a list of the parcels in the proposed renewed district are attached, and they include five parcels that total $12,000, -- $12,747.82, representing about 3.40% of the wages within the district. if you have any questions about the ballots for these parcels or the resolution, i am here to answer your questions. supervisor campos: colleagues, any comments or questions? why don't we open it up to public comment. is there any member of the public who would like to speak on this item? please go ahead. thanks for patiently waiting on this item. >> no problem. supervisors, i am the president of the fillmore jazz community but the district, and i am standing to ask that you support the resolution before you. as you know, we are in the process of renewal. we are going through transitions and doing the best we can to make sure to take care of the safety, marketing, and cleaning of the area. a negative vote would basically hinder that process. we want to continue the process of making sure to keep that area safe, make sure to keep that area marketed, and make sure to keep that area clean, so we hope

the parcels and these guys on our 0-- -- and the sky zone are parceled dearly. the second issue is mixed use . we know there has been a lot of buzz lately. there are permitted to have the residential and the detail permitted. since this was something that was recorded by the eastern neighborhood plan, we have added language in section 329 that adds the ability of the planning commission to reflect this on condition that the non- residential use can only be on the ground floor, third it also gets used by other agencies, it can only be on the main street and not alleys, and also other conditions and alleys base of the time of approval. i am happy to clarify any other issues. also with me, my colleague cory teague. between the two of us we should be able to answer any questions you may have. chair miguel: thank you. is there any public comment on this item? public comment is closed. commissioner antonini: vote to approve. commissioner borden: second. >> commissioners, on that motion to approve -- [roll call vote] so moved. commissioners, that's passes unanimously 4

and city parcel. it facilitates the city parcel through the redevelopment agency, a party to that agreement, to allow for the development of affordable housing in the future. so this is step one of a secondary step. the particulars of this exchange are 746 square feet going in one direction, 2278 square feet in the other direction. the benefit of that, a differential of approximately $69,637. those are funds owed to the city, providing more land than the seller is provided to us. therefore, it is not quite an even exchange, but the agreement calls for the payment to be made by the llc to the city. supervisor chu: thank you for the presentation. this item does not have a budget analyst's report, given the no impact to the general fund. why don't we open this item up to public comment. is there anyone from the public that would like to comment on this item? item 12. seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues, can we send this item forward with recommendations? without objection. thank you. collea

every parcel and each separate parcel has garbage pickup. can't go with your neighbor even if you only have a small garbage bag and combine your garbage with your neighbor's garbage and have one garbage pickup for two houses. so i don't know how people cannot have garbage pickup for any house. so i just would like to end this by saying that if everyone picked up one piece of litter off the street and encouraged everyone else to pick up one piece of litter off the street every day, maybe our streets would look better and our visitors would be -- have a more enhanced visit to san francisco and not consider that we're one of the dirtiest cities in the country. i'd really like to see our streets cleaned up, and i think that anything we can do to make our streets beautiful is an advantage. thank you. president chiu: thank you. any other members of the public wish to speak in general public comment? seeing none, general public comment is closed. madam clerk, could you please read the adoption without committee reference counter. the clerk: these i

the liberal on the parcel -- laguna honda parcel. they are habitat corridor related, whatever, and i do not think there is a way to encapsulate his policies so as we move forward, we can say about the terms of the relationship with other city departments or community groups because this really is our mission and our charge, in this is what we should be doing, but it is complicated. particularly in a situation. i do think it is part of the conversation around p.c.s. sets and how we either contract with other agencies or with stakeholder groups -- it is part of the conversation around puc assets. >> clearly, as we work with the trailheads, there is an organizational aspect but also a safety aspect, but inside the city, the charter gives the recreation and parks department authority, so if you really are talking about boating on the lake and fishing on the lake, where does that fit into their charge versus our charge? we will take a look at that. president vietor: particular one is land that we know, as opposed to other rec and park par

