we agreed to swap this parcel with ticd for a parcel in a later phase, which will be more -- this parcel is a little small to be an efficient development parcel for affordable housing, so these other parcels will give us greater development potential in terms of the total number of units we can construct on those sites. and it will be more in line with what we anticipate having funding. within this major phase, we maintain the same number of affordable parcels because of the parcel from what was supposed to be major phase three that i just discussed, which has been moved into this major phase. so our next steps in going forward to issue final approval to ticd, and upon receipt of the navy concurrence, continue the subdivision mapping process with public works. the director of public works will be holding a hearing tomorrow morning on the tentative transfer map for this subphase. because of our trust exchanges with the state lands commission, we actually have a complex mapping process where we will have a tentative transfer map, multiple final transfer maps, two trust exchanges with the s

so the flex-zoning there's one parcel, the tower parcel that's zone up to 450 feet and three parcels that are zone the up to 315 feet. and then as i mentioned, the bulk of the east side neighborhood, as well as several parcels on the west side of the site, are flex-zoned up to 240 feet. then there are also, as shown in blue on the image, a number of parcels that are zoned up for to 115 feet. so there are a number of sites where the project can seek more height. the flex-zoning on the eastern side of the neighborhood has some special provisions to it, in that that area cannot be uniformly increased to 120 feet. but where it is increased above the base zoning, then there are offset requirements from other parcels, before they can go up. so the image at the top center shows that any individual tower, going up above the base zoning, has to have 115-foot offset from any other tower and that the north and south directions from any individual tower, that the closest tower must be offset by 500 feet. and that's both about allowing sunlight into the neighborhood and also allowing space betwee

the entitlement process is catching up with parcel f. though it's still a large project it's not as large as parcel f which is a 170-feet tower to the occupied floors. we feel comfortable block 4 would be delivered prior to completion of parcel f. both projects are kind of on the one-yard line and block 4 is maybe the 10-yard line. >> there's not a land dedication so we'll be building in conjunction with the high rise. it will be a high rise and mid rise podium all built at the same time. >> thank you for repeetdiating and giving that detail. i'm talking about the balance between workforce and housing from the description. i hear the project would do that. i want to step back and move on a question and observation. there was a presentation and i asked if there was an idea of how to phase the project. this say large area and one thing i always wanted to avoid and that's part of my own practice is leapfrog opportunity grabbing where an entire large district becomes a construction site for the next 20 years. you may remember that part of my

we're sponsors of trans bay par parcel f. i'd like to introduce you to the project seeking 275,000 square feet of office allocation. it's located at 542 howard street. the sponsor acquired the property in 2016 who used the $165 million of proceeds to complete the construction of the transit center. it includes residences in the upper tower and public pedestrian passageway and the new transit center. it provides a direct public access to sales force park by way of public elevator up to a pedestrian street at level 5 and the reason the project requests 275,000 square feet of office space. that's less than 10% of the currently available prop m allocation. the project is shovel-ready in the sense it's exempt from further review under ceqa in reliance of the studies and they're complete and there's no significant environmental impacts. the site application is actively under parallel review by d.b.i. and we're ready to begin work as soon as the project is entitled. the sponsors committed for union labor for the hotel and the office

and they made parcels. they made nine parcels. the lot ended up being nine parcels. it ended up being eight parcels. the lot behind us, there were two instead of 3 and the original lot with this way. the parcel of the lot stayed in the washington estate until robert washington relinquish control. this is an indenture for the property, lot 112. is signed by george washington and signed by him three months before his death. here it says, lease washington and wife. it is leased to as a lot stated 8th of september 1789. and is has perpetual. that is all in george washington's hand wiring two months before his death. all seven archaeologists came from mount vernon and he held this document and said he had never seen anything like it. because on this document it is signed by george washington, signed by martha washington and signed by george washington's secretary. and it is signed by his stepson and signed by john anderson. his manager at his farm at mount vernon. as are lots has signed it here, he was the least of the property. and it is signed by two gentlemen and john

