after date in parenthesis april 1, 2010, line three. >> ok. and down on the second to the last line after task force by legislation adopted 2011, adopted by the board of supervisors, 2011. >> and we'll find the dates on that. >> so we don't have a date? >> it's july something. >> so i would move that we don't include that. >> ok, so here we go. we're going to have to vote on each one. that's the only way we can determine that he's been skherd whether or not we agree wilt. on the question of whether or not he go back and determine what the date was, mr. alons snowe >> sure. >> sure what? yes or no. >> yes. >> yes what, in? >> in >> mr. leigh? >> i'd say only if we can find the data -- date while we're doing this editing process. i don't think we should extend this >> miss mondejar? >> yes, if we can find it before we leave today. >> let's just find it. >> it's the task force legislation approved by the board of supervisorses? >> adopted by july blank throvepb carry out the required redistricting. >> north carolina >> no, he wants it in the prio

spoke about it as if, you know, as this term ends, as if this is a throwback, as if it is sort of a parenthesisn history it was almost a sympathetic view, well the country was in distress four years ago, it went for this charismatic hope and change and of course now it's all been dashed. i think romney might want to use that theme, so that especially for the presidential candidate, it's less of an attack, it's more of in sorrow than in anger, saying we tried this other approach, we went for the grand sweep and the charisma, but progressmatically they had nothing to offer, they don't respect the freedom or origin of our successes and therefore we have to go back to what our strengths are and romney will try to show how he can both represent them and bring them to government. jenna: we'll watch for that theme and see if it comes up tonight as we await this speech. charles, i was looking back on some of your writing in 2008 after the conventions for both the democrats and the republicans, and i want to share with our viewers something that you wrote about the democrats and president obama in 2008

room, 50% less likely chance of getting a comic pain medications for fresh long bone fracture in parenthesisshows parking that it was repeated in atlanta, this time looking at african-american in the exact same study and the same results were found. so, this has been covered i think in a lot of ways, but it was just like to share with you it talks about the inertia of racism. we talked about it a social event, lots of ways to look at it. but this is a racial iceberg. an iceberg is 9% below the surface, 10% above and above the surface of things we been talking about for the most part today, the encounters and difficulties. but this iceberg is in a sea of history. and it is really helpful to me to get a feeling, an understanding of this inertia, this environmental racism. and it depends on the fact that amnesty of history, this racial iceberg is supportive. it has its inertia and the fact that is due to an rear projected still by slavery, but jim crow, by colonialism, but the civil war itself, japanese internment, immigration, lynchings, chinese and terminate, the monroe.come in the mexican-am

says ominously -- "but if china continues its rapid economic growth" -- and i say as a matter of parenthesis, who doesn't believe china is going to do everything in its power to continue its growth path and do what it's doing? so he says -- "if china continues its rapid economic growth, it has averaged 10% per year over the last 20 years, and its vast use of coal, it typical ly adds one new gig a watt per month -- gigawatt per month, then that same warming could take place in less than 20 years." less than 20 years, folks. in north carolina recently, state senators actually voted not to do any planning for the poe tension of sea level rise, even though scientists today tell you the sea level is rising. ask insurance companies about what they are thinking about, about their potential exposure in liabilities as you look down the road with respect to the disasters that could come as a consequence of these changes. so the plain fact is that despite all of the evidence -- i'm not going to go through all of it right now, but it is there for colleagues to analyze. countless studies of what's happen