another one, pascal, he also has a planning background. i thought both were great. i did have concerns. i will now be supporting -- not be supporting the standard oil. -- sandra boil. she had a very impressive real- estate and environmental background, but i think we need to find someone who actually works in environmental work, since we have only one position for that seat. but i was happy to see their real applications. i know that these individuals that reapply, they are very active in their districts and neighborhoods and i'm happy to see that they want to continue to serve. i will be supporting applicant seats won, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and eight, but not two. gregg's you bring to mind -- >> you bring up the point that this is an environmental position and she does not seem to have that background, so how did you select her as an environmentalist? >> the candidates indicate what areas they are engaged in. we do have several people who indicate more than one area. but it is difficult to fit people into all of the slots. in that situation, we were relying on herself --

what's the infamous quote about pascal who's 17th century french philosopher who said when he sent a letter to somebody, sorry i made this so long, i didn't have to time to make it shorter. that reflects the idea of how much time you have to put in to make a complex idea really understandable. i certainly by the president as well. >> i don't think there's anything wrong with that. what i think is troubling is there can be an attempt on the right to actually run against int lek chul. that i find troubling. boiling things down to their essential elements, i don't think that's a big problem. >> i think most americans would like members of congress to be pretty smart. i think that goes without saying and i think the real question is maybe another study is how many times do they actually listen to each other enough that it makes a difference. >> that it matters. >> and get something done. >> but when you can take a complex idea and boil it down to a simplistic level so people can grasp it, you've shown how smart you are in your ability to do that. >> thanks, chris. >>> there is a shocking

what's the infamous quote about pascal who's 17th century french philosopher who said when he sent a letter to somebody, sorry i made this so long, i didn't have to time to make it shorter. that reflects the idea of how much time you have to put in to make a complex idea really understandable. i certainly by the president as well. >> i don't think there's anything wrong with that. what i think is troubling is there can be an attempt on the right to actually run against int lek chul. that i find troubling. boiling things down to their essential elements, i don't think that's a big problem. >> i think most americans would like members of congress to be pretty smart. i think that goes without saying and i think the real question is maybe another study is how many times do they actually listen to each other enough that it makes a difference. >> that it matters. >> and get something done. >> but when you can take a complex idea and boil it down to a simplistic level so people can grasp it, you've shown how smart you are in your ability to do that. >> thanks, chris. >>> there is a shocking

mÉxico carmen salinas informÓ que el proximo 10 de mayo dedicarÁ dos funciones, a la memoria de juan pascaly tener aquÍ con nosotros >>> increÍble >>> quÉ maravillosos recuerdos >>> demasiado una gran constelaciÓn de estrellas y los vuelvo a ver en l pantaa me recuerdo exactamente el dÍa que vinieron el corazÓn pone aquÍ, recordarlos exactamente, pero hay que celebrar son 15 aÑos >>> claro recordar es vivir este dÍa viernes tenemos gran celebraciÓn en >>> disn world >>> vamos muchachos. ♪ ♪ ♪ ahora, empieza ♪.

the question is to pascal obama and did that. at present cannot simply say, i don't have the authority to do this. i am cstrained by the constitutional system. what other means to have to try to persuade the congress, the constituents to talk to members of congress. that is what the power of the presidency is. some do it better than others. >> i think that that is so important. as i see it, i think the american people -- it is interesting, the system is so partisan, so structurally partisan, and yet on the day that american elects a president, it is the american people who are thinking. maybe one thing that is happening in the country is the value d importance of that is becoming greater. the potential of what can get created out of that is becoming more visible. i was thinking about the party's versus the people. it is section of the title of a chapter in my book. i washinking and it embodies a deeper truth within that which is that the parties are not the people, the people are the people. the constitution, of course, it recogn