parcel 5 is market rate and the parcel 6 is affordable housing. what i thought these funds were used for is not for the street but actually for the foundation of both of these blocks. that there is a gap of $1.6 million on block 5. that actually needs to be closed. using some of these funds to actually close $1.6 million gap. i wasn't aware that it's for streets, for things like that. i thought it was actually for the foundational work only the actual blocks. >> it is for the foundational work. >> chair fewer: is if for the foundational work for the block 5? >> it is for the foundational work of block 6, 5 and 284 future units as well. >> chair fewer: what you're asking for today is for -- you're saying it's not a loan? you're saying that actually that all of this is one big project so all the funding, any funding that goes into block 5 or block 6, actually just is part of the whole development? >> correct. >> chair fewer: i'm not comfortable passing this out of committee today. i like to continue this item to the next meeting please. if i can tak

it's believed the process of the rfp to sell the commercial parcel has been less than transparent. this is evidenced by an ongoing lawsuit the process of the long-time community members and others believe. this lack of transparency seems to be the case with assignment of recently expired lease for the commercial parcel and propose renewal of the lease as the interim activation activator. finally and most importantly, we the fillmore heritage center home others and you the ocii as the successor to san francisco redevelopment are legally bound as real estate entities by the reciprocal agreement to increase our reserve fund and it was blocked by this language and the reciprocal easement agreement and such action affirms our bond with the city and ocii. therefore it is only right and just we should have a co-equal voice in the disposition of the parcel and insist on an experienced operator who is in immediate possession of sufficient resource to maintain current payment of all requires common access areas. >> thank you very much. do we have any other speaker cards, madame secretary? >>

as commissioner black noted, only approximately 20% of the city parcels have been surveyed.and so those parcels are generally located within the shaded areas. that have been surveyed. we estimate is that based on the areas that aren't shaded and the number of known properties that we have, remaining 80-100,000 parcels are left to survey. this map shows the number of designated properties that are designated either locally or in the california or national registers. and this is included to show how little of the city is actually designated and the geographic distribution of the designated properties. it's important to note while survey information can provide background for a property or district designation and note eligibility for the designation, the surveys does not equate to designation. that's a separate process that will rely upon data collected in the survey, but is not the direct result of a property being surveyed. one of the primary goals of the survey is to move properties from that category b, where they are age-eligible, but their historic status is unknown, int

finally, the parcel is a necessary stopgap. here in san francisco, we're lucky. we have a lot of voters who consistently approve parcel tax funds to go to our kids at public school whether you're benefiting or not. that's not necessarily something that will always continue? we think that you know as far as sustainability of these funds that we really want to look at what are alternate sources, like state funding? those are things we should consider because we know there'll be a cliff at some point. there's a point where the revenues and spending just kind of merge and there'll be a cliff at some point? so that's something we want you to continue to look at? rich also mentioned how the money is divided. we know that the categories, those are clear. those are the categories we're going to spend this money on. however, how you spend the $100 million, how it's spread, there's flexibility there. so i think commissioners, looking at that division and just of course prioritize where it needs to be. thank you so much for your time. >> thank you to our coaches, leigh and

the first phase has eight parcels. you can see on the bottom, that's the two parcels we discussed last week at the tida board meeting on treasure island. and those are the first two parcels where land will be available. the second part, also within the green, is the land will be available after the current subphase application is approved and then the work is done. it is projected the earliest will be about two years that the land will be available. after, you'll see that through the four phases, and each of the different phases is a different color, but through the four phases, you get 20 parcels. the majority are in phase one and in phase four. so one of the other things that's pretty exciting about treasure island is that because of the d.d.a., there are some baked-in funding programs for the -- that can be used for affordable housing. most notably, there is a $17,500 per market rate door contribution for affordable housing from the master developer. likewise, because of the i.r.s.d., the project gets tax increments

