and this was also another mass party, even when you had a party. it was really a collection of notable's, i think i'd call it. i'm trying to remember the exact number of people who voted for the president in 1800. i think it was about 50,000. you know, there were more people than in the sub of bethesda, north of washington d.c., twice this, money than they were voting for president for both candidates in 1801. >> the electorate was tiny. even among those who could for most people didn't bother to vote in national elections. >> exactly. >> the federal government was as did the thing. >> most people can vote. you had to have property, had to be a white men, and you had to be, of course, over 21. >> so, sean lawrence, a store in your familiar with, when it comes to jefferson as a founder of party, i think you're right, it wasn't a party, but when it comes to small "small d" jeffersonian democracy, he argues that in a sense, jefferson was this founder. against condescension and determined obstructionism jefferson and his party vindicated the political

and this was not a mass party, even when he had a party. it was a collection of notables, i think i call it. i'm trying to remember the exact number who voted in the 1800s, you know, 50,000. there's more people in the suburb of bethesda, north of washington, d.c., twice as many as there were voting for president, both candidates then. >> electorate was tiny, even those who could vote most didn't bother voting in national elections. the federal government was a distant thing. >> most didn't vote, you had to have property, be a white man and of course, over 21. >> yeah. so sean wentz, a historian, you're familiar with, when it comes to jefferson as found earp of a party, i think you're right, it wasn't a party. but when it comes to small d jeffersonian democracy he argues that in a sense jefferson was this founder against con de against condescention he rallied the mass of citizens in effect laying the ground work for the democratic reform for jackson and van buren and others, do you agree with that? >> i think that's true, there's a big exce

stop criticizing exactly and also this was not a mass party even when he had a party. it was really a collection of notables. i think i call it. i'm trying to remember the exact number of people who voted for president in 1800. there's about 50,000, you know, they're more people in the suburb of bethesda north of washington dc twice as many than the word voting for president, you know for both candidates in 18. the electorate was tiny even among those who could vote. most people didn't bother voting in national elections. exactly. the federal government was a distant. most people couldn't vote because you had to have property you have to be a white man and you of course over 21 so sean will answer historian you're familiar with when it comes to jefferson as founder of a party. i think you're right. it wasn't a party but when it comes to small d, jeffersonian democracy, he argues that in a sense jefferson was this this founder against condescension and determined obstructionism jefferson and his party vindicated the political equality of the mass of american citizens ci

i would not join the labour party or tory party — i would not join the labour party or tory party.he person i_ tory party. i am an independent. the person i went — tory party. i am an independent. the person i went to see said what can i do and _ person i went to see said what can i do and what — person i went to see said what can i do and what can't i do and what rules— do and what can't i do and what rules do— do and what can't i do and what rules do my following can you help me was— rules do my following can you help me was sue gray, funnily enough, who is the _ me was sue gray, funnily enough, who is the senior— me was sue gray, funnily enough, who is the senior civil servant who has been _ is the senior civil servant who has been doing — is the senior civil servant who has been doing the investigation on all of this _ been doing the investigation on all of this. and you put the fear of god into me _ of this. and you put the fear of god into me then so she is a formidable and excellent woman. but i think were _ and excellent woman. but i think were onto — and excellent woman. b

they followed all the parties.ns of organizations only in this regard, that is, they behaved more moderately, another issue that then arose in the late nineties. and you too well, when it was said that the property is personal to you, and 122 apartments and 227 cars bought for cash, at the same time you assured something of the party. actually, it’s true, that means, after all, that’s why such fame, er, in quotation marks, goes exactly to the liberal democratic party under others who are more scrupulous or more inventive in their actions, there is always someone around your party around you. flair, what's the matter? i explain, i’m even hooked, we’re not doing anything wrong. sometimes to hit the leader to bind the kgb and there is nothing, but you can say who will prove it here. now now, as far as property is concerned, the program is not discussed by our actions, our successes in the elections. and here is how it happened. i am looking for people who will buy us cars and apartments, there is money. i can use them

of the black vote for the democrat party..t's what they have been doing. >> it's fascinating, the play on words, weren't you saying when -- you talk about this in your book about education, high crime, homicides and how it is heavily concentrated in these communities, do you believe there is a connectiontw between the leadership relinquished their moral obligation and leadership obligation to make sure new plantations, you keep them dependent and make them believe there's always racism so there's no need to try because you will be pushed back and discriminated against especially with other race cases you see which reinforces it and they use this to say the white men would never allow you to progress and therefore letet us go. >> it'st just an old play on the old showow. they've got them picking and they have them demoralized. when a person is demoralized, they can't get the truth. the civil union did that to their people, beat them down. the schools are terrible, they destroyed every t institution, e education system, the econ

