their word sounded from the pages of the newspapers of the partisan press on the belarusian radio, raising the morale of the soviet people. frequent guests in the editorial office chairman of the union of writers of the bssr petrus, brovka yakub kolos other famous writers but other information was to be broadcasted pride, excitement could hardly be hidden left in a bit fall among the cultural inhabitants of ukraine the premiere screening of the film konstantin zaslov yun illuminated glory to that son of the belarusian people kirovnik orsha partizans to the hero of the soviet union konstantin sergeevich zaslov, the dishes are introduced by the ranniks, a belarusian playwright. arkad. iosifovich maozon belarusian director kosh sablin director alexander falshimer the picture became a post-war film made on foot at a film studio, belarusfilm, go yak, they are shown wim, lumpy. screenshot the heart or reached. now i have fresh calms for them who waved at once for the elephant feat of the belarusian partisans will be shaking. and give if many generations in the first post-war years, despite all t

their word sounded from the pages of the partisan press newspaper on the belarusian radio, raising the morale of the soviet people. frequent guests in the editorial office of fur with linkov chairman of the union of writers of the bssr petrus, brovka yakub kolos other famous writers playwrights poets but other information had to be broadcasted pride, excitement could hardly be concealed with difficulty departed in a beaten case with the cultural life of ukraine premiere screening of the film konstantin zaslonova youn illuminated to the glorious son of the belarusian people, the kirov of the orsha partizans, the hero soviet union konstantin sergeevich zasledov, the dishes from the rannik are acquaintances, belarusian, playwright, arcade. iosifovich mavzon, belarusian director kosh sablin, director alexander falshimer, the picture was the first post-war film made at the film studio. belarus movie, go. which are shown wim, a lump turned into the heart of the ice show. i am now freshly remembered, who waved at once for the elephant feat of the belarusian partisans will be stunned. and opin

being elected partisan sheriff who stood at the press conference last week and talk to this as good policyficers on the line every day, working for us and i have in the past have been concealed every permit it is not a terribly high burden to me already it's a background check it's the ability to show proficiency with a firearm and it's filling out a form for the government it's really not a high burden and now we're giving away with all of. that. so individuals who may never have had a background check appleton estate of florida. that just wild than i want to shift gears. as we talked about florida has a history of horrific mass shootings from parkland marjory stoneman douglas we are coming up on the five year anniversary you are an alumnus of that school 2008 we also have the pulse nightclub shootings in orlando. i mean why has this become a priority for republican lawmakers in tallahassee? and want to be very honest with our viewers. there is a super majority in the florida legislature. so, is it really reality to say, they aren't, it's inevitable that this hamas carry is going to pass?

after the partisan, being itself stands out from the group of those who attacked with the mind from the vulgar about the breakthrough, i pressging over him with a real field, then kalina brest fortress with magic dachshund is in the image of a soldier soldier, the defenders sound like such a camp, here he is belarusian partisan as once i show. carried him like that. lenin shows them supposedly. so the most on the way to the way to live and die, that what a breakthrough here i am such an idea, and she brought it, because only often the partisans managed to break through. here is the blockade. or emotions, and here there is such a confusion of displacement and heroism and displacement without multiplying and pain, because these are young creatures, it seems that those live in this battle, this is a bullet, i hit them, and he froze in this flight in this to her. 45% of the partizans of belarus were young people from 15 to 25. that is, that is the basis, and calibrate w from 20 six and up to 45 and 6:42%, that is, here we are talking about those who rose to fight the suffix occupier and the tokyo warehouse was. uh, partizan ikea

. >> you are a nation that no longer has a free and fair press, fake news is all you get. judy: we watched partisan that undermine our ability to deal with real problems. >> much of the federal government was dark after congress failed to agree on a stopgap funding bill judy: shocking acts of violence directed at our political leaders. >> remains sedated three days after being shot in the head at point-blank range. judy: for at least five minutes, gunshots crackled across the northern baseball field where members of congress were practicing. >> nancy pelosi's husband, paul, was severelyeaten with a hammer this morning. judy: and even attempt to subvert the machinery of democracy itself. >> chaos erupted at the u.s. capitol today when pro-trump demonstrators breached barricades and pushed their way inside. judy: our current and former presidents of both parties acknowledge that something has changed over time. pres. biden: we did not have many people playing on the fears of the american people. it has gotten to mean -- too mean, personal, devices. >> so much of our politics has become a naked appeal

the press supposed to be the guardians of free expression and seem to be partisans like present tornistration. not honest brokers. as madison said in the at all ralist a virtuous citizenry we have 30 million people regular users of illegal drugs in the country. that's a problem. we haven't mentioned the economic situation. everybody talks about that. we are also balkanized red and blue, staring each other down. these are not good times. we need good leadership and we need the correct but good institutions. one other example. the military has always been held in the highest esteem by the american people. what happens after these balloons and all that? does that just fall on the president sorry is there some question about shooting those balloons down? those guys in illinois from the balloon shop are they going to get a refund? it just seems crazy and whom can you trust? of course maybe the most importanting thing i mention the decline in religious instance tuksz attendance in church way way down. >> yeah and i want to go back talking about education because culver city in southern cal

