the sate can vote on the parcel. a list of the parcel is attached. the one parcel has a total assess of 318,.13 cent. if you have questions on the ballots or the proposed resolution i or my manager [inaudible] can consider questions. thank you >> supervisor kim any last remark snz let's take public comment on item 3. public comment is open >> thank god for public comment. i have been doing public comment for 25 years. i'm retiring from that plat form but i'm talkic about cbd. the parallel is you will speak on the western addition what i call the fillmore. i'm up here to testify. i'm not lying because in july i don't want to hear lies from the mayors office to the janitors office. we are in a state of emergency right here in san francisco. anybody think it is peaches and roses. but there is another story that must be told. now, right now all these cbd's are working all over the community. everything starts in the western addition, the fillmore. we call it the fill no more. the rich history of the city starts in the western addition. goes back to after

that involved the larger parcel is n one and that is the parcel that will actually be sold to m a west which is the developer other two parcels are open space parcels next slide is a rendering of the average office building i'll talk about that more in a minute purchase price is one hundred 72 millions the proceeds go towards the construction of the transit center and in 2016 the project consists of 7 hundred and 66 thousand seven hundred square feet of office space and to restore the tower there is 86 hundred square feet of ground floor retail space and about 24 thousand square feet of public open space the plan to start construction in 2016 and required to complete the construction within 39 months of commencement as supervisor kim mentioned the developer will pay the impact fees of 6 point plus million dollars and $11 million plain clothes 8 is located on fulsome street between first and fremont this is a rendering of the building this one is residential and it consists of tower building plus two podiums located adjacent east this is a site the purchase price is $71 million again th

the me up transportation commission i serve asking for a similar quit claim in order to sell the parcel the mtc commissioner were quite unhappy to put it mildly with the staffs presentation requesting that quit claim we felt the management team had not been an adequate job of estimating and keeping the decision makers informed of the projects but there are contributing factors like martin outside of the control like costs we have gas by the overly optimistic estimate the mtc was not confident in the increase finger and waguespack was skeptical to bring the project on time and on budget and, in fact tjpa staff indicated there were only thirty percent confidence with the upward revision of the last of the cost increases the mtc voted to approve the quit claim but it was approved as part of the motion to approve the witness claim the mtc included an amendment mandating the agency to do the cost committee comprised of the city and county of san francisco through the controller's office and the transportation authority to review the costs of both phase one and two and to make recommendations

the parcel will be more than a hundred and 60 hopefully a lot more but the minimum bid even with thatcel an hundred and $87 million gap to get to the cost that the tjpa approval of so hundred and $87 million gap the decision explicit effect that the condition as a in the future no september the tjpa should not adapt a budget that exceeds the known funding that will be parcel f and could be more the hundred and $87 million exists today >> you're making a recommendation to accept the amendment. >> absolutely the amendment is reasonable and calls for support. >> chair wiener. >> you know in the discussions of the mtc last week and also in talking with director reiskin from the tjpa yesterday and others their focus was please grant the witness claim we have the option of delaying the witness claim and on september 2nd they could auction it to the lease in september the closing period and ms. kaplan asserted that will cause the construction blow up i don't believe that is the case but the request has been please don't delay the quiet claim we are putting reasonable conditions and the tjpa

rooftop park the pharmacies or parcels were originally set aside for the project but we are looking at this as an option to close the funding gap tjpa will be hosting a live auction in december of 2016 and anticipate higher funds of one hundred $50 million i think i - >> all right. with those two incorporated into the funding gap analysis what is remaining $87.5 million to the address tjpa staff is looking to use the melrose fund currently $100 million for phase one a timing issue where the fund may not be available so a need for financing that has an issue are redirecting fund from feats one to two tjpa is looking at sponsoring opportunities project is well underway and tjpa feels confident they can deliver this one the proposed budget we'll be working to allow the project to draw down and continue to work on the advocacy for phase two of the project i'd like to thank mark of tjpa for his cooperation and collaboration in being here in the audience thank you >> all right. thank you very much for your presentation supervisor breed. >> thank you i had just a question you just mentione