the democratic party is owing to cheat again. -- the democratic party is going to cheat again. they are going to plan out how to do it. the republicans, they need to take the cover off the mechanism and get inside the clock works and clean it out. host: why focus on the can accept the election, versus the issues? caller: everybody knows the issues. i think republicans won a clean election. they gummed up the works. democrats gummed up the works and stole the election. now, it is going to happen again. unless, the republicans can get in. it starts in these big cities who have been cheating for years upon decades. chicago, new york, all these big towns. st. louis. host: ok. memphis, tennessee. democrats line. caller: this is joshua from memphis. i hear obama last week. he a year late. another thing, watch out for the young folks. they are not polling how they think they do. they live a different life than the republican party thinks they think about. we want to be divided. the young folks, they come out and vote. get the people out of control, of our government so everybody can l

and a tory party— party led by keir starmer and a tory party ted _ party led by keir starmer and a toryy borisjohnson, who would _ party led by borisjohnson, who would they go for? 57% went for sama's— would they go for? 57% went for sama's labour, 43% went for boris johnson _ sama's labour, 43% went for boris johnson -- — sama's labour, 43% went for boris johnson —— starmer's. you might get different— johnson —— starmer's. you might get different answers depending on the question— different answers depending on the question is, but that is certainly cause _ question is, but that is certainly cause for— question is, but that is certainly cause for concern at conservative party— cause for concern at conservative party h0 — cause for concern at conservative party hq and the guy in charge, essentially, ultimately as boris johnson, — essentially, ultimately as boris johnson, but it comes to elections it is oiiver— johnson, but it comes to elections it is oliver dowden, the chairman of the party— it is oliver dowden, the chairman of the party and his clearly concerned about _ the party and h

any political party-— say, you have no connection with any political party-_ i - political party.we needed to get that on the record. you are saying this on the basis of what your feelings are and what you have been through, and michael fabricant said, he didn't think he lied, but hejust fabricant said, he didn't think he lied, but he just didn't understand, what do you make of that? he either thinks that we _ what do you make of that? he either thinks that we are _ what do you make of that? he either thinks that we are falls _ what do you make of that? he either thinks that we are falls or— what do you make of that? he either thinks that we are falls or the - thinks that we are falls or the prime minister is a fool because the prime minister is a fool because the prime minister is a fool because the prime minister and his government created these rules and to say he didn't really understand them all was —— or was not aware of what was going on, it's not really good enough. going on, it's not really good enou:h. 2. going on, it's not really good enou:h. . ., 2, , , enough. thanks

the labour party-— worked with him and he leads the labour party. your standard answer when you _ labour party. what is your standard answer when you say _ labour party. what is your standard answer when you say you _ labour party. what is your standard answer when you say you want i labour party. what is your standard answer when you say you want to i labour party. what is your standard | answer when you say you want to be labour _ answer when you say you want to be labour leader— answer when you say you want to be labour leader and _ answer when you say you want to be labour leader and primus _ answer when you say you want to be labour leader and primus of- answer when you say you want to be labour leader and primus of the i answer when you say you want to be. labour leader and primus of the day? copy and _ labour leader and primus of the day? copy and paste — labour leader and primus of the day? copy and paste. it's— labour leader and primus of the day? copy and paste-— copy and paste. it's not the pacific form of words. _ copy and paste. it's no

my party's is an independent party, _ prime minister yourself?? my party'si is an independent party, we have our own manifesto and mission. the alliance you see before you is not just between two micro—parties but amongst all of the parties in parliament and we represent separate 5% of the population of pakistan. my party —— 75% of the population. we are limited to one to see elect all of the form to restore democracy and my party would put forward its own ministerial candidate for the next election. �* ., ., ministerial candidate for the next election. �* . ., �* ., ministerial candidate for the next election.�* . ., �* ., ., ., election. bilawal bhutto zardari, thank ou election. bilawal bhutto zardari, thank you for— election. bilawal bhutto zardari, thank you forjoining _ election. bilawal bhutto zardari, thank you forjoining us - election. bilawal bhutto zardari, thank you forjoining us on - election. bilawal bhutto zardari, thank you forjoining us on bbc. thank you forjoining us on bbc news. let s get some of the day's other news. the prime

