conditionally disapprove the department's decision and approve the application for the proposed tentative parcel map, and item 37 is a motion to direct the preparation of findings in the event the board acts to approve the tentative map application. >> president breed: colleagues, we have before us now the appeal of the department of public works disapproval of a tentative map application for condominium conversion at 668 through 678 page street. for this hearing, we will be considering whether or not to overturn the department of public works' disapproval of a condominium conversion subdivision map act -- application for 668 through 678 page street in district five. without objection, we will proceed as follows: up to ten minutes for a presentation by the appellant or the appellant representative. up to two minutes perspeaker in support of the appeal. up to ten minutes for a presentation from city departments, the department of public works and the planning department. up to two minutes perspeaker in opposition of the appeal, and finally, up to two -- up to three minutes for a rebuttal by the appel

we will begin with the parcel map. the union scare business improvement district is around the union scare neighborhood and assesses 597 parcels. it was originally informed in 1999 angry newed in 2005 and -- renewed in 2005 and 2009. a budget of a little over $3 million. i would is to expire on june 30, 2019. the union scare businesses district is led by karen flood. the service areas are clean and safe, marketing advocacy, beatification and street scape improvement and management and operations. oewd reviewed the following four benchmarks for the bid. the only difference is benchmark two where they were review for 1% of the union square bids from sources other than assessment revenue. bench america one, -- benchmark one they met this requirements. for benchmark two, for the assessment revenue and other income, union square business improvement district raised 35% from nonassessment sources which clearly exceeds the 1% requirement. for three they met this as well and have historically met this. for four they indicated c

and then, on the most western side, it also included another parcel that's actually not included on the map before you that we refer to as the jamestown parcel. hunters point shipyard of course is the previous location of the naval shipyard. i want to give a quick background of sort of the structure of what's the governing structure behind it. these two projects are of course within two redevelopment project areas. the hunters point shipyard redevelopment project and its associated plan was established in 1997. it includes two phases. phase one is currently under construction, partially complete. and then, phase two has not begun its implementation. candlestick point is in with the bayview-hunters point redevelopment project area. that area was established in 2006, actually, in its current state, it was establish index 200 200 -- established in 2006. in 2010, of course the project, the candlestick point hunters point shipyard project was -- received its master entitlements. it has its two components in these two project redevelopment areas. that project is a part of its master approvals, in

these navy maps show on several parcels up to 67% of the cleanup data may have been falsified.t means some of the shipyard could still be contaminated with radiation. at this point, is the safety of the shipyard in question? derek: we have to make sure it's safe before we transfer it to the city of san francisco. liz: so, right now, the navy doesn't know if hunter's point is safe? derek: we have to collect new data to ensure that the property's safe. liz: robinson says the navy plans to retest all of the land where tetra tech performed radiological work that could lead to more cleanup. but tetra tech already spent 12 years and a quarter of a billion dollars in taxpayer money. where was the navy in all of this? how did the navy let this happen? derek: all i can say is that we do--we do what we can with the information that we have. liz: this is the navy's land, this is the navy's project. isn't the navy supposed to be overseeing this, keeping a very close eye on your contractor? derek: yeah, and we have site superintendents that go out and look at contractors every day. i think

so on any parcel in orange or yellow area on map, a developer would be entitled to request trance eu9-rich bonus exempting them from parking limits. the city would be prohibited from enforcing the height limit of 55, or 58 feet but could still enforce objective zones and design standards as long as they don't we deuce the development potential bloat f.i.r.s list -- below the f.i.r.s listed here. there are areas downtown and area plans where the existing wroaning iser in permissive than what sbal 827 proposes. so there be no change from today. as a mentioned earlier, the bill does not mandate changes to the local approval process. they would be subject to local inclusionary requirements. including conditional use authorizations and historic preservation review. our section 317 controls on deck lition of units would replain in place. as mentioned earlier, projects requesting a bonus would be a able to compound the bonus and remain eligible for other streamlining laws like sb 325. there are a set of protections for rentals. the bill bans the demolition for rental units for transit-rich p

here's a map showing in blue the jamestown parcel that would be removed from the development project by excising it from zone one of the redevelopment project area. now, with respect to the d for d, with the stadium option gone, five point engaged london base arc tech sir david ajay -- [ inaudible ] >> -- to align with the shipyard's historic street grid and the creation of large blocks. both of these aspects would allow the developer to maintain more of the large industrial buildings that currently exist on the shipyard and celebrate them by -- [ inaudible ] >> -- starting in the north -- [ inaudible ] >> -- the north shoreline district is residential in isn't that true and lower in building heights. it would serve as a continuation of the hunters point hill development down to the northern waterfront. as you see in the center in red -- in green, the village center is the home of the artists building and the commercial kitchen, and it's a prime location for future maker spaces and retail. [please stand by for captioner switch] . >> it calls for an appropriate massing around the gree

are saying this is actually not one parcel but three -- or excuse me, five, five parcels, can you explain to me how on the map, when you look at it, it looks like one, but you're arguing that it's five. >> on july 14, 2014, lot 019, which is the lot that the existing church currently is on, was sub divided into lots 061, 062, 063, 064, and 065, and the project sponsor who's here can speak more to the history of how these lots existed, they previously exited at five were merged into one and then subdivided subsequently on 2014. >> supervisor cohen: thank you. i want to say that the appellant says that it's one, and the planning department says that it's five. thank you for that clarification. i no further questions, colleagues, i don't know if you have any questions at this particular point. i think it's pretty open and shut. >> president breed: thank you, supervisor cohen. seeing no names on the roster, i would like to ask for the project sponsor to come forward. you have up to ten minutes for a presentation. >> members of the board of supervisors, my name is david rubbenstein. i'm one of the sponsors of this