my name is pat buskovic, and i believe that this plan under 317 is going to end up as a defect in demolition. i don't believe in 317. i believe it's fundamentally flawed. at the back, there's a 12-foot tall gravity wall that needs to be upgraded. it's got 8 feet more dirt placed on it, so they're going to have to retrofit a 20-foot-tall wall and keep the building in place. they're going to add a third floor, and everything below is going to have to be code upgraded, but they're going to have to keep everything in place as they upgrade the wall and the building. you can't do that. you can't deal with the fire upgrades at the property line walls and holding up the building without crossing the line and generally it happens in the field, where a neighbor, not me, not my client files a complaint that says you've torn too much of the building down. my client has given an alternative approach. i understand they don't want it. my client doesn't want to be here in a year depending that because on a defected demo, you guys don't like enforcing them, everybody gets hurt. they don't want to do that fin