that involved the larger parcel is n one and that is the parcel that will actually be sold to m a westhich is the developer other two parcels are

those parcels were achieved -- those parcels were developed, received by the city in 2000. there's been a steady buildout of those because of the central freeway demolition. but, with this new level of financing that we have, a new level of resources, we absolutely agree with you that we went to the more conference of analysis, reach districts and neighborhoods where there is great cost efficiency and that's going to be in neighborhoods that have available land that's not so coveted by market rates for example. so, i think that will be a good opportunity for us to really make an impact in neighborhoods that previously may have been underserved >> thank you.: make sure the office was closed works closely with mine and housing development on the community site. my district where people are actually real housing developers people ashley try to build support for that and we have hundreds of people involved in that effort there's a couple projects that were looking at. i want make sure that we don't miss out on -- were able to pass this bond did not miss out on opportunities tha

were some parcels that weren't claimed, so white settlers came in and took those or they would buy the 160 acres from native americans for a reduced price and the reservations were gutted because of the act. while the intention might have been good, the result was horrific. it was disastrous. another further irony of this whole attempt to gain equal rights for native americans. it was misused and abused and resulted in perpetuation of their inferior status as opposed to what it was intended to do. people look at this and say this is incredible that it took the rule of court to determine that a native american was a person. it is. when we look back at the filter of our country and think how could that be and we not see this. and yet, there is also an error made in thinking this was a significant ruling that changed everything. it didn't. it changed things for standing bear and a few followers. the last person to begin in or native americans, 1924. after white males, black males females, and the last was native americans, 1924. 1879 on>> american history tv is featuring omaha nebraska. o

m-1 and 3 location getting to our access to those two parcels m-3 and one that is los angeles county complicated because of the train expectation we've developed a temporary park for both of those sites and once a final assess for entry the m-1 and 3 and those parts with filled with trees and outdoor spaces and seats generally we'll work with a nice landscaped design to be a variety of options for the users on both the parcels so with that said we're very excited where we are on this project and this is an image here that illustrates it, it's potential to stand out in a positive way with the san francisco we've enjoyed the process with planning and thank you for your time. >> opening it up for public comment comment. >> larry juicy edmond as keeping the spirit we the people we do at city hall when people get married that means two people living in the building today that is showing that everyone needs justice and pride and love and housing with e we have to think that martin luther king was killed in memphis tennessee when you go downtown people sleepingal along main street i'm hopin

the parcel will be more than a hundred and 60 hopefully a lot more but the minimum bid even with thatcel an hundred and $87 million gap to get to the cost that the tjpa approval of so hundred and $87 million gap the decision explicit effect that the condition as a in the future no september the tjpa should not adapt a budget that exceeds the known funding that will be parcel f and could be more the hundred and $87 million exists today >> you're making a recommendation to accept the amendment. >> absolutely the amendment is reasonable and calls for support. >> chair wiener. >> you know in the discussions of the mtc last week and also in talking with director reiskin from the tjpa yesterday and others their focus was please grant the witness claim we have the option of delaying the witness claim and on september 2nd they could auction it to the lease in september the closing period and ms. kaplan asserted that will cause the construction blow up i don't believe that is the case but the request has been please don't delay the quiet claim we are putting reasonable conditions and the tjpa

what happened is that these lands were held by the tribe were then broken into 160 acre parcels. there were some parcels that were not claimed and white settlers came in and took those, or they would buy the 160 acres from the native americans from a very reduced price, and the reservations were gutted because of the act. while the intention might have been good, the result was horrific, it was disastrous. just another further irony of this attempt to gain equal rights for native americans was misused and abused and resulted in perpetuation of their inferior status as opposed to what it was intended to do. people go back and look and say that this was incredible to do that the court went and said that a native american was a person. we look back at we go, how could that be? how could people not see this? yet, there was also an error made in such a significant ruling that it changed everything. it did not. native americans finally gained this in 1924. white males had it first, it was followed by african-american males, then it was finally white and -- it was finally women, and fin

