>commissioner miguel: i patronice san francisco and am there from time to time. they have not been occupied. not for 20 years or so. i have no problem with the demolition of something used for many of those last 20 years as an office. this was a disgrace and a fire hazard with no mid-block open space. in the manner in which the homes are build. t. i do not want to see buildings in 2012 looking like 1907. i want to see something built in the 21st century. i know that -- the more modern or contemporary term, that style -- this does not please everybody. i look at some edwardian and victorian, with the 18 colors, and it clashes with my eyeballs, also. that's what the people want, they won thown the house. i have no problem with it. i say to not take the eir and approve the demolition. i agree that this is a very good project. it could have been 10 feet higher. they are paying be $8 per square feet, which they would not have had to pay. they are creating 3-bedroom units which are family sized with appropriate parking. it is well designed as far as the plants. -- plan