly with item 5. under that provision as well as the commissions unregulations probable cause hearings have to be held in closed session there's incrimination we have to vote even though their notice latitude as item 67 i think that there maybe some discretion but this truly is pending litigation and i think it would be, you know, possible to provide, you know, full and frank advise to the commission about that pending litigation in open session. >> is there a motion to going go into closed session. >> before we go into closed session i think at our last meeting we said weigh to explain why you should understand that when we are considering whether or not a complaint should be filed with the individual the individual has been informed he or she knows w

five under with respect to item 4 there's the chapter section 3 plus if you'll look at the final paragraph it basically states that any member of the compligs commission that dloez information before the probable cause so the commission has to go into closed session for the proposed settlement a that's a violation of the proposed chart similarly with item 5. under that provision as well as the commissions unregulations probable cause hearings have to be held in closed session there's incrimination we have to vote even though their notice latitude as item 67 i think that

i walked into the studio and the host i saw him hunched over the about the author paragraph. i a new right away this is all he would know about me. [laughter] he looked up at me looking like the cro-magnon. [laughter] and i said -- he said you were adviser to william howard taft? i said yes. [laughter] now something was not right to but he said we will go with that. are you willing to talk about that? i said yes. [laughter] and we did. [laughter] i have not been invited back but it was kind of worth it. so to mention book titles anybody guess how the new books are published in the united states every year? it is about 1 million. i am not sure they all can read. [laughter] but most of them are from carol oates. [laughter] the others are all titled "50 shades of grey." but titles are very important with the brand you go in to a bookstore. remember those? . . detroit nokia was of course the rich patron and petronius is terra-cotta because you're a menu that. [laughter] or you could take another influence right under the 20th century, adolf hitler. hitler's original title for min

and would it be all right procedurally if i just read the first paragraph? >> that would be great. very all right. >> all right, general council is suggesting that i read the first and the fourth, so i will take that wise advice. [inaudible] and the san francisco county office of education be submitted for second reading as the budget for fiscal year 2014, '15 and be placed in the official files of the secretary of the board of education that the superintendent is authorized to make any transfers necessary to correct erroneous account changes in the method of expenditures within the purpose of the appropriation. and then just skipping down to the fourth paragraph, that in accordance with the california education code, the california school accounting manual and governmental stan tardz board, statement number ten, accounting and financial reporting for risk financing and related insurance issues, [inaudible] fund to account for the self insurance activities including workers compensation, general liability, property insurance and dental insurance, education code section 39602. >> we

. >> good morning, supervisors if you look on page 2 of the digest, the last paragraph, indicates when we dealt with, and first of all the people who are placed on electronic monitoring were limited to those that consented to it and that has been addressed. in addition the committee requested, that the electronic monitoring in lieu of bail be offered only to inmates charged at low level offenses and that has been incorporated. and finally, the committee requested that the ordinance requires that the superior court approve the placement of inmates on the electronic monitoring in lieu of bail in the district attorney objects to the placement, we have incorporated that and if you look at the ordinance itself, on page 3, section 13.63, you will see that we have limited to those who want to do it voluntarily and further down at section 13.64, the paragraph in there does indicate what is defined as a low level offense, and misdemeanors a person in custody, and 30 days, at least. and those charges of felonies and are those that will be eligible for sentencing pursuant to the section, 1170.h,

david savage has it in the sixth sentence of the fifth paragraph, which was higher up than anybody else. he addresses the question of whether anyone would lose access. in other stories, it was much further down. >> i wrote about four versions of that story. we are all in the same business of trying to write a very quick version for the web and an updated version for the web and another version for the newspaper. with each version, i get questions from editors. are women really going to lose contraception? by the end of the day, we got a few sentences that says not many women will lose coverage. >> what you had here was, saying that this decision was very broad. you had an opinion saying, it is actually very narrow. they went back and forth on these two things. some wondered, was ginsburg making it a bigger decision than it was in the way she wrote about it? others say, what she did was force the majority to go back and say, it is not about this and it is not about this. it is just about contraception. i think it remains to be seen. it was interesting that the two sides went back and for

are there clerks shuttling back and forth between the office with newly written paragraphs flavor? >> yeah. i think that's really some interesting information we have gotten about the court over the years is that thing actually don't speak to each other that often. they communicate regarding writing. major are personable but i think they are being cautious and careful to write that opinion to make sure the reason something sound from their view and share it with each other and modify and change as need be. and i think chief justice roberts said in his hearing, he wanted to bring the court together. he did not succeed for many years. this may be an outlier year or we may see a new trend. >> do we see the emergence of a roberts style now that you can really identify given the auk of several years now? >> i do think that he and i think the other justices as well are disturbed by some of the media stories over the last few years about how this court is the first court to be divided by the political party that appointed them. so when they split 5-4, they usually do along lines of which

