parcel a is the park view terrace which is senior housing and parcel c is the senior community center which provides 100 units for low income and homeless seniors and the richards apartments for homeless individuals and parcel q has the octavia court for those with disabilities. and the mayor's house says that parcel o project will start in 2014 which will add another 100 rental housing, parcel u has been programmed for h use. parcel k is on -- it's one of the 7 former freeway on octavia build and is affordable housing. it's programmed for 20 to 25 units and the units are affordable with ad to 100, the mayor house has housing for those throughout the city and will not develop parcel k until 2021. in response to concerns to activate the space while waiting for development, they issued a question for temporary use if 2009. and the proxy was selected by parcel k and l. the project used shipping containers and small retail service and food services and businesses located on parcel a is smiten ice cream and coffee and basic training and city car share, parcel k hosts multiple food trucks,

the zone one parcels and the parcels he see hieltsd are trans california parcels. the property tax from zone one as well as the dispositions those all go to fund the terminal. and this goes to affordable housing as well as the infrastructure work-related to the parks and the new streets consistent with the new corridor you heard. here i see the big story here is again, the number of property dispoegsdz for the state owned parcel. a number of them are under construction. have you heard from the lost procedures. each of those developments because there's a mandated period there's no off-site for affordable housing this is provided primarily along the state parcels with an inclusionary part. not all the parcels are departmental parcels. that's right making sure they're mixed communities in those areas and, of course, our perspire with our citizens advisory committees and making sure the theme here is sustainable in terms of financing. those new parks are developed through a cd v and you'll see that so it doesn't hit the general fund. this slide here everything's we're

of those parcels. to a single-family homes to the downtown high-rise. there are several instances we value the property when there is a new ownership and construction and a temporarily reductions is loud. we have prop 8 that is required by california laws. we collect and transfer fees. we're the official record keeper for the city for many documents like marriage certification p and, of course, we maintain parcel maps for all 2 hundred thousand parcels. the chart next is 13, fourteen general figures. that is the proposed budget and the reason this is based when we created the slide off last year but the story is the same. what we're sharing is the transfer tax empires a large portion of the general revenue getting to 40 percent of the cities budget okay. next slide. we wanted to share is the fact we talk about the city's general fund and how we pay for property taxes. there are other amenity we care about. supervisor mar i used to be on the school district board and bart received part of the funding. t

were to approve this resolution a list of the parcels is attached. the five parcels have a total assessment of 29,726.43 annually represents 2.5% of the total vote. if you have any questions of the ballots or the proposed resolution i'm here to answer any questions. >> supervisor cohen: thank you very much. colleagues? no questions. is there any public comment for item number four? seeing none of the comment is closed (gavel) can i have a motion? >> so moved. >> item passes unanimously to the full board. item number five. >> clerk calonsag: (reading) >> supervisor cohen: colleagues this is an item i work on with the budget analyst's office. the three topics i heard of that are in need of additional evaluation include the fire department, the use of children's baseline funding by dcyf and the-- we've got ms. severin campbell from the budgets office to present on this item. >> good morning supervisor cohen, supervisor campos and supervisor tang. i have a summary about these three items and i can go through it in more detail if you would like. i would l

this is a better shot of the parcel and the picture of the parcel. we have pipelines running underneath the property. in 2004 after the sfpuc reserved and protected the pipelines, other qualifications have been issued. following that review process an option agreement with the city have been approved by the puc commission and board of supervisors at a sale price of $8.1 million. this agreement was extended and the negotiations for further extensions ensued. that's a development in restated option agreement that you have before you. some technical agreements were made. so the other party has changed slightly, nonetheless thees assess of the agreement is the same as approved back in 2006. we rechecked the value. we set the value -- at $6.6 million. the agreement before you retains the original price of $8.1 million. it remains to the benefit of the city. the agreements secured and additional deposit of $300,000 includes what is already provided it includes the pipeline for pipeline purposes and the commission an approved the transaction and in their de

to the public trust and some are not and enables the port to reorganize which parcels are subject to the trust so it's more rationale. just putting the project in pier 70, it's the right side of the map going counter clockwise north of there, the ship repair operated by ba systems, it's a priority to keep that time use if place. the cove parcel west of the ship yard or the ship repair yard, the port is planning a large new water front park currently wrapping up the community process and it will utilize park bonds for its completion. the historic core of historic office and industrial buildings along 20th street, the port as entered into a negotiation with development for the rehabilitation and they're on track to get going on that rehabilitation project the beginning of next year and the hill site south of the historic core, the northern portion is port property that is expected to generate revenues that are help fund the entitlements and the water front site and the port, in negotiations of pdg which owns that parcel to acquire it. it's currentry a dirt recycling facility. and we're