we are the owners of free with parcells -- freeway parcels j and h, directly south west of the site. i am here to support -- to voice our strong support. we think this project will significantly in rich and enhance this portion of the neighborhood. we think it architectural design is very attractive, very interesting. we think it is very appropriate in terms of size and scale. there is a proposal to enhance ivy street -- straight and make it a vibrant corridor. we believe this project will significantly further the goals of the market octavius street plan and abide by its many precepts, including the 0.5 parking spaces per unit. also, the willingness to build below market units on site will enhance affordable housing. we strongly support this project. president olague: thank you. >> good evening. i am with construction employers association. i will be very brief. we represent commercial general building contractors. this project is a win-win-win. it enhances and beautifies the neighborhood, as we have heard. it is mixed use. it has shops on the floors. it has to burst residential uni

the proposal is for a 3-story single-family residence on a coral parcel -- corner parcel. it will eliminate one parking space. the project is to raise the overall building heights 42 6 inches to construct a new roof deck at the rear and eliminate of street parking and make other exterior modifications. the building is located within the required funds and set back and rear yards. the expansion will require a variants with the nonconforming structure. the variance hearing was continued until march 23, and it will be continued until august. >> we do not have a quorum. chair miguel: we are without a quorum. >> thank you. commissoner moore: continue. >> we will be consistent with the guidelines, and there is no requirement for the proposed expansion being compatible with any existing neighborhoods -- buildings in the neighborhood. it requires that the proposed reduction to the rear improves the stepping pattern along laidley. it provides for lateral slipping to biography. -- laterals slipping into poverty. -- lateral sloping topography. we recommend that you approve the projec

over which the board has jurisdiction, where this five parcels would be subject to assessment in the proposed renewed and expanded property and business improvement district currently known as the bill more jazz community benefit district. >> good afternoon. i am year to present a resolution authorizing the mayor to cast assessment ballots in the affirmative on behalf of the city and county of san francisco as the owner of five parcels over which the board of supervisors have jurisdiction, where these five parcels would be subject to an assessment in the proposed renewed and expanded property and business improvement district, currently known as the fillmore jazz community benefit district, to be renamed. the district is in the process of renewal, and right now, the department of elections has sent out all of the ballots to every property owner within the proposed renewed district. they have also said ballots to the

, the more easily parcel. we said we would do the analysis, and that there was no problem, and the commissioner said she did not want to make a problem out of this. we were happy about the ability to do it, so that is what you see before you. as mike said, the height here, dealers talking about buildings of 250 feet in height, and we were able to look at what a model profile was, and we worked closely with the department on what the modeling look like, and in the end, i think they are happy with what the neighborhood will become. it is a real opportunity. you have heard it from people in the community. they see an opportunity, after 30 years of being vigilant about what the opportunity was, that they will be able to do that. i guess the last thing i would say is you had this up before the commission. you rely upon them as supervisors and their guidance, and i think they have done a wonderful job on your behalf, so thank you for your concerns and your comments on that. >> good afternoon, supervisors. general ma

that item is an exchange of 6.21 acres of city-owned land in the 6264-foot parcel from the sfpuc to the college in direct exchange for 6.6 acres of land from dulles to the sfpuc. the to the consideration of other requirements. i will spell those out a bit for the record for you. they are approximately valued at $37 million. this is an even, no cost exchange to either party. so the terms of the exchange, let me very briefly sure you a before and after that i think will be clearer than this rather tactical map. so this is the before situation. sfpuc is ownership is to the north. , the other to the south, and we are transferring some lands to create the future of busted project and a connection with the ocean, which is currently disconnected. >> so mr. updike, the bus is going to go around the fire station, so it will go on ocean, koran around, come out on phelan, and come back around? >> yes. now, the split is east-west, rather than north-south. re quickly, the points are that this is a direct, no-cost exchange between the parties. grants and reservations of easements for water pipeline a

tie- back easement and a temporary construction easement over, on, and in portions of assessor's parcel no. 038-200-020 located in the town of hillsborough, san mateo county, and required for the crystal springs pipeline no. 2 replacement project, known as project no. cuw37801, for a purchase price of $87,570. supervisor chu: thank you. please also call item 10 and item 11. >> item 10. resolution approving and authorizing an agreement for the purchase of a two permanent access road easements and two temporary construction easements over, on, and in portions of assessor's parcel nos. 253-270- 17, 19, 21, 24, and 25 located in san joaquin county, required for the san joaquin pipeline system project no. cuw37301 for a purchase price of $83,900. item 11. resolution approving and authorizing agreements with purchase of a permanent access verdi's men and a temporary construction these men over, on, and in portions of assessor's parcel numbers 253-170-05 located in san joaquin county, required for the san joaquin pipeline system. supervisor chu: these are all items related to projects that the