it just so happens that this parcel was in an n.c.d.and you haven't adopted it yet. >> got it. >> so then, all my questions are answers. at the end, when you survey the city and adopted them, it will help to inform the process that much better? >> correct. >> because now, as i understand it, the planning department has a new program where you can come in and submit and do the consultation and within 60 days, they will let you know what category or area that the particular parcel -- >> you are referring to our historic resource assessment process program. which is new. we're piloting it this year. it's an advance of a property owner can voluntarily apply for that process. essentially it is a property-by-property survey and it was infende intended to fillp before the survey can get to these. >> my last question before supervisor mandelman, what willl you adopt the surveys on the n.c.d.s? did you already talk about that too? >> well, i'm not 100% on the timeline for that. i think we are looking at probably moving forward with those maybe a

adjacent, a site that is highlighted in black, it is a privately owned parcel, it is an important parcel in that the developer that we are bringing forward to you today to be our partner on this has secured an option for that property and by including that property has given us a greater better urban form development for consideration. the area also shows the context -- that is a 16 story building, 22 stories kitty corner from the site, 22 stories also in the opposite direction, so 2022 stories seems to be a theme, and here we have the zoning at 200 feet or approximately 20 stories. let me review for you the process that brings us here today. back in january, we issued a prospectus that solicited those proposals for development of 530 sansome. four proposals were received. we did not -- we then headed team review those proposals, rank them, of those four, you see the four that were received and the bidders made them and the ranking. this was the more complex of the projects. this was the more robust in terms of gross square footage, and therefore, this also had the greatest yield to the

at the request of the tribe, it also prohibits the operation of gaming facilities on this parcel. which is a key element to -- the people wouldn't have been concerned about. it respects the rights of ways held by local stakeholders. the bill represent, again, the culmination of years of good faith negotiations by all parties, should be considered a model for maintaining positive working relationships between tribal governments and local governments. i urge my colleagues to support the measure. i thank everybody that has helped with this and the bipartisan effort. i yield back the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from california yields back the balance of his time. the gentleman from utah reserves the balance of his time. the gentleman from new jersey is now recognized. mr. van drew: mr. speaker, i have no further requests for time and i would enquire whether my colleague has any -- inquire whether my colleague has any remaining speakers on their side? mr. bishop: i do. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from new jersey reserves. the gentleman from uta

he didn't know there's about eight hundred letters and ninety parcels of dave he works with dr past germany's biggest mail company. he drives an electric powered light utility vehicle called a street scooter. the post has a fleet of thirty four at this sorting office. the message i got my first impression was that they look a bit odd that the design was unusual. past special nothing like it had ever been seen before not the vehicle was commissioned by daiichi past because there were none on the market that fulfilled its requirements. dacha passed for the company that makes the vehicle four years ago. when benyamin four sets off each morning the battery is fully charged it can't be recharged while he's out and about only back at the depo. the range is eighty kilometers that's fine for his routine it's a whole except perhaps when he has the heating on. as i was once when it was raining a lot and everything was really damp i cranked up the heating on and i used five percent more power on that day and it wasn't even cold when i have to see what happens when it really does get called agent work fo

if you take that and go, oh, we only surveyed 20% of the city, and i come in on a parcel or a building that is in the 80%, well, what's going to happen to it? this is the urgency. the development pressure is now becoming so great that i really don't think six and a half years is -- we don't have six and a half years to do this. i think we should condense it as much as we can. the two and a half years i intended at the h.p.c. building -- it's only adding a couple of interns and a couple of positions. to that end, president hyland and i went and met with sandra fewer's office on getting additional money for these couple of survey people. and i mentioned that when we had lunch. and we're slated to talk were you each one owith each one supervisors, and we talked with justin true, who is trying to get housing sped up. we have this thing called the pre-entitlements, and i think we're on to something. for not a lot of money, we could probably get a big bang for our buck and increase housing production because we won't be pecking, like a kitchechicken does. if l.a. can do it with 900,000 units

