at the heart of the case, what did pattie dunn know about the pretexting, or the use of pretenses, to get phone records? evidence includes a conference call, apparently with dunn, during which pretexting was allegedly discussed, and notes of an interview with dunn about the case. "dunn thinks it is probable that she was told, 'in some circumstances, they may need to use false pretenses.'" >> i refute those notes. i was never given a chance to review them. this is not a deposition. this was not recorded. if it's going to be used as evidence against me, somebody needs to take my deposition. >> and perhaps the most serious charge against her involves passing along personal information to the investigators to enable the pretexting. the complaint specifically mentions that you gave the investigators the home phone numbers of your fellow board members. >> i don't remember giving the investigators the home phone numbers of my fellow board members, but those are not hard to get within hp. they're public information within the board infrastructure. >> at a news conference, an hp lawyer said du