hundred and 5 feet designation is on the second and 3 townsend street and on this block there's a parcel for a hotel that has been proposed and reviewed by this commission. and for the benefit of the audience this is that area. a portions of the district is located within the central corridor area. they intended to provided strategies for proposing changes along the streets. this draft includes principles and implementation strategies intended to accumulate growth. and one recommendation of the draft plan is to permit larger hotels, however, the central corridor plan is to consider a broader change. i want though emphasis that the draft ordinance is a much smaller more targeted approach to amendment controls for a small block of those designations within 1 hundred feet and higher. as poeptd to the ordinance this will facility a project that has been approved. additionally at the may second hearing the commission discussed the roles of the hotel and tourism in the city tourism is the largest industry and 6.9 investors spent 1.9 million in money. tours generated thousands of dollars. howev

we would only consider sale of parcels at the water front site for condominium purposes. these leases would be long term leases, 99 year leases. we would rely in the earlier phases for prepaid leases to have the proceeds payoff the developers equity very quickly. the goal of this deal structure is to retire their spend as quickly as possible. after they hit their 18 percent return which we're currently projecting to be in phase 4 after all the infrastructure is built, it will be split, 55 percent to the port. the parking structures that i addressed earlier are preferred option and we're going to analyze a number of options through the dda period, the disposition agreement and negotiation period is to publicly finance the park. after they're paid off, the port would own the revenues from these garages over the remaining term of the pier 70 development. we're looking at how to finance these place making uses, they're not very profit uses as you can imagine. they don't generate high rents so we're looking at public financing strategies to fund these place making uses and we'

one, it is the parcel that was put aside for or possibly a public [inaudible].w as the school board member, we had discussed and we brought it up -- in fact, when i first got in as school board member, the school district didn't even know about the parcel. what we realized was that the footprint of that particular parcel was going to be very small. i don't know where thing are in terms of -- whether things are finalized totally or whether -- so, the question for me would be whether or not the possibility of expanding the footprint so that you can build a school there rather than squeeze everything into a closet basically for a school. i'm not too sure how to answer these questions, but the other concern i have is around child care, and i'm not real clear any more where that is at, whether or not there is any parcel put aside for child care. i don't know how many of the total 6,000 units will be for family. you're just talking about the affordable housing units, that would be almost nearly 2000 units of affordable housing in which you mention that it's going to b

the specific parcels can be seen the district plan. the proposed budget is $106,567. 99% of the budget could come from property-based assessments. with that said, above and beyond the annual assessment budget a donation of $100,000 for year for the first two years has been offered if the cbd is established from a business located within the top of broadway boundaries. the intent of this is to supplement the cbd's budget to provide additional security, marketing and economic development and administrative services. the first two years when a significant investment is needed to get the cbd off on the right foot. as supervisor chiu mentioned the proposed services will include a variety -- including sidewalk maintenance and beautification and greening and that comprises about 25% of the proposed annual cbd budget. district identity, which is marketing and economic development and assistance to businesses, that represents 42% of the cbd's annual budget and then administration of the district, overseeing all of these services, represents 30%

and that different parcels and the gaps between the parcels that allows the air to flow and the light to come in. it is that zone coincidings with the access to the hotels. the hotel iss has a corner volume and there's a second volume that rotates. it is that gap that takes the view from the hotel all the way out to the park but also connects the uses within the building. that summarizes the main components. probably the most fundamental principle is that the buildings are loin with the sidewalk and the streets are activated with hotel lobby and the building lobby and the restaurants that occur the two ends have outdoors diane and the parks along the canal. there's a lot of open space here as you can see. particle fortunately to the park we're creating a park at the center of the project. the fact that we have a strong street wall will hopefully create on atmosphere that is more like the rest of san francisco and mission bay with activity along the pedestrian pathways that surround the building. architecturally we're trying to show you the intent to create a architectural structure th

