and then in parenthesis, we have back. i presume it was the back building. the permit again, issued and reviewed -- reviewed by bid. the fire department and central permit bureau issued on the 28th of march, and the permits were suspended on april 10th because of the appeals. let me start with the complaint that d.b.i. received. complaint was received on the 20th of february, 2018. and it was -- the complainant's name and phone number is on here. legal conforming windows on the property line and there were pictures atta wid the complaints that was received by d.b.i. that was on the 20t20th of february. on the 21st of february, it was -- sorry the 26t26th of february it was seen by inspector duffy. inspector duffy ruled the following notice of an of violation. a complaint has been filed in this report -- department on the east property line with the building permits. on the third floor of the front building, the installation of two numbers and the third floor of the rear building, installation of fraud or a windows. no permit exists for this work. he cited th

when you are accepted into the cemetery they list you in parenthesis is pending.all of these other celebrities that were around texas and then he comes to me. as much as i loo forward to it myself. my application was rejected. it went around. when i told people i was interviewing you. i've called the last couple weeks the larry palouse a. in writing for the new yorker in the looming tower has been on julio. as a young writer and have a trading in this. for me i have to research everything to death. if i had trouble writing it's usually because i don't know enough. then i forget everything. i have to start using note cards can i borrow your legal pad a minute. there is this little margin over here so i will write down the names of the people i have heard about and then i would write down their telephone numbers over here. so new names and new telephone numbers as i talk to each of them i highlight that i've talked to them. if i'm at the fbi and i say who also mike to talk too. their eyes get big. they are more forthcoming. one of the fbi guys once told me that they

all of the targets in that framework, i want to focus today on housing and open space. )-right-parenthesisary expo -- focus is to... this affordable housing plan has been designated, or i'm sorry, designed to facilitate development of 25% of all residential units built within the project site. the developer may satisfy the foregoing obligations through a combination of the following options. in addition, that affordable housing plan establishes maximum affordability levels and inclusionary units. at each of the milestones described above, and upon full buildout of the project site, the rate at which rental units are offered must not exceed on average a rate that would be affordable to households earning 110% of ami at the rate at which for-sale units are offered must notch doors must not exceed an average which be affordable to households earning 120% of ami. all fees generated would be applied to affordable housing projects to be constructed in the bayview neighborhoods. training to open space, the developer proposes a mixed-use development of the project site which would include a new pu

he seeks massive matter parenthesis at nothing to do with ideology at all.he transcripts were released, it was his homophobia. other come of it was because he was a latent or an outright homosexual. i think he is correct to say that that's what this represents come very islamic interpretation. interpretation. because the revert to text more so than 90% of the modern, it's the way they skewed the text and to cut a check to understand the nuances of the ideal to get this working make mistakes a mainstream. don't miss are not that basis is it your understanding of that is needed in order to refute the ideology. not saying that realizations i came to was i thought it was all ideology and an objective assessment of one to find the truth but i realized it had a lot more to do with personal issues. ideology is what transitions you from hearing to radical ideas and acting upon them. i think would is correct. >> i'm not totally convinced actually that is correct. i think you raise the couple important issues. first, there's a very deep theological debate going on in

i think also by the time my father gets to his birth, i mean, he mentions his birth date in parenthesis[laughter] you know, in conjunction with another event. and i remember reading that and thinking, well, how very interesting. i think that i could both see that it was, quote-unquote, weird from a western narrative point of view and yet, of course, there's something about it which was incredibly familiar to me, and i understood this. i understood this diminishment of the self. i mean, it was, you know, you know what i mean? one thing was something i knew with my left hand and one thing was something i knew with my right because i had this conflict between an interdependent self and an independent self, both of which are in me. i did have an artistic preoccupatn and sething which i had to say you know, would have t say was definitely mine. and so there is a way in which even as i inhabit all these other people and all my fiction regardless of who i'm talking about, i am also still there. so there's a way i which this problem, if you will, that i have, this split between interdependence