the law and this case generally i really liked the judge in this case, maybe he sounded a little paternalistic. but what he said at the end, this family is well worth the effort to salvage. he's not giving up. first of all there is another stage in this case, the question of whether they have to pay for college. today he only decided the issue of high school and immediate support. whether she's emancipated. she's 18 for goodness sake. we would be told to get a job. >> new jersey law, in many states if you are 18 parents have no responsibility. >> in new jersey it is a case-by-case basis. i like his tone, listen people, don't bring this to court, go to family counseling, get in a room together and work it out! >> what do you think about the role of parents? >> i think in other generations everything after 18 was sort of considered gravy, if you got any support after that period in life you were very lucky. but today the economics of being a young person and being a millennial, parents do support their children if they're lucky enough through college. rachel for the most part she does have a col

what makes that paternalistic is it is influencing your choice in you that depart from what might havedone without the influence. where i would go with recognize thatto sometimes people don't think things through fully. help in use a little the form of information, say, about what happens if they don't pay off their credit card bill. in the form oflp some default rule, as it is called, that establishes what happens if you do nothing. it might mean that you are automatically enrolled in a retirement plan, as many companies are doing. warnings can be very valuable. these forms of paternalism that i would endorse all preserve freedom of choice. they do not eliminate freedom of choice. they are soft or weak forms of paternalism. they don't mandate or coerce or imprisoned or fine. what i think is extremely promising, actually exciting, and we are seeing it all over the world, is the recognition that there are tools we have that fully preserve and respect liberty but that also can help people do better, including live longer, by their own lives. the forms of paternalism i would endorse do no

i don't think it's the cold war because we don't really have two ideologies, we have one paternalistic power, which is russia and pretty much the rest of the world. i think when vladimir putin decides for him to unite with somebody else, for example, with china, or say with iran then we should think about how the cold war lessons affect our behavior. it's one man who really thinks he walks in the great steps so he can really expand that land to make future greatness. what he doesn't really take into account, that markets -- you cannot order the markets not to shiver and not to go down and that's something today that suddenly the markets are going down that russia -- russian economies is shaking and trembling and that may be something that would really stop his advance into other parts of what used to be the soviet empire. >> thank you so much. it's so good to talk to you. talk about a golden egg, a scrap metal dealer in the midwest got the shock of his life when he learned a gold egg he bought at market was in fact a rare faberge piece. worth $30 million. he hoped to make a few thousan

. >> as a follow-up, perhaps there is a space for maybe a somewhat more paternalistic approach by government, as the europeans are. michelle, you have to comply with all these rules around the world -- i think to be -- you cannot tell people how to care about privacy in that way. you cannot say you will care. it behooves us if we want to show value, we have to be more serious about what is going on -- real choices, contextual understanding. instead ofphic novel writing and i do have the written policy but i also have because i know that people do not read privacy policies. i think that is where we are reaching out to our art students and musicians. for every sitcom, you have a laugh track. whenever anyone falls in love, when the making out is not enough, you have to have violence. but when you read a contract, there is no music for it. i don't know how to feel and when, and i think it is an important decision. i think we should think about it is notcontext, and just pop-ups, but there are huge -- there is huge room for innovation. nangu gave the unit theple, the u.s. versus european approach

it's a paternalistic system that runs almost like a plantation mentality this is the most nassif group of workers who are being exploited in modern history there are tens of thousands of athletes who go through the inside of a each year hundreds of thousands if you include the last decade and they have absolutely no voice in the enterprise which returns for the enterprise billions of dollars a year that's unheard of at sweatshop mentality if visit oh if you win in the future do you see the u.c.l.a. is playing more than the troy state university's what you're saying there who's paying more than the smaller schools of course and i have to and you're saying now a realignment you know in in now see the emergence of the they five conferences separate from what the internally n.c.a.a. calls they have not schools. it's a matter of there are those schools that have the greater talent even within division one from those schools that don't book as it said for purposes of having a voice there has to be a voice on behalf of all athletes not only division one division two division three and all spo

their argument is what essentially that the athletes are amateurs and as amateurs in a paternalistic way the university and the athletic departments have to protect these young people from exploitation from others when in fact the very people that are exploiting them are the universities in the athletic departments themselves. and i are you saying this in about half of former athletes formerly you're not you're not asking this for a current players you dealing with former players well initially it was for former players. it has branched off and through many different. fields you know there's my my initial beef my initial. thought process was for form or for former players and then once that happened once we got going on with that particular lawsuit then it all started to qana branch off and for lack of a better word take on a life of its own this will be historic will it not yes i mean this is this could change revolutionize sport as we know it in america it would revolutionize college sport because it doesn't clued current players as well as former players and we're as i understand

course, is nonsensical and doesn't really exist in other goods or services, and it's in an archaic paternalistic way to view things, oh, we're afraid you don't know what you're doing if you go -- of course, if you live in new jersey, i don't know why nay can't shop in pennsylvania or vice versa. that's a problem. it sets up monopolies and barrier to competition for ?ups, and the second issue with the states is that there are now over 2,000 mandates that is requirements for all policy in the state to cover things that many people, obviously, would never want to pay for. for example, massage therapy, in-vitro, and when i give a lecture to people, the average age is 60, i look at audience and they know you won't use that, but your insurance is required to cover that. they have to ramp up the cost of health insurance by as much as 50%. there's a barrier to competition because there's not the opportunity for people to buy the insurance coverage they actually want, which would be cheaper. there's a whole host of these kinds of things that i think government has an opportunity, a big one that i failed