i understand there is a lament number of 2 acres parcels but there are parcel thazerate under utileized. parking lots we can build on top of and want to examine those sites. i don't think anything in the measure stops the mayors office from examening [inaudible] there is nothing restricting that examination and encourage it. on a certain level we wanted flexibility to the city as wem understanding the lem naigdss sites under 2 acres have but the ordinance doesn't limit that type of examination. i'm not sure-there were a number of question. s. supervisor tang-we would thruv work with your office because we want to make sure we make this as strong as possible. over the last 10 years we want to address the gaps that we see in the previous ordinance in fulfilling its intention. i did have a couple follow up questions with the mayors office but know there are a snb of member thofz public here today. if the chair would love to begin public comment >> let's do public comment and let you call the cards and if you have the questions of the departments you can ask afterwards. [inaudible] while do

it encompasses a parcel is referred to in many cases as s&p 24 surface mining permit 24. which is necessary for water management and fine management for mission valley box operation. the area to the northward of it is number 32 was the active mining area they use reyna. so this v-6 engine would match up with the other lease and allow them to continue their operation inefficiently but also has benefits for us in terms of water management, both for the alameda creek recapture project and the san antonio bypass i plan parts. we recommend approval of this item to extend the lease permission value valley rock for these parcels. >> thank you for that. when i was before us before, was not clear to me at the time this was not really prominent. that the extraction of this site has terminated and were renewing not for mining purposes but something else. that's a very different kind of lease. tenant unusual circumstance. i'm prepared to support it. >> i have the same questions as i thought at first it was a renewal and as i said before, i'm not a big supporter or even a small suppor

i think a good example are parcels a and c on central part weight. they both have seniors senior service centers on the ground floor. they very active senior services programming. they cooperate with each other about bringing in hundreds percussion or to bring work with tenants within exercise classes, or dance nights. that sort of like all those kind of activities so that seniors don't get isolated. that is exactly the kind of senior services programming that we would include on future projects. >> the? >> supervisor avalos >> new questions >> okay. thank you ms. howard. ms. regan. you want to go over your economic report here? >> good morning. ted egan with the controller's office bit of economic announced. opposite issued an economic impact report on this item and without going through every slide in detail, without high points and answer any questions you have about the specific good rpg writing this report was to examine for housing policies already in place that are similar to the funding priorities that the expressed with the bond package. tho

as described in the plan the district will be approximately 2123 identified parcels located on 20 whole or partial blocks. details of the covered area are in the file. at the conclusion nof public hearing the department of elications tabulate the ballot and report to the board of supervisors. member thofz public may view the ballot tabulation on the basement level of sitee hall in room 59. the board of supervisors will neither lev athe assessment [inaudible] without objection the public testimony will be as follows... we'll hear from speak aers in support of the district 2 minute max and then hear from speakers in opposition to the proposed assessment district. during the hearing a property owner wishing to change his or her vote or who has not yet voted may speak with department of election staff at a table just outside the board chamber. they will provide you with the affidavit [inaudible] after the hearing closes the ballot will be counted. at this time supervisor kim since this is in your district would you like to make a comment? >> i want to recognize the hard work of the yerba br

. >> the regime tends to view these different form of violence of islamist violence apart and parcel of the same phenomenon. so when attacks happen in the sy sinai, that may make the regime less likely to come to some kind of conscious with members of the muslim brotherhood within egypt proper or within the nile valley, let's put it that way. is this tendency on the part of the security apparatus within the egyptian regime to view all these disparate action he as part and parcel to a seasonal be islamic state feet against regime. we saw that already right? we saw today the killing of nine members of the muslim brotherhood including one form err member of parliament, nasser al drofi. and i think the regime very much views itself as a multifront war against an almost differentiated islamist enemy. >>> european officials have slammed the door on any further debt negotiations with greece before the referendum on sunday. language has become very bitter with the german chancellor. be people standing in line outside tboorchtion withdraw cash. banks to withdraw cash. >> we believe there have

