here is patrick mchenry taking that out of the defense bill, why?elieve we should have we should not be imitating china which is their line. i understand that but the problem is you cannot have a free-trade architecture you cannot have free investments when you have china which restricts this and indeed the free-trade criminal. we have to understand this and reciprocity has to be our goal in addition to defending the american republic. maria: roger robinson has been on this program and worked with dragon to make sure the country was not funding our adversaries, the nazi's but let's remember there are companies right now that are still sanctioned by the united states in our indexes and atf. i just want to make sure american investors understand what they're doing when they buy these companies they fund the chinese communist party. >> is even worse than that. up until november 14 the thrift savings board which administered the federal government 401k was allowing investments and military members invested in chinese military companies companies that th

of the republicans who voted just to name some of them, ken buck sided with democrats on this, patrick mchenryknow very well now, virginia fox, mike turner? >> i was surprised to see names like virginia fox in particular because usually they would lose no time embracing anything marjorie taylor greene does. what it base kpli is a push to let's do things and something resembling regular order even though this is a stunt process. let's have the committee do it. and that kind of a traditionalist approach. i do want to say, all this stunt impeachment politics which we have seen a lot of is occurring against the backdrop this week of the president biden meeting with the chinese premiere xi. and it just reminds you of the stakes of reality in places where there is common ground getting tougher with china. but yet still they can't push through a funding -- balance proposal pushed by the president with israel funding, ukraine funding and the border wall. something for everybody if you're on the right side of the aisle. it's a question again, you want to demonize is dhs secretary, okay. if you want to

in fact, i talked to patrick mchenry yesterday who said there is no question he is a bad guy. the question is do we kick him out before or after he gets convicted of ar crime. there are a number of house republicans who aremb still deey uncomfortable of the idea that thebl allegations against santo no matter how strong they may be, are simply allegations until they're proven in a court of n law. and that's theco question that hanging up some house republicans. whether it's enough house republicans that santos gets to stick around beyond the end of the day tomorrow is the ow unanswered question in all of this. >> maggie said this. i rise not to defend george santos, whoever he is, which is a remark in itself. he also brought up senator menendez, and the fact that he is still getting security briefings whenur senator menend has been accused of acting as a foreign agent.t. garrett, i'm not -- tell me if i'm wrong about that. but i'm not seeing any of the leadership in the house come up and speak. i'm u not seeingfully of the we respected republicans in the house. where do they st

solvers caucus to drastically change the way congress does business by saying we're going to have patrick mchenryere as speaker and empower this person and try regular order for a change. the problem is those democrats and the problem solvers caucus were terrified of primary challenges. they thought they could not survive in the party that made that move. >> you talk about this, what you're basically saying there should be bipartisan compromise. that's exactly the reason that kevin mccarthy is no longer the speaker. because he -- to raise the debt ceiling and to pass a tremporar spending bill he had to get help from democrats and the republican caucus kicked him out. >> speaker mike johnson could make a difference here. look, he's someone new to the job, he's also a fresh face, but also someone who has rock solid credentials saying he wants to get back to regular -- >> wait, wait. so what they did, the way they were able to pass this temporary spending bill to january and february is that with more democrats than republicans supporting it. this bipartisan compromise. that left one conservative me

we saw patrick mchenry pass a bill through his committee that would provide framework for stablecoins a chance before the end of this year that we do see stablecoin legislation moving forward. this is an issue that everyone agrees needs to be addressed. it is not the goal of kinsler to regulate stablecoin. they are not securities. caroline: he will debase that. the protections bureau overlooking these movements from big companies toward accessing crypto at large by a consumer base. what about the etf conversation? that has been driving bitcoin. are we anticipating as soon as the end of this year we will get a bitcoin etf? how much do you think that will be liked or loathed? kristin: we are already starting to see some price action in the markets on anticipation of a bitcoin etf. we had a very important moment over the summer where the sec lost a case that it acted in a capricious manner by not moving forward with a spot bitcoin etf. thanks to grayscale for the hard work they put into getting that ruling. we have multiple applications. these have deadlines where the sec has a deadline

problem solvers caucus to drastically change the way congress does business by saying we will have patrick mchenry in there as speaker and empower this person and we're going to do something a little bit different, try regular order for a change. the problem is that those democrats and the problem solvers caucus were terrified of primary challenges. they felt that they could not survive in the party if they made that move. and that is why we have this -- >> you talk about this, what you're basically saying, is there should be bipartisan compromise. that's exactly the reason that kevin mccarthy is no longer the speaker, because he, to raise the debt ceiling, and to pass a temporary spending bill, he had to get help from democrats, and the republican caucus kicked him out. >> that's why i say speaker mike johnson is someone who could make a difference here. he is someone who is new to the job. he is someone who is a fresh face. but he is also someone who has rock solid conservative credentials while saying he wants to get back to regular -- >> wait, wait. so what they did, the way they were able to

