moderator please unmute. >> gone, it is patrick shaw. i'll try to be brief regarding approval of the policies listed on the consent calendar. it sill remains shocking the health commission hasn't reviewed an updated laguna honda nursing restorative care policy (indiscernible) to respond to root cause number 8, lack of (indiscernible) nursing program in the resident rights and free from harm section of the first root cause analysis report dated, december 1. even earlier, as far as back as laguna honda's first survey that began june 28, it had identified problems with the restorative nursing program and recommended that nursing take corrective action to reopen the restorative gym for residents. 9 months later, that entire program remained problematic. laguna honda subsequent action plan claimed "gap analysis" on restorative program would be completed by january 25 and a "scope of service" defining parameters and updating restorative policy would be completed by february 8. today is march 21. were those two documents completed? and if so, s

moderator please unmute. >> gone, it is patrick shaw. i'll try to be brief regarding approval of the policies listed on the consent calendar. it sill remains shocking the health commission hasn't reviewed an updated laguna honda nursing restorative care policy (indiscernible) to respond to root cause number 8, lack of (indiscernible) nursing program in the resident rights and free from harm section of the first root cause analysis report dated, december 1. even earlier, as far as back as laguna honda's first survey that began june 28, it had identified problems with the restorative nursing program and recommended that nursing take corrective action to reopen the restorative gym for residents. 9 months later, that entire program remained problematic. laguna honda subsequent action plan claimed "gap analysis" on restorative program would be completed by january 25 and a "scope of service" defining parameters and updating restorative policy would be completed by february 8. today is march 21. were those two documents completed? and if so, s

this is patrick shaw. i'm speaking to the motion to continue and like the previous caller am raising a bit of objection. mr. bush has served san franciscans remarkably for many many years, and i hope you read my letter of support that i presented. i'm hoping clerk young will get it posted online. but, since larry bush is the only candidate who applied, i don't see the need to postpone this hearing to the call of the chair, and i strongly recommend that you today pass a recommendation to approve his application as the sole applicant, and forward it to the full board of supervisors with a strong recommendation to reappoint him. my rational explaining his qualification and experience and his tenure on various policy bodies speaks for itself. really urge you to get this done today. thank you. >> thank you. just checking to see if we have additional callers. that was our last public commenter on the telephone. >> thank you mr. clerk. public comment on this item is now closed. we have a motion on the floor to co

this is patrick shaw, i'm having difficulty speaking. i had cancer surgery last october on my face. so, it's difficult for me to talk. on public comment, on your motion, to disclose or not to disclose, it's really appalling that whatever lawsuit, assistance district attorney,ing deputy city attorney, henry lipton filed against the retirement board is not available publicly. i've tried searching it online to see why a city lawyer would be suing the retirement board. you need to disclose what this lawsuit is about. in the interest of member benefits and retiree interest in potential use of funds to settle a lawsuit against the city lawyer, this is ridiculous. thank you. i yield. >> thank you for your call. moderator, do we have any further callers? >> yes, we have one more caller on the line. >> caller, please state your name, your two minutes begin when you speak. >> caller: i'm speaking, but i would like to speak on the general public comment. >> okay, that is the next item, sir. >> caller: oh. >> thank you. moderator, do we have any further callers? >> madam secretary, there are no

this is patrick shaw. just real briefly on two points. i support supervisor dorsey's efforts to have fentanyl drug dealers dealt with appropriately. it is obvious unless you get rid of the drug dealers that crisis is going to continue forever. on another point, i thank you for continuing the remote public comment agenda item to next week. >> we cant talk about that during general public comment. >> i was just wanting to remind you during public comment that the issue with callers on the -callers on the monkeypox vaccine efforts that the city commendbly tried to curtail should not be used as a precedent. it was a (indiscernible) and should not set remote public comment policy. thank you very much. >> thank you for your comments. before i call on mr. lam, i am go toog say we have a member of the public here in the chamber. we'll come to you next. mr. lam do we have another caller in the queue, please? >> hello. how are you? my name is marie (indiscernible) the director of community engagement and organizing for dolores street and i wanted t

this is patrick shaw. just real briefly on two points. i support supervisor dorsey's efforts to have fentanyl drug dealers dealt with appropriately. it is obvious unless you get rid of the drug dealers that crisis is going to continue forever. on another point, i thank you for continuing the remote public comment agenda item to next week. >> we cant talk about that during general public comment. >> i was just wanting to remind you during public comment that the issue with callers on the -callers on the monkeypox vaccine efforts that the city commendbly tried to curtail should not be used as a precedent. it was a (indiscernible) and should not set remote public comment policy. thank you very much. >> thank you for your comments. before i call on mr. lam, i am go toog say we have a member of the public here in the chamber. we'll come to you next. mr. lam do we have another caller in the queue, please? >> hello. how are you? my name is marie (indiscernible) the director of community engagement and organizing for dolores street and i wanted t

this is patrick shaw. just real briefly on two points. i support supervisor dorsey's efforts to have fentanyl drug dealers dealt with appropriately. it is obvious unless you get rid of the drug dealers that crisis is going to continue forever. on another point, i thank you for continuing the remote public comment agenda item to next week. >> we cant talk about that during general public comment. >> i was just wanting to remind you during public comment that the issue with callers on the -callers on the monkeypox vaccine efforts that the city commendbly tried to curtail should not be used as a precedent. it was a (indiscernible) and should not set remote public comment policy. thank you very much. >> thank you for your comments. before i call on mr. lam, i am go toog say we have a member of the public here in the chamber. we'll come to you next. mr. lam do we have another caller in the queue, please? >> hello. how are you? my name is marie (indiscernible) the director of community engagement and organizing for dolores street and i wanted t