partisan. why do we have to listen to you? if you are reporting on both sides, you have that credibility of neutrality to be able to press botht humanitarian law. sure, but the ukrainians were only firing from civilian areas because their civilian areas were being attacked and indeed occupied by the russian military. but what you're doing, you're getting into the substance of the report, and i'm not prepared to get into those details here. but that's very different from attacking the principle. amnesty was completely right on the principle to report on both sides. human rights watch does that as well. now, if i could, let me come back to your autocracy point, because this neutrality that human rights watch maintains in the context of armed conflicts, we don't pretend to be neutral about whether there's a democracy or not. you know, a democracy is, you know, is basically a government respecting human rights. you know, if you don't have respect for human rights, you don't have a democracy. so in that context, i mean, to say we're neutral or we don't really care what kind of government is there, no, that's not true. you know, we

take overall 50 state election laws on a partisan basis and believe it or not, 47 of 49 democrats went along with them. the liberal hysteria spread to the pressand the private sector, woke activists started talking about boycotting companies like coca-cola and delta airlines, major league baseball moved the all-star game out of atlanta directly harming the local economy, all for the sake of symbolism. republicans said this was unhinged, phony outrage over common sense law that would make it both easy to vote and hard to cheetah. democrats said the new voting rules were evil and racist and the literal death of democracy. mr. president -- rum call. the presiding officer: without objection. ms. stabenow: thank you. mr. president, last month i received a message that reminded me of just how important the work we do here is for people and families in michigan and all across the country. dianna bloomfield wrote to me about the cost of her prescription medication. diana is diabetic and takes two types of insulin, four injections a day. she is retired and on medicare and with a supplemental policy for sub scritions. diana -- subscriptions. diana said

press while employed at the fcc. her actions purposely derailed the bipartisan agreement for the program. i am certain we will only see more of this partisan deceptive conduct if the fed moves this nomination forward. the fcc's mission rests on advancing communications in ways that serve the public interest. i am afraid ms. sohn and i have different outlooks about what is in the public's interest rate i cannot support a nominee who would put rural broadband access on the back border -- on the back burner. i cannot support a nominee who willfully jeopardizes broadcast stations. i cannot support a nominee who has the record of acting unethically while working at the very agency to which she is nominated. i voted for democratic fcc nominees in the past. including chairman stark and commissioner start. i do not agree with all of their positions, they were qualified and they were not driven by bias. this nomination has turned into a practical -- into a spectacle. because of the nominees own record and actions. i will not support a partisan nominee and i urged the administration to withdraw the nomination. at the previous two hearings i have ask

fiestier and a little more partisan >> it's a long way away from a speaker of the house ripping up a speech. >> we're watching president biden slowly soak up the moment, press the flesh, talk to folks we'll stay with these shots and then we're expecting to hear from newly elected governor of arkansas sarah huckabee sanders who will deliver the official republican response. it's interesting about mccarthy and what you were just saying, chuck. mccarthy and president biden had their first meeting at the white house last week. no one is going to say that there was kumbaya or the peace pipe being smoked, but the signals from both sides was sorta positive it wasn't as contentious and bitter as i think either one expected. >> they're the same guy. meaning they're the same political creature and i say this with respect for both of them when you think of the stereotype black slapper, the didn't i that pulls you over, can't we work this out, that's who kevin mccarthy is, that's who joe biden is now, neither one of them have political bases that will reward them for that behavior you can even tell kevin mccarthy was deciding i'm not going to stand up too many times an

confidential documents to the press while employed at the sec her actions purposely derailed the bipartisan agreement for the program i'm certainly well see more of this partisanceptive conduct if we live the nomination forward. the sec mission is advancing communication and the ways that promote set public interest i'm concerned just know it's in the public interest i cannot support a nominee who would put rural broadband access on the back burner i cannot support a nominee who would willfully jeopardize local broadcast stations i cannot support a nominee who oversees public safety communication but has amplified rhetoric for defined the police and i cannot support a nominee has a record of acting unethically for working against the very agency of what she is nominated i voted for fcc nominees in the past even commissioner stark i do not agree with all of their positions, but they were qualified and not driven by bias. this nomination has turned into a spectacle because of the nominees own record and actions. i will not support a partisan nominee in ath urge the administration to withdraw the nomination. the previous two hearings i have asked questions i have

press while employed at the fcc. her actions purposely derailed the bipartisan agreement to reform the program. i'm certainly we will only see more on this partisaneptive conduct if the nomination is moved forward. the fcc's mission rests on advancing communications and ways thatom serve the public interest.te i'm afraid ms. sohn and i have very different outlooks about what is in the public interest. i cannot support in nominee who would put rural broadband access on the burner. i cannot support a nominee who has willfully jeopardized local broadcast stations. i cannot support a nominee who public safety communications but has amplified rhetoric to defend the police. and i cannot support a nominee who has a record of acting on unethically while working at the very agency to which she is nominated. i voted for democratic fcc nominees in the past including chairman rosenworcel andmm commissioner stark. i do not agree with all of their positions, but they were qualified and they were not driven by bias. this nomination has turned into a spectacle because of the nominees record and actions. i will not support a partisan nominee and i urge the admini