i think it is very paternalistic for the nba to think they know what is best for the players.ake the decision whether they should enter the draft early or wait through college or a couple of years before they go in than themselves. >> it would make the nba better. silverman's argument is right. but we could debate that. you as player get better in the nba than you do as a player in college. it would make the nba better. it would make the ncaa better. but the small detail, it's totally unfair. i'm sure a lot of movie directors would like to shoot 14 hours a day with their kids. a lot of sweat shop owners would like to work child labor all day. it's a totally unfair restriction of labor. >> you have a different take. >> i own the ranch. i get to decide what crops i want to plant. you own an nba team, you get to decide which people we're going put on the floor. you get to say, i want some maturity. because i sell these tickets to people who bring their sons and daughters, i want our players to be role models. i want these people to be mature enough to make $10 million and no what

. >> just as a follow-up, perhaps there is a space for may be a somewhat more paternalistic approach by government, like the europeans, perhaps, i don't know, michelle, you have to comply with all these rules around the world. >> i love europe. no. i think, you know, you can't tell people how to care about privacy that way. they say you will care and you will be, i think it behooves us to be want to show value we have to be more transparent about what's going on. real choices, in textual understanding. i get a graphic novel, instead of writing and you do have the written policy but i also have a policy with cartoon name just because i know people don't read privacy policy unethical be easy to gather the context about the amount of sharing this done in a security context that i didn't understand before i came on board. and i think that's where we are reaching out to students, for every set, you have a laugh lauh track and likely falls in love, like making out isn't enough, you have to have violins but when you read a contract there's no musical score. i don't know how to feel and when

maybe a somewhat more paternalistic approach by government, the europeans. perhaps -- i don't know. you have to comply with all these rules around the world. so. >> no. to be -- you can't tell people how to care about privacy in that way. he can't say you will care and technically it behooves us to do want to show value we have to be more transparent about what's going on. real choices, contextual understanding. a graphic novel instead of writing. you have the written policy, but also have a policy with cartoon images because i know people don't read privacy policies. it will be a lot easier for them to gather the context about the amount of sharing that is done in a security context that i didn't understand before i came on board. and i think that is what we are reaching out to our students in these missions. for every sitcom you have untracked. if anyone falls in love, you have to have violence. when you reach a contract there is no musical score. i don't know how to feel and win think it's an important decision. if you want someone to feel something in that this is the moment, th

there are a lot of ,omen that don't fall for this they don't fall for this idea of and having this paternalisticovernments take care of them. the $.70 to a dollar is a lie. what about the death gap? do youw how many have -- know how me thousands of men are maimed and killed at the workplace over the year so they can have a roof over their head? it is a meeting -- it is amazing the lack of gratitude women have for what we have accomplished. hundreds of thousands of men have died in the building of the infrastructure of this nation. host: john from pennsylvania. meanwhile from our facebook page, there is this from elizabeth shackleford -- nic is joining us from tennessee. welcome to the conversation. caller: we have two separate religions. obama is for socialist theocracy whereas the pope is based on a christian base. wondering if the pope is going to ask him about abortion. hen he was a state senator didn't even vote two times against the act that allowed babies die if they survived an abortion. of af the commandments socialist theocracy is commitment to a higher moral authority. you have two dif

. >> isn't it patronizing and paternalistic saying girls are going to to go into a shell because someone are doing really well. actually all the studies show that young boys in public schools especially are the ones under huge pressure. they're the ones who need i think a lot more help and assistance in many ways and girls are getting a lot more of the focus in social science studies and universities. so i don't think banning the word bossy is probably going to catapult young girls into careers they otherwise wouldn't have -- i think girls are pretty smart. >> it's bad news for -- >> do you guys repeat what your mom told you? i do. elisabeth, do you do that? >> all the time. >> i do that all the time. >> i have no catch phrases as a parent. my kids are going to look back years later and go, nothing really stands out. >> brian, how many times have you said, because i said so? you say that all the time. give may break. because i said so. why, dad? because i said so. we all say that. >> the wonderful laura ingraham. >> i'm going to be bossy. >> thanks. >>> now to you bossy pants over there,

unfortunately, too many paternalistic washington politicians distrust the american people to earn a better for themselves or to take care of each other without government coercion or intervention. financially irresponsible washington politicians insist on spending money we do not have, risking a debilitating american insolvency and bankruptcy, debasing our currency, punishing success, rewarding destructive behavior and strangling job creation and bureaucratic red tape. the federal government, by attempting to supply and command all things, zaps america's spirit of energy and devours the financial capital needed for innovation, productivity growth and jobs. america must stop kicking the can down the road to a day when the debt challenge is even more daunting. the time to act is now while america has sufficient economic strength to succeed. we cannot wait until america's bankrupt and defenseless. our currency is valueless and we are overwhelmed by closed businesses, lost jobs and poverty. congress must use the debt limit, the budget, appropriation bills and every other means available to fre