moderator please unmute. >> gone, it is patrick shaw. i'll try to be brief regarding approval of the policies listed on the consent calendar. it sill remains shocking the health commission hasn't reviewed an updated laguna honda nursing restorative care policy (indiscernible) to respond to root cause number 8, lack of (indiscernible) nursing program in the resident rights and free from harm section of the first root cause analysis report dated, december 1. even earlier, as far as back as laguna honda's first survey that began june 28, it had identified problems with the restorative nursing program and recommended that nursing take corrective action to reopen the restorative gym for residents. 9 months later, that entire program remained problematic. laguna honda subsequent action plan claimed "gap analysis" on restorative program would be completed by january 25 and a "scope of service" defining parameters and updating restorative policy would be completed by february 8. today is march 21. were those two documents completed? and if so, s

. >> good morning this is patrick shaw.the out fit of this, hearings and public comment either supervisor mandelman or yourself noted this the mayor's wanted to standardize the approach across all policy bodies i support amendment to introduce i think a great. the board should use its authoritied or [inaudible] to further standardsize remote public comment by e eliminating this [inaudible] three tiered direction if the city add administrator's office regarding time limits and creating 3 tiers one for people attending the meeting creates a second for remote callers who have requested an accommendation and had it rekosovo their status of having a disability. and then a third -- category for other remote callers. that can be time limited to 20 minutes. or whatever the policy body decides for time limitful the healing commission adopted that 3 tier requiring that people self identify as being disabled in order to get accommendation. for an unlimited amount of time to speak. i think the board shared work with the city administra

this is patrick shaw. i'm speaking to the motion to continue and like the previous caller am raising a bit of objection. mr. bush has served san franciscans remarkably for many many years, and i hope you read my letter of support that i presented. i'm hoping clerk young will get it posted online. but, since larry bush is the only candidate who applied, i don't see the need to postpone this hearing to the call of the chair, and i strongly recommend that you today pass a recommendation to approve his application as the sole applicant, and forward it to the full board of supervisors with a strong recommendation to reappoint him. my rational explaining his qualification and experience and his tenure on various policy bodies speaks for itself. really urge you to get this done today. thank you. >> thank you. just checking to see if we have additional callers. that was our last public commenter on the telephone. >> thank you mr. clerk. public comment on this item is now closed. we have a motion on the floor to co

shaw— be plenty of people not watching this show breaking— be plenty of people not watching this show breaking news. sorry, rattan— this show breaking news. sorry, rattan tn— this show breaking news. sorry, patricking to be sitting there watttng— going to be sitting there watttng ta— going to be sitting there waiting to get caught, are you? unttte— waiting to get caught, are you? unlike .course,_ waiting to get caught, are you? unlike course, rather unlike of course, the rather natataus— unlike of course, the rather- notorious_ hamlets? notorious case of tower hamlets? n0, notorious case of tower hamlets? ha-ant— notorious case of tower hamlets? ha-ant t— notorious case of tower hamlets? ha-ant t nean- notorious case of tower hamlets? n0,-and i mean,lthink. no, exactly. and i mean, i think the point that a contributor just made is also relevant, right? that there are correlations to labour voting and the people who are less likely to have photo id, but it's important to say that people can apply for free for a voter id as well. so if they haven't got one, they should be. they should be getting that now. and you're completely right. of course, that we course, the point is that we don't have stati