three paragraphs later. committee currently judges that there's -- i know they're not directly analogous, but how can we be at 0 for 09 p 25% fed funds when the federal reserve is saying that there's enough strength in the economy to support a growing job market? >> so that is used -- that particular paragraph -- that particular sentence is for the real tea leaf readers of the fed to snaskt the justification for tapering. the fed said it would taper when it saw the economy could assistant on its own and the labor market was making enough progress on its on, then why isn't it gulf enough to sustain perhaps a quarter of a percent -- >> why don't you ask, brian, the guys who sold bonds like they were going out of style in may and june when ben bernanke talked about an earlier tapering than expected? that's why. the fed is gingerly moving here, trying not to upset bond markets. it wants to bring the markets along with it in a very, very gentle way. what are you upset about? >> is rick still there? james car vill

i also will be approving the statement authorizing the official statement and paragraphing others action. for your consideration the hunters point shipyard we'll give an overview and lastly give you a forward look at marketing the bonds. ultimately we're seeking to refinance the variable rate bonds and on april 15th the bond process started the board gave it's approval and this is the final commission approval for the bonds to be issued later this month. the shipyard will be developed in two projects including the hunters point shipyard and the candle sticks bay area totally acres in san francisco. this agreements for the agreement were executed in 2010 for the phase of the shipyard and candle sticks the cf d-7 and 8 are over the geography boundary which phase one and two this is the critical part of the financing the shipyard development and the issue before you there will be no authorization. we're going to look at the bonds not to exceed $40 million to replace the bond issuance as you recall the credit was needed no 2005 when the shipyards yard was being developed and had a low land d

to the senate: under the provisions of rule 1 paragraph 3 fs standing rules of the senate i hereby appoint the honorable angus s. king jr. from the state of maine to perform the duties of the chair, signed patrick j. leahy, president pro tempore. mr. reid: mr. president, following my remarks and those of the republican leader, the senate will resume consideration of the nomination of pamela harris to be united states circuit judge for the fourth circuit postcloture. the time until 5:30 p.m. will be equally divided between the two leaders or their designees. at 5:30 the senate will proceed to vote on confirmation of the nomination. immediately upon disposition of the harris nomination there will be four voice votes on the following nominations: elliot kaye to be commissioner of the consumer product safety commission. elliot kaye to be chairman of the consumer product safety commission. joseph p. mohorovic to be commissioner of consumer safety products, consumer product safety commission and brian p. mckeon, principal deputy undersecretary of defense. i ask unanimous consent that upon dispos

bill and you know we saw some paragraph sort of plane crash story after it was in after more history the number markets will bushnell three percent or four percent but the warst so you're saying sure so it was like a seven percent drop we saw it will fall about two percent but as we see things the fall of the plane crash the market actually started to rebound from the low. for the stabilization going on in the street it was in a little bit there a few factors first of all there is not much for money in the markets anymore a lot of forms are in the stores that are left over from the current new situation . they were on officially forced to sell their russian holdings not only and i could use them bonds if we look at the world the people started to panic because they still something's going to happen and sanctions the bulls will be started to buy dollars will definitely the people bought more than twelve billion dollars cash if we compare that to last year it was only one billion dollars was while times more these are people holding the dollar cash at the moment in the receipt of the r

use of the ruble but the make even though it was after the sanctions bill and you know we saw some paragraph sort of plane crash or after it was an after market street a number market spill or three percent or four percent but the warst absolute essential so it was like a seven percent drop we saw it will fall about two percent but as we see things the fall of the plane crash the market actually started to rebound from the low. to the stabilization going on in the street it was in a little bit there a few factors first of all there is not much for morning in the markets anymore all four of our investors that are left after the core of your situation. they work on the fishery forced to sell their russian holdings not only and i call these on balance if we look at the ruble the people started to panic because they still something's going to happen but it sank shows the ruble so they started to buy dollars and you will definitely the people bought more than twelve billion dollars cash if we compare that to last year it was only one billion dollars was while times more these are people holding t

