patrick shaw, i take exception on this first decision point. with definition section 2, m and n and p. regarding m and n, both exscopatory information and mitigating information suggest people of ordinary and average intelligence that you are fishing for a way to get the respondent off the hook through an investigation of some sort. when sunshine cases are referred to for enforcement. you are not supposed to conducting a new, brand-new investigation. even your new process here. that you have haven't adopted yet. it says it's up to the respondent to offer, i mean to meet the burden of proof. since they did not violate the sunshine ordinance. presumably by citing a violation or state or local law that permits at the time that they did so. i suggest you take m and n out completely. your role is not to help the respondent mitigate or expullicate their behavior. and set another quasi-judicial body. and i believe i am correct, mr. grossman will correct me if i am wrong. the sunshine task force is a quasi-judicial body. they have already conducted the

i'm patrick -- shaw, here as a private citizen today to support bruce wolfe, who's clearly the most qualifiedat the third candidate, ms. forsley, is a city employee, should not even be considered by this committee for this appointment. to support a false claim that the sunshine task force had engaged in official misconduct and had undermined transparency in government mr. wiener failed to provide evidence and presented misinformation at least four times during the board's full meeting on may 22nd. wiener wrongly claimed the task force had exempted itself from the san francisco charter, wrongly claimed the task force had said how dare you, sunshinelight us end quote when the task force never claimed such thing. wiener claimed he asked for a, quote, audit, in compliance with this ordinance when in fact he had asked for a survey. wiener also inflated the average number of times city employees had to attend hearings to resolve sunshine complaints. mr. wiener also claimed the sotf had ignored the city attorney's opinion but the fact is the city attorney's website that -- city attorney opinion, tha

times" and patrick shaw who made a run at the dodgers earlier this year.out $7 billion each according to forbes. david? >> that's not bad. that's real money when you talk billions. >> thank you, jane wells. >> extending the asset purchase program by 10 trillion yen. how does this impact the currency? let's bring in kathy, with the "money in motion." what are the effects that we initially see and how are traders getting behind this move? >> melissa, in terms of the magnitude and the size of the program, it was the timing that was a surprise. well interestingly enough, we haven't seen the sell-off in the yen last. it was lower where it was before the bank of japan and this is similar to what the federal reserve did where the market prepared for the move and the move came in and that evaporated quickly. >> it does. in terms of how it changes the dynamics overall it does seem like we're in a global race to the debase as central banks around the world are easing in various ways. so what is the currency trade that you're looking to put on right now. >> think in