, emphasis on corner parcel, so i have to actually -- i half to not as this being a very creative and very harmonious solution. i do also have to take stuff such a careful evaluation into consideration, which basically does not leave one page unturned to look as to whether or not they are deficiency are not -- or not. there are none. the staff believes that from code compliance to density, size , and architectural characteristics, the project is compatible with the neighborhood , and further to that, it is basically unnecessary and desirable desirable project given the very difficult charge for us to support density and support sensitive infill, which i believe this project achieves. >> thank you. commissioner hillis? >> i generally like that there is new units coming on this lot, but can i ask the architect a question for a minute, i did a little -- it is -- there are 78 -- it is 7300 square feet. >> the existing lot. >> if you do the math, a typical lot is 25 by 100, it is three lots, you have divided this into four. why did you do that, first of all? >> we are under the planning co

by vacationing the street, the rec and park department will be able to create a single parcel for theark by merging ab0046 and assessor block 0047 and the vacated area that will allow rec and park to maintain the park. the vacation is conditioned on the successful transfer of the abudding parcels, 0046 and 0047 from the san francisco public utilities commission to the recreation and parks department. now, in the event that the abutting parcels are not transferred to rec and park, the vacation and the transfer of the street shall not occur. the jurisdictional transfer is expected to occur by 2026. >> supervisor peskin: thank you, mr. banks. any questions or comments from committee members? any comments from staff or supervisor stefani, within whose district this falls? any public comment on item number 2? mr. banks, i think we're opening it up for public comment. you're go to go for now. mr. wright? >> i agree with the improvements for the park. this is not the first time i've done this. i've done this before to remove a person's name by the name of feeling from two locations within th

sudan's foreign relations there is no doubt that our country is part and parcel of the region and the world. we are not an isolated island we should continue to communicate with other word community however our top put it at the now is to maintain security and order within us in order to be able to function be on. again we will do all what we can to continue to establish communications with the world community. as to the. responses from the world community i believe they are mostly positive and we should join forces to take the sudan forward and achieve a better change. use we have no ambition to hold the reins of power the message there from almost the same lobby the chief of the political military council he's speaking addressing the sudanese nation saying we will be the guarantee gallants halls of change mandated by people we are the guardians of change he went on to characterize the military's intervention which ended with the president ahmed bashir being relieved of his juices by saying we responded to the demands of the people. and i ask the sudanese people to support the milita

most of the units on this parcel also have individual elevators, so we are really looking to provide aging in place and allowing people to stay in these homes forever. the stacked flats building, as i mentioned, are four-story. this provides a very unique experience where you take an elevator from the parking garage to your floor, and the elevator opens right into your unit so there is no corridor, nothing, it really feels very much like a single-family home even though you are in a building with seven other neighbours. again, huge terraces with gorgeous views and a lot of fenestration and doors opening up to nature. similar material pallet with stucco, metal panel and a little bit of stone at the base. the two buildings are connected, and will be permitted as one, so you enter the garage, the first story garage off the private road four, and enter your elevator to go up to your unit. all of the living and kitchen and dining are in the corners, again, with the sliding doors that just open out, so it is very much indoor outdoor living experience. the three why townhomes are also a uni

we found it necessary to address ongoing issues for the commercial parcel at 1330 fillmore.is typical concerns of crowd control and noise complaints, and crowd disbursement upon closing, the reason we are here is because there have been numerous meetings public and private regarding the sale and use of the commercial parcel from which we have been excluded or our point of view has been minimized we are here to correct that and obtain a voice in the process. the format -- homeowners of the fillmore heritage centre are tied to the commercial parcel, fiscally in that we share corridors and adjoining walls, and financially because we share the common areas, and because emotionally, what happens at this parcel has a significant impact on our will be -- well-being. i'm sure members are not surprised that we're here to stand up and make our voices heard in the wake of a brutal killing that happened march 23 rd just steps from our front door. that shooting death of innocent bystanders have made us question concerns for our safety and has galvanized as to wake up as community harold

different height limit than parcel c3.1. and along avenue c, it's a little bit shorter. >> lastly on the replacement, again a little clarification here. are we matching -- i mean, we are providing affordable housing, we're not necessarily matching four bedrooms before and now you're going to be getting four bedrooms. that's not -- we're matching approximately to what you can get. because, yeah, is that -- >> i mean, we have to -- per the d.d.a., there's a certain number of households that have replacement unit benefits. and those units need to be matched based on the unit sizes. but moving forward, once everybody receives their benefit, it's more typical to both the market and what's typically seen in affordable housing. >> commissioner richardson: city wide. city policies that guarantee one for one-on-one replacement. you're going to have something. but if you were in five bedrooms before, that does not mean you're going to have five bedrooms. we need to be questioning that. this is a city policy. they guarantee you'll not