affordable housing development this is driven by the affordable timing and hopefully to be able to parcel off the sites and sell them so the proceeds can cross subsidize the work for rebuild. >> just to the director one of the numbers which trigger a feeling of complete development is in the hundred to 2 hundred units of the many blocks it would be great not to build half blocks especially end for the rest of the neighborhood as you are redeveloping you i hope we get guidance. >> i'm happy to have that conversation in the next few months i think one way or another what you're talking about is creating a critical mass and i appreciate that we'll work with them on that. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah. i think you answered my first question i saw the completion at a time was 2034 probably because of the phasing but my second question 7 hundred units i assume the 775 is market rate am i correct about that. >> there's a exponent of the affordable housing that is added to that so - this is ramming i didn't from mercy housing and we're a co-developer so the breakdown is the maximum of 17 hund

with the open space where we are providing on the site and providing open space planning for the parcels n-3 and one. >> the site is very - the building i should say is designed specifically for the site we've looked at the locations of the virtues from the building and we really tried to maximize the views towards the building the high-rise of the building is fantastic views towards the bay and the low revised is close to the base has a dynamic relationship with the transbay terminals design of the tower is essentially you take a mass and the second slipping slide to provide floor plates that provides to the requirements of the different size the smaller at the top and bigger at the base with a nice lobby and 35 foot plaza i'll get into later we further go through the staircases they have a dynamic and visual connectivity to the transbay terminal this is an image of the tower looking north on beale you see the massing the tower and those architecture terraces both on the southeast corner and north northeast corner of the tower. >> this is a view of the transbay terminal looking from exc

the project comes before you in a very narrow way and that is there is a small portion of the parcel that this project will be built on that is within the rincon point south beach redevelopment project area. the project sponsor first applied for planning department approvals in 2012 and 2013. they had a slightly larger project at that time. subquently they applied for a revised project in 2014 that further reduced the size and earlier this year they submitted yet aortproposal that brings the project into the limit i just described as the project description. the planning department back in 2012 determined that environmental impact report was required for the projecktd and that has been prepared. comments and responses document has also been prepared in that eir as well as project approval is scheduled to be heard by the planning commission on july 23. in mid-june last month, we received a request from the developer of the project to approve the small portion of the project that lies within the rincon point south beach project area. that area, the small triangle property is identified

[inaudible] yerba buena community district and item 18 a parcel of property in the rincon hill district >> colleagues can we tace these items same house and call? these are passed unanimously >> establish the last 10 dayoffs jan as restaurant week and eliminate the health code of [inaudible] >> colleagues can we take this item same house same call? >> without objection the ordinance is passed on the first reading >> item 12 is a motion to repoint supervisor kim term ending june 30 [inaudible] >> colleagueicize there a motion to excuse supervisor kim? without objection supervisor kim is excused. madam clerk on item 20 can you please call the roll >> item 20, yee, aye. avalos, aye. breed, aye. campos, aye. christensen, aye. cohen, aye. farrell, aye. mar, aye. tang, aye. wiener, aye. there are 10 aye >> the motion is approved. >> item 21 is a motion to reappoint supervisor eric mar to the association of bay area government executive board >> is there a motion to excuse supervisor mar? without objection supervisor mar is excused. >> item 21, yee, aye. avalos, aye. breed, aye. campos, aye. c

complex deal i know also in my framing we have the worst housing affordability crisis and any public parcels to be used for affordable housing or mixed use for the prop k housing balance of 50 percent of affordable housing we should be doing everything possible and coming up before the november ballot is surplus policies for initiate i have questions how that factors in i know that mr. updyke walked us through the one hundred percent affordability and the cost that that are challenging for a citywide like ours i want to ask where would we wave the city's ordinance for this if you could explain that mr. updyke. >> so in this case we have an active use for a lease back so let's step back into the normal course of finding a surplus and offering that with the plus ordinance that is normally unproved land or vacate vacant and it is straightforward to follow the as much as policy act if not available for onsite then prudent to pursuance to the ordinances the sale if i understand go to affordable housing in the tersely as articulated in the ordinance the difference we don't have a supplies asset we