i parties, why are you focusing relentlessly on parties?ut the cost of _ relentlessly on parties? i want to talk about the cost of living. - relentlessly on parties? i want to talk about the cost of living. why j talk about the cost of living. why were _ talk about the cost of living. why were we — talk about the cost of living. why were we in — talk about the cost of living. why were we in parliament _ talk about the cost of living. why were we in parliament on - talk about the cost of living. whyl were we in parliament on tuesday with the _ were we in parliament on tuesday with the prime _ were we in parliament on tuesday with the prime minister? - were we in parliament on tuesday with the prime minister? becausej were we in parliament on tuesday. with the prime minister? because he -ot a with the prime minister? because he got a fine _ with the prime minister? because he got a fine i— with the prime minister? because he gota fine ido— with the prime minister? because he got a fine. i do want— with the prime minister? because he got a fin

trump has a modern-day party boss. quote, inspiring fear, hoarding cash, dueling out favors and seeking to crush rivals, mr. trump is behaving not merely as a powerbroker but as something closer to the head of a 19th century political machine. a former trump advisor describes the ex presidents exile as lawyer, quote, a developing tammany situation. referring to tammany hall, the political machine that essentially controlled the new york city for nearly 200 years. goldmacher also compressed trump to tie many holes most notorious, deeply corrupt leader, boss tweed, shown in this famous cartoon saying, as long as i count the votes, what you're gonna do about it? that certainly sounds familiar. you'll remember when donald trump asked georgia secretary of state to just find him 11,780 votes to overturn joe biden's win in that crucial state. of course, raffensperger thankfully refused, so trump has since endorsed his challenger. along with many other far-right secretary of state candidates around the country who plan on doin

there's a chance for every party. however, when you zoom in on the situation of hungary on the hungarian media situation as well, if you look at the budget that the hungarian government had and has it to you to booster campaign compared to the fraction that the opposition parties have in that regard. observers say that already the lead up to this election wasn't really very just something that primary civic to albany was asked about. after casting his bellow this morning, he says, no, that's not the case. it's a very fair election. so that's one way of looking at just really healthy out is that even before people come to make a decision here, how well they could actually be informed on the various arguments that are here on display, both from the government and from the opposition parties. but once again, if you look at those poles and people here who want to believe that your position parties do have a chance to win today, the alliance does have a chance to win today did do not really want to consider those balls. be

party are in trouble because boris — party are in trouble because borisjohnson _ party are in troublety are in trouble because boris johnson has led the i party are in trouble because . borisjohnson has led the ship into the — borisjohnson has led the ship into the rocks _ borisjohnson has led the ship into the rocks that _ borisjohnson has led the ship into the rocks that therefore l into the rocks that therefore voters — into the rocks that therefore voters just _ into the rocks that therefore voters just say, _ into the rocks that therefore voters just say, well, - into the rocks that therefore votersjust say, well, this i into the rocks that therefore | votersjust say, well, this lot are terrible, _ votersjust say, well, this lot are terrible, we _ votersjust say, well, this lot are terrible, we have - votersjust say, well, this lot are terrible, we have to - votersjust say, well, this lot are terrible, we have to vote j are terrible, we have to vote for the — are terrible, we have to vote for the other— are terrible, we have to vote for the other lot. _ are terrible, we have to v

i'll put it right down to the democrat party the upper escalon to the democratic party. not the ranking five people that vote for the democrat not a whole lot of the people. that i elected by democratic party because you know why a lot of these people are in districts where the democratic party has so much control that in order for them to win. they have to run as a democrat. so before they can do some good and they have told me and they told you man, i support a lot of what you talking about, but right i can't run as republican conservative in my district. help me change it. i've had so many of them sickness help me change if you can get my people support school choice. i'll vote for it. but right now. have my money comes from the teachers unions. if i go out to school choice, i'm done. they're just gonna bring somebody else in. at least i'm doing a little bit of good right now. so who controls the democrat party planned parenthood? the atheist from george soros on down the the people that want to open borders the people that love the drug trade the people i love the se

was it a party where the guidelines are l a party where the guidelines are followed or was it not a partyelines followed or was it not a party? the guidelines are followed at all times — guidelines are followed at all times. ~ , ., , the times. were you satisfied? the guidelines _ times. were you satisfied? the guidelines are _ times. were you satisfied? the guidelines are followed - times. were you satisfied? the guidelines are followed at - times. were you satisfied? the guidelines are followed at all . guidelines are followed at all times — the guidelines were followed at all times. our political correspondent sean dilley is at westminster. the police beg to differ. where does this leave borisjohnson politically now with 7 ? this leaves them in a very sticky lace. ? this leaves them in a very sticky place- one — ? this leaves them in a very sticky place. one local— ? this leaves them in a very sticky place. one local politician - ? this leaves them in a very sticky place. one local politician says - place. one local politician says that they are not a happy bunch of the moment and if o