currently available is sf parcel the assessor's application. you can go to the assessor's website and bring up a map of san francisco you can search by address and get information about any place in san francisco. you can search by address and find incidents of crime in san francisco in the last 90 days. we have [inaudible] which allows you to click on a map and get nchldz like your supervisor or who your supervisor is. the nearest public facility. and through the sf applications we support from the mayor's office of neighborhood services. you can drill down in the neighborhood and get where the newest hospital or police or fire station. >> we are positive about gis not only people access it in the office but from home because we use the internet. what we used to do was carry the large maps and it took a long time to find the information. >> it saves the city time and money. you are not taking up the time of a particular employee at the assessor's office. you might be doing things more efficient. >> they have it ready to go and say, this is wha

fa it just has one completed parcel. [speaker not understood] ~. these include 150 units of affordable housing. [speaker not understood]. along with 15 acres of park land and the first phase of the medical center is under construction along with the public safety building. from about 2015 mission bay it will be completely different neighborhood. block 1, today's item is 2.7 acre parcel located in mission bay south. [speaker not understood]. expanded by a channel street to the south, 3rd street to the east, fourth in the west, mission bay park to the west along the creek. currently developed [speaker not understood] overflow parking for at&t park. the site did he nated under the redevelopment plan as hotel and the current entitlements permit up to 500-room hotel and up to 5500 square feet of retail use. the block with the mission bay south hotel land use. since the adoption of the mission bay plan in '98 we had roughly [speaker not understood] developers meet with us over the years to discuss the availability of block 1 but none of these projects ha

a previous version included some non-c p parcels. at the recommendation of planning staff and working closely with the theatres we have move forward. there's a staechlg that moves toward a transit district and we don't want in fillmore to over lap. so thank you for your consideration i'm open for questions >> thank you. >> thank you carter as mentioned earlier it would open up the district it will have maximum parking districts. it will allow up to one car for every two units for up to 7.5 cars for each dwelling unit. it will be under the maximum car restrictions. it will provide a 5 foot height allowance and it will allow the services on the second floor. as discussions the commissioners outlining the alternatives are in favor the koifr the district. the last item the staff recommends the items in the last presentation. our recommendation is for approval f with modifications and that concludes my presentation. thank you for your time >> thank you any public - oh. >> i want to add a little bit to the staff presentation. in response i

and for it to double or triple in size by the parcel numbers, i think was great, but i was wishing it would get a little bit bigger, but it didn't. i wanted more of the south of market expansion. so i appreciate the first step that has been passed and has been stated, the 32% has already been weighed in and now we're looking forward for the vote for the final passage of the cbd and forming of it for 15 years. so i look forward to the process, and i look forward to the property owners weighing in on this and also the community benefiting from the benefits of the community benefit district in the future. thank you very much. >> thank you very much. next speaker jim haas. >> supervisor i'm jim hooser and the principal gateway is the transit station and particularly will the grove street entrance and that has been a hellish experience for people in the last year. there have been enumerable shopping carts with guys sitting around drinking and getting into fights, et cetera. it's the largest source of complaints to the performing arts organizations that they have. this is driven by -- has b

. >> there is one already the suits that exists on one of those parcels that are probably above 1 hundred and 5 feet. >> this does not impact existing. >> commissioner. >> never mind. >> no? is there a motion and a second >> there is indeed (calling names) so moved commissions that motion passes unanimously and places you on item 11. inclusionary affordable housing program for potential >> good afternoon. i'm still planning staff. the proposed ordinance before you would add a new code. in order to have the charter amendment you can approve or disapprove this. the background of the ordinance i'll detail the definition and i'll reiterate the departments recommendation which is to recommend approval. by the way, background san francisco voters adopted proposition c for the housing production incentives and a among other amendments it added charter to lower and stabz certain projects. it was amended to raise the number of units subject to affordable housing requirement to 10 or more requirements prior it was 5 units. ordinance number 06213 was adopted to implement most of the amendments made

this parcel is the last remaining parcel that we came up with with 28 years ago. what's also important is the area and all the different how this project fits in. it's consistent with the area it brings residential product to the area it establishes the mexican museum in the area and looks at doing something very good with the area. it's an under utilized facility. it's also important to see what's around it. i think our building fits into the fabric. it's a residential project it's an institutional project it conforms to all the other buildings around it and those are aspects of the building. in terms of the agricultural components the cumulation. and we spoke will earlier, you have all the information you need but i want to talk about the agriculture. we have the tower in the eulogy we're in keeping with all the other institutions around it will bring new life and really enhance the area much more and i think that's an important aspect. it's not just about the programming but the agricultural. we're trying to work on this building skumg the top of the building a