david: patrice, depends which advisor he's talking about.y cohn who is leaving that white house, the economic position of the white house was against the tariffs and that may be one reason why he left. the president-- the president made it absolutely clear in his campaign he was for tariffs, that he was-- he thought that we'd signed all kinds of bad trade deals and as you mentioned before, patrice, we have, and over time, by the way, the nafta deal has changed even more favorable towards mexico against us. so, things need to be tweaked and maybe this is just a process of tweaking that we're in right now? >> i mean, it is. talking about his advisors though, it would be interesting to see who is going to be appointed to that position. if you have someone who is going to be not a free market, more of a nationalist perspective. we might see more of these types of tariffs or maybe some changes to monetary policy which also deals with the trade deficit and that's something that president trump wants to deal with. what is interesting though, when y

phillip is right, patrice, they're hitting back at this. let me hold on for the question at the moment. looks like prime minister of israel benjamin netanyahu is pulling up to the white house to see the president. the first lady have come out to greet the prime minister as the prime minister and mrs. netanyahu will be on their way into the white house. as blake burman told us moment ago when we reported on this, we'll get a pool stray at the top of this meeting, comments from the two leaders won't be carried live but will be taped and carried back to a location and played back to us. you see the two old friend greeting each other there. this prime minister comes at a interesting time for him in, in terms of what he is dealing with at home, the corruption probe going on for some time. he was questioned he and his wife by the police on friday. that is something hanging over his head at home. he says he wants to come here to the united states and talk princely about iran with the president of the united states. earth issues could come up. the

david: patrice, you have 15 seconds, who do you think the nominee should be or will be? >> i do hope it's somebody more of a free market oriented person. david: okay. all right. >> my choice is larry kudlow. david: larry kudlow. [laughter] >> hope steve forbes is covered the job. steve is shaking his head, no, i don't want it. nancy pelosi appears to be trying to pick up the crumbs from her controversial comments on tax cuts being crumbs. oh, not so fast, carl. ♪ oh no. schwab, again? index investing for that low? that's three times less than fidelity... ...and four times less than vanguard. what's next, no minimums? ...no minimums. schwab has lowered the cost of investing again. introducing the lowest cost index funds in the industry with no minimums. i bet they're calling about the schwab news. schwab. a modern approach to wealth management. >> the democratic party are labeled with calling these tax cuts that seem to be so successful, just crumbs. >> yes, the democratic party has always been against the taxpayers, so this tax cut is helping the taxpayers, that's going

. >> hi, i'm patrice sutton, scientist as ucsf. i'm speaking as an individual. i'm also echoing the other comments you've gotten speaking in support for hh 669 and also thanking you so much for paying attention that issue. it's such a huge issue and i know you confront so many issues in terms of all the problems in our city. i've lived here since 1982, but it really does warrant your timely attention. i wanted to particularly support the -- you're support of 669, because it can have a lot of national implications in terms of san francisco speaking up on this. the idea that anybody should have the power to get us into a nuclear war seems so crazy, but it's also really among leaders in the globe who have thought about this issue also does not have resonance. there was a -- in 2006, there was a weapons of mass destruction commission that was headed by hans blitz and it had such illustrious people, switch as rick perry, former secretary of defense, on it. they were looking at the issues reeled to ha 669 and i wanted to quote. so long as any state has nuclear weapons

not only was common and andra day there, but behind them were dolores huerta, patrice from the blackecile richards from planned parenthood. tir raun na burke, the founder of the "me too" movement. it was incredibly powerful statement that they were standing with these women. >>> lupita nyong'o and -- are both immigrants and they gave a speech paying tribute to dreamers. here's some of it. >> like everyone in this room and everyone watching at home, we are dreamers. we grew up dreaming of one day working in the movies. dreams are the foundation of hollywood, and dreams are the foundation of america. >> beautiful examples, i thought. alice, what do you think? >> i think they were phenomenal, and i think his statement following up with what she just said was stating that he was from pakistan and iowa, two places that people in hollywood wouldn't be able to recognize on a map because so many times they're so focused on hollywood and what they have going on there, they don't understand what's going on in middle america, in the heartland of america, because they're so focused on themselves

joining me is steve forbes, and patrice, and good to see you all.o say, i'm not a big fan of census forms. they've gotten a lot too personal for me over the years. >> they have. david: they ask me that, they ask me that, but their main purpose is to see how many citizens live in a particular area of the country so we can adjust our congressional county vis-a-vis that, but these are citizens. that's their job is to count citizens. why is it not proper to ask that the person they're asking is a citizen? >> the constitution says they're counting people. david: forgive me and you're a better constitutional scholar than i am. >> no. david: the real point technically speaking why they wanted to know how many people were living in each area of the country was so they can adjust the number of congressional representatives, right? >> that's right, but they did the whole population. notoriously and they said only three-fifths of a person then, that part of the constitution that got amended, but they ask how many cars you have, your income and everything else.

to daily caller editor in chief chris bedford and patrice wuka.th you, obviously conor lamb ran as anti-pelosi. pro-guns, antiabortion, pro tariffs, if you didn't know better, you would think he's a republican candidate. >> he was a trump candidate. he supports lots of issues that unfortunately for the democrat, many in the base totally disagree with. when you consider a lot of democrats are trying to figure out how to appease those who are far left and reach out to those in the center who voted for president trump, this is more than anomaly than anything else. charles: chris, this might be an anomaly, how does this guy usurp president trump's message and his accomplishments. how does he get the steelworker vote when president trump is out there fighting for steelworkers? >> well, you had to hit a lot the places where donald trump hit with pennsylvania voters. the reason they went by 20 points for donald trump. he was a marine corps veteran. he didn't attack the 2nd amendment rights, talked about ways to figure out the coal problem. if you look in

patrice onwuka.st: your second point first is really interesting about how women treat other women. there was a recent study that of after ahe results decade of having a quota system for women on corporate boards in norway and they fund more women on corporate boards did not necessarily mean you will have more senior-level women. you won't see women necessarily moving up in the corporate ladder. it may be that a lot of women that are in leadership make decisions that are about the corporation, the organization, and not necessarily about women specifically. it is important, though, that women see there is a pathway to leadership if that is what you want to go. to your first point about contraceptives, i think that is an interesting idea. it is important that women have access to whatever family-planning they need, whether the government is the right entity to provide for that, that is another discussion. but, you know, i do think you raise an interesting point. host: "the guardian" has this headline -