i importance, not whether the prime minister was at a party.— minister was at a party.ook at the _ minister was at a party. i think you just look at the climate _ minister was at a party. i think you just look at the climate of - minister was at a party. i think you just look at the climate of the last | just look at the climate of the last few months. when these allegations started to _ few months. when these allegations started to come out at the end of last year. — started to come out at the end of last year, they dominated the headlines for days on end. and there was also _ headlines for days on end. and there was also a _ headlines for days on end. and there was also a feeling among tory mps that they— was also a feeling among tory mps that they could decide to topple the prime _ that they could decide to topple the prime minister. if you look at the reaction — prime minister. if you look at the reaction today and look at those comments from certain tory mps who have been_ comments from certain tory mps who have been vocal critics of the prime minister. _ have been

party.politics became part of the church and it never should have been. the black preachers job and any preachers job c.s. c lewis saids to live for eternity in the presence of jesus . that's their job. we have politicians and we s hae lawyers but when you are talking about in jesus i tell people i cannot be oppressed and i can believe in systemic racism. i'm the son of. i've never met anybody -- he teaches us a the whale have gifts and we are supposed elevate each other's gifts and when we elevate each other's gifts jealousy and income inequality you go to a better school than i do? no, think about you. elevate your gift help your neighbor allocate his gift and guess what i happens? the doctor helps everybody in a great mechanic helps everybody a great cook a great teacher helps everybody. instead they. america down by saying you have some type of superiority over me and therefore i want you to give up your privilege. i was born with privilege. i had two great parents a great family. i was

china's top party state military leader. she jinping and i know you've given a great deal of time to studying him as a figure and i think you are about to get your defilt at oxford on the see if i passed my bible monday writing you will be writing. you've written a thesis on xi jinping and he of course came to power in china and 2012-2013 and followed quite a less charismatic leader jin tao, so i wanted to give you a chance to talk about she and his role in the current state of us china relations and indeed. maybe china's international role more broadly, but one point that you make in your book that i wanted to you to address because i think it will be of great interest to the audience. is that under xi jinping the chinese communist party decided that china had more in common with russia than with the united states and wanted you to help. understand why that is how does it relate to xi jinping's leadership and the impact that she has had on the direction of chinese policy and because we're focusing on us-china relations in f

that is the conservative party for you. dodge, deflect, - party for you.ok overthere— over there. but those were conservatives _ over there. but those were conservatives who - over there. but those were conservatives who are - over there. but those were i conservatives who are calling over there. but those were - conservatives who are calling for him to resign. so what has changed? they say a lot has changed. there is a war in europe... the they say a lot has changed. there is a war in europe. . ._ a war in europe... the has been the beacon of — a war in europe... the has been the beacon of a — a war in europe... the has been the beacon of a leader _ a war in europe... the has been the beacon of a leader he _ a war in europe... the has been the beacon of a leader he always - a war in europe... the has been the beacon of a leader he always has i beacon of a leader he always has dreamt of being! he beacon of a leader he always has dreamt of being!— beacon of a leader he always has dreamt of being! he hasn't made any... ukrainians _ dreamt of being! he hasn't

more important than parties, i think you are trying to - parties, i think you are trying to say, _ partiesortant than party—gate? l am just— say, more important than party—gate? lamiust going — say, more important than party—gate? lamiust going to— say, more important than party—gate? l am just going to say— say, more important than party—gate? i am just going to say to _ say, more important than party—gate? i am just going to say to you _ say, more important than party—gate? i am just going to say to you humbly. i am just going to say to you humbly that i think that is what people want me to be focusing on right now but for my friends in westminster, they must get on with their votes. that's fine. borisjohnson, there. now it's time for a look at the weather with carol kirkwood. good morning, everyone. this morning, there's been a fine start to the day for most of us, with sunny spells. we will carry on with that through the day. but we have a cool easterly breeze coming across a cool easterly breeze coming across a cool north sea. this area of low pressure is sinking away and you can see

