i think that patrick henry is ron paul. i think truly that the two-party would love of patrick henry. he -- in the opening days of the first continental congress he made this speech arguing for representation and the congress, which he was defeated, saying we're not just virginians are new yorkers. we are all american. that gives an impression of the continental minded politician. what he was mainly concerned about is protecting the interest of the most populous colony in america, the colony of virginia. all of his career, his primary devotion was to defending the interest, first of his colony, and then of his sovereign commonwealth. so i think he gets along really well. really think of all the 18th-century politicians, though one consistently through his career who is most consistently supporting the tea party ideals is patrick henry. >> what distinguishes temperamentally dickenson, the compromiser, the person willing to set aside ideological terry and the service of legitimacy and henry, i guess you'd call him the ideolog

i think patrick henry is rand paul. i think truly the two parties would love patrick henry. in the opening days of the first continental congress he made this speech arguing for proportional representation in the congress which he was defeated saying we are not just virginians or new yorkers. we are all americans and that gives an impression of henry as the continental minded politician but what he was mainly concerned about was protecting the interest of the most popular colony of america, the colony of virginia. all of his career his primary devotion was to defending the interests interests first of his colony and then of the sovereign commonwealth of virginia. so i think ian rand paul would get along pretty well. i really do think of all the 18th century politicians the one consistently through his career who is most consistently supporting of the tea party ideals is patrick henry. >> so what distinguishes temperamentally dickinson from henry dickinson the compromiser at least the person willing to set aside ideological purity in the service of legitimacy and henry we sho

there's a park around the corner and then eventually i can switch back over to patrick henry which is and down the street. the school that ally used to go to. straight down the street from disneyland. yeah, so it's a better move. it's only $19 more than this place. >> daddydo you have ga >> daddy, do you have gas? do you have gas to pick me up? i have a stomach ache. do you have gas because i have a stomach ache. no? okay. bye. bye. i have a stomach ache. >> what's wrong with your stomach? >> i don't know because every time i try to go to sleep, my stomach starts hurting. >> so why did you call your parents and have áhem come pick you up? >> because my dad doesn't have gas and my mom doesn't have money to get on the bus, and my mom doesn't have the car. >> so you're stuck here? >> and i have to go to -- i have to wait until 5:00. >> what? >> i have to wait till 5:00. >> you have to sit here all day until the bus takes you home? >> we're going to the beach. >> field trip. >> yes! >> we're almost there. we're almost there. we're here! >> i love when we go on field trips like this becaus

they're learning about patrick henry. whoop-de-whoop. okay, cool, you've got to learn about that, but can you actually learn how to deal with a person and look them in the eye face-to-face? 'cause you even got adults who are like, "yeah, chat. "yeah, girl, when i see you, "yo, on the real... [typing noise] i catch you at the club, girl." "okay, i'll see you then." [laughter] and then when they get to meet each other, they can't even look at each other in the eye. "so how--how are you?" "fine." then when they get home, "i had a great time." [laughter] this is a serious, serious issue. it's like, you know, prince says: you get on top of technology; you don't let technology get on top of you. you be on top of the computer. you get on the computer. don't let the computer get on you, because you can actually lose it and fall into big brotherism. and that's where we're at. you've got companies out there who are basically heading to the streets of bel air based on the expense of the hood or the community, which is thrust upon as being this big

people, including washington and jefferson and all but a few real hot heads like samuel adams or patrick henry was worked as, but instead of being subordinate status, the two jurisdictions would be virtually co-equal, but sharing the same mop ark, and it evolved, relations broke down, and the, you know, that was the aspiration. then once independence was achieved, it was quite another matter to set up a system that worked. the original articles of confederation were not successful, and at the same time that the committee led by thomas jefferson was instructed by the continental congress to prepare declaration of independence, and franklin was instructed to try to round up some allies in europe for the revolutionary war that was about to begin or had, in fact, begun, the -- there was also a call for a satisfactory set up of confederation between the different colonies, and there's no such thing that happened, and what did happen was that washington and franklin convened the constitutional convention in 1787 which began as a matter of resolving a boundary dispute between virginia and maryland, b

these people including washington and jefferson and all but a few hotheads like samuel adams are patrick henry was that it would be worked out but instead of being the samore demint status, the two jurisdictions would be virtually cut week will sharing the same mark and then they broke down. the was the inspiration. once the independence was achieved was quite another matter to set up a system at work. the original articles of succession or not successful and led by thomas jefferson and was instructed by the continental congress to prepare the declaration of independence. franklin was instructed to try to round up some allies in europe for the revolutionary war that was about to begin war had begun. there was also a call for a satisfactory set up of confederation between the different colonies and no such thing happened. what did happen is washington and franklin convened the constitutional convention in 1787 and resolving the boundary between virginia and maryland but quickly turned into a call from delegates all over the colonies to try to devise a system to govern themselves in a federal wa

