on the eichmann trial in israel we can get patricia wald we have been able to get leading constitutional scholars to look at the first amendment for us and we just had a terrific response from people and m.i.t. has a wonderful book they will review the book from gourde and woods we have been able to get topnotch reviewers and it is an exciting thing. everybody in this operation works for the same amount of money and that it is wonderful to see people pitch 10 to create this conversation which is what we are all about. >> host: there has been a decline in traditional media but there is an active market place. what do you bring to the table that is different? >> the depth and the quality we have author interviews and q&a and a couple of radio interviews and partners who will put up the podcast so we will provide a full range of information and the other operations trying to do the same thing are doing the lord's work as well and there is room for a lot of voices and that is important. you're not just talk with one or two reactions which maybe idiosyncratic. >> host: will you look at politi

we've got a book on the eichmann trial in israel we were able to get judge patricia wald who was on thewar crimes tribunal for yugoslavia. we've been able to get the leading constitutional scholar erwin chemerinsky to look at a first amendment book for us. we have just had a terrific rate on sprint people, just an example, pauline who has a wonderful book out about the ratification of the constitution is going to reviewing a book on the revolution by gordon wood. so we've really been able to get top-notch reviewers and it's an exciting thing. now everybody in this operation works for the same amount of money. nobody is paid and that includes our reviewers. this wonderful city people pitch in to create this conversation about the world of books, which is really what we're all about. >> and there has been a decline in traditional media preview of works, but online there is quite an active marketplace of reviewers. what do you bring to the table that is different? >> i think were going to bring the depth and quality of our reviewers. we also redoing features. we are going to have interview