as, er, the party of regions of the russian federation are not political parties, the sharia party, there is a whole list of these anti-ukrainian forces and they have nothing to do with the competitiveness of the political process in ukraine, in the end, since the communist party, which is ultimately banned, is the center of ukrainian power, which should be banned, those convicted of their activities should be recognized this is the kind that harms our country, and people who were related to these parties do not have the right to hold positions in the state. after all, this is not a new practice. it is a practice that was used by many countries of our neighbors. returning to the uh-uh uh-uh situation that we discussed. uh, you know about the turning point in the war. well, it seems to me that the key turning point was in general, the first day of a large-scale tuesday when the whole world saw that ukraine and ukrainians would fight, that our army uh- this is the army that can protect ours state because, well, time goes by very quickly. we forget about how uh, european countries, in

the mood of your own party._ the mood of your own party.od of your own party. i don't think it is sensible to _ the mood of your own party. i don't think it is sensible to have - the mood of your own party. i don't think it is sensible to have endlessl think it is sensible to have endless investigation and analysis now before the met have concluded their report. look, my view is if the opposition really want to focus on this, that's all they want to talk about, that's fine, but what i want to talk about is the stuff we are doing to take forward the uk. talking about the most serious issues, whether a prime minister has lied to the house of commons, and you seem to be making up your approach to this question on an ad hoc, hour by hour basis, and that is proven by the chaos around this vote. don't voters expect a bit more? �* , ., ., , ~ more? i'm sorry, what voters i think we'll want to — more? i'm sorry, what voters i think we'll want to see _ more? i'm sorry, what voters i think we'll want to see is _ more? i'm sorry, what voters i think w

what are their chances in any action, there's a chance for every party. however, when you zoom in on the situation of hungary and the hungarian media situation as well, if you look at the budget to that, the hungarian government had and has it to you to booster campaign compared to the fraction that the opposition party sat in that regard observer say that already the lead up to this election wasn't really very just something that prime is civic to albany was asked about after casting his ballad this morning. he says, no, that's not the case. it's a very fair election. so that's one way of looking at it just really healthy or is it even before people come to make a decision here how. * well, they could actually be informed on the various arguments that are here on display, both from the government and from the opposition parties. but once again, if you look at those poles and people here who want to believe that your position parties do have a chance to win today, the alliance does have a chance to win today did do not really want to consider those balls.

i ukraine and journalists asking them about parties?— about parties?s main message is that he's johnson�*s main message is that he�*s going to be in power in six months�* time. this is a bold statement that he made whichjust time. this is a bold statement that he made which just at once was a message to the country at large, but also to members of his own party might seek to replace him. as i forget that the front runner to replace borisjohnson rishi sunak has the on a banana peel due to his wife�*s tax affairs and has become a liability rather than an asset and borisjohnson is in this sense that you might want to get rid of me but who would you put in place of me? that is a question that the tory parties is really struggling to answer. there�*s no doubt he slipped in popularity he is now 7.7 points behind keir starmer and he was a 1.14% behind the labour leader in those days. and so, i think there�*s a sense that he is suffering a setback as a dip in his popularity, but there�*s a very strong confidence and message from borisjohnson that he will be ab

the -- party.es that have dominated french political life for the last many years are in tatters. macron is in the middle. what you are going to see on the right is a recomposition -- the hard right, le pen, the people who backed her, plus -- voters. and the hard right party on the right which could gather a percentage of the voters. and this is similar to the british tory party. very nationalist and protectionist and at the same time, against foreigners. it is [indiscernible] host: funny you should say that. we need to get into the parliamentary elections. i'm sorry to interrupt. a president without a majority has no power and we have parliamentary elections coming up in the summer. traditionally, the winning president gets the parliament. do you think this will be a different ballgame? >> yes, certainly if marine le pen wins. ever since they changed the timing of the parliamentary elections putting them after the presidential election, there is a momentum going in. however, i don't see marine le

i and now they have joined hands, been the opposition parties, namely pml and box on people's party. so it, it is only both parties be the so called members of the box that you can solve who are not considering their policies in the correct way. they have not voted in this in this vote of no confidence such a democratic process. and mr. chavez has said that we are going to go against any, any been debt order or are making against a greek against anybody. so if you can shop and his body considers that they should come out on the street, it is their democratic, right? if there's, if it is within the right of the political domains under the law of the land, they must together, they must raise their weiss and if they are able to muster that support and the stabilize the government and then push them into the new elections. so be it, but for the moment we must all accept the demo that the process and the last the last night. so we must accept the democratic process. you say, maria, let's talk about the 1st big challenge for this new prime minister and this new government. and that is the