have had a number of different members who voted against this on my podcast, including can but, patrick mchenrynd others. i invited them all to come onto my fox news podcast and explained to me why they would vote this way because i don't think there is a reasonable expo nation that can be advanced. he is obviously failing and he's failing the american people, we need somebody who can do the job and that is a basic standard i think that we should have for government employee. stuart: a million migrants coming across the southern border in the 14 months mayorkas -- maybe 1,000,0001/2. great stuff today. thank you for joining us, see you again soon. texas voted in favor of a controversial immigration law. i want to hear more about this, actually. ashley: it creates two new state crimes for migrants who enter or try to reenter texas from another country, punishable by two years in prison. one of the most controversial provisions allows law enforcement to arrest migrants they suspect of unlawfully crossing into texas. judges will have the opportunity to order some drivers to return to the country t

not vote, the republican devoted to block the end for ken buck, darrell i said, tom mcclintic, patrick mchenry turner. we have seen enough of the dereliction of duty at the border to know the alejandro mayorkas is not keeping a secure border. why the pushback in the impeaching of mayorkas. >> mayorkas needs to be impeach is long overdue receipt invasion at the southern border, millions of illegals crossing the southern border including high interest targets, potential terrorist are coming across our southern border this is unacceptable, mayorkas is not following the law he's preaching the law he needs to be impeached i voted to impeach him last night. maria: many of your colleagues did not vote. i guess that's their way of not impeaching mayorkas. >> i read something to do want to get the congress perspective on this. i read the reason that those individuals decided not to go after impeaching mayorkas is because the plan is to go after and impeach joe biden meaning the train has pulled down the tracks and republicans didn't want to see that there being too many impeachments, do you buy that li

ken buck, darrell issa, patrick mchenry, virginia fox, cliff bense and mike turner. it's interesting to see the group say no, we're not going to impeach mayorkas despite all the complaints for so many years about the wide open border. >> the level of duplicity that we are seeing at absolutely every level. todd mentioned that obviously trump can be basically indicted, we can have speed, race on the documents he has but no one wants to acknowledge the documents that biden has had. people are sick and tired of being directed one way by one political party, by another if it's another. we're awake. we're aware. we're not going to stand for it anymore. i feel like i'm speaking for the american public, saying enough is enough. don't clean up san francisco just because xi jinping is coming to town. how about you clean it up for the taxpayers. maria: it's incredible, the fact they cleaned it up for xi jinping. todd, your thoughts on the mayorkas situation. we've listened to republicans complain about the wide open border with real concern. i agree with had that concern. and y

. >> so that was former acting house speaker patrick mchenry reacting to what could have been a goodavoid a government shutdown with three days to spare, instead of take ago victory lap on that news, the hill instead was dominated by chaos with everything from name calling to reported elbow jabs in the hallways. even threats of physical violence from a senator in the middle of a hearing. nbc's garrett haake joins us from the hill. garrett, a big legislative win for the new house speaker, but that's not what's dominating the conversation on capitol hill. what the heck is happening there? >> caller: yeah, ana, really another example of a congress that can't seem to get out of its own way. look, these lawmakers have been in town, in washington for ten weeks straight. that's an unusually lengthy session for them of long days, long nights, lots of time around each other, and you see it leading to these tensions boiling over, even on a day when they have a significant bipartisan achievement. >> the bill is passed. >> reporter: this morning congress is one step closer to avoiding a governme

. >>> according to "politico," patrick mchenry is advancing crypto legislation by the end of the yeartance from his colleagues on capitol hill is narrowing in on getting something to done. joining us now is congressman french hill. congressman, what does the bill do, what's in it, and what are its chances in your view? >> well, first, joe, let me first say to the "squawk box" family and the munger and buffett families, my condolences on the loss of charlie munger's, berkshire hathaway's vice chairman. what a remarkable person. i hope everyone gets poor charlie's almanac as a christmas gift. what an ultimate guy. >>> we have two dies concerning regulation and legislation in the united states. first the bill that was passed with bipartisan support. it represents a stablecoin. secondly we created a regulatory framework that directs the s.e.c. and cftc as to what the rules of the road are. we provide investors, innovators, consumers how to invest safely and securely in krupp toe currencies and leaders as to what the rules are. they go to the s.e.c. right now. they don't know if they can h

. >> reporter: we're glad patrick mchenry is talking to reporters again. he summed it up nicely.e senate will likely vote on it either today, more likely tomorrow. we're all hoping no more october ga nairian senators are needed to prevent further violence on the hill. >> bernie sanders, you gotta love him keeping it peaceful. have you ever seen anything like this? do you think this will have any impact? it feels a little bit like more of what we have seen, quite frankly. this is just analysis on my part. i would love to hear yours. since donald trump came to town. >> yesterday's antics took a little bit more of a wwe over the top quality. it's not unusual to see one of these incidents every couple of months, especially recently. especially with lawmakers here for long stretches of time and they get incredibly sick of one another. to see this building up yesterday -- there was another incident we didn't include in the piece. comber called a lawmaker a smurf. an attack line in a hearing. i do think the parties have gotten further divide and further at each other's throats. internal