so it took from 1928 to 1957 to buy up all the parcels of land that ended up in this 317 acres. the park, as a general rule, is heavily used in the mornings and the evenings. one of the favorite places is up by the upper reservoir because dogs get to go swim. it's extremely popular. many fights in the city, as you know, about dogs in parks. we have 317 acres and god knows there's plenty of room for both of us. man and his best friend. early in the morning people before they go to work will walk their dogs or go on a jog themselves with their dogs. joggers love the park, there's 7 miles of hiking trails and there's off trail paths that hikers can take. all the recreational areas are heavily used on weekends. we have the group picnic area which should accommodate 200 people, tennis courts are full. it also has 3 playground areas. the ampitheater was built in 1972. it was the home of the first blues festival. given the fact that jerry garcia used to play in this park, he was from this neighborhood, everybody knows his reputation. we thought what a great thing it would be to have an

currently available is sf parcel the assessor's application. you can go to the assessor's website and bring up a map of san francisco you can search by address and get information about any place in san francisco. you can search by address and find incidents of crime in san francisco in the last 90 days. we have [inaudible] which allows you to click on a map and get nchldz like your supervisor or who your supervisor is. the nearest public facility. and through the sf applications we support from the mayor's office of neighborhood services. you can drill down in the neighborhood and get where the newest hospital or police or fire station. >> we are positive about gis not only people access it in the office but from home because we use the internet. what we used to do was carry the large maps and it took a long time to find the information. >> it saves the city time and money. you are not taking up the time of a particular employee at the assessor's office. you might be doing things more efficient. >> they have it ready to go and say, this is wha

currently available is sf parcel the assessor's application. you can go to the assessor's website and bring up a map

. >>> city council also placed mayor jean kwan's parcel tax proposal on the ballot. they will decide the issue in special election. it will raise $11 million for five years. the mayor has been pushing for a parcel tax to maintain staffing levels and fux more potholes and restore park maintenance crews. >> you voted for warmer weather and today mike found it. >> it's that easy, take it away. >> wish it was. i wish i could please everybody all the time. good morning to you. coming up on 4:38, storm track still moving to the north. in fact, we have the dry air over the top of us. no clouds this morning, and without that marine layer that means the sun will spend all the time warming us today. it's mild this morning. we have temperatures, upper 50s to low 60s. extreme, 67 in antioch, half moon bay. as is the case, it gets chilly at night, 46 degrees. take a look at the afternoon temperatures, we'll have near 70 along the coast. mid to upper on 70s in richmond, oakland and san mateo and low to mid-80s for fremont and into the south bay. upper 80s to near 90s in the north

currently available is sf parcel the assessor's application. you can go to the assessor's website and bring up a map of san francisco you can search by address and get information about any place in san francisco. you can search by address and find incidents of crime in san francisco in the last 90 days. we have [inaudible] which allows you to click on a map and get nchldz like your supervisor or who your supervisor is. the nearest public facility. and through the sf applications we support from the mayor's

i have organized to them by parcel. but if you look at that, out of the 27 parcels represented, only eight are in the immediate vicinity, only one of those in favor, six are neutral, and one of recently resend it. -- and one has recently rescinded. my house is two stories over basement, not three stories, with a similar amount of square footage. despite my requests, numerous requests, i have never been able to meet with the architect through the whole process. there were four general meetings, but none of them concerned these plants. the decrease in height between 2008 and 2010 from 12 feet to 7 feet had nothing to do with the neighbors. the planning department did not approve it. each meeting was slightly different, with various hand drawn concepts. be seen to be strategic in nature as opposed to sincere venues for attempting to accommodate some of our concerns. the last meeting was may, 2010, and as a result the current plans were seen for the first time by us in march of this year and by the planning department, no s