the one parcel that was built took forever to get that money and that was for families. i just thing like other issues we're dealing with, there has to be more than one way we do this and go out and say we're going to have to address this. i just want to make that point. i think the buying and acquisition of existing buildings just as important as building the new affordable. >> and we absolutely agree preservation is an important component of our work and appreciate the board and mayor also on allocating the funds to small site acquisition and contemplating adding a component to the fund because we realize we need additional capacity in other areas of the city there hasn't been historically a community develop tore go after sites. >> commissioner: again, thank you for the report. i wanted to maybe make some suggestions. i think it's great what we see in terms of possibly looking at what's lacking and certain distric districts can use help in some of the affordable units but one thing i find the report lacking is information. it probably doesn't quite fit into the format

almost 900,000 parcels. 500 square miles of property in seven years. still today in san francisco, we've only surveyed 20%, and no large focused effort. these are all individual, project-driven efforts. so it is time. it is time we need to get this survey done. we need to get it done yesterday. why? because it's not just about protecting our historic resources, but it is about identifying what is not historic. which, based on the data from the l.a. survey, and it's been confirmed with our own limited data, that will be half the city. more than half the properties surveyed are not historic. but because we haven't done the survey, every individual project that comes before us has to go through this process of evaluating it. that takes about a year and a half to two years, delaying the project from moving forward. so currently with current resources, it will take between six and seven years to complete our survey. [buzzer] >> what i'm asking is for your support to get this done in half that time. we're currently trying to break free the post-entitlement p

second finding they found it would not remove all the constraints for parcel. there would need to be other limitations on setbacks in order attract new development and maximize. they're going tob to be writing future brief. they used an estimate. those were the three maintain -- >> supervisor fewer: so nothing about displacement? >> that's right. >> supervisor fewer: there's surprising there's nothing about displacement. thank you. >> supervisor brown: one more question, did your report find in the sb50, the results that it would produce more subsidize affordable housing? >> can i have a minute to look at the report? >> supervisor brown: yes, you can. >> supervisor mar: because large number that like to speak -- >> this my last one. ours does talk about that and the answer was question at the time we were estimating inclusionary production based upon the way the bill was drafted at that time. it would apply to all potential development. the bill has been amended and inclusionary requirement currently drafted only applies to buildings that have 10 or more units

between him and the volume of parcels has been rising and will continue to do so we can only guarantee delivery if we have a fleet they can reach our customers where ever they are that will no longer be possible with our diesel trucks and inner cities and the perceivable future. so we have to consider alternatives. environmental activist zone kiddies and regularly measures the air quality. it's not just cars and trucks that pollute the air here but also ships have buggies germany's largest port. the concentration of particulate matter is high from. the same kind of pollution from water traffic that we do from street traffic it's just that on ships the diesel engines are much bigger hence the high levels of nitrogen oxides and find particularly. matter in our city. diesel vehicles that don't meet the euro six standards have now been banned from parts of downtown. at least that's a step in the right direction. just. follow all road traffic to be electric powered there are no longer any technical obstacles to cars and light commercial vehicles all going electric. then of course the air wo

there hamburg in northwest germany he didn't know there's about eight hundred letters and ninety parcels a day. he works for dr past germany's biggest mail company. he drives an electric powered lights to lety vehicle called a street scooter. the post has a fleet of thirty four at this sorting office. and yes i'm in my first impression was that they look a bit odd that the design was unusual. past special it's nothing like it had ever been seen before. the vehicle was commissioned by dr passed because there were none on the market that fulfilled its requirements. dacha passed for the company that makes the vehicle four years ago. when benyamin four sets off each morning the battery is fully charged it can't be recharged while he's out and about only back at the depo. the range is eighty kilometers that's fine for his routine it's a whole except perhaps when he has the heating on. as i might once when it was raining a lot and everything was really damp i cranked up the heating on and i used five percent more power on that day and it wasn't even cold when i have to see what happens when it