if at all passossible, we must interpret the act that is consistent with the former and avoids the latter. my colleague is he could host of "the cycle" and nbc's chief legal correspondent. i say that chief justice writes again. wrote the decision in 2012. he takes the lead here again. break down what the decision means and what it says for the american people that need the subsidies. >> that's exactly right. chief justice roberts was the key fifth vote last time. this morning, he was the sixth vote. what it means is that the law obama care is here to stay and the subsidies are going to over six million americans throughout the country. that money keeps flowing more over. it is law of the land. so it not only stays as a practical matter but the uncertainty that some policymakers, doctors, hospitals, and regular citizens had will this change this will court or another do something different with this money? that ended this morning emphatically as the chief justice said this law clearly was designed to fund and advance health care, that's what it intended to do the the court let that stand.