the republican party started as the party of lincoln and it is not now, not even the party of ragan. richard nixon got one third of the black vote, started the epa, was environmentally sensitive, expanding the clean air act. george bush said, if you pass an extension of the assault weapon ban, i will sign it, but they could not get it to him because of democrat and republican votes. i offered to be the only republican to support the ban if democrats could get it over the fence and they could not. host: do you think you could be elected today? guest: no. i decided early on that it was better to speak what i believe and that meant opposing president trump then to stay in office. host: kenneth, missouri. caller: good morning. you are an old country club republican, you and this cheney. -- liz cheney. i am a vietnam veteran. i am a republican, but you are a go along, get along and have been through most of my life. you give into the democrats. you are past history. you could not win your district now because people in red states do not like country club republicans such as yourself. we t

in our party, grassroots matter. — the party. in our party, grassroots matter. this— the party.ked with kevin— in her. in full disclosure, i worked with kevin mccarthy, and she not only went — with kevin mccarthy, and she not only went against house republicans, she went _ only went against house republicans, she went to work with nancy pelosi on the _ she went to work with nancy pelosi on the january the 6th commission. when _ on the january the 6th commission. when your own party in wyoming sensors _ when your own party in wyoming sensors you and says we're disappointed in how you treated your own party— disappointed in how you treated your own party by working with democrats, that's _ own party by working with democrats, that's a _ own party by working with democrats, that's a really big statement that comes— that's a really big statement that comes from the grassroots. that was supported _ comes from the grassroots. that was supported by the vast majority of local republicans. this isn't some sort ofm — local republicans. this isn't some sort of... this is how the grassroots

— speak we have other left—wing parties coming communist party and green _ parties coming communistmore than 280 members of parliament if people _ more than 280 members of parliament if people are mobilised in the third round _ if people are mobilised in the third round that — if people are mobilised in the third round. that is our task now, get people _ round. that is our task now, get people out— round. that is our task now, get people out there ready to vote. that is a bi if people out there ready to vote. that is a big if in — people out there ready to vote. that is a big if in terms _ people out there ready to vote. twat is a big if in terms of numbers and we will wait to see how that pans out. another bigger if it is that your leader said make the payments to police. that is not going to happen. to police. that is not going to ha en. ., ., ., to police. that is not going to hauen. . ., ., , . , to police. that is not going to ha en, ., ., ., , ., , , to police. that is not going to hauen. ., ., ., , ., , , ., happen. part of our strategy is to ut happen. part of our strategy i

the republican party must be the party of freedom. republicans must rollback joe biden's assault on the bill of rights. freedom of speech, assembly and religion, the freedom to bear arms, the bl -- the ability of the states to retain their own prerogative are all essential to our society's basic fabric and prosperity. the american people are the most creative and innovative in human history. these natural gifts flourish under freedom. they wither without it. it matters who is in charge. and as a party, we as republicans will have failed if we do not make it very clear what the consequences are of having democrats in charge. look from state to state and compare the difference between republican and democrat leaders. and democrat states families are devastated financially. from mandates and closures. having lost precious time in the classroom, kids have fallen behind. economies have been crippled by regulations and restrictions. law and order has been eliminated by leaders who embrace criminals and embolden them by disrespecting law enf

i worry it could happen to the republican party. susan: i was struck by the last paragraph in your book, and i wanted to read it. one thing i want to talk about is an organizing principle for a lot of history. you write, in the space of 100 years, despite setbacks, the american right to come of age, gained trust, changed the world, and after decades of confusion, join forces with the man it did not trust but became too a door. -- became to absorb. not only was the right not only able to get out of the hole, it did not want to. let me start by asking, limburg, mccarthy, george wallace, pat buchanan. what did they represent? matthew: they represent a form of the american right that in varying degrees has drifted towards conspiracy theory. as distrusted elites so much that it ends up close to distrusting america and the capacity for american government and american people. they are also distinct in a few ways. charles lindbergh. national hero, he became a prominent spokesman, opposing american entry into the second world war. he repres

a drinks party. the daily mirror has a similar story on its front page, saying borisjohnson encouraged staff to let off steam as covid rules were broken. the i describes the prime minister as facing a �*triple threat�* over the downing street parties. mps return on tuesday, he'll face prime minister's questions and a possible vote of censure too. the daily mail says ministers have rounded on the the archbishop of canterbury after he criticised the uk's plan to send asylum seekers to rwanda. meanwhile, the daily express describes the same story as mps attacking the archbishop of canterbury over his criticsim of the rwanda migrants plan. the guardian's front page highlights that women in the poorest areas of england are dying earlier than the average female in almost every comparable country in the world. so let's begin... lots to get through. we are going to start on the downing street parties as we had seen on quite a few of the front pages, hello to you both, good to see you again. we'll start with

