this is just a term extension to the parcel k, and i have k and l on the map, the larger parcel is technically a sublease with the redevelopment agency and then passed through to proxy. we have done the background work necessary to allow this extension by extending our agreement with the redevelopment agency as well. that was included in your package. finally, a technical item i want to correct an error in both items. it is a typographical error of the day. for item 6, on page one, line 24, the reference to the director of planning letter, which states april 26, 2011, should be made 14, 2010. that is consistent with the attachment in the package. similarly, unfortunately, this is the curse of cutting and pasting sometimes, for item 7 on page two, line 15, same change in revising the date from april 26, 2011 to may, 14, 2010. we respectfully request to make that amendment. supervisor chu: just to clarify, what was the second one on item number seven? >> that is line 15, page two, revising the date of every 26, 2011 to may 14, 2010. >> and these are not substantive and would not require a contin

this is just a term extension to the parcel k, and i have k and l on the map, the larger parcel is technically a sublease with the redevelopment agency and then passed through to proxy. we have done the background work necessary to allow this extension by extending our agreement with the redevelopment agency as well. that was included in your package. finally, a technical item i want to correct an error in both items. it is a typographical error of the day. for item 6, on page one, line 24, the reference to the director of planning letter, which states april 26, 2011, should be made 14, 2010.