sometimes the most i can get back is a boilerplate one paragraph. oft does not tell their side the story are how they came to decide on this policy. i end up cutting frustrated because i realized by their choice, i've only told one side of the story. now, i just wanted to say when war started i was a middle east correspondent based in israel. so i did not get to see the in up in washington, d.c. decision-making process. you could see from the way the inspectors were getting turned away from the sites they were trying to visit, the nuclear inspectors. and the tension in the iraqi government that they were bracing for this confrontation but they were also paralyzed. because one of the things that did not come up many places was iraqi government had made a conscious decision to make countries in the area think they had a wmd program. i spoke to intelligence officers who raided sites that look from above like a covert nuclear facility. they would lift up air vents. and they went to know where. it was if attempting nuclear facility -- as the invasion hap

cesar chavez's mother came across the mexican border and had to paragraph 2 penneys because they neededhe workers. we can see that the 11 million that are here are contributing. it's not like, you know, they are living off of the dole of the united states. they contribute trillions of dollars to the economy with the consumption, by spending and they contribute because of their labor. another trillion dollars to the economy. they deserve to be able to have that you are place in the sun. they deserve to be able to granted residency and eventually citizenship in the united states. they have worked for it. they have earned it. >> sometimes in the same day, we may have different emotions about who these people are, what they are doing here we don't want to buy a $1 strawberry or an $8 head of lettuce. but we also don't want people coming in from another country without obeying the existing laws using public services, sending their kids to the local schools. there is a lot of emotional reaction on the spending side when it comes to what local governments spend on people who are not supposed t

we'll -- we in the protocol look at the very last paragraph of the protocol. we will work with the claimant to make sure the claimant gets a lump sum payment, and we'll work with them on the medical expense problem which is implicit in your question. note the last paragraph of the entire protocol in that regard. >> thank you. >> i'm sorry? >> my name is laura christian, and i'm the birth mother of amber marie rose. i have another family with me here today. i have personally found 165 deaths. i have this information in my hand. would you like it? >> i would, indeed. >> thank you. >> i would like not only that information, ms. christian, i would be glad to meet with you or your family members privately, and i would like to know anything you have or anything you think would be helpful in this program. i would love to sit and chat with you at your convenience to learn more about what you think and how this program can be made the most effective way. >> thank you. i welcome that very much so. now, as far as the non-airbag deployment, we have evidence in a few cases

requires a building permit not a plumbing permit there's nothing that says its illegal and in the paragraph 6 of the regional occupancy two family dwellings there's no pending 90s notices on the non conforming status the september 2013 nova didn't mention it i'm going to be showing you a data sheet hopefully, you'll see that after two recent inspections on june 24th and july 9th any public comment? 2014 the inspections were inclusive as to the existence of a violation of the housing code with respect to the legitimate of the unit. after further use on july 21st entry the housing inspector said it shows an r-3 d 23 facility the legal description further indoctrinates defines two residential units on the ground floor. in fact the housing inspectors findings says the housing unit maybe a legal conforming unit the permit holders allegation it's illegal is in dispute and can't be substantiated without the involvement of the planning department through the discretionary review thank you. >> yeah. >> thank you we can hear from the permit holders. >> thank you. good evening, commissioners. i think

and the inspector general's report if you look at it, there is a whole paragraph how it talks about in the hiring process, the civil rights division overlooked and didn't hire lawyers with stellar creditentials from disfavored organizations and firms. >> one of things you talk about in the book hans, or both of you, had to do with the department of justice behavior during the bush administration regarding detainees and the role that eric holder and the office of responsibility played respect to the investigations of them. can you talk about that? >> this shows how politics drive the attorney joan general, not the law. there was a great deal of controversy by the cia and others in try to get information from the terrorist in guantanamo bay. but you know, at the end of the bush administration, the justice department set-up a team of prosecutors, career prosecutors -- not legal appointees -- to take a look at the action the interrogators had taken skwp they did it by legal memos by the justice department but they took a look to see if any violated criminal laws and should be prosecuted. a

. >> it's very advanced when the emphasis and tone of individual paragraphs are changed a little. for example, when somebody adds a half a sentence to a critique, it is an internal cat & mouse game that has been going on for years. >> the biggest problem for wikipedia is the decline in the number of volunteers. an increase of articles by people who are paid by agencies. some are even administrators. >> i know several pr agencies in germany that have at least one user with status and they can have an unbelievable amount of influence on the discussion. >> you have told us you use several different accounts anonymously and insert information and nobody knows where it is coming from. that is not really compatible with the rules of pr, is it? >> what do you want to hear? >> is it just trivial offense? not when a source of information has become so prominent, says this media research scientist. >> it is a very serious problem for society on such a vast store of knowledge so many have trusted and is used so often when it is undermined by political and financial interests. there's no gate