the democratic party won 24.3%, do you see what is being done?mir zhirinovsky surprised, it seemed that he deliberately ran into scandals, shlonders and balls in power in russia today, the communists lie dimorosis, and lie with whom fight. thank you arranged the distribution of money. on the street. get some rest, communist. they took lermo. i give in the body the ethers of passion all these years went off scale. something like that. i'm sorry. oh well, what are you doing? well, what are you doing? idiots definitely didn't come, right? the official is sitting here in moscow. here, under the lyceum, the scoundrel is also beautiful the scoundrels are all going home konstantin you don’t have, because you don’t give, but as soon as the camera was turned off, calm smart. very deep very thin and very reliable person. he's fine well versed in international processes. he spoke four languages. back in 2006, i met with sadom hussein gaddafi's marble in kiev and tried to explain to ukrainians what the united states wants and now they are ukraine and crimea

you remember they rebranded it as the union party rather than the republican party. he believed he was the right man to nominate for the presidency. and even for me, that's a little hard. how can you be a loyal subordinate if you're also scheming to get the nomination. it all blows up. >> we'll get to had that. let me go back to the wigwam here in chicago in 1860 where lincoln was nominated because this letter is one from march 5th. and in may it was when the convention was and i could read the -- not all of it, but he says doubtful writing your judgment as to the possible action of the convention. so as far as i'm concerned, i leave the whole matter unreserve bliss to its decision. well, is that the case, he did not try? >> no, he was -- that very letter that you're holding is part of his effort. one of his consistent themes, in 1860 and again in 1864 and again in 1868, that i'm really not ambitious. you shouldn't be afraid of me. i'm leaving this to the people, but if the people want to nominate me, i will be the candidate. so but the fact that there are hundreds o

i would say opposition party but of course, it's not a party, it is an alliance of parties which looks if this is a concession speech by the party candidate to be prime minister, the alliance's candidate to be prime minister, but the position at the moment, with 70% of the votes cast, with the protection of only having 57 seats in a 190 member parliament, is that his brave attempt at dislodging the prime minister viktor 0rban by burying their own differences, this attempt has failed, it would appear to be the case. let me just check one more thing for you. yes, this is in fact the leader of the alliance, the 49—year—old leader of, there would—be prime minister who is taking on, peter marki—zay there, addressing the opposition alliance, and one assumes, they won cannot be certain, i'm afraid i don't speak hungarian, one assumes, not least by his facial expression and the lack of response from the crowd, that that was probably something close to a concession speech, or at least, an acknowledgement that the alliance of parties in hungary has not done as well, anything like as well, as the

rise of macron almost as sort of a personalised party has kind of completely fractured the party systemyou know, macron busted through that, but with these consequences that the parties are so weakened, there could be space for a le pen figure to surface at some point, so i think it is rather worrying that those older parties have just kind of collapsed because what replaces them? yes, the party may be over for some but the consequences live on for everybody else. thank you all very much. thank you for your company. martine croxall will be be in this chair next week. i'll see you in a fortnight�*s time. from all of dateline, goodbye. hello. the weekend brought us lots more dry and settled weather. now, april 2022 is turning out to be a notably dry april, particularly towards the south. this was the picture as the sun set in north yorkshire sunday evening, and we've got a bit more of the same, so no great changes in the weather forecast over the next few days — it stays mainly dry and settled. you'll notice it'll be a little bit cooler and cloudier compared to the weekend, but also less

uh, like no other party and the liberal democratic party, this is renovsky. the obvious thing. and it's even hard to imagine so that there could be a change, i can imagine that there could be a change in the communist party of the russian federation in united russia, but the liberal democratic party is somehow unreadable without you. so these voters or your voters is the one who in the way he wants to voice his protest. that is, he wants to spit in the direction of power, and for this your party is suitable for him, while he understands that he cannot win. but it is you who give him the opportunity to express himself, since other parties can not do this, this is selective or some other way. here. now i'll start from the end now for the liberal democratic party representatives of all strata vote for the most difficult. we were artistic intellectuals. i say, they explain layers of motivation, some kind of motivation. i'll start from the end all today why is there no one else they want the communist party of the russian federation for, they fought the united rus

