so in seven of those cases, there's no obvious partizan or ideological balance. it's the federal government saying, hey, help us out. and, you know, that's par for the course. if you look at the historical average, trump goes to the court, 41 times in four years and. the end, the justices acquiesce. justices grant relief in 28 of those cases. and in almost all of those 28, there dissent republican right. and so, you know, i think it's it's part of the book tries really hard in four to sort of suggest at least at the beginning of the recent shift, the justices were not leading the charge right. that the the charges really led by the trump justice department. but there were all these opportunities for the court to push back and say this is not what these kinds of applications are for. this is not what we should be doing in this context. and instead, the court has kept saying, sure, so how much of this is the court and how much of this is this court? you cannot talk about the trump years acknowledging that during his years as president, he appointed gorsuch. he appo

the match against partizan was held by cska moscow, the match was also played here won.exander abramov in his sports news. the fighters of the western district destroyed the ukrainian armed forces strongholds in the kuppinsky direction with shock, if the crew of the vasilek automatic mortars they can fire up to 120 shells per minute in order to remain unnoticed, they quickly change the firing position, they move in off-road vehicles, and the artillerymen of the western district perform similar combat missions every day. yes, before that i had my own slavic ip auto disassembly. yeah a long time ago looked at it all, it means it’s a disgrace. so i closed the individual entrepreneur and refused to rent. i moved everything. i went home and my son grew up. well, for example, i want to tell him that victory will be ours. in the donetsk people's republic, they are restoring infrastructure, so in makeyevka they updated street lighting in the city and installed about 2,000 led lights. now it has become safer for both drivers and pedestrians to move around in the dark - all the de

such as a saber, these bayonets were very, very important for the partizans. third hall of the museum is called the hall of memory, it is dedicated to the liberation of the territory of belarus from the nazi invaders and the preservation of memory from those great days. we come to the central place of our memorial of the complex is the reconstructed partizanskaya dugout and of course, of course. you understand that it was not housed here during the years of the great fatherland of the patriotic war. uh, zemlyanka itself is the center of the shchuchin partisan formation, of course. or rather, they say, what remains of it is located much further from here in the depths of the forest. this place is very important as the preservation of our memory and, first of all, for teenagers for children for young people, who, of course, not only cannot remember, but many do not know about what happened, so for us it is very it was important to convey this information and show exactly. to the younger generation and in such a way that it is accessible. that is why the particip

and now i think it's all but disqualifying across partizan lines and so so you know at the one hand i agree with everything don said, but i also think are a couple of sort of modern tendencies that do take us in a direction that, you know, in my humble view, is not entirely healthy. another question i heard put out oh, i heard they put out pens for you guys. do they still do that? and what do you do with those things as well? so i'm oh they they put out quill. you know when you argue a case they put out quill. yeah. you know not everything's changed since your. department you're out to. i wish one of you worked for president who was a lawyer. the other of you worked for president to forgive me. may i've even heard of john marshall. humor aside or attempted humor aside, what was it like to? work for a president who at least paper understood the process of the law. so i guess that's to me. so you know, it's interesting one of the things what we about the nature of the office and part of preserving its reputation for being straight shooters and being non partizan is actually to maintain

but when you create these sort of vacuous, non partizan characters and then put them into partizan situations and then subject them all of these sexist bromides, right? and all of these sexist donald sutherland, remember is no prince in in commander in chief. i think you're you're creating a situation where it's very difficult to envision applause. all female president, unfortunately, and i mean that unfortunately in ways that it may have to wait until we actually have one. and then the are the writers and the show showrunners and the creators can envision what that might actually be. yeah, i'll challenge that a little bit i mean, you know, obviously in veep the star is a female and the antagonist not a protege in this. but i think just to the point we were saying earlier about the cycle of the sort of next wave of this being those aspirational shows, i think you're to see a wave of shows that will come up that will depict more gender and racial integration and diversity in how washington is depicted. i think they're going be popular because of what we were discussing about. i think people wa

and at the end of the release, beautiful shots from serbia, basketball in belgrade partizan played aen labrada, the match took place in an unusual atmosphere for basketball and the location was played outdoors in one of the parks belgrade. under the basketball court. the pool there was refurbished and about 7,500 spectators attended the match. and since the open-air friendly match at the game was officially allowed by the fireworks so beloved by the balkan fans, the effect was on basketball against the backdrop of fireworks. partizan won with a difference of 30 points and i would also add that earlier in the same place in serbia as part of a friendly tournament. the match against partisan was played by cska moscow. the serbs also won plus 20. that's all about sports for now until we meet in the next hour. you stole this at age 7 grandfather's dirk? the men from the yard told you this, soldier. it’s you who was never afraid of a fight, it’s with you, she’s everywhere, it’s calm, it’s you that friends can always rely on. it's you who can't stay. aside. this is you and here you are amon

