was focus political analyst, chris banbury, and geopolitical analyst, patrick hennington, who say the move is politically motivated, not just the german regulars sources. it sounds like the i, e u, the european regulator is also involved. but i think this follows as sort of a general pattern, because there's a lot of, it's been a lot of political brings been ship in germany. i really believe that there is a geopolitical element to this. and the problem is, not only is it a dangerous precedent, but the, you know, the language is also disturbing when you have the sort of blogs, a ha dismissal and dismissing off hand ortiz, simply because it's, russian does sound like there's a bias. there an inherent bias when you have all out media war, that's a prelude. sometimes you could say to hostilities, if we haven't, you, germany, governments, which ones to distinguish itself from angela marco's pizza says so on, is clearly moving in a direction, whirl wind with united states and its allies in relation to russia. so shutting down our t deutsch would fit in with that agenda. but germany, no one'

bring, but that said it and we're ready to keep back to keep fighting. geopolitical analyst, patrick hennington says the move is politically motivated and that a dangerous precedent has been set. not just the german regulars office. it sounds like the i, e u, the european regulator is also involved. but i think as follows is sort of a general pattern. as there's a lot of has been a lot of political brings midship in germany. i, i really believe that there's a geopolitical element to this with germany to really important language block for media. so it is a really important in terms of soft power in terms of influence. and this is the, this is what media is all about. all countries exercise all our in the problem is not always in a dangerous precedent, but the, you know, the language is also disturbing when you have this sort of blah say, ah, dismissal, and dismissing off hand ortiz, simply because it's, russian does sound like there's a bias there and inherent bias, they don't give any specifics of why they don't like the content, or they just say that, oh, it's because well that they must be u

unless patrick hennington, crisp amber told us what they believe prompted the court's decision and the expulsion of the russian diplomats. they were seeing a change in berlin from the angel nato yos, the new social democrat wide coalition. i expect to take a harder attitude and she did in regards to russia. germany's come is coming on to immense pressure from the united states and from its allied france. so i think we will see germany coming coming through on this, or it's not the 1st time that we've seen courts make such a sweeping statements, presumably of fact. but when you actually look what the provenance of the statement is, there's, there's not much evidence to draw that conclusion definitively anyway. seems like, you know, these days any time russia is involved, almost assumed that whatever the narrative is that's out there in the sort of public domain is probably based on fact is probably true. so we can just, we have license to go ahead and generalize that. the russian state is behind whatever the various plots are, and there are many of them in the last couple of years. in a

we have patrick hennington. he is the editor and founder of 21st century wired dot com. all right, gentlemen, crosshatch, rules and effect. that means you can, joan, any time you want, i got a lot of questions. let's see, we can get to as many as possible here. the 1st question is, let me go to glen 1st. what are the chances of an arm conflict involving russia and nato in the new year? thoughts? well, i think it's unlikely, but it's becoming increasingly likely and i did. they are a good the good. the news is that the recognizing actually difficulties we have in europe and them in conflict as effectively what is your pin secure security architecture for the russians. they're demanding an estimate based on all our underpin security agreements, which suggest invisible security. so you know, made to, for example, once on the expenditure it at the expense of russia. well the, and they was arguing your pediatrician to based on the principal of naples freedom to expand so. so this is the main main main main conflict of this, or having discussions about this, which is something

patrick hennington says that the move is politically motivated and a dangerous precedent has been said, not just the german regular. it's also sounds like the e u. the european regulator is also involved. but i think this follows is sort of a general pattern. there's a lot of, there's been a lot of political brinkman ship in germany. i really believe that there is a geo political element to this with germany is a really important language block for media. so it is really important in terms of soft power in terms of influence. not only is it a dangerous precedent, but the, you know, the language is also disturbing when you have this sort of blas, a dismissal and dismissing off and r t simply because it's russian. they don't give any specifics of why they don't like the content. they just say that, oh, it's because, well, they must be up to no good in generally to prelude to hostilities when you have all out media war. that's a prelude. sometimes you could say to hostility, that means that they're going to be escalating in other areas. well, we have reached out to one of the main europea

we have patrick hennington. he is the editor and founder of 21st century wire dot com. all right.

we have patrick hennington. he is the editor and founder of 21st century wired dot com. all right, gentlemen, crosshatch, rules and effect. that means you can, joan, any time you want, i got a lot of questions. let's see, we can get to as many as possible here. the 1st question is, let me go to glen 1st. what are the chances of an arm conflict involving russia and nato in the new year? thoughts? well, i think it's unlikely, but it's becoming increasingly likely and i did. they are a good the good. the news is that the recognizing actually difficulties we have in europe and them the main conflict as effectively what is your pin secure security architecture for the russians. they're demanding an estimate based on all our underpin secure agreements, which suggest invisible security. so, you know, made to, for example, once on the expenditure it at the expense of russia. well then they was arguing european situation to base the principal of naples freedom to expand so. so this is the main main main main conflict of this, or having discussions about this, which is something d

we spoke with jr political analyst, or patrick hennington. he says the move is politically motivated and it sets a very dangerous precedent. not just the german regulars celsius. it sounds like the i, e u, the european regulator is also involved. but i think this follows as sort of a general pattern it's, there's a lot of, it's been a lot of political brings midship in germany. i, i really believe that there's a geopolitical element to this with germany to really important language block for media. so it is a really important in terms of soft power in terms of influence. natalie? is it a dangerous precedent? but the, you know, the language is also disturbing when you have this sort of blogs, a ah dismissal and dismissing off and r t simply because it's russian. they don't give any specifics of why they don't like the content. or they just say that, oh, it's because, well, there, they must be up to no good. the in general, it's a prelude to hostilities when you have all out media war. that's a prelude. sometimes you could say to hostilities, i