the communist party and the socialist parties— fighting for the communist party and the socialist partiesarties but now- fighting for the communist party and the socialist parties but now they. the socialist parties but now they fi-ht the socialist parties but now they fight for— the socialist parties but now they fight for marine. _ the socialist parties but now they fight for marine. so, _ the socialist parties but now they fight for marine.— the socialist parties but now they fight for marine. so, back to you, ou fight for marine. so, back to you, you voted — fight for marine. so, back to you, you voted against _ fight for marine. so, back to you, you voted against le _ fight for marine. so, back to you, you voted against le pen - fight for marine. so, back to you, you voted against le pen but - fight for marine. so, back to you, you voted against le pen but do | fight for marine. so, back to you, i you voted against le pen but do you think in the next five years, if emmanuel macron wins, he can deliver for people like you don't necessarily support him? i for people like you don't nece

because we have people coming into our party they don't want to help with our party.it. they just want to change it to fit them and our party cannot continue to move. we have to stay firm. we have to stand where we are at and we have to continue to fight that fight. >> tucker: you make a really fair point. the republican party should be welcoming. they have to be pretty broad. only have two parties. cox and romney are not moderates. they are not finding the center. they are wild side crazy people pushing for the far left agenda. do you ever talk? >> not very often. i don't receive very many phone calls. we see each other and i try to be cordial. we don't tend to chat on the weekend. >> tucker: [laughs] i would be interested to know what he's doing on the weekends. is there widespread support for cox or romney? >> it's hard to stay to be honest. but me coming from my side of it, i've got my side of the opinion. i am out with the people. i've spent the last six weeks out with the county conventions and there's a lot of people that are really upset with what's happening.

this is part— resulting from other parties. this is part of— resulting from other parties. a second transient fines, and i suppose for me what that says it is about _ and i suppose for me what that says it is about leadership, the prime minister— it is about leadership, the prime minister in — it is about leadership, the prime minister in the chancellor, the two most _ minister in the chancellor, the two most senior politicians in downing street, _ most senior politicians in downing street, they said the culture, they said the _ street, they said the culture, they said the climate and there will be other fines that emerge from this even if— other fines that emerge from this even if it's— other fines that emerge from this even if it's not to the prime minister— even if it's not to the prime minister and the chancellor. so for me they— minister and the chancellor. so for me they have been fined, the prime minister— me they have been fined, the prime minister is _ me they have been fined, the prime minister is the first premised are to be _ minister is the first premised are t

you are about what your party should be doing and how you would advise your party. hello.aller: i think they need to start doing impeaching on the democratic party. i think not even half of the republican party because they are have a democrat. when i lived down there i did a long survey of a week. of time, i talked to 49 republicans and one democrat that came up with a republican --. our rent has gone from 500 to $1200 a month. our food prices have skyrocketed. should that tell american people anything at all? i think we need to start impeaching quickly so maybe we can get our country back. the democrats --. tell me the republican people aren't doing something? host: ok. recent polling taking a look at president biden would expect a good impact on november. just 41% of young americans approve of president biden's performance. according to a new poll, adults from 18 to 29 down 46%, falsely 21 and the majority last spring -- 21 and the majority last spring. years ago, 456 approved of obama . a few more calls on this topic. this is terry in ohio. independent line. caller: fi

greens, but your party will not work with i but your party will not work with anybody — but your party anyone to lock out susan aitken, you are in coalition- work with anyone to lock out susan aitken, you are in coalition with - aitken, you are in coalition with the snp — aitken, you are in coalition with the snp in _ aitken, you are in coalition with the snp in some _ aitken, you are in coalition with the snp in some counties, - aitken, you are in coalition with the snp in some counties, how| aitken, you are in coalition with . the snp in some counties, how can aitken, you are in coalition with - the snp in some counties, how can we trust scottish — the snp in some counties, how can we trust scottish labour— the snp in some counties, how can we trust scottish labour with _ the snp in some counties, how can we trust scottish labour with this? - trust scottish labour with this? what _ trust scottish labour with this? what you — trust scottish labour with this? what you have _ trust scottish labour with this? what you have to _ trust scottish labour with this? what you have to understand

item extol gods bruno here, member of the national rally party, marine le pen's party.ird _ it can't repair france? she will fight the third round, - it can't repair france? she will fight the third round, the - fight the third round, the legislative elections. it's not the presence of mr macron himself, there can be variousjudgments presence of mr macron himself, there can be various judgments about his personality, but i think it is the fact that he is completely indebted to globalism, to free trade, to giving up french sovereignty, that will rise to the european union that, in fact, will rise to the european union that, infact, has will rise to the european union that, in fact, has very little to do with two european coat traditions and identities. that's the main points, that we all, not only marine le pen, worrying about. we would have preferred to win, obviously, but still, i think it's an important progress that she appears in the national rally now appears that the main opposition party to mr macron, getting 41% of the votes, which is very important, and in prog