but partizan organization introduces its own problems. let me fast forward about eight decades to another observer of congress that is the political scientist, wilson woodrow wilson, as a as a doctoral student at johns hopkins university, wrote a book that became probably the bestselling work of american political science in history and it's called congressional. most people remember it today, a famous pronouncement that congress in committee is congress at work. that's sort of the most famous. but wilson wasn't wasn't just writing a textbook. the book is quite polemical, and he's very concerned that the congress of his day was, again a place where special interests were predating on the american that all of deliberation was happening in committee behind closed doors. there were no open hearings at that time and that the committees would write legislation, which would promptly be signed into law after passing on the on the house and senate floors without much real substantive debate. and we once again, a situation where the parties which

one of the things that makes education and reporting so fascinating, is that there are no clear partizan on a lot of these issues. and i think school choice is probably the best example that and what do you want people to take away from this book what do you hope that they'll conclude or learn once they finish this book. well so i really was trying to go into it a journalist as someone with our own viewpoint you know i felt like there are pieces of this history around and there's there's a number of of partizan books, you know, for or against school choice. and so i felt like i wanted to create something that would explain all of this history that i thought i hadn't known as a reporter. that was helpful in sort of understanding what's going on in education right now. and i wanted it to be, you know, sort of neutral and fair minded, which actually is kind of hard. i think people want you to make an argument and to pick a side, especially with something that's incredibly polarizing. but i think what i what i'm hoping for is that people who are maybe less familiar with school choice but are

constitution on a non partizan basis. and today, i am so excited to show you a new gallery we've just opened american treasures, which contains the five rarest early drafts of the u.s. constitution in american history, not even at the constitutional convention, where these five drafts displayed in the same place. and now, thanks to a great partnership with the historical society of pennsylvania and the wonderful full support of david rubenstein, we've been able to open this gallery, display these drafts together, and tell the story of the evolution of the text of the constitution into the draft that was ratified on constitution day, september 17th, 1787. it's so exciting and i can't wait to show it to you. let's go inside and come take a look. so in many ways, this gallery tells the story of that underappreciated hero of the constitutional convention. jane wilson. we've all heard of james madison and alexander hamilton, the rap star of the moment. of course, president washington. but in many ways, james wilson was the int

they had to be cleared of enemy elements for the germans in the partizan units of the red army that wererrounded. and from the inhabitants of these areas, the operation was called the pripyat march or the pripyat swamps. it was one of the first bloody operations nazis in belarus for the speedy liberation of the occupied territories from the local population, but the nazis had been hatching such plans for a long time. it was under the slogan of the exclusivity of the german nation and the need to expand living space for the population of germany that hitler came to power. top secret only for the command from hitler's speech at a meeting in the imperial chancellery on november 5, 1937 , there can be only one way to solve the german question, the way of violence, the goal of germany is to seize the living space in the east and ruthless harmonization. on august 9, 1940 , hitler issued an order to prepare for the blitzkg; it must be carried out before the winter of 1941 in history. he entered as a plan, and in the baosta the buildup of forces in the east . among the priorities, it was planned

i am at the iconic pratsy partizans for the land.l, black reality and senya look relevant expressively, and besides umelevskiy chroniclers call the belarusian, the history of culture for mostat images, and i am a classic of the belarusian literature of the bridge, and in the morning they grow up poison and pass it on, so that generations of cultural spudzhen we will get from mikhail baranovsky for a gadzhik by a branch of the literary museum of maxim bogdanovich mikhail alexandrovich good afternoon, you stave sculptures and the lion and sergey gumilevsky passes near the walls of the literary museum of maxim bogdanovich shamomin, the vitality of the face was taken for the rise of the gumilevsky family in the film people close to us according to their efforts. e , on this grave, ivans are just tired of it, now she is not pretty, uh, she remembers and what kind of ships i pass on to me. i've worn out this mood. i often visit mine and show maxim bogdanovich, because it is not surprising that these are people. what shmat they thought abou

they're not seen as partizan actors. they're seen as someone who represents the interests of everybody. great. well, thank you so much tv for this conversation. and this and it is a great privilege for me to be with you at acton university this summer. eight years ago, our family had to make a decision about a move, and we ended up deciding to come to grand rapids. and in our pro and con list, the physical presence of the acton institute in grand rapids was a major plus. on the good side. so i'm glad to be here. i'm also glad that we are here in person. it wasn't too long ago when we had to meet in a rather gnostic fashion, and so that we were able to meet incarnation early is a very good thing. i'm also delighted to join you because we are discussing the intersection of c.s. lewis, liberty and law, or jack lewis, as he was known to his friends and family. if your name was clive staples, you might go by jack as well. if you're attending this session, i probably don't have to sell you on why lewis liberty and law is a fun

