duffy, representing the department of building inspection, and we also have patrick o'riordan, and john. -- john kwong. if you could, please, mr. pacheco, go over the royals. secretary pacheco please turn off yourself funds -- secretary pacheco: please turn off your cell phones and have conversations in the hall. the comments must be within the seven to three-minute periods, and some not affiliated have up to three minutes each to address the board but no rebuttals. to assist the board in the after preparation of minutes, members who wish to speak on item are asked, but not required, to submit a speaker card or business card to board staff when you come up to the podium. speaker cards and pens are available on the left side of the podium. the board also welcomes your comments and suggestions. there are customer-satisfaction forms on the left side of the podium, as well. if you have questions about requesting a rehearing or rules, please discuss this with staff after the break or meeting or call tomorrow morning. the board of appeals office is located at 1650 mission st., room 304, betwe

patrick o'riordan, dbi. this is a pretty complicated case, as you have been hearing. from our kids, we came on board -- from our side, we came on board in july 2008. three notices of violation were issued. the first one being in 2008, 65117, issued on july 10, 2008. this was in response to an anonymous complaint, and this was to do with a new third level added above the garage without obtaining a building permit. now, this was evidenced by our inspector, who went out there, and it was clearly evident that there was, indeed, a third story added over the garage. the next day, based on another, this was july 11, 2008, 2008, 64297 was issued for horizontal building enlargement that had been constructed on the southeast or left side of the building, and the requirement was to file a building permit to comply with the construction. and the final notice of violation was issued actually by myself on february 6, 2009. that is 2009-89665. and that had to do with the rear of the property. the southernmost faÇade wall of the property, which had been added to, and it did not match