i think of what our message should be, i think of patrick henry -- give me liberty or give me death. i think of the passion of the founding fathers, of those who stood up for the fourth amendment, the first amendment, the second amendment, with passion. terrorists are bad people. zore regas and murderers. we give them all -- so are regas and murderers. we give them all trials. we want to stand up for our system. when we proclaim our message, that i think we will become the dominant party again. thank you. [applause] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2013] [captioning performed by national captioning institute] >> we have got a gift to present to you to say thank you for being here. [applause] >> that is the end of our official program. the quote i like is i have no intention of streamlining government. >> you remind me of him. >> senator paul. >> thank you for having us. >> great to see you. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> thank you, sir. >> thank you. thank you for coming. >> we are excited about that. how do you know him? through the monday meeting? thank you for co

patrick henry. we could go on and on. now how many women can you name who were important figures? >> abigail adams. see one, two. >> sipple ludington. abigail adams, martha washington margaret corbin marcie otis warren. betsy ross. martha washington, six. we are not going to get up to 10 are we? >> mrs. loring. [laughter] >> that is another issue. she would have a very interesting memoir, however the point is that there were at many women at least two or witnesses or involved in the american revolution. but we don't know that much about them and the accounts if we have from those who are left in mrs. loring is a perfect example among others are very scant. there are only a few. we we know for instance that there were women spies and we get a few sentences here and there and women during the lexington and concord when the british were marching, we know american patriot women through -- down on them to the to keep them. we only have scraps aside from the women you mention and this is always been a real frustration to me, throw frustration. i said there have to be more accounts and t

when i think of what our message should be, i think of patrick henry -- give me liberty or give me death i think of the passion of the founding fathers, of those who stood up for the fourth amendment, the first amendment, the second amendment, with passion.even when it is uncomfortable, even when we are talking about someone who is an evil person. terrorists are bad people. so are rapists and murderers. we give them all trials. we want to stand up for our system. when we become the party that stands up and proclaims our message like a man coming over a hill singing, then we will be the dominant party again. thank you. [applause] [captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2013] >> we have a gift air from our republican party that we want to present to you and safety why so much for being here. [applause] -- and say thank you so much for being here. [indiscernible] >> that is the end of our official program. >> the quote i like, and that uses on time, as i have no intention of streamlining government come up or reduce the size

when i think of what our message should be, i think of patrick henry -- give me liberty or give me death. i think of the passion of the founding fathers, of those who stood up for the fourth amendment, the first amendment, the second amendment, with passion. terrorists are bad people. zore regas and murderers. we give them all -- so are regas so are rapists and murderers. we give them all trials. we want to stand up for our system. when we come -- become the party that stands of and proclaims our message like a man coming over a hill singing, then we will be the dominant party again. thank you. [applause] [captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2013] >> senator paul? senator paul? we have a gift here from our republican party to say thank you so much for being here. >> thank you. [applause] >> tonight on c-span, duende -- q and a, with charles bolden. charles bolden >> this week on "q&a," a talk with participants in the 2013 -- charles bold yep talks about his decision to attend the united states naval academy. >> charles

he is currently a professor of history at patrick henry college. and i would note when he was with time magazine in beijing, he was the bureau chief for "time" magazine. we'll then hear from dr. sophie be richardson who is the director of human rights watch, the author of numerous articles on domestic chinese political reform, democratization and human rights in many asian countries. she has testified before the european parliament and u.s. congress -- including my committee. i thank you and welcome you again. she's the author of "china, cambodia and five principles of peaceful coexistence: an in-depth examination of china's foreign policy since the 1954 geneva conference." so thank you all for being here. i'd like to now churn to mr. chang. >> translator: it has been 24 year since the june 4th massacre. i want to testify here about people's view on this massacre after 24 years and the impacts on chinese politics due to people's widespread view. [speaking chinese] >> translator: the current widespread representative view of the chinese people is di

when i think of what our message should be, i think of patrick henry -- give me liberty or give me death. i think of the passion of the founding fathers, of those who stood up for the fourth amendment, the first amendment, the second amendment, with passion. terrorists are bad people. zore regas and murderers. we give them all -- so are regas and murderers.-- rapists and murderers. we give them all trials. we want to stand up for our system. when we come -- become the party that stands of and proclaims our message like a man coming over a hill singing, then we will be the dominant party again. thank you. [applause] [captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2013] >> we've got a guest from our republican party that we want to present to you. winky so much for being here. -- thank you so much for being here. [applause] >> i have no intention of streamlining government or making it more efficient. i intend to reduce its size. >> former florida governor jeb bush was the keynote speaker at a fundraiser for the conservative party

however, asked the iconic patrick henry, not patrick mchenry, said in one of his greatest speeches, different men often see the same subject in different lights. so i recognize and respect that difference of opinion on this google issue of how to eliminate taxpayer bailout funds, including the different perspectives of members of this committee, other observers and the members of this panel. it is our view of the dallas fed that dodd-frank despite his very best intentions does not do the job it's about to do. it is not in too big to fail. it does not prevent more taxpayer funded pales. first and quick facts, less than a dozen megabanks, 0.2% of all banking organizations. the concentration of assets is greatly intensified during the 2008-2009 financial crisis when several failing joints were absorbed with taxpayer support by large are presumably healthier ones. today we have about 5500 banking organizations, 5500 banks in the united states, most of these are bank holding companies and represent no threat to the survival of our economic system. but less than a dozen of the larger most complex b