it's a shame, i agree, it's very insulting, but it's better than playing partizan during interrogationlking business. especially now vorobyova is on her own line. i can't show anything. i need to talk to him. we'll arrange vadim sergeevich fedorov we're making some progress here. we'd better organize a meeting between krylov and his friends. get up. hands take off the handcuffs. all go myself. how are you? yes, better than you. they told me, you are no more. yes, vorobyov , of course, overdid it, the old regime opera tricks, okay, i won’t bother you anymore. talk for half an hour is enough. bros i'm sorry i can't get you out of here. thank you hopeful. there is one version of sanya fedorov, this major. he suggests that you sign a confession, you will be transferred to the pre-trial detention center and refuse to testify there. do you yourself believe this fedor? personally, i don’t trust anyone here anymore, i agree, they only we don’t need our confession to the pre-trial detention center at all , and lobachev will be flunked during the arrest, by the way, he doesn’t know how to get ou

the things matter most and common ground how to stop the partizan war that is destroying america. before i turn the stage over to cal, who will make remarks and then your questions, just a few more words about his career and the lessons that he's taught us through his humor and, common sense. he started his career in journalism at the age of 16 and would eventually have his column printed by hundreds of news outlets including our own daily signal. when that column started, he was in fewer than ten papers nationwide. and although he wasn't the only voice appearing on america's editorial pages, cal distinguished each week by focusing on objective truth and serving as the watchman for america's founding principles. cal was also a commentator on fox news channel for 19 years, hosting own show and serving as a panelist on others. he has worked for kprc in houston. nbc news here in washington and hosted a program, cnbc in 11. cal received the william f buckley award for media excellence from the media research center and the tow. and in 2002, the william armstrong award for visionary le

and conduct yourself a in a overtly political or seem like you were using the office to advance partizan objectives, you'd have like a full scale revolt among your, among your staff. you wouldn't, you wouldn't be able to manage it. it just would, it wouldn't work because those values really are ingrained ingrained. did anything surprise you when you started the role of solicitor general, anything you weren't expecting. i mean, you know, it's i'm the wrong person to ask because by the time i was solicitor general, i did that office for four years. i think surprised me most, though, about coming into the office. when i first came into the office really was this notion that what really differentiated it from being a lawyer in private practice was how much additional knowledge. you were charged with when you went up to the podium because you know in the it's like the corollary to kind of losing the right way or winning in the the right way is you know you are expected by the justices to really understand all of the various far flung interests of the us government. and so, you know, when you'

to leave for the forests , because they knew what the nazis were doing after the departure of the partizans and it so happened that some remained stronger, then a day later some residents began to return near the village. meanwhile, the punishers who were here did not let civilians out, except for a few dozen. maybe even more than a hundred punishers here were forced to leave neighboring villages for three days at a time and tormented, and on december 26, forty-second, they were found to be driven near the shed in two in sheds, according to some reports in the church, some of them were in their homes. who did not agree to melt in the houses. they just shot in the evening from the twenty-sixth to the twenty- seventh, flooded after the war, gathered all the participants. and here in buried died. there are practically people with every family. each glushkov had some of his relatives, or even entire families, were destroyed. during that tragic time, among the dead civilians there are my relatives and a lot. during the great patriotic war the jamming especially suffered the restoration of ours i

they're not seen as partizan actors. they're seen as someone who represents the interests of everybody. great. well, thank you so much tv for this conversation. and this

well, again, we will not hide the fact that the belarus film was now called the partizan film in sovietes, because a lot of wars were filmed. here is this segment of time, as again, i will make a reservation about my own opinion about the polish occupation. he chosen now that's no coincidence this is a single option. or we will have films sent by this time. well, they may not necessarily be specifically about the confrontation, there are two enemies or two spies. about love. it’s just that the time itself is when really a lot of our territory took place both on the territory of western belarus, for example, the uprising against the poles, and on the territory of eastern belarus , the creation of the belarusian state. that is , there were times when well, history was fleeting in this here in this period. yes a lot of events took place there, therefore, if you take it directly there, you know all your life, uh, soared with molly that he lives by his own matter and his own brother ended up on polish territory in the polish occupation. anton directly fights the poles, is a partisan, and so

the reason for a particular curricular decision, including removing a certain book, is because of partizan disagreement of the idea or discrimination against the author, that is not a justification and under the rubric of pornography and obscenity. many states and local school districts are now removed in books by lgbtq authors or about lgb. q characters i hate as endorsements from both cornell west and former tennessee republican senator lamar alexander and nadine streisand writes in this book that nothing strengthens hate groups more than censoring them as it turns them into free martyrs. she on to say that free expression is the foundation of human rights, the source of humanity, and the mother of truth. nadine strossen thanks for being on book tv. thank you so much for having me.