rosa marquez, linda chapman, patresia from new community employment report, linda harter and bruce hicks. prosecutoreer >> linda harkin. i'm here representing the van ness plan. for more than 20 years, it's been the guideline that's directed what's developed on van nes and what cpmc has proposed violates every objective of the van ness plan. i also believe that a win-win solution is possible. probably, even though no hospital is supposed to be built there, no office buildings, nothing but housing with retail beneath, minimal retail, i believe that this is not a bad location for a hospital to replace an office building and a hotel provided that in other respects it follows the van ness plan. if it's going to completely violate the van ness plan with the height limit, with not producing housing, etset -- which is required of every developer at a ratio of 3 to 1 and of course will not be all located within the van ness area but could be located on many sites in the tenderloin or even south of market if they pay for that. otherwise, there is the no project alternative which means they can st